I distributed 300 WPLs this afternoon in Mt Vernon, MO. Population about 10,000 and 35 miles west of Springfield, with a growing wetback problem. Sun came out around noon, so I phoned the weather report, and no rain was forcasted. Perfect day. No wind even.

I mailed out 200 WPLs to Kosher Nazi in GA, who pledged to mail in $32.00.

And I checked my PO Box. Empty. Not even hate mail. No money, not even a copper. Life is not good.

This morning, I mailed a shipment of 300 WPLs to N.E. Rebel in Massachusetts, one of our most reliable and prolific distributors.

I've decided that since I'm down to only 600-700 left, I'll go ahead and close out the books on TWPL issue #1, and open the books on issue #2. I'll tally up all the receipts and monies taken in, and post a full financial disclosure report here within the next day or two.

Trustworthy VNN'ers are welcome to the remaining WPLs. Just PM me how many you want. Otherwise, my friends and I will get them out here in S.W. Missouri.

And so as promised, I'm giving everybody 2-3 weeks off from TWPL Project. We can now leisurely begin to put together the contents for TWPL #2.

Don't think I'm getting soft, but I'd like to give my heart felt thanks to all you loyal, unselfish, contributors and distributors who sacrificed so much of your time, free labors, and money in making TWPL-1 such a huge success. (I'll post the screen names and number of WPLs they distributed in a special thread, in honorable recognition of them).

Hail Victory !!!

OK, here's the figures for TWPL Fund, as of 12 August 2006, the date I closed out the books on issue 1, and opened the books on issue 2:

Bills, including cost of printing issue #1: $5,386.82

Money received since books for TAA 3 were closed: $10,000.83. (Ain't that a coincidence? And don't ask me where the 83 cents came from. It's been on the books for over a year.

Balance to date in TWPL Fund: $4,614.0l (More than enough to pay printers for our next 40,000 sixteen page, in color, newspapers)

As for the details regarding monies received, as you all know, I've posted each contributors screen name, and the date, and amount contributed on day of receipt on this forum inside TWPL-1 thread.

NOTICE: In all previous editions since we began publishing in Oct 04, I've always mailed the receipts to Alex Linder for his inspection and verification, when I closed the books on each separate edition. But since Alex is no longer interested in receiving them, I've chosen Ron Doggett. And so, I'll mail all receipts related to TWPL-1 to Ron on Monday. He'll inspect, verify and report his findings here, sometimes next week.

I'm sure everybody here, who's been in the Movement for any significant period of time, knows Ron Doggett, and therefore knows there's no one on this forum more trusted or respected, nor anywhere else among genuine WNs.

40,000 newspapers distributed is 40,000 knives in the heart of the enemy.

You have achieved economic sustainability on your paper! God, that must strike fear in their minds...

40,000 newspapers distributed is 40,000 knives in the heart of the enemy.

You have achieved economic sustainability on your paper! God, that must strike fear in their minds...

Thanks for the compliment, KN. Actually, we've printed and distributed 153,000 copies of our newspaper so far, with 40,000 more in the works.

That "sustainability" part is my biggest fear, though. I worry that too many will lose hope, and along with it, cease their support of TWPL project. In short, they'll "drop the ball". We'll see.

We must not only sustain our present pace, we must speed it up. I'm confident we will.

