July 19, 2006 at 11:15:10

The Coming War with Iran

by Robert P. Abele

http://www.opednews.com

The Coming War with Iran

It is more than a rumor that the United States is preparing to attack Iran. This would be a gross violation of International Law and all ethical and legal codes concerning war. First, we will review the evidence for the coming attack, and then proceed to agreed-upon ethical norms concerning such actions. Next we will examine some of the conceivable consequences of such an attack. Finally, we will examine international law. The coming assault on the sovereign state of Iran violates every moral and legal constraint on nations and every rational examination of the conceivable disastrous consequences of such an action.

There are three facts about Iran that corporate media has and will continue to ignore. The first fact is that Iran is a democracy in the sense that its leaders have all been elected by the people. This makes the Congressional passage of the "Iran Freedom Support Act" hypocritical in the extreme, since it imposes deeper sanctions on Iran and explicitly calls for bringing democracy there. This also gives lie to the alleged Bush doctrine of spreading democracy a reason for an attack.

The second fact is that nuclear experts worldwide are agreed that Iran is ten years or more away from developing a nuclear weapon, if that is their goal.

The third fact is that no one in the Bush White House or anywhere else has proffered evidence that Iran is attempting to build a nuclear weapon. Even the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) admitted that all the evidence it has accumulated so far on Iranian plutonium production is circumstantial. It is also important to note that the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) allows every signatory, of which Iran is one, to produce plutonium for peaceful purposes. Perhaps Christopher de Bellaigue, reporter for Harper's magazine, said it best: "In the absence of incontrovertible proof that Iran has developed a bomb, or seeks to do so, the crisis is about intentions, and no outsider knows Iran's intentions."

I. The Bush Plan

Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh has presented the following evidence that Bush is planning on invading Iran:

1. The administration has admitted to increasing clandestine activities inside of Iran; 2. Bush has charged the Air Force with drawing up lists of targets for bombing Iran; 3. Bush has ordered teams of American combat troops into Iran to collect target information and support anti-government ethnic-minority groups.
4. American Naval tactical aircraft have been flying simulated nuclear-weapons delivery missions within range of Iranian coastal radars.
5. The U.S. is ignoring the International Atomic Energy Association and its recommendations, having told the world nuclear energy body to get out of its way as it makes its plans for Iran.
6. President Bush is now giving speeches about "bringing freedom for the Iranian people."
7. The U.S. has been flying unmanned aerial surveillance drones over Iran since 2004.

There are also eerie parallels of the current situation in Iran with the build-up to the invasion of Iraq. These include the following:

1. Iran is an oil-rich state;
2. The Bush administration is exaggerating the WMD threat that Iran poses;
3. The Bush administration has accused Iran, without evidence, of harboring Al Qaeda operatives and supporting terrorist groups. For just one example, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice stated that Iran is the "central banker for terrorism" in the Middle East and is the single most dangerous threat to the United States today;
4. Bush is spending millions of dollars on propaganda efforts and alliances with dubious ethnic groups in Iran. This includes spending $85 million to support dissent groups in Iran;
5. U.S. officials are openly talking about bypassing the U.N. when it comes to attacking Iran. As John Bolton, Bush's appointed representative at the U.N., said: "If this is d�j� vu, then so be it. That is the course we are on."
6. The Bush administration is scrambling to make a connection between Iran and Hezbollah, something which should not be terribly difficult to do, although no concrete evidence has surfaced yet to make the connection.
7. There is open talk on the part of Bush administration officials, of the phrase "regime change."

rest HERE

Sorcha Faal is overstretching to try and convince people that the recent 'non-binding resolution' is a declaration of war. I think she's right in predicting that Turkish troops will enter northern Iraq to try and put down Kurdish independence fighters. Other than that she's off base or hoping that future events may develop close enough to what she's imagined to make her look like she was able to predict it. Then again Hal Turner reports...

U.S., BRITISH AND AUSTRALIAN TROOPS IN BAGHDAD ORDERED TO "RAPID DEPLOY" TO ISRAEL!

SUPPOSED TO BE HANDLED VERY "HUSH HUSH"!
TROOPS IN BAGHDAD GOT WORD TO ME AND TO OTHERS THAT THEY ARE BEING TOLD TO PREPARE FOR A MAJOR WAR AND THEY ARE NOT HAPPY AT ALL

I just had a conversation with the wife of one of my old friends in the army. She had just got off the telephone to him in Baghdad and was quite distraught.

Eight hundred of the Australian force of 1,600 in Iraq have been ordered to redeploy to Israel immediately and with all haste.

He told her that US and British troops are also packing their kit and being redeployed to Israel.

The government has not said a word about it domestically and the whole thing is supposed to be hush hush.

The streets of Baghdad and Baghdad airport are supposed to be buzzing with activity and word of a major war coming on.

Didn't there used to be some sort of thing called, I think it was something like "the United Nations"? And weren't all these countries members? And wasn't the purpose of this organization to stop wars between the members?

Well, that organization never did work too good, I guess they finally scrapped it!

I hope Russia nukes Israel off the face of the planet.

New York too. Nobody needs New York.

depends how committed China is also.
that's the WildCard here.
The Chinese have $multi-billion deals with Iran re: natural gas &c
If China comes in on the side of Russia, and Russia attacks, all HELL could break loose.
and all for....what... the FCKN yids! FCK!
(a FCKN alien INVASION would be better than those SCUM!)

(jimbo!)

Hal Turner reports...
Quote:
U.S., BRITISH AND AUSTRALIAN TROOPS IN BAGHDAD ORDERED TO "RAPID DEPLOY" TO ISRAEL!

