Ten Principles of National Socialist Thought

I. BE HONEST. A National Socialist faces a fact whether he likes it or not.Dishonesty is the mark of the enemy. National Socialism above all representsliving truth in its purest form.

II. BELIEVE IN YOURSELF. Destiny subjects only its strongest mortals to enormous tasks which would crush lesser men. It wills only the best to fulfill the highest task of life: to perfect mankind. Give yourself utterly unto Destiny, and it will shield you in your fight. It helps only those who helpthemselves. We will lose only if we lay down our arms due to our weakness and cowardice. There is only one true disgrace: submission to the enemies ofour race.

III. BE FAITHFUL TO YOUR RACE. No one must be allowed to spoil what Nature created down through aeons of racial evolution. Your highest purposein life is to carry on that evolution toward a stronger, better, more beautiful mankind. The purity and strengthening of the Aryan race is the basic requirement of every future higher evolution.

IV. FIGHT FOR YOUR RACE. Fight for the holy ideals of National Socialism, the heart of your great race. Only in this struggle can you prove your true worth as a man or a woman. Only thus can you fulfill your potential for courage, dedication, and ennobling self-sacrifice. Life's struggle for survival brought Man upwards from the apelike beings of the distant past to the height of Aryan culture and achievement. The Party's struggle will produce the revolutionary elite who will lead the National Socialist ideal to victory.

V. YOU ARE A SUPERIOR INDIVIDUAL. You will be outnumbered in this struggle, because the best are always a minority. History-making decisions have never been the work of formless masses, but always victories by active and dedicated minorities. You are both the servant and the spokesperson for your race. Make sure you set an example worthy to be followed in your person and your life.

VI. LOVE YOUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS. You owe your existence to your racial family; let your love of them be your overriding passion in life. Do not fear the Undermen, the racially inferior, and do not persecute them. You are their superior, but you are not their owner. When the time comes to fight them, do not lose your senses through counterproductive hatred. Detach yourself, clear your mind, and destroy them completely, methodically, clinically, as if in a surgical operation. Nothing is more pointless than wasting time hating mud people; it detracts from the positive love of your own.

VII. IMPROVE YOUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS. All Aryan men and women are your brothers and sisters, although not all are equally intelligent or courageous. It is up to you to inform them, to encourage them, and to instill their hearts with courage. Some of your kinsfolk have been misled and made ugly by the Judaic evil which is corrupting our racial soul. You must not hate them on that account, but rather strive to bring them back to their racial family.

VIII. REJECT THE DECADENCE. Decadence is anything which detracts either physically or spiritually from the health and the upward development of our Aryan race. You must hold your racial and spiritual purity above your very life, and not associate with anything which is decadent or which gives your life the appearance of decadence. Every aspect of life must be judged in relation to the survival and improvement of your race; anything hindering these attainments must be ruthlessly rooted out and destroyed.

IX. THE BEST MUST RULE. All great achievements on earth are the product of great leadership, political or scientific or artistic. The racial community can gain strength only by applying the Leadership Principle and placing in front the men and women who have demonstrated superior ability, dedication, and tenacity in the racial struggle. Democracy is a sickness which leads inevitably to chaos, corruption, and the collapse of society; from democracy steps forth the cruelest of tyrants.

X. NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE. Where there is a will, there is a way. Everything falls before the man of indomitable will. Suffering and sacrifice are necessary; we are hardening ourselves for the most decisive struggle in all of human history. Victory will fall only to the most truthful, the most fanatical, the strongest, the bravest, and the best. Be that.

NATIONAL SOCIALISM -A LEFT-WING MOVEMENT
NORDLAND FOBLAG

For far too many years it has been widely accepted that National Socialists are extreme right- wingers, and only rarely have they hestitated to refer to themselves as such. At a certain point, however, it became the official policy of the World Union of National Socialists to avoid the term "right-wing," claiming that National Socialism does not fit into the pattern of "right" and "left" and instead ought to be considered as standing above this distinction. This most certainly was a step in the right direction, but at this time and within the context of the current struggle it might, however, be a good idea to reconsider the whole question about political wings and make a few points clear concerning the meaning of the terms "right" and "left" and their application to today's political scene.
Historically, the words" right" and. !left'' in reference to ( .political views originated in_, pre-revolutionary France, where i those who wanted to preserve the system of government^ more or less as it was sat^ to the. Right in the Natjonal Assembly, whereas those who wanted more radical changes sat to the left. Hence, the term "right" for the reactionaries and "left" for the revolutionaries— terms that have since become universally known and used. Neither the word "reactionary" nor the word "revolutionary," however, says anything universal about the particular views in question. They are both relative and receive their specific meaning only within a given historical context. The revolutionaries of former times, as for instance, the European National Liberals of the 19th century, do not seem very revolutionary today—quite the contrary!—just as .today's reactionaries would have been considered very revolutionary 200 years ago. When the Communists took over in Russia in 1917 they did so as revolutionaries out to overthrow an ineffective and corrupt regime, whereas today they represent the reactionary establishment facing a new revolutionary challenge.
In our time the traditional left wing is predominantly Marxist —even to such a degree that the very term "left wing" is thought to be synonymous with the word "Marxist." This, of course, has no basis in reality. Any revolutionary is a left-winger—it is just that the Marxists have had so little competition that they have been able to appropriate the term.
On the other side of the political spectrum we have the right wing, consisting of reactionaries who want to preserve the present society and the so-called Christian civilization of the West with its materialism and capitalism. The rightwingers stand up for traditional patriotic values: they are good Christians and good citizens who defend the Constitution and are loyal to their country and their monarch, if they have one. They are willing to go to war against any other nation to assert the greatness of their own—even if it means waging a nuclear war against another White country if they think its system of government threatens their own domestic order, no matter how corrupt and degenerate it may be. They are for an economy based on unrestricted free enterprise, regardless of the .consequences, but they resent the Liberal trend in politics as well as immigration and racial integration, because they fear any
changes that could upset the order to which they are accustomed.
Where National Socialists are to be found in this spectrum seems quite clear: We are leftwingers—no doubt about it! We do not want to preserve the present system or any part thereof. We do not believe in the foundations of a system that has led our people into the misery of the present time! We do not want to support any institution which is responsible for two world wars between White nations as well as countless minor wars;
nuclear rearmament; the pollution of the environment; unemployment; the total disillusionment of young people, who have lost all faith in the future; drug abuse; pornography; and all the other forms of complete degeneracy which are displayed today. We National Socialists want the most radical change of all: we want the complete overthrow of the entire Old Order!
Whereas Marxism shares a basic equalitarian philosophy with the Old Order and defines itself as a materialistic movement aiming at the mere redistribution of the material goods. National Socialism seeks to build an entirely New Order based on idealism and a profound respect for the laws of Nature in all aspects of life. This, definitely, is the most revolutionary idea of this century—and thus very much left-wing!—and it certainly is not Marxist! Compared to National Socialism, Marxism is nothing but a pseudo-revolutionary idea, invented by Christianity and upheld by Liberal Democracy: If all people are created equal, why should not all wealth be distributed equally among all people? Seen in this light, Marxism is simply part of the Old Order we want to destroy.
If National Socialism is, in its essence, a left-wing movement, it is, of course, paradoxical that National Socialists should have devoted so much time and energy to catering toward traditional right-wing attitudes, whereas they have shunned all openings to the left. Is it any wonder that all attempts to create a National Socialist movement on this basis have been utterly unsuccessful?
Where National Socialists are to be found in this spectrum seems quite clear: We are leftwingers—no doubt about it! We do not want to preserve the present system or any part thereof. We do not believe in the foundations of a system that has led our people into the misery of the present time! We do not want to support any institution which is responsible for two world wars between White nations as well as countless minor wars;
nuclear rearmament; the pollution of the environment; unemployment; the total disillusionment of young people, who have lost all faith in the future; drug abuse; pornography; and all the other forms of complete degeneracy which are displayed today. We National Socialists want the most radical change of all: we want the complete overthrow of the entire Old Order!
Whereas Marxism shares a basic equalitarian philosophy with the Old Order and defines itself as a materialistic movement aiming at the mere redistribution of the material goods. National Socialism seeks to build an entirely New Order based on idealism and a profound respect for the laws of Nature in all aspects of life. This, definitely, is the most revolutionary idea of this century—and thus very much left-wing!—and it certainly is not Marxist! Compared to National Socialism, Marxism is nothing but a pseudo-revolutionary idea, invented by Christianity and upheld by Liberal Democracy: If all people are created equal, why should not all wealth be distributed equally among all people? Seen in this light, Marxism is simply part of the Old Order we want to destroy.
If National Socialism is, in its essence, a left-wing movement, it is, of course, paradoxical that National Socialists should have devoted so much time and energy to catering toward traditional right-wing attitudes, whereas they have shunned all openings to the left. Is it any wonder that all attempts to create a National Socialist movement on this basis have been utterly unsuccessful?
The first precondition for creating anything in this world is that one has a clear idea of what one wants to achieve and how one can possibly achieve it. A sculptor who wants to create a work of art starts out with a mental concept, and then sets out to realize it in his chosen material. He does not just dabble around casually with his chisel on a piece of marble, wondering what the final result will be.
Thus, it is crucial to realize that National Socialism is not just a form of extreme rightism. Anybody within our ranks who still has such notions should devote himself to studying the idea of National Socialism to find its true meaning and significance—or, if he doesn't have the energy or ability to do so, he should find another outlet for his activities. This Movement does not have room for frustrated haters or religious dreamers, but only for devoted National Socialist revolutionaries!

* * *

Let us face it realistically: The right wing is mostly a pitiful conglomerate of people with very unclear ideas. They realize that something is wrong. But they refuse to leave the Old Order. Instead they cling to it with all their might and wish to revert to the situation as it was 75 or 100 years ago, thinking that this will solve all their problems. They simply fail to see that the mess we are in today is a logical result of the system we had 100 years ago—that the foundations of that system were not good and stable enough to safeguard us from the present development. The father of most of our problems is to be found in that very Christian idea, whose equalitarian philosophy and alien and unnatural teachings have robbed our people of its soul, but which they continue to praise as the very shield against the decline they see all around them. When all their futile attempts to halt the development fail, they become frustrated and turn into mere haters, because they have no real vision and no ideology.
It is a historical fact that nothing good has ever come out of the rightwing. If it had not been for such revolutionaries as Copernicus, Kepler, Giordano Bruno and Galileo, we should still believe that the earth is flat and the center of the universe. When capitalism developed, the establishment made no attempt to solve the social problems resulting from the industrial revolution, but went on to exploit the new working class mercilessly— thus giving rise to revolutionary thoughts as expressed in Marxist ideology. And all the necessary and just social improvements we have seen during the past 100 years have only been introduced after hard pressure from the left wing, with right-wing conservatives in constant retreat, pitifully trying to preserve as much as possible for themselves.
This does not mean, of course, that any effort to overthrow an established system is, per se, good. If man .succeeds in creating a new natural order which does not fossilize but remains a living organism and develops within the boundaries of natural law, adopting new scientific and philosophical insights into the nature of life without clinging to outdated conceptions, it would, indeed, be a most serious offense to try to uproot that order and revert to egoistic materialism, Christianity, or any other unnatural philosophy. What is good and bad can solely be judged on the basis of natural law—the closer to it the better.
It is almost universally accepted that there is a gulf between National Socialism and Marxism. By the same token, however, National Socialists are certainly not rightwingers either. The only common ground National Socialism seems to have with the right wing is the racial issue..But here too there is an extreme difference in the outlook. The rightwingers believe that being White holds an absolute value in itself, which elevates the Aryan race over all other living organisms and gives it a right to do with the world what it wants to. As National Socialists, however, we are not just concerned about the life and immediate wellbeing of our own race. We see the White race as part of the whole natural order of the universe and our wish to preserve it is linked with our wish to preserve the entire natural environment—including other human races—out of a deep Copernicus, Kepler, Giordano Bruno and Galileo, we should still believe that the earth is flat and the center of the universe. When capitalism developed, the establishment made no attempt to solve the social problems resulting from the industrial revolution, but went on to exploit the new working class mercilessly— thus giving rise to revolutionary thoughts as expressed in Marxist ideology. And all the necessary and just social improvements we have seen during the past 100 years have only been introduced after hard pressure from the left wing, with right-wing conservatives in constant retreat, pitifully trying to preserve as much as possible for themselves.
This does not mean, of course, that any effort to overthrow an established system is, per se, good. If man .succeeds in creating a new natural order which does not fossilize but remains a living organism and develops within the boundaries of natural law, adopting new scientific and philosophical insights into the nature of life without clinging to outdated conceptions, it would, indeed, be a most serious offense to try to uproot that order and revert to egoistic materialism, Christianity, or any other unnatural philosophy. What is good and bad can solely be judged on the basis of natural law—the closer to it the better.
It is almost universally accepted that there is a gulf between National Socialism and Marxism. By the same token, however, National Socialists are certainly not rightwingers either. The only common ground National Socialism seems to have with the right wing is the racial issue.. But here too there is an extreme' difference in the outlook. The rightwingers believe that being White holds an absolute value in itself, which elevates the Aryan race over all other living organisms and gives it a right to do with the world what it wants to. As National Socialists, however, we are not just concerned about the life and immediate wellbeing of our own race. We see the White race as part of the whole natural order of the universe and our wish to preserve it is linked with our wish to preserve the entire natural environment—including other human races—out of a deep respect for the inscrutable wisdom of Nature.
No doubt, our race has great possibilities in its intellectual capacity, but its abilities have absolutely no value as such, however, if they are not put to the right use in accordance with the laws of Nature. For much too long we have joined in the chorus claiming "White Power," and ignored the sad fact that our race has had the absolute power for at least 2000 years. And it is exactly this power that has led to the kind of society we have today.
Thus, we do not share the right-wing belief in continuous technological and economical expansion, which has already led to the pollution of air and water and has made huge areas of the world unfit to live in for all species—a development which means that the ozone layer in the atmosphere is systematically destroyed so that coming generations are going to be exposed to life-threatening radiation, that tropical forests which had supplied us with oxygen, are cut down to make room for industrial growth, and that the deserts are irrigated so that the ground water level sinks in fertile areas, which then become deserts in turn. All this is the result of Aryan genius, without which it would not have existed—genius which has not been put to work to build a better world for our children and grandchildren, but only to satisfy the human greed of the moment, to secure a pleasant life now without regard for the future. This fatal trend, which by the standards of natural law, has most certainly turned the industrialized White countries of the West into a far more degenerate state than any so-called primitive society of the Third World, is violently supported by the right wing, which seems to think that everything would be just fine if only the Blacks, the Jews, and the Boat People were expelled. We know that in itself this would not change anything at all.
Our aim is a complete spiritual rebirth, and it is our immediate goal to define and build the foundations for this rebirth— which is the only thing that can give the racial struggle any meaning. And this struggle should not be understood as a struggle against other races, but as a relentless fight against

the decadence of our own race. The isolated appeal to Race as the basis of a new society is meaningless, unless we can overcome this decadence and find our way back to natural values. // our race can only survive within the context of the present system, we do not want it to survive, because then it would represent nothing but the grossest form of anti-natural degeneracy. The claim for "White Power" can only gain any meaning if, by that, we mean the wish to reactivate the power of Nature as it rests latently in the genius of the White man, whose duty it is to put this power to use in order to uphold the very principle of life.
Of course, this does not mean that we are in favor of any kind of multiracialism. Race is one of the cornerstones of the natural order, and thus must be defended like all other natural principles. It certainly does not mean that the white color of one's skin is necessarily a hallmark of human quality. The White race has allowed the world to slide to the brink of disaster, and unless it can be brought to realize that the quality oflif& can be improved by replacing the materialistic consumer's society— which is the supreme goal of both Marxism and Liberalism— by natural and spiritual values, it is doomed and will only be destroy the whole planet in the process of its absolute decline.
Naturally, National Socialists do not think that we should go back to the Stone Age caves; But we do think that we should never take more out of Nature than we put back into her. The quality of life should mean more to us than the quality of material goods.
In today's disillusioned society, growing numbers of people realize this and, what is more, they protest against the ruling order. They do not become National Socialists, however, for one simple reason: They are not aware that National Socialism—and only National Socialism!—can solve today's crucial problems. Instead they allow their protest movements to be taken over by the Marxists, who are better at selling their product than we are, despite the fact that no Marxist government has ever made the slightest attempt to tackle these issues—simply because the very concept of Marxism is materialistic, and at no point concerned with natural values. The Marxists merely use popular dissatisfaction with the establishment to promote Marxism. The dissatisfied individuals themselves are not at all Marxists to begin with.
While National Socialists run around trying to win over small fringe groups of traditional rightwingers with all their political and religious hang-ups , their notorious megalomania, and their lack of commitment to a cause—resulted from their being constantly on the defensive trying to save what has to go—the Marxists get a foothold among concerned citizens who renounce unlimited materialism out of an idealistic concern for the future of our planet. For the most part, these people do not realize that preservation of the natural order calls for more far-reaching measures than the control of pollution and the abolition of nuclear energy and the atomic bomb. They do not see that it also demands racial separation and a general spiritual revival that can lead Man back to the sources of life. They can also learn this, however—or rather, they cannot help but see it— if they are provided with the necessary information and insight and not left exposed to the exclusive influence of asinine Marxist teachings. These .people are idealistic and for Nature, and thus they really belong to us—and they are generally far more valuable as fighters than a good many disillusioned youngsters who call themselves National Socialists in an attempt to boost their egos and hide their personal problems and insecurity behind a self-styled uniform and ludicrous ranks and titles. But the environmentalists are not attracted by storm troopers or by hate propaganda, all of which just confirms their negative impression of National Socialism. Nor does it help to talk to them about the significance of Race, because they have not yet come so far in their development that they can see the relevance of the racial issue. They must be approached where they are and on issues that concern them here and now. To do this, it is necessary to produce good material on the environmental problems as seen from the National Socialist point of view, and to go into the groups where these people gather in protest against nukes, pollution and nuclear warfare. We cannot expect the environmentalists to come to us, because they have no way of knowing what National Socialism is all about; and if we fail to get in contact with them, they will be lost to the Marxists, in whose hands they are never going to realize the full consequence of their own attitude.
These new protesters are hostile to us—simply because of decades of enemy propaganda, which has not only alienated sound and intelligent people from any kind of movement which overtly expresses National Socialist ideas, but which has also succeeded in attracting a large number of individuals to our movement who suit this propaganda image of National Socialism only too well, and who come to us simply because they want to live up to this image. They want to be such murderous, bloodthirsty beasts as they have come to know from countless Hollywood productions and yellow-press accounts of the terrible "Nazis."
For far too long we have welcomed such psychopaths into our ranks and for far too long we have failed to dissociate ourselves from other organizations which do the same. Because people call themselves National Socialists and wave the Swastika does not make them our comrades! Many organizations still do not realize this, and as long as they do not do so they are doomed—and, unfortunately, so are we, if we do not take every opportunity which offers itself to denounce them in public. It has often been said that we should not "wash our dirty linen" in front of our enemies and that all "internal strife" should be kept within our own walls. However, this is not our linen and it most certainly is not "internal strife"—it is a necessary cleaning operation, and it must be carried out in public.
Our worst enemies are not the Jews or the Communists, but the very people who while calling themselves National Socialists debase the fundamental concepts of the National Socialist philosophy through their behavior, thus confirming the distorted impression of our Idea conveyed to the public by our enemy. Indeed, we can feel no loyalty towards such people and no friendship. On the contrary, we have to rid ourselves of any connection with them whatsoever, and go out of our way to show people that they do not belong to us. Above all, we should take great pains to do exactly those things that are not expected of us. We are expected to embrace just about any right winger who waves a Swastika—and we are most certainly not expected to be found anywhere near the leftwing, simply because people have been told over and over again that we are right wingers . Consequently, we should deliberately show them that they have been misinformed. The surprise effect will be likely to make at least some people listen to what we have to say. Furthermore, it is going to make people think twice about what they are told concerning National Socialism when they realize that they have been lied to once on this subject.

* * *

In this connection, it should be noted that we are not a historical association. Many National Socialists seem to think that we are going to revive National Socialist Germany and transplant it to other parts of the world. This is the way our enemy would like to make us look, but this is not the case! National Socialist Germany represents an attempt—and a not altogether successful attempt!—to organize a National Socialist community at a given time and in a given historical context. It can inspire us and we can learn from it—but we cannot revive it—nor should we ever try to. It was an experiment designed to deal with a set of problems that were of major concern to the German people at the time, but which are not necessarily felt as equally important by people today.
When Hitler set out on his historical mission to reorganize Germany about 60 years ago, the entire German nation was at its knees economically, militarily, and politically. After the defeat in World War I, Germany not only lost all its colonies, but an enormous part of its European territory settled by several million Germans who found themselves cut off from their mother country, living a miserable life as minorities in foreign countries that only wished to wipe them out. What was left of Germany was totally demilitarized, and the weight of outrageous claims for reparations put forward by the conquerors caused the most hideous inflation in world history and crushed any possibility of economic recovery. In this situation a small minority of Jewish immigrants from the East slowly gained control of the shattered economy, as well as the entire cultural and political life of the country. Compared to this situation, all talk about a present economic crisis is ludicrous. Materially, any country of the West and most Communist countries are far better off than Germany was in the '20s. Today it is a matter of selling the family car and perhaps moving to a cheaper apartment. In Germany it was simply a question of surviving.

* * *

Morally, however, we are faced with a much graver threat than Hitler was. His Germany was still a fairly homogeneous country, where most people shared a set of common values and norms and a common belief in the cultural tradition of the nation. They wanted to regain their former power—they wanted to be strong and respected by other nations. Hitler did not have to tell them to love their people and their race. He could take it for granted that they did. Their values and norms were not necessarily all in accordance with National Socialist philosophy, but they were a sound basis on which a National Socialist state could be built without too many difficulties, and thus Hitler could concentrate his political propaganda on more mundane things.
He was living in thoroughly revolutionary times, in which the need for work and food was of paramount importance, and he knew that a program which could secure these things would give him the support of the voters and thus enable him to gain power so that he could try to realize his political vision which, of course, went much further than the immediate need for material things.
However, as we all know, National Socialism was not the only revolutionary force in Germany at that time. The Communists had exactly the same advantages as Hitler: a starving population willing to try almost anything to survive. They also had the advantage over Hitler that they could point to the successful revolution in Russia. Hitler had nothing of the kind to which he could relate his struggle. And it is noteworthy that he did not link his movement to any of the powerful right-wing ideologies of the past such as the monarchy or the churches. His approach was thoroughly left-wing and equally opposed to the Establishment and the Communist Party. When, at last, he won over the Communists, it was not by beating them into silence, but by draining away their support by taking up the same issues as the Communists and pointing out a better solution—all of which convinced the German worker that he could be a better and more competent leader than Thaelmann, who was head of the German Communist Party, would be. He talked to people about what concerned them in the language of his time and adopted a military style, which was popular in a country full of ex-servicemen who had any reason to feel betrayed by the government and which was also useful in a situation where you had to fight the numerous Communist murder gangs, who used very much the same style and language as Hitler.
To try to imitate Hitler's style today would be political suicide. As a matter of fact it has been the end of every group which has tried it so far. Nor can you take over Hitler's propaganda material. To translate it, reprint it, or imitate it in a different context as anything but historical study material is ridiculous. Hitler was catering to the German masses of the 1930s. Apart from everything else we must realize and accept that there is no way to win the masses in the present situation. Today, we are looking for a small ,number of idealists. To find them_we have to turn our attention to, problems that concern exactly the.tipe of people_we are looking for: pollution the nuclear threat, the| curse* of multinational Capitalism, etc, Most of these problems were unknown to Hitler's contemporaries—but that is no reason not to tackle them! Our world has become much more complicated than it was 50 years ago, and any political movement that fails to take this into account reduces itself to an anachronistic fossil.
We must admit that generally we have tended to speak and write too much about National Socialist Germany. In spite of all the good we may be able to show that Hitler did for Germany, the people we are looking for today are not really very interested in what happened 50 years ago. They are concerned about their own time—and the future.
When we cling so desperately to the past, one of the reasons is, of course, that National Socialist Germany is the only example of applied National Socialism the world has ever seen and that those 12 short years represent the only glory and 'success our Movement has ever had. This is understandable. We need it in these difficult times of humiliation and persecution. We need it to show to ourselves that National Socialism once was victorious—in spite of all adversity.
However, it is extremely dangerous when this respect and admiration for the past, instead of being a productive inspiration, becomes a nostalgic fixation on a bygone era, a blind, love for the paraphernalia of the NSDAP, the uniforms, the symbols, the ranks, the haircuts, and even for the linguistic style of the '30s. Not the outward appearance but the inherent idea is important, and we have to get on from there. Like Hitler, we must avoid being trapped by history. In other words, we must show how National Socialism can solve the unemployment problem today—not merely how Hitler solved it in 1933.
The idea behind National Socialism transcends Hitler and Nalional Socialism itself. Hitler applied it to an earlier time and place; we have to apply it to our own. It is timeless, because it represents the very principle according to which Nature lives and creates. It has existed since the beginning of time and is going to exist forever, as long as the universe exists, no matter whether the Aryan race—or mankind as such, for that matter-exists or not. Man has abandoned this principle, and it is our task to show him that he cannot do so unpunished, and that all his present problems are caused by the insane belief that man is elevated above Nature. In doing so. we should be as little tied with National Socialist Germany as the other leftists are tied up with the Soviet Union.

* * *

We should also learn a great deal from the way the other leftist groups are organized. It is commonplace to claim that Marxist organizations consist of human waste. This may, of course, be true of the followership of some groups, but the hard core of the serious Marxist organizations is organized along lines that are certain secure quality and devotion. Members .are. very ofter tithed_.and they are required_to spend a certain number of. flights every ....week with ideological trainig end Practical activites. Altogether, the demands put on a Marxist far exceed anything we have ever dared to expect of our members. This says something about quality, and it also explains why the Marxists are doing so much better than we are— despite the fact that what they preach is utter nonsense.
Among National Socialists, however, taking stands or adopting methods which are normally considered to be Marxist seems to be met with a good deal of fear of somehow being "contaminated" by Marxism. It would give us a bad name among both friends and enemies, they claim. Now, we certainly have a bad name already—to be quite honest, it could hardly get any worse. But as we are not too concerned about winning over traditional conservatives, what does it matter? If they cannot tell the difference between Communism and National Socialism, it is their problem, not ours! In that case, they show a lack of intelligence that makes them useless for us in any event. We cannot allow our enemies to determine what is a National Socialist viewpoint and what is not, and we sure cannot leave all the good causes to the Marxists, just to please people who have proven to be totally useless to us anyway. We have already done that for far too long—and that is another reason why Marxists have been so successful and have been able to take over vast segments of our culture and intellectual life, while National Socialists have allowed themselves to feel obligated to say "yes" to NATO, the European Common Market, the bomb, Capitalism, unlimited "free enterprise," etc. It is time that this be changed! Let us not continue to do what people have been led to expect of us. Let us do what National Socialism teaches us to do—not what people think it ought to teach us.
In this connection the sad truth, is that many National Socialists in their traditional thinking have fallen victims of the worst kind of rightwing anti-Communist propaganda. The main threat against Man most certainly does not emanate from Moscow, Peking or Havana. There is absolutely no way you can blame the Communists for the sorry state of the world today-tor drug abuse, crime, pornography, nuclear rearmament, racial integration, pollution and so on. It is our own present system of government that is to blame—neither the Communists, nor the Jews! We have to realize that these evils have been created by our own corrupt and morally depraved politicians and stockbrokers and that we, the Aryan peoples of the world, have ourselves allowed it to get this bad. It is not a foreign government but this present system which is a threat to the existence of the planet, and without this system there would not be any Soviet Union or any other Communist state today. Communism would have been wiped out during World War II if the West had not given the Soviet Union the necessary arms and technology. Even today, all Communist states would immediately disintegrate if they were not constantly supported by Western governments and bankers, who earn fortunes on trade with These countries—and on lending them money. The Communists certainly know this, and they have more than enough to do keeping Eastern Europe in line arid securing the Communist regime in Afghanistan to constitute a serious danger to the West. Interestingly, the same multinational corporations which generate huge profits on trade with the Communist bloc, make another fortune on the production of arms our politicians try to persuade us are necessary to defend ourselves against the Communists—as if you can defend anything by destroying all life in a nuclear war. This is, of course utterly ridiculous—but it is nonetheless the political and financial system so vigorously supported by the rightwing.
No doubt about it: Communism would most certainly be a very unpleasant thing, but it would not be the end of the world. Christian liberal democracy most likely would! There is far more racial purity in Eastern Europe than anywhere in the West—simply because their inefficient economic system does not attract large-scale Third World immigration; and the racial consciousness of the Russians, who are the dominant nation in the Soviet Union, definitely promises a better prospect for the survival of the Aryan race than the visions of liberal and conservative American politicians. It is true, of course, that Communism does not support racial principles in theory—but with Communism theory and practice are two very different things. No doubt the materialism offered by the West is more attractive here and now, but this pleasant life is more likely to be followed by a deluge that might well wipe out all life on earth. However, with a sound political system in the West, Communist states could not exist. They simply would not be able to survive on their own, and their hungry populations would rebel. Very much the same thing would happen if the Communists were to take over the West—their regime would not last very long.

* * *

At this point someone might venture to ask whether we should not then abolish all talk about National Socialism and the Swastika and disguise ourselves as "real" leftwingers witha new idea that could easily be sold to people under a different name. This, of course, is not possible. To try such an approach is to underestimate our enemies. They really do not mind the name or the symbol. What they mind is the idea, and you could not disguise that beyond recognition. Our enemy will always oppose anything that is good for our people, and they would— rightfully! —claim that we are just "Nazis." Then we would have to devote a lot of effort to "proving" that we are not. This would be ridiculous. Many organizations have tried it; none has ever succeeded.
There is only the difficult way: to prove that National Socialism is not what people think is and that it is the only way to secure the survival of life on this planet. We know that we are in a weak position, but quite frankly, we should rather be glad that we do not have to worry about taking over power right here and now. We simply would not be able to handle it. This is one of the unpleasant facts that many National Socialists—and people who call themselves National Socialists—seem to overlook completely. It would be of little use to us to win over the masses tomorrow, when we do not have the necessary number of National Socialist experts to make a National Socialist state work. We need economists, jurists, administrators, biologists, etc., who are also National Socialists. Power must never be an aim in itself. We want ,to create a New Order because we want a better world, but a better world cannot be created just out of the blue sky. It takes a lot of dedicated people with thoroughgoing education to carry out such a task: and right now it is more important to win over a number of these people, than to fight a losing battle in the streets to impress a number of bigots and losers.
Again National Socialist Germany furnishes us with a very instructive example. One of the reasons why the experiment to create a National Socialist order right from the beginning could not be completed and a new state could not survive the pressure from the outside world was that Adolf Hitler had to rely on a large number of experts who had nothing but disdain for National Socialism. He simply did not have the time to train and educate enough- National Socialists because he had to concentrate on winning the people before the Communists could take over. We should be grateful that we have no such worry. We could never win a revolutionary victory under the present circumstances anyway, so let us concentrate on establishing a sound foundation for a future mass movement.
However, let us be realists. This, too, could be a losing battle. We have no guarantee that we are ever going to win. To be quite honest, we have nothing but a very vague hope to support the belief that we can win. However, Nature herself may wipe mankind from the surface of the earth because it has neglected the laws of the universe. This may be what is in store for us. We National Socialists, however, have decided not to accept such a development without a fight—even against all odds! But we have no desire to be martyrs for a lost cause—and that is exactly what we are going to be if we stick to the old ways. As a Movement we have been notably unsuccessful so far. It is time to wake up and recognize the true significance of our ideas. A first step is to become revolutionary professionals. We must leave all half-cocked right-wing attitudes behind us and realize that we are left wingers. Furthermore, we should stop blaming others for our misery. We have been our own worst enemies in all respects, and we need no scapegoats! Any change we desire has to start as a change in the basic attitude of our own people. This is a heavy task—but the thought of what is going to happen if we do not win makes it worthwhile to give it a try!

RIGHT WING: NATIONAL-SOCIALISTS ARE NOT
by Colin Jordan

In rigorously resisting and rejecting all the befuddling and distracting talk about uniting the "right wing" with us as part of it, we must from this moment onwards completely and constantly disown this term as applied so commonly, wrongly and harmfully to us, along with the nationalists. This rejection is a vital part of the purification and clarification nec- essary for the creation of the combat efficient force we must have for our victory. We National-Socialists are no part of Democracy's political pattern, right, left or centre. We are wholly outside it and wholly against it, and intent on declaring and demonstrating this.

As part of the rejection of the right wing label, along with calls for our involvement in right wing unity, we have firmly to resist and sternly to expose and denounce the recurrent disposition of those who accept the label to fancy that there is some easier way to better things by fondly grasping at some right wing figure of Democracy's old parties as some shin- ing white hope of salvation. We have had this furore in the past here in the U.K. with Enoch Powell serving Democracy as a safety valve on the issue of Coloured immigration, appearing to wishful thinkers galore to be raising a banner of competent revolt against this alien invasion, while all the time remaining a devotee of the system inherently responsible for it.

Recently another pied piper from the same political abode playing much the same political tune to beguile the public and boost his prestige, came on stage and predictably attracted an instant accolade from the legions of undiscerning optimists who seemingly never learn. This second seducer was appropriatelya second Winston Churchill. His grandfather was that calamitous character who, for the benefit of the Jewish cause which he espoused for his political and financial advancement, put us into and kept us in the inferno of the Second World War to the bitter end of unconditional surrender to an insanity resulting in all our present afflictions.

Winston No.2 won all his instantaneous and resounding hurrahs from the credulous congregation of the right wing for what resolved down into no more than a virtually useless proposal to slow down slightly the process of making Britain Coloured. Thus all he had to offer was a slight delay in attaining this culmination of that descent to ruin so powerfully pro- moted by that supreme showman of spurious patriotism, his grandfather, winston No.1. A founder-member of the Inter-parliamentary Council against Anti-Semitism, who has told the London Jewish Chronicle that he wants "ex- emplary sentences" for those "who incite racism" , Winston No. 2, toast of the nitwits of the right wing, did not even call for a complete stop to further immigration. So he never went beyond this to suggest anything at all to encourage the departure of any part of the millions who are already here, thanks to all he and his Conservative and Liberal and Labour fellow political criminals have or have not done over the decades since his grandfather made war on Aryan racial resurgence.

Even if, contrary to both Churchills, all further Coloured immigration was permanently stopped tomorrow, there are already so many Coloureds here, and they are breeding so fast that it is only a matter of time, and not so very long at that, before they become Democracy's majority. Then the Aryans who have trod, worked, fought for the land, and died here time out of mind, bringing about a unique blend of blood and soil, will become a dissipated, demoralized, dwindling minority in what was once their homeland, facing extinction by reduced reproduction and miscegenation. That is our destiny under Democracy, the death system of the Aryan.

Even if, in addition to stopping all further entry by Coloureds, there was some encouragement to repatriation solely on a voluntary basis by means of some financial inducement, as has been proposed in various circles of the right wing, it would be woefully inadequate to remove the Coloured set- tlers as a whole or any great part of them. Coloured immigrants swarmed here and still do, despite the tricks of Democracy's politicians to dis- semble -precisely because of the benefits of residence and citizenship. The vast majority of them will only be induced to depart voluntarily if, in addition to any reasonable repatriation grant and other assistance, those benefits are withdrawn from them, something you can be absolutely certain the politicians of Democracy, along with right wing nationalists, will never contemplate.

Генерал Леон Дегрел: Хитлерова Енигма

Хитлер... Знали сте га... Какав је био?

То питање ми је било постављено хиљаду пу.та од 1945. и ни на шта ми није теже да одговорим. Скоро две стотине хиљада књига се бавило Другим светским ратом и његовом централном личношћу Адолфом Хитлером. Али, да ли је прави Адолф Хитлер откривен било којом од њих? ¨Хитлерова енигма је изнад свих људских поимања¨, једном је написао немачки левичарски недељник ¨Die Zeit¨.

Салвадор Дали, јединствени уметнички геније, тражио је да продре у мистерију једном од својих најдраматичнијих слика. Слика високог планинског предела попуњава платно, остављајући свега неколико метара морске обале обележене тачком са нежном умањеном људском фигуром: последњи сведок умирујуће тишине. Велика телефонска секретарица капље крваве сузе са грана мртвог дрвета; ту и тамо обешени кишобрани и слепи мишеви чији визуелни наговештај је исти.

Онда се поверио: ¨Сматрао сам да је ова слика дубоко пророчанска. Али признајем, још увек нисам израчунао Хитлерову енигму. Он ме је привукао само као објекат моје луде имагинације, зато што сам га видео као човека јединствено способног да окрене ствари наглавачке.¨ Каква лекција из милосрђа за гласне критичаре који су од 1945. похрлили у штампу са својим хиљадама књига, већином презривих, о овом човеку који је толико узнемирио Далијеву интроспективу, да се он после четрдесет година осећао болно и осећао несигурност у присуству своје сопствене халуцине слике. Осим Далија, ко је други икада покушао да направи објективан портрет овог изузетно необичног човека, кога је Дали означио као најексплозивнију фигуру у историји човечанства?

КАО ПАВЛОВЉЕВ САТ

Брдо књига о Хитлеру, базирано на бљеску мржње и игнорисања, мало доприноси описивању и објашњавању најмоћнијег човека кога је свет икада видео. Да ли хиљаде ових портрета Хитлера било како личе на човека кога сам ја знао? Хитлер је седео поред мене, стајао, причао и слушао. Било је немогуће објаснити људима да оно што су слушали или читали на телевизији не стоји у сагласности са истином.

Људи радије прихватају измишљотину, поновљену хиљадама пу.та, него реалност. Иако никада нису причали с њиме, никада чули речи из његових уста. Баш то Хитлерово име одмах призива гримасу ђавола, извор свих негативних емоција. Као Павловљев сат, спомињање Хитлера означава изостављање битног и реалности. На време, међутим, историја ће демандовати све накупљене осуде.

НЕОБИЧНО ПРИВЛАЧАН

Хитлер је увек присутан пред мојим очима као човек мира 1936. и као човек рата 1944. Немогуће је бити лични сведок тако необичног човека, а не бити обележен тиме за цео живот. Не прође ни дан а да се Хитлер не јави у мом сећању, не као човек одавно мртав, него као живи створ који је прошао канцеларијским подом, седео на столици, гурнуо дрво у камин.

Прва ствар коју је свако примећивао када га угледа били су његови мали бркови. Безброј пу.та су му саветовали да их обрије, али је увек одбијао; људи су навикли на њега таквог какав је био.

Није био висок... не више него Наполеон или Александар Велики. Имао је дубоке плаве очи за које су многи мислили да су чаробне, иако ја нисам тако мислио. Нити сам опажао струју сигурности из његових руку за које су рекли да ће одустати. У неколико прилика сам их брзо ухватио и никад нисам био погођен њиховом светлошћу. Његово лице је показивало осећај равнодушности према страсти или болу тренутка. У тренуцима када је био умртвљен не говорећи ни речи, његова вилица се померала као да меље неку препреку у парампарчад. Онда би изненада оживео и упустио се у директан разговор с тобом, иако би уствари држао говор маси од неколико стотина хиљада људи на берлинском пољу Темплхоф. Онда би се преобразио. Чак и његова комплексност, иначе досадна, развезла би се док је причао. И у тим временима, сигурни смо, Хитлер је био необично привлачан као поседник магичне снаге.

ИЗУЗЕТНА СНАГА

Све што би могло изгледати превише узвишено у његовим коментарима, он би брзо ублажио призвуком хумора. Живописни свет, љутите фразе, све су биле под његовом контролом. Брзина којом би осликавао слику света доносила је осмех, или би почео с неким неочекиваним и умирујућим поређењем. Могао је бити оштар и чак неумољив у својим одлукама, и скоро увек у исто време бити изненађујуће помирљив, осећајан и топао.

После 1945. Хитлер је оптужен за свакакве ужасе, али он није био човек такве грозне природе. Волео је децу. Сасвим природна ствар за њега је била да заустави ауто и подели своју храну с младим бициклистима дуж пу.та. Једном је дао свој кишни мантил оронулом човеку који се гегао по киши. У поноћ он би прекидао посао и припремао храну за свог пса Блонди.

Није могао поднети да једе месо, јер је то значило смрт живог створења. Одбијао је да једе зеца или пастрмку, који су били жртвовани да би њему обезбедили храну. Дозвољавао је само јаја на свом столу, јер је јаје значило да је кокошка била поштеђена, пре него убијена. Хитлерове навике у исхрани су за мене биле сталан извор чуђења. Како би неко са тако ригорозним распоредом, ко је имао удела у десетинама исцрпљујућих масовних окупљања из којих се појављивао окупан знојем, често том приликом губећи један или два килограма, ко је спавао само три или четири сата ноћу, и ко је 1940-1945. носио цео свет на својим леђима, ко је владао над преко три стотине осамдесет милиона Европљана, како би, размишљао сам, физички преживео само на куваним јајима, неколико парадајза, две до три палачинке и гомили резанаца? Али он је уствари добијао на тежини.

Пио је само воду. Није пушио и није дозвољавао пушење у његовом присуству. У један или два сата ноћу још увек би говорио, неузнемирен, близу свог камина, живахан, често забаван. Никада није показивао знаке умора. Његова публика би могла бити преморена, али он не!

Описивали су га као старог, уморног човека. Ништа није даље од истине. Септембра 1944. представљали су га као прилично излапелог. Ја сам провео једну недељу са њим. Његова ментална и физичка снага је била још увек прихватљива. Напад на његов живот који се одиграо 20. јула, ако ништа друго растеретио га је. Пио је чај у својим одајама у миру, као да смо били у његовом приватном апартману у канцеларији пре рата или да уживамо гледајући снег и чисто плаво небо кроз велики прозор у Берхтесгадену.

ГВОЗДЕНА САМОКОНТРОЛА

На самом крају живота, сигурно, леђа су му се повила, али ум му је био бистар као зрак светлости. Тестамент који је сталожено диктирао уочи ноћи своје смрти, у три ујутро двадесет деветог априла '45, пружа нам трајно сведочанство. Наполеон на Фонтенблоу није био без тренутака панике пре него што га је напустио. Хитлер се једноставно руковао са својим заменицима у тишини, доручковао као и сваки други дан, и пошао у смрт као да иде у лагану шетњу. Да ли је историја икада била сведок тако енормне трагедије доведене до краја с таквом челичном самоконтролом?

Хитлерова најизраженија карактеристика је била његова једноставност. Најкомплексније проблеме решавао је сам уз неколико основних принципа. Његове акције су биле усклађене с идејама и одлукама које је свако могао да разуме. Радник из Есена, изолован фармер, рурски индустријалац и универзитетски професор могли су са лакоћом пратити начин његовог размишљања. Јасноћа његовог резоновања је све чинила очигледним.

Његов начин живота и понашања се никад нису променили, чак и када је постао владар Немачке. Облачио се и живео скромно. Током својих младалачких дана у Минхену, није трошио више од једне марке дневно за храну. Никада у животу није трошио превише на себе. Током свих тринаест година канцелар никада није носио новчаник или новац са собом.

КОМПЈУТЕРИЗОВАНИ МОЗАК

Хитлер је био самоук и није се трудио да сакрије ту чињеницу. Његово знање се састојало од селективног и истрајног проучавања и знао је много више од хиљада углађених академика.

Мислим да нико никада није читао као он. Обично је читао једну књигу дневно, увек прво читајући крај и преглед да би одмерио најинтересантнији део за себе. Имао је моћ да изведе суштину сваке књиге и затим је запамти у свом компјутеризованом мозгу. Чуо сам га како прича о компликованим научним књигама са савршеном прецизношћу, чак и у огњу рата.

Његова интелектуална радозналост је била безгранична. Читачки је био упознат с делима најразноврснијих аутора и ништа није било превише комплексно за његово резоновање. Дубоко је разумео Буду, Конфучија и Исуса Христа, затим Лутера, Калвина и Савонаролу и писце дивове као што су Данте, Шилер, Шекспир и Гете, као и аналитичке писце као што су Ренан и Говино, Чембрлен и Сорел.

Вежбао се у филозофији читајући Аристотела и Платона. Могао је да цитира целе параграфе Шопенхауера и дуго времена је носио џепно издање Шопенхауера са собом. Ниче га је научио много о моћи воље. Његова глад за знањем је била неугасива. Провео је стотине сати проучавајући дела Тацитуса и Момсена, војне стратегије као што су Клаузевицева, и градитеља империја као што је Бизмарк. Ништа није заобилазио: светску историју ни историју цивилизација, дела као што су Библија и Талмуд, томистичку филозофију и сва огромна дела Хомера, Софокла, Хорација, Овидија, Титуса и Цицерона. Знао је Јулијана Апостату као да је био његов савременик.

Његово знање је проширено механиком. Знао је како машине раде; разумевао је балистику разноликог оружја; задивљивао најбоље медицинске научнике својим знањем медицине и биологије. Универзалност Хитлеровог знања је могла да изненади и да се не допадне онима који је нису били свесни, али и поред тога, историјска чињеница је да је Хитлер био један од најкултивисанијих људи овог века. Много пу.та више од Черчила, интелектуалног медиокритета, од Пјера Лавала који је имао пуко познавање историје, од Рузвелта, или Ајзенхауера који никада није отишао даље од детективских романа.

МЛАДИ АРХИТЕКТА

Већ током својих најранијих дана, Хитлер је био другачији од остале деце. Имао је унутрашњу снагу и био усредсређен духом и инстинктима. Вешто је цртао са само једанаест година. Његови цртежи урађени у тим годинама показују особиту сигурност и живахност. Први цртежи и акварели, цртани када је имао само 15 година, пуни су поезије и осећајности. Један од његових највише задивљујућих раних радова, ¨Тврђава утопија¨, такође показује да је био уметник изузетне имагинације. Уметнички је био оријентисан у многим правцима. Још као младић писао је и поезију. Диктирао је целе комаде својој сестри Паули која је била запрепашћена његовом стваралачком слободом. Са шеснаест година је покренуо у Бечу стварање опере. Чак је дизајнирао и уређење на бини, као и све костиме; наравно, ликови су били Вагнерови хероји.

Више од обичног уметника, Хитлер је био изнад свега архитекта. Стотине његових радова су биле познате, како у архитектури, тако и у сликарству. Напамет је могао репродуковати, насликати сваки детаљ лучне куполе цркве или испреплетаност лукова израђених од кованог гвожђа. Уствари, хтео је да испуни свој сан да постане архитекта, када је и отишао у Беч, почетком века.

Када неко види стотине слика, скица и цртежа које је створио у то време, које показују његово владање тродимензионалним формама, онда је запањујуће да га је комисија на ¨Академији лепих уметности¨ оборила на два пријемна испита. Немачки историчар Вернер Масер, који није био Хитлеров пријатељ, критиковао је ову комисију: ¨Сви ови радови откривају најнеобичнији архитектонски дар и знање. Градитељ Трећег рајха дао је оснивачима ¨Академије лепих уметности¨ у Бечу разлог да се постиде¨.

У својој соби Хитлер је увек постављао стару слику своје мајке. Сећање на вољену мајку било је с њим до дана када је умро. Пре него што је умро, 30. априла 1945, ставио је слику своје мајке испред себе. Имала је плаве очи као и он и слично лице. Ментална интуиција јој је говорила да је њен син другачији од друге деце. Понашала се као да је знала судбину свог сина. Пред смрт је осетила бол због неизмерне мистерије која је окруживала њеног сина.

СКРОМНО ПОРЕКЛО

Током младих година, Хитлер је практично водио живот пустињака. Његова највећа жеља је била да се повуче из света. Усамљеник у срцу, лутао је, јео мало, али гутао књиге из три библиотеке. Уздржавао се од конверзација и имао само неколико пријатеља.

Скоро је немогуће да се замисли нека друга таква судбина у којој је човек почео са тако мало, а постигао тако много. Александар Велики је био син краља. Наполеон, из имућне породице, био је генерал у 24-ој. Петнаест година после Беча, Хитлер је још увек био непознати каплар. Хиљаде других је имало хиљаде пу.та више могућности да оставе свој траг на свету.

Хитлер није био обузет својим приватним животом. У Бечу је живео у отрцаном тесном смештају. Али и поред свега тога, изнајмио је клавир који је заузимао пола собе и концентрисао се на писање своје опере. Живео је на хлебу, млеку и супи од поврћа. Његово сиромаштво је било страшно. Никада није имао зимски капут. Чистио је улице у данима када је падао снег. Носио пртљаг на железничкој станици. Проводио је недеље у прихватилиштима за бескућнике. Али, никада није престајао да слика и чита.

И поред свог страшног сиромаштва, Хитлер је на неки начин успевао да одржи уредан изглед. Газде и газдарице у Бечу и Минхену су га се сећали по његовој цивилизованости и пријатној нарави. Понашања увек беспрекорног, његова соба је увек била чиста, оскудна имовина прецизно уређена, а одела обешена или сложена. Сам је прао своју одећу, што је нешто што данас мало људи ради. За опстанак му скоро ништа није требало и новац од продаје неколико слика био је довољан да задовољи све његове потребе.

ПОТРАГА ЗА СУДБИНОМ

Задивљен лепотом цркве у Бенедиктанском манастиру, Хитлер је брзо сањао о томе да постане Бенедиктански монах. Интересантно је и то да кад год је посећивао мису, у то време он је увек морао да прође поред прве Свастике коју је видео; била је угравирана на каменој плочи манастирске капије.

Хитлеров отац, обичан официр, надао се да ће дечак поћи његовим стопама и постати државни службеник. Његов тутор га је охрабривао да постане монах. Уместо тога млади Хитлер је отишао, односно побегао у Беч. Тамо се с својим уметничким аспирацијама противио бирократским медиокритетима академије, издвајао се и медитирао. Изгубљен у престоници Аустро-Угарске, трагао је за својом судбином. Током првих тридесет година Хитлеровог живота, датум 20. април 1889. није никоме ништа значио. Тог дана је рођен у месту Браунау, малом граду у долини Ина. Током свог избеглиштва у Бечу често је размишљао о свом скромном дому и нарочито о мајци. Када је била болесна, он би се враћао кући из Беча и пазио на њу. Недељама ју је лечио, радио све кућне послове и помагао као највољенији син. Када је на крају умрла, Божићне вечери, његов бол је био неизмеран. Скрхан болом сахранио је на малом сеоском гробљу. ¨Никад нисам видео некога тако сломљеног.¨, рекао је доктор његове мајке, који је иначе био Јевреј.

ЈАК ДУХ

Хитлер се тада још увек није усмерио на политику, али без правог знања о њему, то је била његова најпознатија каријера. Политика је на крају заслепила његову страст за уметношћу. Људи, масе, били су глина која би за њега постала прелеп уметнички рад као једна од чудесних Миронових скулптура, Ханс Макартнова слика или Вагнерова кружна трилогија.

Љубав према музици, уметности и архитектури није га удаљила од политичког живота и друштвених питања Беча. Да би преживео, радио је као обичан радник окружен другим радницима. Био је тихи посматрач, али му ништа није промакло: ни сујета и егоизам буржоазије, ни морална и материјална мизерија људи, нити стотине хиљада радника који су узбуркали широке булеваре Беча с бесом у срцима.

Био је запањен порастом броја брадатих Јевреја у Бечу који су носили кафтане, обележје непознато у Линцу. ¨Како они могу бити Немци?¨ питао се. Читао је статистике: 1860. било је 69 јеврејских породица у Бечу, а 40 година касније 200.000. Било их је свуда. Посматрао је њихову инвазију на универзитете и правну и медицинску струку, као и њихово преузимање новина.

Хитлер је у овој навали био изложен страсним реакцијама радника, али радници нису били сами у својим несрећама. Било је много истакнутих личности у Аустрији и Мађарској који нису крили своју озлојеђеност због оног за шта су веровали да је била инвазија на њихове земље. Хитлер је жељно слушао демохришћане, главне у Бечу.

Хитлер је исто тако био забринут због судбине осам милиона аустријских Немаца удаљених од немачке националности. Видео је цара Франца Јозефа као огорченог и ситног старог човека неспособног да савлада дневне проблеме и тежње будућности. Тихо, млади Хитлер је сумирао ствари у својој глави.

Прво, Аустријанци су били део Немачке, заједничке отаџбине.

Друго, Јевреји су били странци у немачком друштву.

Треће, патриотизам је био вредан ако су га делиле све класе. Обични људи с којима је Хитлер делио жалост и понижење су били исто толико део отаџбине као и милионери у високом друштву.

Четврто, класни рат који би уништио сваку земљу, пре или касније би осудили и радници и шефови. Ни једна земља не може да преживи класни рат, само сарадња између радника и шефова може да унапреди земљу. Радници морају бити поштовани и морају да живе с поштовањем и чашћу. Стваралаштво не сме никад да буде угушено.

Када је Хитлер касније саопштио да је своју друштвену и политичку доктрину направио у Бечу, рекао је истину. Десет година касније његово опажање стварано у Бечу постало је дневна заповест.

Према томе, Хитлер је живео у претрпаном граду Бечу практично као изгнаник, још увек тихо осматрајући све око себе. Његова снага је долазила изнутра. Није тражио ни од кога да размишља уместо њега. Изузетна људска бића увек се осећају усамљено у огромној гомили људи. Хитлер је видео своју усамљеност као предивну могућност за медитирање, а не да буде зароњен у море глупости. Да се неби загубио у неплодној пустињи, јак дух тражи уточиште у себи. Хитлер је био таква душа.

РЕЧ

Светлост у Хитлеровом животу је долазила од речи. Сав његов уметнички таленат је био усмерен у мистерији комуникације и речитости. Хитлер никад не би замишљао освајање популарности без моћи речи. Он би очаравао и био очаран речима. Нашао би тотално испуњење када би магија његових речи инспирисала срца и мисли маса с којима је комуницирао. Осећао би се препорођеним сваки пут када би с мистичном лепотом саопштио знање које је стекао у свом животу. Хитлерово чаробно говорништво ће постати за још дуго времена огромно поље проучавања психоаналитичара. Моћ Хитлерове речи је кључ. Без тога, никад не би било Хитлерове ере.

ТРАНСЦЕНДЕНТАЛНА ВЕРА

Да ли је Хитлер веровао у Бога? Веровао је, и то дубоко! Звао је Бога ¨свемоћни, господар свега познатог и непознатог¨. Пропагандисти су представили Хитлера као атеисту, што он није био. Био је представљан као лицемерни и материјалистички свештеник, али он сам није био у томе. Веровао је у неопходност стандарда митолошких догми, без којих би, понављао је, велика институција хришћанске цркве била срушена. Ове догме се сукобљавају с његовом интелигенцијом, али је исто тако препознао да је било тешко за људски ум да обухвати све проблеме стваралаштва, њен безгранични обим и величанствену лепоту. Потврдио је да сваки људски створ има духовне потребе.

Песма славуја, мирис и боја цвета, непрестано су га враћали у велики проблем стваралаштва. Нико на свету није причао са мном тако речито о постојању Бога. Он није носио своје ставове зато што је одрастао као хришћанин, већ зато што га је његов аналитички ум довео до концепта Бога. Хитлерова вера је трансцендирала формуле и могућности. Бог је за њега био основ свега, заповедник ствари, Судбине и свега осталог.

National Socialist Racial Policy:
A Speech to German Women
by Dr. Walter Gross

My Dear German Women and Girls!
When Germans come together today to discuss the things that concern us both as individuals and as a nation, it is a solemn occasion, whether we wish it to be or not. During the political struggles of the past, we could speak of party programs or of civilization without any involvement of our soul.

Now we have forgotten how to approach an issue merely with our understanding, merely with our mouth, merely with our heart. We have become whole people once again. When we speak with others, we do so with our full being.

That is what made the movement strong, and great, and powerful from its first days. It is also that which the enemy on this side of the border and the other cannot understand, and which it hates with deadly strength. As this great and beautiful people's movement began, so too began a hard and bitter struggle between enemy and German forces, between an old world that is really long dead and buried, and the new world that is struggling to reach the light through us. This struggle has been going on in people's hearts and souls for years, and is nowhere near its end. The world finds it difficult to understand that which is at the center of our endeavors:

the value of blood and race.

Our enemies first laughed in pity, then in hatred as we spoke of it.

Let us speak of what we National Socialists mean by that so that it will become clear why the German woman may be even more concerned about these matters than the man, his state, and his fighting organization can be.

There was a time in the past when we were untrue, untrue in the deepest sense. We were untrue not to other people, or parties, or states, or kings, but untrue to something far greater, untrue to the laws of life. As long as the world exists, as long as life grows, flourishes and perishes, so long will this life have the urge to live on into the future and win new territory. Whether plant or animal or man—as we, or I, or you:

wherever there is life, it has the longing to bring forth new life.

It should be unnecessary to speak of such things. We speak of them only because for a few decades a crazy era ignored, blasphemed and mocked these greatest, most beautiful and purest dreams of life. This was an age that made the idol of money supreme and said: "The world should be governed not be what serves life, rather by what some fool of an accountant decides is best." We know the results. The great laws of life were evaluated according to money sacks and checkbooks. When we think back on our parents, grandparents and great grandparents, there were many children in the house. It may have been crowded and hard financially, but we were happy, perhaps because there were so many of us in so large a family. But the time came when people said: "As man or woman, as parents or teachers of leaders, you have the duty to show the people the way to a better future." That better future, people thought, could only be a richer future, a future in which the individual had more money. And when they were asked where this money would come from, a false teaching arose in the last century: "The fewer people there are, the more an individual child can inherit from his parents." He who loves his children and wishes a prosperous future for his nation should therefore see to it that Germany's population is small, and that only a few children continue the family after he is gone. That was the terrible teaching of birth control, which Marxism preached and the bourgeois followed. No one dared stand against it. That was the doctrine that made us what we are today:

a dying people,

in which fewer children are born each year, in which today more people die each year than are born. This all was supposed to lead to a happy future. It understood happiness only in terms of possessions. It was therefore inherently false. But even in its own terms it was false, for it forgot something:

When a people begins to die, when a people no longer obeys the laws of life, when a people values money more than its existence and posterity, this people is on the path to disaster, both historically and politically. Within a few decades it will be dead, oppressed by other peoples who are stronger, closer to life, and who follow life's laws better than we.

If present trends continue, by the end of the century Germany will be a nation with only 40-50 million inhabitants,

and we know that on our borders other peoples are growing quickly and strongly. Sooner or later, these other peoples will come in conflict with a shrinking and dying German people, and the result of the supposed doctrine of happiness will be a hard and bitter

national death for our children.

Those who believed that they can give their children a happy and peaceful future by reducing the number of children err deeply. They give the children only the promise of a hard and bitter struggle for Germany's existence as a state and as an idea.

Today when we work to show people that the ideas of yesterday are false, that the state and nation cannot do without the family, that the family cannot exist without children, and when we not only provide economic support to make it easier to begin families and have children, but also tell people again and again of the sanctity of life and the necessity of continuing our people into the future, our enemies on both sides of the border suddenly have insults and hateful things to say about us. They wish to disturb our work. Suddenly there are voices saying: "National Socialism's doctrines are inhumane and barbaric. National Socialism's views on children turn people into breeding animals. When it says

that it is the duty of men and women to continue the eternal chain of life, a chain that begins in the distant past and continues into the future, a chain of which we are only a link leading into the distant future,

our enemies on both sides of the border claim: "You reject the dignity and value of humanity. National Socialism holds that men and women have no value other than that of breeding cattle." It is a shame that we have to respond to such words, but it is necessary because our enemies have always tried to persuade women to oppose us, even though what we say is rooted in the souls of the men and women we speak to. This is our response: "You are mistaken in accusing us of thinking that the only purpose of humanity is to continue the species by passing on our blood to future generations. We know the other values. We support them and find wherever we can those values that the individual shows in his work and selfless service. We know well enough that

each person lives a double life. The first is the one he lives between birth and death. We are to do as much as we can to make this life rich, to accomplish that which is good and beautiful, to use our strengths and gifts for others. That is the duty of the individual. But as a person you are something more:

You are a member of the chain of life, a drop in the great bloodstream of your people.

There too you have duties and obligations before the eternity of the nation. You have the duty to pass on what you received from your parents and ancestors. I do not believe that such behavior, which obeys both the laws of reason and of life, is barbaric, hateful or inhumane. I believe instead that the barbarism is to be found in the years we have left behind us, when any dirty lout could besmirch the most valuable, holy life of a man or women in their families, or drag children through the filth, without anyone defending their culture against such an attack.

I believe that when we tell people once more of the great value of blood, and remind them that they have duties not only for the 60-year span in which they work and serve, but also to the millennia of the past from which we come and to the millennia of the future to which we are heading, then we are giving them higher values than those of yesterday. Let me say also, however, that it is wrong if someone thinks that only those who found families and bear children are valuable to our state. We know that is not so. We know there are reasons why some people leave their people's flow of blood. We know that some are denied what the nation places great value on. We do not ignore them or think ourselves their betters. We only say this: "My friend, you and I must do our duty to our people, and when we cannot fulfill it in one way, then we must do what we can with even greater energy and devotion.

When you do your duty, you are one of us,

we extend our hand to you, we honor your humanity and your service for Germany. Let us work together so that in the future, as many people as possible will be able to serve the nation in both ways.

That is a piece of the thinking of blood and race that National Socialism has taught us. And there is another aspect. When we see people today, we can recognize that we are not all alike. There are differences in value;

each person does not have the same value as everyone else.

In the past, people believed that these differences were superficial, the result of the environment in which one grew up. People believed that what became of a person depended primarily on the house he grew up in or in his social environment, or the class he came from. They believed that a person born in a slum, surrounded by shadows, troubles and poverty, a child lacking in love and affection, could only become a second-class human being, a physically and psychologically ill member of the society, someone failed by the society and the state. One thought that a child growing up in such slum inevitably became sick, or even criminal. It was because he grew up in such a poor environment. The Marxists claimed that if every child in Germany grew up in an environment that gave him all he needed, he would inevitably become a useful, decent, upright, proud and honest adult. After a few years or decades, the entire German people would consist of such decent and useful people. In the past people believed the environment was responsible even when a person failed miserably.

We recall the days of delirium, when millions of unemployed had been thrown on the street by a sick political and economic system, made superfluous. A single person pried the tracks apart and derailed a train in the middle of the night. Within a minute he murdered 30 innocent people who had never done anything to him, and stole their money. And what did the world of yesterday say? "He can't help himself. He is a victim of circumstances. He has Beethoven's hands and an artistic temperament. We need not put him on the gallows or in prison to protect us and our children. No, this poor Schlesinger is only sick because of his environment. Put him in a modern sanitarium, give him what he needs: radio, a library, a smoking salon, a language teacher, a pastor, a newspaper room, give him everything he needs to put him in touch with better things. In a few years, this mass murderer of 30 people will leave as an ideal human being, so pure and innocent that one can put him in charge of a kindergarten." That's what people thought in the past.

Today that seems a bad joke to us, a crazy fantasy, but a few years ago it was government policy in Germany. Those who did well under such policies and have joined to fight us think that they can accuse our doctrines of blood and race as barbaric.

Why do we see things differently? Because we have learned something:

In the end, you are not as important and significant as you thought yesterday;

your strength and abilities are not as great as you believed during the liberal era. Oh yes, it was a lovely dream to say: "I will do with my life what I want, and if I happen to be a teacher, I will teach what I want, and do what I enjoy, and what I think right." Well, that was your idea of the environment.

We are a bit more modest, a bit more humble before the laws of fate.

We have learned that what I can do for myself or what you can do for yourself, or what we can all do to each other, is not as important, or as deep, as that which a greater power has already done to us. It is that power that even before our birth gave us a part of our nature, and laid out our path for us in the world. Here are joined two things: the knowledge of modern science and the sensitivity and understanding of a humble person. Suddenly we see that:

What you are, what I am and what I can be in my life is in part predetermined by that which I have inherited.

If my inheritance is good and strong, and if I am true to it and develop what is within me, my life will be successful, and perhaps of benefit and joy to others. If such an inheritance is denied me, or if for some inexplicable reason fate has given me other, perhaps weak, perhaps even bad traits, I can struggle against them for my entire life, and will still not be able to rid myself of that which slumbers in me because of the actions of a higher power.

We see then that a good part of a people's history is determined by what it has inherited. If we ask what sorts of physical or intellectual traits these may be, or what groups there are, we will see that each people has three groups. The first is a large group of people with average gifts, the most of us who are able to deal with the normal problems life presents us with. Next there is a very small group. This group has received a better inheritance than most of us, not because of any particular virtue on its part, but simply because of fate. The leaders of humanity, those who build states, lead people, or touch the soul, come from this group. And there is a third small group with particular traits, also not their fault: those who are sick or genetically defective. They are not up to the challenges of life, and need outside help to survive.

As humanity of a nation go through the centuries, the decisive fact is which of these three groups is the strongest. One might say: "That is not a question at all. The strongest will win, the group from which the leaders come. This superior group has to be the strongest in the end, it must gradually have its way." Well, that is how things would be without people, if people with their little brains did not believe that they could change the laws of life given to the world by heaven.

Man has interfered in these matters. He has tried to change the laws of struggle and existence and selection. Those were ancient laws of life, to which men too were subject:

That which cannot meet the challenges dies.