Distribution of white supremacist paper upsets town
Police question whether or not disributors violated law
by Brandon Shulleeta
Local police have not reached a consensus as to whether or not distribution of a white supremacist paper to doorsteps in Caroline two weeks ago could be considered trespassing.
Cheif Steve Hoskins, of the Bowling Green Police Department, said that a self-proclaimed racist has the legal right to publish a paper condemning Jews and Afican Americans. The unknown distributor who placed copies of the paper on home doorsteps may have violated the law.
"As far as charges go, if you go on somebody's property with-out their premission, that's trespassing," Hoskins said.
When contacted by phone on Aug. 2, Glenn Miller of Springfield, Missouri, the owner and primary writer for the White Patriot Leader, said that he was not responsible for the distribtion of the papers in Caroline.
The man said someone likely purchased a large amount of copies and distributed them on their own intiative.
"I don't know who did that," Miller, said. "We caution our distributors all the time not to go on private property."
Miller said that the people associated with his paper do not condone illegal activities.
"We publish a frekin' newspaper. That's all we do," Miller said.
Police say that a large number of copies were distributed through-out Caroline.
In the 16-page tabloid, Miller blames Jews for taking over the media and the U.S. Federal Goverment, and for being the culprit of all wars.
He refers to African Americans using racial slurs, saying that they're responsible for killing innocent whites and raping women.
In the interview, Miller said that he avoids African Americans and looks at them in the same way that he would look at a dog.
The 65-year-old said that his wife, five children, and parents are also racists.
Both Caroline police departments said that the publications are protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Hoskins said that the department plans to consider possible trespassing and littering charges, if the distributor is found.
Trespassing on private property is a Class 1 Misdemeanor that carries a punishment of up to 12 months in jail. Littering is a less severe misdemeanor offense.
Major Mike Hall, with the Caroline County Sheriff's Office, said that the sheriff's office does not anticipate that they will be pursuing criminal charges. Captain Scott Moser said that the department is still analyzing whether or not charges could be filed.
"Those are very gray areas," Hall said on Aug. 2, referring to the propspect of charging the distrutor with trespassing or littering. "It's not different than a car salesman, or Chick-fil-A (employee) handing out fliers."
Hall argued that police would not pursue charges against a political candidate for placing campaign brochures on doorsteps.
The major said that the sheriff's office would pursue criminal charges if the papers were distributed in a threatening or hateful manner, or to a specific group of people, based on race or religion. Hall said that the content of the papers and the way that they were distributed were non-threatening.
"(This was) not a hate crime or anything like that," Hall said.
Miller said that in the 22 years since he began publishing the paper in October 1984, Arkansas police were the only officals to threaten that they would arrest him for distributing the papers.
Miller said he went to the Arkansas police department, held out his hands, and said, "Arrest me."
A police officer then told him that they could not arrest him because he had not done anything illegal, he said.
Miller said that he's a veteran Army Master Sergeant and a lifelong racist.
He began publishing the paper after retiring from the Army, after serving twice in Vietnam, he said.
He has about 200 distributors who have distirbuted 153,000 copies of the White Patriot Leader, in 28 to 30 states, since founding the paper as a nonprofit way to spread his message, he said.
The Missouri man said that he has two to three writers who contribute to the paper and the paper's motto is, "To secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."
Miller said that he has an online forum where 5,000 people post messages.
The papers that were distributed in Caroline feature a picture of about 30 white men in camouflage, posing with a Nazi salute, some holding rifles.
When asked why he believed that it was necessary for the men in the picture to be holding rifles, he said, "To defend themselves from violent (racial slur)."
"I swear...you're young and naive. You don't understand what's going on," Miller said. "At least 95 percent of all blacks hate white people. That's war."
Miller said that he and those associated with the White Patriot Leader are nonviolent messengers of the truth and that the picture in the paper represents the way that white men should unite.
Hoskins said that he was first told by Glenn McDearmon that Miller's papers had been distributed in Caroline. McDearmon is Vice Mayor of Bowling Green Town Council.
At the Aug. 3 meeting of the Bowling Green Town Council, several residents said they received the paper and were upset about it.
Councilman Eric Hinson asked that the distribution of the paper be discussed by council. Council discussed the paper after residents Jonathon Stuart and Deborah Howard said that they found the tabloid in their driveways. Mayor David Storke said the town was upset that the white supremacist tabloid was distruibuted in Bowling Green.
"Everyone was shocked and disappointed," Storke said. "It upset a lot of people."
Cheif Hoskins said that Caroline recipents of the tabloid have said that a man driving a teal car was distributing the papers. Ther have been differenet reports as to what kind of vehicle the alleged suspect had, but it is believed to be some sort of sports car, the cheif said.
Both departments are asking the residents, who have infromation that could assist the investigation, contact the Bowling Green Police or Caroline Sheriff's Department.
Commonwealth Attorney Harvey Latney said that he and Hoskins have not talked about the incident. He has not seen the paper, but the contents of the literature is irrelevent to whether or not trespassing or littering charges could be pursued, Latney said.

That's the whole article, damn that was a lot of typing, for the record no one went on anybody's property.

Thanks for typing that very lengthy news report, Ron. But since they don't post articles on their website, you typing it was the only way to get it posted here.

You and Ironguard1940 deserve the credit, I understand. And obviously yaw'll did a great distro job, since even members of the town council admitted they received copies.

Not a bad "write-up", if you ask me. And we all know that lots and lots of White folks there were highly inspired to learn there is, in fact, a White Resistance.

Hail victory to Ron Doggett and Ironguard1940 for executing yet another highly successful WN mission.

(I'll send um a LTE, and I'm confident they'll print it)

August 10, 2006
The Crewe Burkeville Journal
White Power
Newspaper
Tossed Here

Crewe- Several town residents notified The Journal last week that copies of a publication called The White Patriot Leader had been left at their homes. It was not immediately known who had distributed the newspapers to local residents or how extensive the distribution was.

