Jew York Times piece linked by jew Drudge.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/24/washington/24intel.html?ei=5065&en=e77bf0c565627e43&ex=1157083200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print

The House Intelligence Committee report released Wednesday was written primarily by Republican staff members on the committee...

[color="Red"]The report’s cover page shows a picture of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran speaking at a lectern that bears the message
“The World Without Zionism.” (Ha ha ha-- truly frightening!)

Page 3 of the report lists several public comments from Mr. Ahmadinejad, including his statement, “The annihilation of the Zionist regime will come. . . . Israel must be wiped off the map.”

Some policy makers also said they were displeased that American spy agencies were playing down intelligence reports — [color="red"]
including some from the Israeli government — of extensive contacts recently between Hezbollah and members of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. “The people in the community are unwilling to make judgment calls and don’t know how to link anything together,” one senior United States official said.

The complaints, expressed privately in recent weeks, surfaced in a Congressional report about Iran released Wednesday. They echo the tensions that divided the administration and the Central Intelligence Agency during the prelude to the war in Iraq.

The criticisms reflect the views of some officials inside the White House and the Pentagon who advocated going to war with Iraq and now are pressing for confronting Iran directly over its nuclear program and ties to terrorism, say officials with knowledge of the debate.

The new report, from the House Intelligence Committee, led by
Representative Peter Hoekstra, Republican of Michigan,
(Following link from Zionist kike campus spy Daniel Pipe's):
http://66.249.93.104/search?q=cache:CmwR8xJpwjUJ:www.campus-watch.org/article/id/1079+Peter+Hoekstra%2Bjewish+contributors&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1

On Sept. 17, 2003, the House Select Subcommittee on Education unanimously approved H.R. 3077, the "International Studies in Higher Education Act." The chief sponsor of the legislation was Rep. Peter Hoekstra, a conservative Republican from Michigan.

H.R. 3077 calls for the establishment of a seven-member advisory board that would have the power [color="Red"]to recommend cutting federal funding for colleges and universities, which have offered a venue for academic and public debate on the Arab-Israeli conflict. (Why not just call criticism of kikes' policies hate speech? That seems to be very effective in intimidating Whitey.)

portrayed Iran as a growing threat and criticized American spy agencies for cautious assessments about Iran’s weapons programs.

The dissonance is surfacing just as the intelligence agencies are overhauling their procedures to prevent a repeat of the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate — the faulty assessment that in part set the United States on the path to war with Iraq.

Earlier this year, the intelligence agencies put new procedures in place to help avoid the type of analysis that was contained in the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate about Iraq and to prevent another “Curveball” — the code name of the Iraqi source who fed the United States faulty intelligence about Iraq’s biological weapons program. “I think that the intelligence community is being appropriately cautious,” said John E. McLaughlin, a former director of central intelligence.

“I think that what is going on is that people are holding themselves to a higher standard of evidence because of Iraq.”

Analysts also are required to include in their reports more information about the chain of logic that led them to their conclusions about sensitive topics like Iran, North Korea and global terrorism — “showing your work,” as Mr. Fingar put it. (Yeah, I remember we had to do start doing this around the 6th and 7th grades-- 1962 and 1963..LOL. Glad to see they're bringing it back.)

“It reflects a certain way of looking at the world — that all evil is traceable to the capitals of certain states,” said Paul R. Pillar,

who until last October oversaw American intelligence assessments about the Middle East. “And that, in my view, is a very incorrect way of interpreting the security challenges we face.”