Nice, I just ordered it.....:cheers:

I don't want to spoil the good news, but just to play devil's advocate....
Maybe a jew bought it so it wouldn't be released as said.

Hopefully its a self hating jew that will.

I don't want to spoil the good news, but just to play devil's advocate....
Maybe a jew bought it so it wouldn't be released as said.

Hopefully its a self hating jew that will.

Party Pooper!

Oh well, if the Ruskies will sell a copy to a jew they will sell another copy to someone else. If there really is a microfilm copy of this documentation, it will eventually surface in more than one place or country. Of course, Abe will scream that it is all a hoax, the microfilm, that is.

I don't want to spoil the good news, but just to play devil's advocate.... Maybe a jew bought it so it wouldn't be released as said.

No, from what I read, the info is in good hands.

A copy of these microfilms was obtained by Germar Rudolf, a German researcher and revisionist who was recently arrested by American agents and sent to Germany to be tried for official holocaust denial.

Before he was taken away, Rudolf passed these priceless records to others for safekeeping with the intention of returning and publishing them. As it now appears that he will be sentenced to a long term in a German jail, the records are being used as Rudolf has directed.

See: The Final Reckoning: An Analysis of Demographics in Holocaust Literature

Ahhhhhh, hopefully something good with come of this. :cheers:

I hate to be a skeptic, but this seems too good to be true....

If it is true, however, things could get real fun, real quickly.....

I hate to be a skeptic, but this seems too good to be true....

If it is true, however, things could get real fun, real quickly.....

House of Cards + Stiff Breeze = lol @ Shoah Business

Are there any other sources?

Are there any other sources?

The site might be difficult to search, but it usually has everything:

http://www.vho.org/

8man's link to TBR has the Rudolf book for cheap download. TBR is dependable]The Final Reckoning is next on my list:

http://www.tbrnews.org/ebook.htm#004

Highlights:

The Final Reckoning: An Analysis of Demographics in Holocaust Literature

By Harold Kreig, Lt.Col, AUS ret.

·This is the first rational, heavily documented work on the subject of the Holocaust. Colonel Krieg has taken thousands of documents, including the official SS concentration camp records from 1935 through 1945 and official U.S. government postwar analysis of the system and the casualties and causes of death and produced a book that is highly informative and readable. Heavily footnoted and annotated, ‘The Final Reckoning’ is logical and compelling and is an historical work that should be read through by any student of the period and subject.

·The Russian army captured the entire file of the SS camp system in 1945, microfilmed it and then, at the urgent request of the Jewish holocaust writers, locked it up in the Central Archives in Moscow.

·A copy of these microfilms was obtained by German Rudolf, a German researcher and revisionist who was recently arrested by American agents and sent to Germany to be tried for official holocaust denial.

·Before he was taken away, Rudolf passed these priceless records to others for safekeeping with the intention of returning and publishing them. As it now appears that he will be sentenced to a long term in a German jail, the records are being used as Rudolf has directed.

·This is a work that stands alone in the revisionist camp because it deals with actual figures from the original German records. Each entry is heavily footnoted for authenticity.

Price: $5.50

The site might be difficult to search, but it usually has everything:

http://www.vho.org/

8man's link to TBR has the Rudolf book for cheap download. TBR is dependable]The Final Reckoning is next on my list:

http://www.tbrnews.org/ebook.htm#004

Highlights:

Franz,

I paypaled him, but I haven't received a response back, I hope I didn't just loose $5.50?

Mark

I got Mueller's diaries a month ago and I'm still reading them.

Which Mueller? You're not referring to the Gestapo Chief series, are you?

Gestapo Chief is a hoax by notorious forger Gregory Douglas aka Peter Stahl. I bought the books when they first came out and fortunately was able to get rid of the first two at a profit.

Yeah, Douglas never finished his alleged second volume of Muller's Washington Journal. It just seems to have fizzled out.

Franz,

I paypaled him, but I haven't received a response back, I hope I didn't just loose $5.50?

Mark

Mark,

You're okay. Some Paypal accounts are set in such a way they take two days to clear, I have no idea why. I got mine a little over two days later actually, but they came through.

This is a good place to point out that Paypal has folded to Jewish pressure in the past. My understanding is the Signs of the Times people got their account froze for linking articles critical of Israel.

You can't be too careful. But I've dealt with TBR more than once. They're staight-arrows. Give it a little time.

Which Mueller? You're not referring to the Gestapo Chief series, are you?

The very one!

I'm a total obsessive for everything involving Rienhardt Gehlen, the Secret Treaty of Fort Hunt, Operation Gladio, all that. I'm aware of the word on Douglas but I'm approaching it as well-researched fiction.