The newspaper's cover story is headed "Invasion!". The secondary front-page headline is labeled "America Under Siege" and photos show faces of blacks, Jews, and Mexicans. The publication takes shots at those groups.

"I don't want this!" said one indignant resident, alerting The Journal to the developments. The tabloid labels itself as "Newspaper for White Americans."
It on the cover that Glenn Miller is editor and publisher.

There are reports that The White Patriot Leader surfaced in Culpeper recently also.

"The so-called White Patriot Leader belongs in the trash," said Journal Editor and Publisher Rick Gunter. "Ours is a diversified nation and our strength comes from diversity, not white supremacist hate that divides and weakens our land." He continued, "The First Amendment protects even Mr. Miller and his ilk. They have a right to publish this garbage. But Americans, including those in Crewe, have a right to use it as trash-can liners." Gunter said the publication surfaced periodically in homes that it would find an audience. "There are residents here who will be drawn to the hate," he said. "But they are in the tiny minority."

I'd like to post a couple of notes about this article. First, the paper was hand delivered "a sample copy of our newspaper". In person by me handed directly to a paper employee. What a bunch of drama queens. Second, this is the first issue of WPL, so how can it "surface periodlically"? I'd considered taking a breather from distros, but after seeing the results, I'm not going to. Like Glenn says, I'll keep on a Kluckin'. Sometimes you wonder if anyone does read them and if they get noticed. We have finally cracked the media blackout in many, many places. If you are going to do a distro, please take a copy by the local paper. Leave it under their door or take it in, if they're open. It does make a difference.

August 10, 2006
The Crewe Burkeville Journal
White Power
Newspaper
Tossed Here

Crewe- Several town residents notified The Journal last week that copies of a publication called The White Patriot Leader had been left at their homes. It was not immediately known who had distributed the newspapers to local residents or how extensive the distribution was.

The newspaper's cover story is headed "Invasion!". The secondary front-page headline is labeled "America Under Siege" and photos show faces of blacks, Jews, and Mexicans. The publication takes shots at those groups.

"I don't want this!" said one indignant resident, alerting The Journal to the developments. The tabloid labels itself as "Newspaper for White Americans."
It on the cover that Glenn Miller is editor and publisher.

There are reports that The White Patriot Leader surfaced in Culpeper recently also.

"The so-called White Patriot Leader belongs in the trash," said Journal Editor and Publisher Rick Gunter. "Ours is a diversified nation and our strength comes from diversity, not white supremacist hate that divides and weakens our land." He continued, "The First Amendment protects even Mr. Miller and his ilk. They have a right to publish this garbage. But Americans, including those in Crewe, have a right to use it as trash-can liners." Gunter said the publication surfaced periodically in homes that it would find an audience. "There are residents here who will be drawn to the hate," he said. "But they are in the tiny minority."

Wow !!! Two Virginia jewspaper "compliments" in two days. One thing for sure, our Virgina "boys" don't let no grass grow under their feet, and they sure as hell, don't waste many days.

Hot damn, just imagine if we had 3 like them in every state.

Thanks for posting yaw'lls latest "compliment", SA Mann. (Btw, I lived in Crewe at age 6. In 1946 right after his discharge from the Army, my daddy ran a restaurant there called "Chicken in the Basket". He did well, and bragged on Crewe, VA for the rest of his life).

Boy, yaw'll sure got the Editor's attention. He badmouthed us like red-headed step young'uns. See ?? Told ya we're doing some good.

Excellent action to drop copies off at newspaper offices. Police departments too. I do both all the time and eyeball-to-eyeball, while saying something like, "Hi, I just passed out 600 copies of this newspaper in your town, and thought you'd like a courtesy copy, too".

Man, this small-town fool of a police chief has no clue about the law, criminal or Constitutional.

First of all, there can be NO tresspassing charges against us because we NEVER set foot on private property. Even if we did walk door-to-door on private property, no tresspassing charges could be filed UNLESS there was: 1.) a no tresspassing sign clearly visible on said homeowner's property or 2.) a property owner saw us on their property, told us to leave and we refused, which would not happen because we never go on people's property.

Second, no littering charges can be filed, as the Caroline County sheriff's department clearly admitted. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution stands in the way of that.

Third, I am a suspect without any crime being committed. I am offended and incensed.

Fourth, I find it hilarious that my car was described as teal and a sports car by various witnesses.

Finally, you would think law enforcement would have enough brains to monitor this website to find out who distributed the papers in "their" town.