That is hard, perhaps, but it is also the way that nature makes life stronger and better. Man has tried more and more to abolish these laws. He has kept life going by using artificial means in cases where, left to itself, it would have ended. He used all his understanding, love and sympathy to keep a person alive, even when it is no joy, but only a burden and misery. We now keep thousands, even tens of thousands of unhappy creatures alive through artificial means, those to whom life itself has denied the right to life. But keeping them alive was not itself the problem. What is worse is that they were given the opportunity to pass on their unfortunate physical and mental characteristics. That was the worst that happened: we took the physically weak, the mentally ill, the genetically defective criminals and not only kept them alive and cared for them—that is our duty as human beings, which we certainly do not want to ignore in the future either—and gave them the ability to have children with the same deficiencies, thus doubling or multiplying their misery. The German people do not know the extent of this misery, it does not know the depressing spirit of the homes where thousands of cripples live their lives only by being fed and cared for, poor creatures who are worse than any animal. The animal at least is as it should be. These poor creatures are distortions of life, no joy either to themselves or others. They are a burden throughout their miserable existences, but thanks to the selfless care and devotion of those who care for them may live 60, 70 or 80 years. The German people do not realize the enormous sums that have been spent for decades, money that is taken from those who are healthy, who could do something useful, but cannot because the money is lacking.

There was a winter in which children in Bavaria did not even have wooden shoes to wear as they walked through the snow on their way to school. They had to walk for hours bare-footed. At the same time, the government made sure that those unfortunate souls in a large institution had fresh bananas twice a week so that they got the necessary vitamins. But these vitamins could not give them joy or strength or health. But they were thus denied to those somewhere in the Bavarian forest, or in the Ruhr, or in a poor fishing village on the Frisian coast, where they could have reduced the poverty and need in some worker's house. At the same time there was a case where

a single mentally ill Negro of English citizenship lived for 16 years in an institution in Berlin, costing 26,000 Marks.

26,000 Marks were thrown away on a life that had no meaning. 26,000 Marks that could have been used to prepare a dozen strong, healthy and gifted children for life and a job.

But I am not speaking of this as a kind of theft. Money is not an end in itself. Rather, we have here committed a theft of spirit and soul, because we tried to persuade the nation and humanity that our own greatness could come from sacrificing for the worst and most helpless. In the end, we went so far as

to put the sick and the dying before the young, strong, healthy and promising.

That is against nature and life. A nation going this way is heading for the abyss. We went so far as to preach year after year to healthy families that they should have no children, or at most one, else they sinned against the nation and the spirit of this enlightened age. But if some imbecile of a whore and a genetically ill criminal had children, they were not only a financial burden for their entire lives, but also took the labor of people who our society gave nothing better to do than to change these poor creatures three times a day and feed them. That is a perversion of everything great and healthy, and is a sin against life and the spirit of creation.

With full knowledge of our duties as human beings and the requirements of pity, we made the decision not to allow such miserable creatures to pass on their misery to the next generation, multiplied perhaps two or three or more times. That is a major accomplishment, for which our children and their children will one day thank us.

I know that there are those who will say: "You are meddling in matters that are not your concern. You are interfering in an area outside human control. Life and death are not in the hands of man, but in those of a higher power. If God wants sick and genetically ill people to be born, you may not interfere through laws, operations, or any other measures with God's will. And if you do so—and you have with your Law to Prevent Inherited Illness—then you are acting against the will of God, and you are heretics."

This is our answer: "My friend, you are wrong. It is true that we are subject to a higher power. We humans may never interfere with the great laws of the Creator. But you are wrong. See the laws the Creator has established for his world and your life. The great law is that life must be able to preserve itself, and that if it cannot, it will collapse. It is the hard, brutal law of the struggle for existence and of selection and extinction. It was the law we saw day by day, hour by hour, under all the clouds of heaven and all the stars of the sky, in which life seemed to find a senseless death, whether plant or animal or person, whether in distant Africa or near us.

That which cannot meet the challenges of life dies, no matter how much pain it causes,

and even if your small understanding or mind cannot comprehend it, these are the great laws of life and the world that God himself gave us. These are the laws, my German friend, that in our crazy fantasies we broke in the past."

With overweening human pride and false pity, we broke the great law and kept those alive who under the laws of God would long since have perished.

Today we are once more following these old laws, using humane methods, for they follow a more hard and brutal course in nature according to God's will. We are doing nothing more than reestablishing the laws of creation, and bowing to the heavenly order. We are thus showing piety and true humility—you are the heretics.

This applies as well to the third and last principle of our racial thinking. This third and last principle is that the people on this world, in America, Africa or China, are different both in body and soul. They are not equal, as yesterday's lie had it.

People are different.

They not only speak different languages and look different: no, they are different in the depths of their hearts and natures, and in their abilities for good and evil. In the past people believed that these differences were accidental, the result of climate or civilization, and that one could overcome these differences and create a unified man in a unified state in which all would be equally happy. We have learned that such ideas are false. We have learned that the differences between the major blood groups of the world, between the major races, are not the result of human action, but of the laws of Creation. We have learned that the lines between blood and blood, race and race, are also the lines between soul and soul and spirit and spirit. We have learned that the opposite of the old phrase "What God has brought together, let no man put asunder" is also true. We have learned:

What God has separated, man should not bring together.

Heaven thought it good not to have only one type of people on the earth, but different kinds, various racially-bound peoples. That is a part of Creation. We bow before this truth and respect the borders. That means that the foundation of our separation of the races is not a matter of politics or economics, rather it rests on a higher level, to which we in the end are responsible.

In our Reich, we are separating that which belongs to us, because it is blood of our blood, from that which does not belong to us, because it is foreign. We are doing that which is right not only for the moment, but for eternity.

Believe me, my dear German fellow citizens, it is not true, as some say, that this doctrine is a sign of arrogance or superiority or boasting. We do not think ourselves better than the other races on the earth. No, we do not think ourselves better, nor do we believe that others are worse than we are. We insist only on one thing—a law established by the Creator himself:

Man differs from man and race from race in this world.

The others may not be better or worse, but they are different than we are, and because they are different than we are, there is a kind of wall between us that is part of the laws of life. That is the core of National Socialism's racial thinking. Our goal is not to insult others, to say: "What a great guy I am!" Rather, we hold to the humble recognition that each healthy piece of life has its corner of the world, and its special tasks. This is just as true of humans as it is of plants and animals in all their multiplicity. We know that one type is no more valuable than another. But we also know that each variety of life has a right to existence only as long as it keeps itself pure and strong. Only when a tree bears the proper fruit does it have a right to live. Otherwise it will be cut down and destroyed. We do not know why things are the way they are, and it would be foolish to ask the reason. That is how things are. Our task is to humbly accept the laws that govern our human existence, and to accept the fact that we are born Germans in Germany, not as Chinese or Eskimos. That is not because of our virtues, nor it is our fault, nor was it our will. It was fate that came from above. We have no choice but to accept this fate and to develop the abilities that fate has given us according to necessity and law.

Others may develop in their own way, in their own land. We must listen to the depths of our own people, to draw from blood and inheritance the strength we need to build our homeland. A higher power will take care of the life beyond.

I believe, my dear German fellow citizens, that everyone who is of our spirit will grant the correctness of our thinking about blood and race, and will say: "I see now that you are not only on the right path, but are honest and in the deepest sense true to demands that are greater than the laws of man."

Let us then together follow the path to a new worldview. Let us go the path of blood and race, which does not ignore faith and knowledge and a sense of higher powers. Let us go this path, not a path of matter, superstition and heresy, rather a path of deep humility and piety before the laws of God. Let us go along this path together and listen to the deepest depths where blood and soul rule. Let us draw from there the strength to build the state, and even more important the Reich. It will be a Reich not only of politics, a Reich of organization, or the economy, but a Reich of people. Germany today has the fortune to find a new way, led by a great Führer. German women today have the good fortune to see a strong and loyal woman at their head. Let us together go forward, hand in hand, as befits comrades building the future, and let us join the strength of men and women, rooted deep in their blood, to build what the world has never before seen:

The holy Reich of the German soul.
Heil!

Part One:- Forensic Traces

Fingerprints

The science of fingerprint examination is called dactyloscopy. We are born with our fingerprints and we'll never be able to change them or get rid of them. Whenever you touch something with your fingerprints you leave behind your calling card. The police will have a varying degree of difficulty in reproducing your prints depending upon the surface in which they lie. Obviously surfaces such as glass, marble, chrome, etc. will be the easiest, whilst it is almost impossible to lift prints from brickwork or untreated wood. A fingerprint is basically the fatty, acidic residue left on a surface in the exact shape of the ridge lines of your fingertips. Because a fingerprint is composed of sweat, which is an acid, in some instances it will etch itself onto metal. This is most likely to occur with crowbars, hammers, chisels, etc and can be erased by rubbing down the said tools with coarse wire wool after use. The police are continually perfecting their methods of print detection because they are such a foolproof piece of personal identification. The police can take prints from skin (if they really try), from tightly woven fabrics, especially sythentic fabrics, and paper.

To convict, the police need to show 12 matching features of a fingerprint. In practice, these can be found on just one square centimetre of skin area. Fingerprints are fairly hard to destroy and even immersion in water will not do the job completely, so if you are going to throw something over a bridge, don't forget to wipe it down first. Unless an object is totally consumed, fire is also not a sure method of erasing prints as a layer of carbon can cover them and keep them recognisable. The older a print becomes, the harder it is to reproduce, although in theory it will last forever, as long as it has not been disfigured. Fingerprints are kept on the Police National Computer (PNC) in the form of encoded data and as such do not need to be visually checked to be found to match. A specialist will analyse the fingerprint and turn it into a series of four digit numbers. These numbers are then entered in to the PNC, which will return the location of any matching fingerprints held by the Fingerprint Bureau at New Scotland Yard. These matches will be examined further in detail to see if any of the candidates presented by the PNC exactly match those found at the scene of the crime.
The PNC fingerprint index is used roughly 300,000 times a year. A new system of fingerprint recognition has been developed which can virtually translate a single print into unique and complex computer data, thus making positive ID from a partial found print possible.
The police show a great deal of interest in everyone's prints, to the extent that babies are now being fingerprinted at birth in some countries, in case they get "lost". How touching! In the station, the police will always try and take your prints. Since the introduction of the Criminal Evidence Act, they have more or less complete freedom to do so, without having to go to a magistrate anymore. In theory, it is possible to smudge or blur your fingerprints. One way is to leave plenty of soap on your hands after you've been made to wash them and another is to try and "help" the police. The idea is that you relax your fingers while they roll them over the sheet. If you apply too much pressure, or slide about a bit, you might smudge a couple. On the other hand, they might just tear them up and start again, or even tear you up and start again!

Glass Traces
This is definitely one of the areas of forensics for people to know about. Every time that glass is smashed, tiny shards of the stuff fly everywhere. For practical purposes it is wisest to assume that anyone even remotely near to breaking glass is covered in the stuff. It sticks to things like * to a blanket, especially to loose-fibred cloth such as woollen hats. The only way to get rid of it is to throw away anything you may have been wearing. Glass also likes to get embedded in the soles of shoes. The police can identify different makes and types of glass, and can therefore put you at a certain place at a certain time. Fine, broken-glass powder will stick to the smooth surfaces of tools, and fibres from your clothing will stick to the sharp edges of broken glass. The best way to break glass without covering yourself in traces is from a very long distance, using a powerful slingshot and marbles or, for toughened glass, steel ball bearings. But remember, marbles and ball bearings retain your prints very well, so wear gloves. Or why not try glass etching fluid? You can get it easily in craft shops, and with it you can write a message on a window that can never be removed without removing the window pane itself.
NB: In some towns you have to sign for etching fluid, and in some instances shopkeepers report sales to the police.

