Somebody throw this lying piece of shit into the op forum.

There was no significant number of rapes of White southern women by White union troops during the civil war. He made up that lie to forment division among VNN'ers.

The only lying POS around here is you, snitchy-boy.

Atrocities were common during the American Civil War, most of them committed by the Union Army against Southern civilians. Every hear of the Red-Legs? How about Sherman's march through Georgia? Sherman's stated aim was to destroy the Souther Civilian infrastructure -- farms, factories, housing, you name it. As Sherman said, "War is hell."

Ever watch "Birth of a Nation" by D.W. Griffith? The film deals with the aftermath of the Civil War when the Union loosed niggers on humans in the South to rape, steal and murder. President Wilson said the following as regards Birth of a Nation: "It is like writing history with lightning. And my only regret is that it is all so terribly true."

BTW, don't forget to collect your check from your FBI handler.

The thread is about US troops raping and murdering civilians in Iraq. You want to change the subject to the American Civil War and Glenn Miller. Why is that? You say that rape and murder of civilians is nothing new. While that is true it's not a brilliant insight on your part and it doesn't justify anything that ZOG has US doing in Iraq, now does it?

How about you stay on topic?

The only lying POS around here is you, snitchy-boy.

Atrocities were common during the American Civil War, most of them committed by the Union Army against Southern civilians. Every hear of the Red-Legs? How about Sherman's march through Georgia? Sherman's stated aim was to destroy the Souther Civilian infrastructure -- farms, factories, housing, you name it. As Sherman said, "War is hell."

Ever watch "Birth of a Nation" by D.W. Griffith? The film deals with the aftermath of the Civil War when the Union loosed niggers on humans in the South to rape, steal and murder. President Wilson said the following as regards Birth of a Nation: "It is like writing history with lightning. And my only regret is that it is all so terribly true."

BTW, don't forget to collect your check from your FBI handler.

The thread is about US troops raping and murdering civilians in Iraq. You want to change the subject to the American Civil War and Glenn Miller. Why is that? You say that rape and murder of civilians is nothing new. While that is true it's not a brilliant insight on your part and it doesn't justify anything that ZOG has US doing in Iraq, now does it?

How about you stay on topic?

I am staying on topic. Unfortunately snitchy-the-flag-waver can't handle the truth. The true is that America is one big lie, and has been a big lie since the War of 1812. Imperial America has been "democratizing" people with dicks and bullets for over 150 years.

Good, then no more on this thread about the civil war or man's general naughtiness to fellow man.

Do you think the GI perpetrators should be hanged if they are found guilty by courts martial? How about their commanding officers, their commander-in-chief?

I am staying on topic.

These atrocities whether real or imagined are just part and parcel to a standard jew vaudeville show. Just as this entire war has been a jewy staged production. When was the last time that you saw a jew movie where there wasn’t the obligatory “sex scene”?

This is the way that the jew vicariously lives-out his filthy sadomasochistic wet dreams via our pain and blood. This is the reason why we read such stories in the jew media. The jew is enormously titillated by this, he’s probably beating the hell out of his gnarly little dick at the mere thought of dozens of big, strong, sweating nigger GIs ass-fucking some poor little 5 year old Iraqi girl in a bombed-out building in Baghdad.

There is no revenge, harsh enough that can be inflicted upon the filthy jew to make-up for their crimes against humanity. They all need to die.

I am staying on topic. Unfortunately snitchy-the-flag-waver can't handle the truth. The true is that America is one big lie, and has been a big lie since the War of 1812. Imperial America has been "democratizing" people with dicks and bullets for over 150 years.

Hmmm... The only people who talk like this are FAR lefties.

BTW, Rounder doesn't get a check from the FBI. He gets a pension for being in the military. He NEVER recieved money from the govt for being an informant. If you can't prove the contrary that makes you a liar.

And please cite sources when you state such accusations.

http://hometown.aol.com/cwrapes/page3.htm

According to the "List of US soldiers executed by the United States military authorities during the late war" (established in 1885 - National Archives) 24 US soldiers were executed

Not to say that many were unreported or that some white men are not capable of such but if the actual executions are a reflection of the real number then your accusation is a tall one.

He NEVER recieved money from the govt for being an informant.

What did he receive for being an informant?

Right on cue, hate dept. I suppose both you and Fissile would rather not discuss the thread topic, that being the rape and murder of Iraqi civilians by US troops. You both much prefer ad hominem or maundering about how war is cruel.

On that topic, is this what your crowd had in mind when the neoconservative cabal first conned the publc into a war to find alleged "WMD"s? How much more rape and murder in Iraq before they are satisfactorily brought democracy?

Do you think the GI perpetrators should be hanged if they are found guilty by courts martial? How about their commanding officers, their commander-in-chief?

What did he receive for being an informant?

The Phora Phebes changed the name of the thread about this subject, interesting.

What ought to be done, well, Germany executed two german soldiers for trying to rape a woman. But that was in world war two, when Germany was ruled by Hitler and not by jews.

Read carefully, people, this article by the jewish press agency AP, because the kikes are doing their best to downplay this story. Read between the lines.

The rapists burned their victim, and four family members, probably alive. Why do I think that? Because the article doesn't clearly state the victims were dead when they were burned. The yids would state that very clearly if that were the case.

Also, the two marines that were "kidnapped and tortured" belonged to the same unit, and were taken after this "incident". It's likely that their deaths was just revenge.

The world must be liberated, jew by jew by jew.

What did he receive for being an informant?

I believe he got a reduced prison sentence. That is usually how it works.

On that topic, is this what your crowd had in mind when the neoconservative cabal first conned the publc into a war to find alleged "WMD"s?

Why didn't the neo-khans plant WMD's in Iraq if they were so good at master-minding the destruction of WTC 7? That's what I want to know. They're both genius and inept at the same time!

Why didn't the neo-khans plant WMD's in Iraq if they were so good at master-minding the destruction of WTC 7? That's what I want to know. They're both genius and inept at the same time!

They tried.
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=iraq_war&Number=294334176

Planting WMD In Iraq To Justify The Illegal Invasion

French President Jacques Chirac once said that if the United States didn’t find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, it would probably stage a discovery.

According to a recent report by Larissa Alexandrovna, the Office of Special Plans didn’t just present cherry-picked pre-war "intelligence" to the White House and the media. It also dispatched personnel to Iraq after the 2003 invasion, when it was known that there were no WMD in the war-torn country, to examine the possibility of planting such weapons in order to avoid the U.S.‘s embarrassment.

http://www.counterpunch.org/leupp01142006.html

A recent Raw Story report by Larissa Alexandrovna suggests that the notorious Office of Special Plans didn't just stovepipe cherrypicked "intelligence" to the White House and press. It also sent teams into Iraq after the invasion began, who after it became apparent that there were no abundant WMDs, examined the possibility of planting such weapons in order to help the president avoid embarrassment.

Citing "[t]hree U.S. intelligence sources and a source close to the United Nations Security Council" Alexandrova indicates that the OSP planned "off book" missions that were dispatched by Stephen Cambone, Defense Department intelligence chief, from March 2003. (Cambone now occupies the # 3 post in the Defense Department.) Teams sent to Iraq included "CIA, FBI, Green Berets, Delta Force operators, and commandos from the Navy's Special Warfare Development Group." Their first priority was to investigate an allegation made by disinformation master Ahmad Chalabi that a USN pilot shot down in 1991 and proclaimed KIA soon afterwards was being held as a POW in Iraq. (That was bogus.) The second was to deal with the WMD issue. The third was to get Saddam.

During the summer and fall of 2004 one unnamed team, according to the UN source, interviewed many Iraqi intelligence officers, telling them, "Our President is in trouble. He went to war saying there are WMD and there are no WMD. What can we do? Can you help us?" The Iraqis understood they were being asked to cooperate with a deception. "But," the UN source continues, "the guys were thinking this is absurd because anything put down would not pass the smell test and could be shown to be not of Iraqi origin and not using Iraqi methodology."

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/4939

Did the White House plan to 'find' WMD in Iraq until Brewster-Jennings intercepted their shipment? Was that why Plame was in their crosshairs long before Wilson's editorial?

Buried in a TPM Nov 18 blog about what the WH was really thinking when it invaded Iraq, Joshua Micah Marshall writes "This even leads to a sort of inverted conspiracy theorizing when people ask, 'If he knew there was no WMD, why didn't they at least try to plant some to avoid the catastrophic embarrassment which ensued after the war....The real answer, I think, is as banal as it is devastating: I don't think they ever gave it much thought -- not in the sense of trying to get to the heart of the matter."

This WH may be diabolical, but it's not stupid. Apparently, they gave it a lot of thought if the following is true. As Wayne Madsen reports (Nov 11):

"According to U.S. intelligence sources, the White House exposure of Valerie Plame and her Brewster Jennings & Associates was intended to retaliate against the CIA's work in limiting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. WMR has reported in the past on this aspect of the scandal. In addition to identifying the involvement of individuals in the White House who were close to key players in nuclear proliferation, the CIA Counter-Proliferation Division prevented the shipment of binary VX nerve gas from Turkey into Iraq in November 2002. The Brewster Jennings network in Turkey was able to intercept this shipment which was intended to be hidden in Iraq and later used as evidence that Saddam Hussein was in possession of weapons of mass destruction. U.S. intelligence sources revealed that this was a major reason the Bush White House targeted Plame and her network."

So, it's the old "genius but inept at the same time" chestnut yet again, is it? How stale. Is that all you can come up with?
Remember what a genius Hitler was? He had the finest minds in Germany and Austria on his staff as well. And yet they lost WWII..... how can that be? What does it prove? Not much at all.

The neocons planned and pulled off the BIG LIE of the century. They screwed up in some of the details though. And we here at VNN take note of them.

Why didn't the neo-khans plant WMD's in Iraq if they were so good at master-minding the destruction of WTC 7? That's what I want to know. They're both genius and inept at the same time!

Right on cue, hate dept. I suppose both you and Fissile would rather not discuss the thread topic, that being the rape and murder of Iraqi civilians by US troops. You both much prefer ad hominem or maundering about how war is cruel.

On that topic, is this what your crowd had in mind when the neoconservative cabal first conned the publc into a war to find alleged "WMD"s? How much more rape and murder in Iraq before they are satisfactorily brought democracy?

Do you think the GI perpetrators should be hanged if they are found guilty by courts martial? How about their commanding officers, their commander-in-chief?

They tried.
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=iraq_war&Number=294334176

http://www.counterpunch.org/leupp01142006.html

They TRIED? The masterminds of the greatest terrorist act ever...they TRIED? That's all you can come up with? Why couldn't they "pull it off"? All they had to do was plant the stuff! "They tried". What kind of pathetic bull shit is that.

By the way, that article looked like it was written by an amateur; lo and behold, it's attributed to Aljezeera. That's a great source isn't it.

What bullshit--Navy SEALS telling Iraqis that our president screwed up--"can you help us"?