Professor: Comparin...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Professor: Comparing Bush to Hitler is an insult to the Führer

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
707 Views
JimInCO
(@jiminco)
Posts: 1923
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/10/11/instructor.sept.11.ap/index.html?section=cnn_topstories

University instructor likens Bush to Hitler

POSTED: 11:39 a.m. EDT, October 11, 2006

MILWAUKEE, Wisconsin (AP) -- A university instructor who came under scrutiny for arguing that the U.S. government orchestrated the September 11 attacks likens President Bush to Adolf Hitler in an essay his students are being required to buy for his course.

The essay by Kevin Barrett, "Interpreting the Unspeakable: The Myth of 9/11," is part of a $20 book of essays by 15 authors, according to an unedited copy first obtained by WKOW-TV in Madison and later by The Associated Press.

The book's title is "9/11 and American Empire: Muslims, Jews, and Christians Speak Out." It is on the syllabus for Barrett's course at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, "Islam: Religion and Culture," but only three of the essays are required reading, not including Barrett's essay.

Barrett, a part-time instructor who holds a doctorate in African languages and literature and folklore from UW-Madison, is active in a group called Scholars for 9/11 Truth. The group's members say U.S. officials, not al-Qaida terrorists, were behind the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

"Like Bush and the neocons, Hitler and the Nazis inaugurated their new era by destroying an architectural monument and blaming its destruction on their designated enemies," he wrote.

Barrett said Tuesday he was comparing the attacks to the burning of the German parliament building, the Reichstag, in 1933, a key event in the establishment of the Nazi dictatorship.

"That's not comparing them as people, that's comparing the Reichstag fire to the demolition of the World Trade Center, and that's an accurate comparison that I would stand by," he said.

[highlight]He added: "Hitler had a good 20 to 30 IQ points on Bush, so comparing Bush to Hitler would in many ways be an insult to Hitler."[/highlight]

Moira Megargee, publicity director for the Northampton, Massachusetts, publisher Interlink, said the book is due out at the end of November and the editing isn't finished.

"It is not final and for all we know that essay may not be in the book or may be edited," she said.

The university's decision to allow Barrett to teach the course touched off a controversy over the summer once his views became widely known.

Sixty-one state legislators denounced the move. One county board cut its funding for the UW-Extension by $8,247 -- the amount Barrett will earn for teaching the course -- in a symbolic protest, even though the course is unrelated to that branch of the UW System.

Democratic Governor Jim Doyle and his Republican challenger, Mark [color="Red"]Green, have both said they believe Barrett should be fired.

One essay Barrett is requiring students to read is entitled: "A Clash Between Justice and Greed," and argues that conflicts between Islam and the western world were made up after the "collapse of the Soviet Union to justify U.S. 'defense' spending, and to provide a pretext of controlling the world's resources."

The author of another essay, "Interpreting Terrorism: Muslim Problem or Covert Operations Nightmare?," contends some western intelligence agencies are commiting acts of terrorism to make them look like the work of radical Islamics.

The university's chief academic officer, Provost Patrick Farrell, decided to retain Barrett for the course after reviewing his plans and qualifications. He said Barrett could present his ideas during one week of the course as long as students were allowed to challenge them.

He later warned Barrett to stop seeking publicity for his personal political views.

Farrell said he has not seen the essay, but faculty can assign readings that may not be popular to everyone.

"I think part of the role of any challenging course here is going to encourage students to think of things from a variety of perspectives," he said.


[color="White"].-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"A careful study of anti-semitism prejudice and accusations might be of great value to many jews,
who do not adequately realize the irritations they inflict."
- H.G. Wells (November 11, 1933)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
Posted : 11/10/2006 10:25 pm
(@whiteman4whiteland)
Posts: 1023
Noble Member
 

Barrett, a part-time instructor who holds a doctorate in African languages and literature and folklore from UW-Madison,

I've heard of picking the easiest curriculum because it's easy but sheeesh.:D


Detroitiscrap.com Bloghttp://detroitiscrap.blogspot.com:Chronicling the last dark days of a once great city.

 
Posted : 11/10/2006 10:34 pm
Anchorage Activist
(@anchorage-activist)
Posts: 612
Prominent Member
 

Comparing Bush with Hitler is indeed ridiculous. Here's an excerpt from an essay entitled "Bush vs. Hitler? No Comparison", originally written by Gerry Frederics and posted on Rich Brooks' White Alertwebsite:

* Hitler was a volunteer in WWI and a certified war hero.

Bush is a deserter and a certified coward.

* Hitler developed a hugely successful economic miracle.

Bush has bankrupted the USA.

* Hitler's love of things automotive sparked total domination of all motorized racing events worldwide.

Bush has a chauffeur and watches niggerball.

* Hitler had impeccable taste in music, drama, opera, literature and art.

Bush lacks any and all of these qualities to a spectacular degree.

* Hitler was well versed in world history.

Bush doesn't even know how to spell the word.

* Hitler was an unfailingly polite man.

Bush is an impolite, rude bully whose behavior is so bad, that in Santiago, Chile, President Lagos CANCELLED the farewell dinner prepared for him in 2004. He's also been photographed giving the finger to a peaceful protester who dared to disagree with him.

* Hitler was openly AND privately admired by men such as Britain's Lloyd George and Lord Rothmere, America's Charles Lindbergh, Sweden's Sven Hedin, Norway's Knut Hamsun, France's WWI hero Marshall Petain, Slovakia's President Dr.Tiso -- virtually an endless ''who's who'' list of of the 1930s world.

Bush is scoffed at and disdained as a useful tool of the jews by the leaders of most civilized nations and is admired only by Britain's Tony Blair, another certified slimebag. That about covers his fan club.

* Hitler was a reader of complex technical texts, which he absorbed and understood better than many ''experts."

Bush has prided himself in not being a reader.

* Until 1939 Hitler's political life was crowned by one stunning success after the other.

I can't think of even one political success of Bush's, except perhaps for stealing two elections.

* Hitler was perhaps the finest orator in the past 200 years. He wrote his own speeches and spoke flawless German.

Bush's speeches are written for him by jews, he peppers them with horrendous grammatical mistakes and only a certified cretin could watch this man speak and believe anything that comes out of his mouth.

* Hitler told the truth and kept his promises.

Bush doesn't know the definition of truth and keeps no promises. None!

So, those pundits who wish to compare Bush with Hitler are totally outrageous, but not for the reasons their critics usually cite. It is an egregious insult to the memory of Adolf Hitler to compare the Führer of the Third Reich to the Alfred E. Neuman look-alike who currently resides in our White House.

GERRY FREDERICS


Alaska Pride Blog

White Reference Blog

 
Posted : 12/10/2006 1:10 am
expose_them_all
(@expose_them_all)
Posts: 724
Noble Member
 

No comparison between the two. Bush is way out of his league here. It would be like comparing a full bred stallion to a rat.

Interesting spread on the IQ, I wouldn't have known that.


 
Posted : 12/10/2006 1:54 am
Share: