Forum
- Home
- Forum
Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
Why would one put both the United States flag and the Confederate flag at the top of the publication? The United States is the enemy of freedom and of the white race as much as anyone or anything else. The Confederacy was a legally seperate nation which fought a battle against the United States of which the later now occupies the former. It's a matter of history and fact that the United States is a de facto government and not the legitimate consitutional government of the Founding Fathers.
So why both flags? It seems to be somewhat schizophrenic and showing of an inaccurate knowledge of history. Why not leave the flags off?
T
OTPTT
Posted : 10/12/2006 6:53 pm
An excellent point made by OnThePathToTruth. Personally, whenever I see that striped zionist ass rag of a flag, I get nauseous. Why not replace it with the new rebel flag of the Second Vermont Republic. One flag honoring those who have seceded and another honoring those who will. http://www.vermontrepublic.org/
The Western democracy of today is the forerunner of Marxism which without it would not be thinkable. It provides this world plague with the culture in which its germs can spread.
-Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf)
Posted : 10/12/2006 7:32 pm
The WPL is propaganda. It is intended to push fence-sitters of the uninitiated variety to one side or the other, while not necessarily satisfying the ideological nuances of the proverbial "choir."
I don't disagree with your position, but the paper isn't intended to influence either of us.
We should also realize that we are not going to initiate a soccer mom with a tabloid. The folks who might benefit from reading the WPL are going to be those who already mostly agree with us, but have never heard our message.
Vote from the rooftops
Posted : 11/12/2006 6:58 am