Given the download rates, it's a better deal than bookshop fiction.

If the undeniable proof is finally out there, why hasn’t anybody spread it all over the net, why the hesitation?

Is there something wrong with this evidence ?

If the undeniable proof is finally out there, why hasn’t anybody spread it all over the net, why the hesitation?

Is there something wrong with this evidence ?

Ordinarily I'd never snag a Stormfront post, but this one (below) is worth it because the truth actually IS all over. It's a question of how many of our fellow whites want to hear it.

**

To me the most damning piece of evidence against white complacency has always been the Auschwitz Plaque. It was admitted the first numbers were wrong, not just dead wrong but totally off.

"Four million" was obviously a phony number. 1 and a half is bogus too, but more realistic for the sheep. At this point the numbers are not the problem. The sheep are the problem.

The masses of asses will never get a clue. It's the small minority of people who get things done in any society. They are the ones who will seek the truth and use it when they find it. Sites like this, TBR and even Stormfront are useful because people like that come here for information.

The main job of WN right now is making sure the leaders of the future get the right information now.

***

From a Stormfront post by Whitelight, 1-31-2006, from this thread:

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?p=2621719

...Take the plaques at auswictz for example, the jews have allways claimed 6 million but that 6 million figure never changed when they quietly claimed that the 4 million killed at aushwitz was actually only 1 and a half million.
So what happened to the other nearly 3 million they claimed before??

Note: Nearly 3 million "persecuted victims" have disappeared, yet somehow the "Sacred Six Million" is still repeated endlessly in the controlled media.

Number of Alleged Dead in Auschwitz Source

9,000,000 Cited by the French documentary, Night and Fog, which has been shown to millions of school students worldwide.

8,000,000 The French War Crime Research Office, Doc. 31, 1945.

7,000,000 Also cited by the French War Crime Research Office.

6,000,000 Cited in the book “Auschwitz Doctor” by Miklos Nyiszli. It has since been proven that this book is a fraud and the "doctor" was never even at Auschwitz, even though the book is often cited by historians.

5,000,000 to 5,500,000 Cited in 1945 at the trial of Auschwitz commander Rudolf Hoess, based on his “confession” which was written in English, a language he never spoke.

5,000,000 Cited on April 20, 1978 by the French daily, Le Monde. Also cited on January 23, 1995 by the German daily Die Welt. By September 1, 1989, Le Monde reduced the figure to 1,433,000.

4,500,000 In 1945 this figure was cited by another witness at the aforementioned Hoess trial.

4,000,000 Cited by a Soviet document of May 6, 1945 and officially acknowledged by the Nuremberg War Crimes trial. This figure was also reported in The New York Times on April 18, 1945, although 50 years later on January 26, 1995 (see below), The New York Times and The Washington Post slashed the figure to 1,500,000 citing new findings by the Auschwitz Museum officials. In fact, the figure of 4,000,000 was later repudiated by the Auschwitz museum officials in 1990 (see below) but the figure of 1,500,000 victims was not formally announced by Polish President Lech Walesa until five years after the Auschwitz historians had first announced their discovery.

3,500,000 Cited in the 1991 edition of the Dictionary of the French Language and by Claude Lanzmann in 1980 in his introduction to Filip Muller's book, “Three Years in an Auschwitz Gas Chamber.”

3,000,000 Cited in a forced confession by Rudolf Hoess, the Auschwitz commander who said this was the number of those who had died at Auschwitz prior to Dec. 1, 1943. Later cited in the June 7, 1993 issue of Heritage, the most widely read Jewish newspaper in California, even though three years previously the authorities at the Auschwitz museum had scaled down the figure to a minimum of 1,100,000 and a maximum of 1,500,000. (see below).

2,500,000 Cited by a famous "witness to the Holocaust," Rudolf Vrba, when he testified on July 16, 1981 for the Israeli government's war crimes trial of former SS official Adolf Eichmann.

2,000,000 Cited by no less than three famous Holocaust historians, including Leon Poliakov (1951) writing in “Harvest of Hate”] [/URL]

With the two pics above you can see the left arm of the man stepping over the supposed bodies is far too long and seems to have two elbows. What is more, the bodies lying on the ground are not only in very poor focus but also anatomically impossible.

Soap:
Aaron Breitbart, a senior researcher at the Simon Wiesenthal Center, said "The leading scholars of the Holocaust are of the opinion that the Nazis did not make soap. It was a cruel rumor at the camps..." Scientists would later go and test the soap for human DNA, and none was found.

Lampshades:
Like the soap lie, this is also a lie. Diane Saltzman, director of the collections division of the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. says “None of the lampshades that have surfaced over the past 50 years have ever turned out to be real. There is no proof that this practice has ever occurred.”