Substance vs. Presentation.

By Curt Maynard

What’s more important to you, substance or presentation? Are you sure?

The battle between substance and presentation may be the greatest hurdle that western civilization has to overcome if it is ever to extricate itself from the Zionist yoke. Western man is not geared toward accepting concepts and/or ideas that aren't presented in a certain format, that is why many, if not most of us are predisposed to disregarding new information that isn't presented to us in a certain specific aesthetically pleasing manner - we are so use to the news networks with all of their bells and whistles, flashing lights, energy and enthusiasm that we tend to accept its lies despite the fact that we know they are lying to us.

At the same time many of us are all too willing to dismiss the views of others if they don't jibe with our own, despite the fact that we often know our own views are the result of misleading information. As an example, most of us will now accept, at least to a certain degree, that George Bush and the entire American government [democrat and republican alike] have led us into a war and subsequent occupation of Iraq based on three lies:

#1. Iraq had weapons of mass destruction [They didn't]

#2. Saddam Hussein was somehow behind 9-11 [He wasn't]

#3. Iraq was supporting Al Qaeda [They weren't].

If you are one of the VERY few that still believes any one of the above falsehoods, immediately seek help, you are dangerously delusional. The fact of the matter is, all of the above were disproved long before a single American soldier ever set foot in Iraq, but this information was only provided on the blogosphere, the Mainstream Media with all its bells and whistles was busily engaged in misleading us into supporting this farce.

Back in 2002 I wrote a psychology thesis entitled A Study Focusing on the Formation of Opinion and the Knowledge Associated with its Development, in which I posited the obvious, that the biggest variable in opinion formation is an over reliance on televised media, and our inherent belief that it can exclusively provide enough information for the development of an informed opinion.

What I found of course is that the above contention was absolutely true - but what I also found was that my thesis wasn't among the first to delve into this area, it was preceded by the work of many advertising agencies in the United States and most of their research on this topic ended in the 1930s, which should give you an idea as to how long they have been interested in this particular topic. Their research didn't dwell on issues related to theory, they were strictly interested in the applicatory, and what I found was most of it focused on a paradigm first developed in the 1930s known as “selective distortion.â€