Steele, Will, Doggett, and the rest of the gang - enough of the bellyaching, shocked innocence, manifestos, denunciations and chest pounding just leave. Be a man and walk away, and leave others to their pursuits. Really, you'll come off like a bunch of cackling hens.
You're the FNG, so you leave. Nobody is feigning innocence here. Read this laughably simple concept one more time:
Legitimate political movements do not resort to hardcore porn. End of story.
The Christian Coalition and affiliated organizations have complete idiots for rank and file, yet look at the power they wield today. Notice that none of those churches or their leaders ever have to resort to displaying the hardcore pornography they are against.
Give us an explanation. Just ONE logical explanation. Why is that so fucking difficult? If it's part of some great master plan to "fight the Jew", why can't anybody explain the details of this esoteric knowledge? Why must it be a mystery to the rest of us?
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!
I can give you two answers.
The first, you have to ignore the muds and focus on whites. Muds are a false diversion]
What rock did you crawl out from under?
You are not a man, you are simply a very sick person.
And obviously have more in common with the perverted jew than you do with the Aryan race.
Failed explosive makers sentanced to six-and-a-half years posting on your board isn't good for image either.
Get back to work on that explanation!
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!
Most people here are on the same page about it. The ones who approve are degenerates and don't have a clue why it's "ok" for it to be done. Even Alex won't comment.
As AE pointed out, this violates five years of Alex's policy and practice on graphics. Therefore I am hopeful this is truly an isolated incident - perhaps some sort of experiment or trial balloon. I am hopeful that Alex will come on board soon and apologize and promise never to allow it again. I have always admired Alex's writing and I am saddened to see things come to this.
I'm actually glad in a way that he did it cuz now we know who the freaks are.
I was thinking the same thing.
[color="Gray"]
I have no idea why he did it so I cannot answer you. I never said I would do it now did I? But I will not react like some of these people are over the image.
I have no idea why he did it so I cannot answer you. I never said I would do it now did I? But I will not react like some of these people are over the image.
What is wrong with their reaction? They saw something disgusting where it SHOULDN'T be and they reacted totally within reason. The only reason why this goes on is certain "wannabe" hardcore types tried to espouse alleged values of such actions, in true sycophantic form. That is why an explanation is demanded of those values. Other than that I think everone here would much rather settle for a simple removal of the photo and a "my bad" from Alex or whoever came up with that idea.
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!
I have no idea why he did it so I cannot answer you. I never said I would do it now did I? But I will not react like some of these people are over the image.
Say what you will but I bet you'd never have the balls to walk into banks like I did.
I'm not the topic anyways. Stick to the issue at hand or start a different thread.
[url=http://video.google.com/url?docid=-515319560256183936&esrc="sr1&ev=v&len=12919&q=money%2Bmasters&srcurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2Fvideoplay%3Fdocid%3D-515319560256183936&vidurl=%2Fvideoplay%3Fdocid%3D-515319560256183936%26q%3Dmoney%2Bmasters%26total%3D1892%26start%3D0%26num%3D10%26so%3D0%26type%3Dsearch%26plindex%3D0&usg=AL29H215m40AxxXXEy5mxBMlQmfwiU4N1g"][color="Red"]The Money Masters[/url]
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
R.I.P. Yankee Jim
[color="White"]Todd Vanbiber
What is wrong with their reaction? They saw something disgusting where it SHOULDN'T be and they reacted totally within reason. The only reason why this goes on is certain "wannabe" hardcore types tried to espouse alleged values of such actions, in true sycophantic form. That is why an explanation is demanded of those values. Other than that I think everone here would much rather settle for a simple removal of the photo and a "my bad" from Alex or whoever came up with that idea.
Isn't going to happen.
Say what you will but I bet you'd never have the balls to walk into banks like I did.
I'm not the topic anyways. Stick to the issue at hand or start a different thread.
He DOES have the balls however, to talk about things like this somehow getting people to "physically attack the Jew", if memory serves me correctly. Hell with my memory, the friendly forum remembers all!
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!
I don't think the people of that time considered them so different than you do.
Besides, who the hell are you anyway to dictate what can and can't be said or posted. Get your own blog.
oh, and quit bellyaching like a baby.
No one claims to "dictate" what's posted. But as concerned supporters of VNN, we certainly have the right to offer suggestions/criticism when we see something that almost all of us agree is a major mistake. Check the poll results. This is an issue which has united me, MOMUS, JP Slovjanski, Doc, HG, Doppelhaken, and others who aren't always on the same page. There's something to be said for that. This is not the issue to circle the wagons on.
Jews Did 9/11
Ban the troll.
Mods may have the ABILITY to ban people now, but they have lost the moral authority to do so.
Mods may have the ABILITY to ban people now, but they have lost the moral authority to do so.
Not all mods are supporting this. AE clearly isn't. Just to be fair.
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!
No one claims to "dictate" what's posted. But as concerned supporters of VNN, we certainly have the right to offer suggestions/criticism when we see something that almost all of us agree is a major mistake. Check the poll results. This is an issue which has united me, MOMUS, JP Slovjanski, Doc, HG, Doppelhaken, and others who aren't always on the same page. There's something to be said for that. This is not the issue to circle the wagons on.
Also, it is obvious that Will, Doggett, and their confederates have gripes that go beyond the question of this graphic. Those disagreements are part of what is driving this thread, not just the graphic question. There are other places to discuss those disagreements. They are using this incident to settle scores.
A White World (Pierce's Vision for our Race):
Originally Posted by J.P. Slovjanski
Gee, you remind me of one of the girls in that picture. Take a guess which one.LOL!!! Best one yet.
I see, it is okay to attack me but when I do it to you, I must stay on topic. Todd, I like you, I really do, but I am just defending myself.
Also, it is obvious that Will, Doggett, and their confederates have gripes that go beyond the question of this graphic. Those disagreements are part of what is driving this thread, not just the graphic question. There are other places to discuss those disagreements. They are using this incident to settle scores.
Bullshit. I have never complained about Linder save for a few comments about the intros long ago in the past. I've written articles on this site(that reminds me, it would be best if they were removed now), and I've usually had more problems with posters than with any of the mods.
Nice attempt at diversion but it won't work. Check the join dates and credentials of most of the people who you accuse of "whining" and think again.
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!