Judge won't block Ariz. voter ID law
By PAUL DAVENPORT, Associated Press
Sept 11, 2006
PHOENIX - A federal judge on Monday refused to block a law that requires Arizona voters to present identification before casting a ballot.
U.S. District Judge Roslyn Silver's order came a day before Tuesday's primary, the first statewide election for which voters will be required to show identification. The law has already been used in some municipal elections.
The 2004 law requires that voters at polling places produce government-issued picture ID or two pieces of other non-photo identification specified by the law. It also requires proof of citizenship when registering to vote.
Parts of the law were aimed chiefly at illegal immigrants.
A number of challengers had sued to prohibit election officials from enforcing the registration and polling place identification requirements. Critics said that the law would disenfranchise voters, particularly minorities and the elderly, and that requiring voters to acquire and produce identification would be burdensome in time, money and effort.
They also claimed it hinders voter registration drives.
Secretary of State Jan Brewer said the law was a protection against voter fraud. "Today's court ruling assures the integrity of this process by retaining the requirements established by Proposition 200," she said in a statement.
Within hours, lawyers for some of the challengers filed an appeal with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Silver asked for additional briefs and scheduled an Oct. 19 hearing but did not explain her reasoning.
Silver's brief order said that she would issue a detailed explanation later but that the challengers "have not shown a strong likelihood of success on the merits, the balance of hardships favor the defendants and the public interest would not be advanced by granting the injunction."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060912/ap_on_re_us/voter_identification
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
No--the judge refused to block that law.
Judge [color="Red"]Roslyn Silver. Anything else we need to know?
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:y5JsqfUAZS4J:www.bogritz.com/newsletter.htm+Roslyn+Silver%2Bbiography&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=8
RE: Hate Dept.
No--the judge refused to block that law.
Yes, you're right. I read the article too fast. And I assumed that Judge Roslyn Silver was a jew. I can't find any info or pictures of her.
However, the article goes on to say that "within hours, lawyers for some of the challengers filed an appeal with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals." That 9th Circut is loaded with swine and there's a good possibilty that they'll overturn the judge's ruling.
In spite of this article not reading exactly how I had wished, makes no difference to my point. And I think that you'd probably agree, voting on a national level is for suckers.
The ink of the learned is as precious as the blood of the martyr. For one drop of ink may make millions think.
I don't vote any more. What's the point? Talking's over, voting didn't work...let's see...