I think this police chief was given this job either out of pity or because he is related to the Caroline County sheriff. What a groveling piece of shit he is.

BTW, many thanks to Ron and SA Mann for going to the trouble of getting the respective papers and typing these articles up.

I sent the Bowling Green police chief this E-mail. Words in parenthesis are mine.

Distribution of white supremacist paper upsets town
Police question whether or not distributors violated law

Chief Steve Hoskins, of the Bowling Green Police Department, said that a self-proclaimed racist has the legal right to publish a paper condemning Jews and African Americans. The unknown distributor who placed copies of the paper on home doorsteps may have violated the law.
"As far as charges go, if you go on somebody's property without their permission, that's trespassing," Hoskins said.

(When these papers are distributed, no one EVER sets foot on private property. However, even if they did, one can be arrested for trespassing in Virginia only if:

1. A "No Trespassing" sign is clearly visible on said homeowner's property.
2. A homeowner sees someone on their property, asks them to leave and they refuse.)

Both Caroline police departments said that the publications are protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Hoskins said that the department plans to consider possible trespassing and littering charges, if the distributor is found.

(If you do press charges for trespassing and littering, you will be made a fool of, sir. Not only will the distributors of TWPL be found not guilty because the First Amendment protects these distributions, a civil rights lawsuit will be filed against your department and town on their behalf, your town will be bankrupted and you will be unemployed. I had to educate the Caroline County sheriff about this, and he seems to understand why pressing charges against the distributors of this publication would be a waste of taxpayer's money. No crime has been committed and the sheriff's department admits this.)

Trespassing on private property is a Class 1 Misdemeanor that carries a punishment of up to 12 months in jail. Littering is a less severe misdemeanor offense. (Neither of which TWPL distributors are guilty of.)

Major Mike Hall, with the Caroline County Sheriff's Office, said that the sheriff's office does not anticipate that they will be pursuing criminal charges. Captain Scott Moser said that the department is still analyzing whether or not charges could be filed.
"Those are very gray areas," Hall said on Aug. 2, referring to the prospect of charging the distributor with trespassing or littering. "It's not different than a car salesman, or Chick-fil-A (employee) handing out fliers."
Hall argued that police would not pursue charges against a political candidate for placing campaign brochures on doorsteps.

(Read that last sentence carefully, because this is an admission that the distribution of TWPL is legal. There are many reasons for this, but the reason that Major Hall came clean on is that if you arrest one person for littering and do not arrest another, that is viewpoint discrimination. This happens to violate the First Amendment and overrides any littering ordinance Bowling Green or any other city, town, village, county or even state may have.)

Miller said that in the 22 years since he began publishing the paper in October 1984, Arkansas police were the only officials to threaten that they would arrest him for distributing the papers.
Miller said he went to the Arkansas police department, held out his hands, and said, "Arrest me."
A police officer then told him that they could not arrest him because he had not done anything illegal, he said.

(Yet another admission that these distributions are legal.)

Both departments are asking the residents, who have information that could assist the investigation, contact the Bowling Green Police or Caroline Sheriff's Department.
Commonwealth Attorney Harvey Latney said that he and Hoskins have not talked about the incident. He has not seen the paper, but the contents of the literature is irrelevant to whether or not trespassing or littering charges could be pursued, Latney said.

(All I have left to say about this is you risk much by filing charges related to this distribution. Remember that it is you that began the threats of arrest, so don't take this message as a threat but as a fact. No laws have been broken by putting out literature you don't happen to agree with. Study the law carefully, including the First Amendment cases regarding this subject, before taking any kind of legal action. White Southern Solidarity.)

Walter Ring

Greetings all.
2001, the United States Supreme Court ruled (State of Connecticut Vs Jehovah witnesses) That not only can one distribute political and religious information onto private property, but may also enter onto said property to do so unless otherwise posted to deliver such material. I'm not sure on the chapter and verse, but I'm sure if one does the research they can find the law. I only know this because I was once arrested for distributing "racist" literature and this was part of my defense. The charges were thrown out!
These cheese eaten ADL cops best learn the law and the Constitution they swore to uphold!

Just delivered 350+ of the TWPL #1 in driveways of South Forsyth Co., GA.
JoeSixPack & Babycakes threw while I drove.
The entire process of rolling, throwing and dinner afterwards took right at 3 hours.
We got some strange looks from White Dads, Moms & kids that were outside as we drove by.
http://www.forsythnews.com/index.shtml
This link is for the Forsyth Co. News online. I'll have to pick up a copy of the next issue, Wednesday, the paper version and see if we are mentioned.