SUPPOSED TO BE HANDLED VERY "HUSH HUSH"!
TROOPS IN BAGHDAD GOT WORD TO ME AND TO OTHERS THAT THEY ARE BEING TOLD TO PREPARE FOR A MAJOR WAR AND THEY ARE NOT HAPPY AT ALL

I just had a conversation with the wife of one of my old friends in the army. She had just got off the telephone to him in Baghdad and was quite distraught.

Eight hundred of the Australian force of 1,600 in Iraq have been ordered to redeploy to Israel immediately and with all haste.

He told her that US and British troops are also packing their kit and being redeployed to Israel.

The government has not said a word about it domestically and the whole thing is supposed to be hush hush.

The streets of Baghdad and Baghdad airport are supposed to be buzzing with activity and word of a major war coming on.

If this is true -- and it's being true is completely consistent with everything JOG has ever done -- then it may start getting a lot easier for us to start a...

NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL

...campaign -- in every town where awakened Whites live.

I hope Russia nukes Israel off the face of the planet.

New York too. Nobody needs New York.

Yes, well Russia would have to simultaneously nuke Amerikwa too -- because Amerikwa is Israel.

That's the problem. That's why Russia will NOT nuke Israel. Jews control not only Israel's nuclear arsenal -- but Amerikwa's. As long as the jews rule the kwa, no country will attack the kwa (unless the jews decide the time has come to finish off the kwa -- and gives the go-ahead -- which day won't come until the jews have jumped to China).

Yes, well Russia would have to simultaneously nuke Amerikwa too -- because Amerikwa is Israel.

That's the problem. That's why Russia will NOT nuke Israel. Jews control not only Israel's nuclear arsenal -- but Amerikwa's. As long as the jews rule the kwa, no country will attack the kwa (unless the jews decide the time has come to finish off the kwa -- and gives the go-ahead -- which day won't come until the jews have jumped to China).

The world is in the following situation: the most evil entities who have ever existed on Earth are in control of the most devastating military arsenal that has ever existed on Earth. It is the nightmare scenario come true. And the jews have promised to take the world down with them if they are significantly attacked.

Yes, well Russia would have to simultaneously nuke Amerikwa too -- because Amerikwa is Israel.

That's the problem. That's why Russia will NOT nuke Israel. Jews control not only Israel's nuclear arsenal -- but Amerikwa's. As long as the jews rule the kwa, no country will attack the kwa (unless the jews decide the time has come to finish off the kwa -- and gives the go-ahead -- which day won't come until the jews have jumped to China)

ooops......yeh, of course, i, for one, forget abt that......also: re: the SSBNs/nuclear 'subs which can 'remote launch' courtesy of the Pentagon.
still...it wouldn't preclude a 'limited, tactical' exchange and/or high-level conventional war eh?

off topic slightly(but perhaps not!).......there's something abt 'nuclear weapons' that`s always struck me as rather odd.

Here, for instance, are some interesting 'facts':
i/the Nagasaki A-bombers flew around over the city for a couple of hours in their B29s before releasing 'Little Boy'....why.....?

ii/during the 1970s/1980s, when the French were conducting nuclear 'tests' in the Sth Pacific re: Muroa Attoll &c, the Kiwi Navy was usually in the vicinity either just before or just after the detonations. How come?
THe French sure as hell didn't inform them of dates, times and places]this: two pieces of plutonium slammed together causes a nuclear blast? THAT sounds like something a 'mad scientist' could cook up in his garage!

iv/how come the kikes didn't take 'the easy way out' in the 1960s/1970s and 1980s and wipe out the White Race by initiating a nuclear war between USSR and the USA?(after all: they pretty well controlled both countries @ the time and still do AFA the JewSA is concerned) way back when few, if any, people knew about the jew and most, if not all, believed the official 'jew line'?

something doesn't smell right here!

in fact, now that i think of it, i seem to remember reading or hearing something nigh on twenty yrs or so ago now abt this mad fundie preacher in NZ called Barry Smith or sumthin' who was allegedly making these 'fantastic' allegations that nuclear weapons could only be detonated @ certain times and in certain places because of some sort of special geo-magnetic relationship between the nucleus of the atoms and the Earth's magnetic field and the Sun.

don't ask me to explain all that because i ain't NO nuclear scientist and my physics stopped @ High School matriculation level.

BUT!....sometimes these 'fundies' (once u'v jettisoned their pro-yoo propaganda) make some points that actually make some sort of sense.

could this be one of those?

it would explain a lot!
(maybe even why Germany didn't actually develop them......wrong geo-magnetic location @ the wrong time to iniate a detonation?
actually: where have most of these things detonated?
if you exclude the yoos maybe detonating them in the Negev.....we have...what?.....a fairly defined sector of the Earth....from where?.....somewhere East of the Urals....to......? the Sth Pacific.....to....Nevada......probably a what...?.....30° segment of the Earth's sphere...OK...say: 35°.....certainly less than a hemisphere [here's another point: in the 1950s, the Brits kindly decided to detonate a few of these nuclear 'bungers' off the NW coast of Oz...well within that 35° arc...why?....wouldn't it have been a HELL of a lot easier to have picked somewhere relatively near-by in Africa, for instance....Libya? Tunisia? Algeria? Morroco?....why travel ½-way 'round the world? could it be because those locations weren't in the required geo-magnetic configuration?].....is it my imagination or is there something strange here?...wouldn't be the FIRST TIME that the yoos have 'pulled a fast one' on the gullible goyim to 'bring on' the Jew World Order....what is going on here? what does the hard-core scientific literature say on the subject [in pseudo-lay-man`s terms] anyone know?.........the jewsmedia, of course, can be pretty much totally dis-regarded as a reliable source on just abt every-thing except, perhaphs, the sport and the weather!)