Forum
- Home
- Forum
Notifications
Clear all
This Just In
1
Posts
1
Users
0
Reactions
829
Views
Topic starter
Non-consensual penetration of a man's anus is not rape, the Constitutional Court ruled on Thursday.
However non-consensual penetration of a woman's anus does [sic], the court found.
Delivering the judgment Justice Nkabinde found that extending the definition to include penetration of a man encroached on legislative terrain.
The court overturned the conviction of Fanuel Setakeni Masiya for the rape of a nine-year-old girl found to have been anally but not vaginally penetrated.
It found that the extended definition of rape could not be applied retrospectively to Masiya. It came into effect from the date of judgment.
While rape of a minor carried a minimum sentence of life imprisonment, there is no prescribed sentence for indecent assault.
The court found that Masiya's crime was one of indecent assault, not rape, and referred the case back to the Pretoria regional court for sentencing. - Sapa
Link to story.
Please note that the story does not make much sense, but thatz nigger journalism. If the court ruled in the case of a girl's ass being raped that she did not experience rape, why does the lead refer to men's asses? What's with the second paragraph?
I guess the important point is: where de libble white girls at?
Monkeys. Retarded, filthy monkeys.
No jews, just right
Less talk, more action
Posted : 14/05/2007 3:05 pm