Our Government and Terrorism

by James Buchanan

Recent events highlight the fact that our government does not care about terrorism –or more accurately they don’t care if any of us get killed in a terrorist attack. How else can Bush’s actions be explained in the Dubai Ports deal? Some of the individuals involved in this deal shared a tent with Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan while on “vacation” there, but George Bush in his infinite wisdom insisted that his buddies in Dubai were just fine, just like his rich Saudi friends. Bush only backed down when faced with mutiny by his own party, many of whom face reelection this year in the same way condemned men face execution.

As if the Dubai Ports fiasco wasn’t bad enough, Bush repeated the mistake suggesting that a Chinese company should take over scanning for terrorist nukes. No one has explained what would happen if the Chinese decided to nuke our cities. Just in case anyone is defending Bush on this deal, the same Chinese company was turned down for a telecommunications contract on the basis of national security three years ago. (Maybe they increased the size of their bribe.)

A recent movie “V for Vendetta” has suggested that a government might stage a phony terrorist attack as an excuse to seize dictatorial power. American history books have no problem claiming that other nations have done this. The National Socialist Germans are frequently accused of burning down the Reichstag to assume dictatorial powers. Are our politicians so saintly and trustworthy that they wouldn’t play a role in bombing the OKC federal building bombing? A small army of spies and Mossad agents were rounded up after 911, who clearly knew something about the attack in advance. Did the Mossad play a role in organizing the 911 attack? Israel was caught trying to set up a phony al Qaeda cell in Palestine.

Either our politicians don’t care about the terrorism risk to us (they have Secret Service protection) or they had a hand in the terrorism and know that it isn’t a real threat. George Bush got a memo on August 8th, 2001 warning him that bin Laden might attack in the US with airplanes. Bush could easily have armed the pilots, deported Mid East students and PREVENTED the 911 attack. Instead, he did nothing and over 3,000 Americans were killed.

It’s believable that George Bush did nothing simply because he’s not that bright. Perhaps he routinely ignores urgent warnings at meetings. The Bush family has an ongoing love-affair with the Saudis. It’s not clear why the Saudis would support the Bush family considering what untrustworthy snakes the Bushes are. It’s possible this family friendship played a role in Bush not deporting Mid East students prior to 911. Failing to arm the pilots is most likely cowardice on the part of George Bush. He really doesn’t believe in the Second Amendment. (His father couldn’t get an endorsement from the NRA.) And he didn’t want to take the criticism from the Democrats if he did arm the pilots.

The only thing done so far to arm the pilots is a ridiculously complicated process cooked up by the Senate, which makes it extremely difficult for a pilot to qualify. Only about two percent of all pilots are armed today thanks to this stealth gun control by the Senate.

So we are still issuing loads of visas to Mid East students and the vast majority of pilots still aren’t armed. Did we at least secure the southern border? Of course not. Corporate greed and the open borders crowd in DC wouldn’t dream of closing off the border to illegals. An entire army of terrorists could sneak across if they wanted to. The only logical reasons we have not been attacked by al Qaeda are (1).they weren’t trying or (2).al Qaeda is being controlled by rogue elements in our government and only carries out terrorist attacks when our top politicians want them to happen.

http://us.altermedia.info/news-of-interest-to-white-people/our-government-and-terrorism_1395.html#more-1395