This is what we carry on our distro's.

We sent this with a free complementary copy of TWPL to Costa Mesa Police Sgt Marty Carver, who was interviewed recently by OC Weekly. We are here not only to educate our White kinsman, but also law enforcement .. What a job we do !

The White Patriot Leader is published by Glenn Miller POB 3861, Springfield, MO 65808. All distributors of this newspaper are unpaid volunteers solely under their own direction and control. The White Patriot Leader distributors peaceably exercise their First Amendment right to free speech by distributing free copies of this newspaper in public places. The White Patriot Leader distributors are encouraged to follow all applicable laws when so doing.

1. The First Amendment protects the distribution of free political newspapers, flyers, or leaflets in public places. See Lovell v City of Griffin, 303 U.S. 444 (1938) where a local permit law infringing the rights of people to do so was struck down. The court said the following: "[The First Amendment] necessarily embraces pamphlets and leaflets. These indeed have been historic weapons in the defense of liberty, as the pamphlets of Thomas Paine and others in our own history abundantly attest."

2. The First Amendment protects distributors of political literature from pretextual arrests for littering. In SCHNEIDER v. NEW JERSEY, 308 U.S. 147 (1939) the court said: "We are of the opinion that the purpose to keep the streets clean and of good appearance is insufficient to justify an ordinance which prohibits a person rightfully on a public street from handing literature to one willing to receive it. Any burden imposed upon the city authorities in cleaning and caring for the streets as an indirect consequence of such distribution results from the constitutional protection of the freedom of speech and press.''

From Wikipedia

During the twentieth century, many major cases involving the free exercise clause were related to Jehovah's Witnesses. Many communities directed laws against the Witnesses and their attempts to convert individuals to their religion. From 1938 to 1955, the organization was involved in over forty cases before the Supreme Court, winning a majority of them. The first important victory came in 1938, when in [color="Red"]Lovell v. City of Griffin, the Supreme Court held that cities could not require permits for the distribution of pamphlets. In 1939, the Supreme Court decided [color="Red"]Schneider v. Town of Irvington, in which it struck down anti-littering laws that were enforced only against Jehovah's Witnesses who were handing out pamphlets. In 1940, the Court considered Cantwell v. Connecticut; the plaintiff, a Jehovah's Witness, was charged with soliciting donations without a certificate from the Public Welfare Council. The Council was to grant the certificate only if the organization requesting it was a charity or sponsored a religious cause. The Supreme Court ruled that any law granting a public body the function of determining if a cause is religious or not violates the First Amendment.

The ruling in Minersville School District v. Gobitis, however, did not stand for long. In 1943, West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, the Supreme Court essentially reversed its previous opinion. Justice Frankfurter had, in the Gobitis case, suggested that the Witnesses attempt to reverse the School Board's policy by exercising their vote. In the Barnette case, however, Justice Robert H. Jackson wrote, "the very purpose of the Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities ... One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote." The Supreme Court did not rule that the Pledge was unconstitutional; rather, they held that students may not be compelled to recite it.

Compelling interest

The Supreme Court under Earl Warren adopted an expansive view of the free exercise clause. The Court required that states have a "compelling interest" in refusing to accommodate religiously motivated conduct as it decided Sherbert v. Verner (1963). The case involved Adele Sherbert, an individual who was denied unemployment benefits by South Carolina because she refused to work on Saturdays as required by her Seventh Day Adventist faith. In Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), the Court ruled that a law that "unduly burdens the practice of religion" without a compelling interest, even though it might be "neutral on its face," would be unconstitutional.

The "compelling interest" doctrine became much narrower in 1990, when the Supreme Court held in Employment Division v. Smith that, as long as a law does not target a particular religious practice, it is constitutional insofar as the free exercise clause is concerned. In 1993, the Supreme Court revisited the free exercise clause when it decided Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah. Hialeah had passed an ordinance banning ritual slaughter, a practice central to the Santería religion, while providing exceptions for some practices such as the kosher slaughter of Judaism. Since the ordinance was not "generally applicable," the Court ruled that it was subject to the compelling interest test, which it failed to meet. The Court therefore struck down the City's ordinance.

Also in 1993, Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which sought to restore the "compelling interest" standard. In City of Boerne v. Flores (1997) the Court struck down the provisions of the Act that forced state and local governments to provide more protections than required by the First Amendment, which the courts enjoy sole power to interpret. According to the court's ruling in Gonzales v. UDV (2006), RFRA remains applicable to federal statutes, which must therefore still meet the "compelling interest" standard in free exercise cases.