Dust Traces
For the police to convict you on the basis of dust traces takes a great deal of work on their part, involving painstaking work with powerful microscopes. The composition of dust in your clothes can tell them where you have been (e.g, a metal foundry) and at what time of year (by identifying the spores of seasonal plants). By just washing your clothes thoroughly you can get rid of most of these traces, but as always, the safest thing is to ditch them. It is unusual, but not unknown, for the police to use dust traces to convict. These traces are more useful as a last resort for clues when other avenues have failed. They are chiefly used to find out where something has been and for how long; e.g, guns, bodies, stolen goods.
In brief, the investigation of these traces is only likely to come up in a serious case, and should you start to worry about traces this tiny, then paranoia is taking over from sensible precaution. If the police threaten to use them against you then it indicates that they most likely have nothing better to go on.

Wood Traces
Wood will yield some information to the investigator. It is possible for him/her/it to match small pieces of wood to each other, even from samples as small as sawdust or splinters. If someone has been introducing your local red's head to a piece of 4x2 then a match can be made to the piece it was cut from. When they remove the said lump from your red's head, it will be checked for foreign bodies, such as textile fibres, paint flakes, hairs and other incriminating evidence. If a baseball bat were to be used instead, and not disposed of, then it could be linked to the "crime" by comparison with the splinters it has left in the skull as well as by traces of varnish or resin and the bat itself will carry traces of skin, hair, blood, not to mention matching dents! There is no point in keeping such weapons after they have been used.

Soil and Plant Traces
A forensic scientist can tell roughly where you have been from the composition of the dirt and soil that you will have picked up on your travels. If, let's say, you've been keeping warm by standing next to a burning portacabin on a building site, then traces of sand, cement, gypsum, gravel, lime, etc. will have collected on your shoes and clothes. If you have been watching Lord Anthony Wedgewood Benn's stately ancestral home burn to the ground, then traces of earth from his garden will be on you, as will traces of plant life, such as pollen from the rare gladioli that you may have brushed against. Once again, it is best to dispose of any clothing. These traces are used to put you in a certain place and, in some cases, at a certain time. As with dust traces, don't let the police bluff a confession out of you by saying that these traces are cast iron evidence; they are certainly not and can be disputed in court.

Hair Traces
We all shed hair, and we shed it all the time. If we stay in one place for any length of time then it is certain that we will leave samples of our hair in the vicinity. It is most likely to be lodged in the clothing of someone with whom you have had close contact (ie, the red you have just throttled). Hair will tell the forensic expert many things: where it came from on the body (scalp, beard, crotch, eyebrows, nose, armpit), how long your hair is, whether it has been cut recently, if you have been using any specific chemicals on it such as dyes, etc. They can also tell if you fall into the racial categories of Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid or even mixtures of the three. They can tell your sex and blood type. It is harder to tell the colour of your hair as individual strands differ in hue from each other. It becomes easier if they possess more hairs. The good news is that conclusive proof of ID is NOT possible, BUT hair samples can prove your innocence, in the same way that parentage can only be disproved through blood tests. On the other hand, if they have a sample of your hair and it is 2 feet long, dyed green and you used superglue to spike it, then they'd probably have a good case for a positive ID. Wear a tight-fitting hat - even if you're a skinhead.

Shoe Traces
There are thousands of styles and sizes of footwear and each one is distinctive, even more so when it has been worn for a while and picked up marks of wear and tear. Basically, a clear footprint is as useful to a forensic expert as a fingerprint. Yet again you can throw away your shoes but better still get a crappy pair second hand and only wear them for the activity before dumping them, without letting your closes friends or relatives know you ever had them. Whilst you are in a cell, the pigs can always con your wife or girlfriend into telling them what sort of footwear you have and this could be a problem in court later if one of the pairs is missing.
Shoe prints can be left behind on surfaces such as lino or marble. On soft surfaces such as mud, earth, dog *, etc, shoe impressions will be left behind. Identification can be made from these and is watertight evidence if a match is made. Shoes also carry traces away with them such as oil, petrol, glass splinters and other such giveaways. Never wear them in your home.
Tracker dogs will also be able to follow the smell from your shoes but not for more than 10 to 12 hours afterwards, and then only in favourable conditions. Roads that smell of exhaust fumes, petrol and rubber will mask your smell. The best conditions for tracker dogs are unspoilt meadows during moist and cool weather.

Blood Traces
There are several instances where blood may be spilt, and for this reason it makes sense to know as much about it as possible. Blood is very hard to get rid of once it has got on you or your clothing. Even dry cleaning will not remove it thoroughly. Should you find yourself near to someone who has been punched in the nose or stabbed, you will be covered in a fine spray of blood droplets.
A forensic scientist can detect, retrieve and examine the minutest traces of blood, and the amount of information to be gathered depends on the circumstances. In the laboratory, a fresh, warm pint of blood can show the type, the sex of the donor, any illnesses peculiar to the donor or any drugs or medication used recently. In practice, however, the smaller the quantity and the older the sample, the harder the task. Importantly, a blood sample cannot be positively proved to be yours, although it can be proven that it isn't.

D.N.A
A relatively new development that has only recently become widely available to the police is "genetic fingerprinting", using D.N.A molecules, as unique to each person as a fingerprint. Since 1996, all people arrestd by the police have had a sample of their D.N.A taken, usually from the roof of the mouth. D.N.A can be obtained from any secretion from the body such as saliva, mucus, sweat, etc. and from blood, hair and flakes of skin. If someone were to commit a crime such as murder then great care would have to be taken by the perpetrator, especially if they had already had a D.N.A sample taken. A simple sneeze or cough could release enough mucus to leave traceable D.N.A behind, a great help to the police in their search for the killer. Most murders are committed by someone who already knows the victim, so the police are likely to ask the deceased's family, friends and acquaintances to give a voluntary D.N.A sample and anyone who refused would have a court order brought to force them to give a sample or the police could get a sample off a toothbrush or the like. At the moment, this form of detection is really only used for serious crimes such as murder or rape but as things continue on this downward spiral and people start to fight back, this could be used to combat things as small as a sticker (your saliva mixed with the gum) deemd to incite "racial hatred" (terrorism, in the System's eyes). Take utmost care when doing anything. Wear full face masks and gloves if necessary.

Textile Traces
There is not a lot to say about these traces that is not common sense - just think of your clothes as blotting paper that will soak up incriminating evidence like crazy! Dust, soil, chemicals, blood, petrol, paint, the list is endless. Clothing will also leave behind particles of fabric, and as with gloves, will leave impressions should you sit or lean on anything soft. Traces of fibre and debris from your own environment will be carried by your clothes and left at the scene. For instance, the fibres from your sofa, carpet, car furnishings, etc. will be carried by your trousers, for example, amd may be left wherever you go. To circumvent this wear old clothes and discard them afterwards. Remember, if you wear them back home, you will also be carrying back traces from wherever you may have been.

Tool Traces
In much the same way that a bullet will retain scratches from the barrel of the gun from which it was fired, then tools such as chisels, pliers, bolt cutters, knives, screwdrivers, etc. will leave identifying marks at the scene of an investigation. These marks can be matched to the tool later using comparison or stereo microscopes. Most obviously, the shear marks on a cut padlock can be linked to the cutters. If the same pair of bolt cutters has been doing the rounds, and you're nicked with it, you might find yourself being held responsible for any number of unsolved "crimes". If such tools have been used to break into somewhere like a Marxist bookshop and serious damage such as arson has taken place, then it is courting disaster to hold onto them. For less dodgy instances, the working edges of tools can be given a new "face" by filing or re-sharpening, but only if the tool is in good condition and not badly pitted or scarred. Tools are not just made of metal; objects such as rope, string, tape, etc. are just as incriminatory and lend themselves equally to comparative analysis

Glove Traces
Although it is always best to wear gloves to avoid leaving fingerprints behind, you should be aware that gloves themselves can sometimes leave as much information. Gloves leave traces of the fabric they are made from on anything they touch, especially broken glass, fencing, masonry and rough wood. They should be thrown away after use or positive links could be found through analysis. Plastic or rubber gloves will leave your prints on the inside and some thin surgical gloves can still allow your prints/impressions to show up on shiny/hard surfaces. If discarded gloves are found, traces of sweat will be present as well as comparative traces such as wood splinters, paint flakes, glass splinters, etc. from the crime scene. Also you are going to look dead suspicious wearing gloves in mild weather, especially if there are more than one of you and you are all wearing them!

Body Secretion Traces
The human body produces various fluids and secretions, apart from blood. As mentioned in the D.N.A chapter, these include spit, sweat, tears, earwax, urine, snot, etc. Apart from D.N.A which is conclusive, any illnesses that you may have will be apparent on examination of any of these secretions found. These illnesses could then be traced to you by examining the medical files of all known members of the group you are involved in; i.e, a sample of spit found at the scene may show that you are a diabetic. By checking the known sympathisers of any group they deem responsible for the "crime" they can then look through lists of registered diabetics and find your name. They can then take a D.N.A test from you to prove that you were there. Avoid spitting, etc. and if possible wear a mask that covers your nose and mouth.

Vehicle Traces
Vehicle traces refer to any parts of forensic evidence that may be left by motor transport. Firstly, tyre tracks: these are usually left in soft ground and not on hard top roads, although they may be found in soft tar, dog *, etc. and in the case of a collision usually imprinted in the flesh of the victim(s). These traces will identify the make of tyre, and most instances will prove unique to one tyre due to the characteristic wear. The distance between tyre tracks will indicate axle width and chassis length, thus indicating the type of vehicle. Some cars carry unique tyres, for instance imported, or small production runs. Transfer traces are those which are left on the scene due to collision or contact. Most commonly this involves paint flakes. These are always left in the case of any contact. As well as indicating the exact colour of the vehicle, when studied microsopically they will identify the brand of car and very often the model. This is due to the fact that auto paint can consist of over 14 layers of primer, paint, lacquer, etc. which are unique to different manufacturers. From one paint flake it is possible to know the make, model, colour, previous colour(s) and the year of manufacture of a given car. Due to the extensive registration of vehicles, this means that the police have a large amount of information to work on.
Other types of transfer traces consist of trim that may have been dislodged, such as hubcaps, bits of windscreen, light covers, door handles, those stupid rubber earth strips that hang off the rear bumper, aerials, coon tails, furry dice, etc. All these things lend themselves to comparative analysis. The direction and speed of a vehicle can be estimated from the direction of tyre tracks, dripping oil, etc.
As vehicles are so closely monitored in this country (M.O.T, license, insurance, tax, etc) the police have a great deal of evidence to go on already, before any crime has been committed. They always monitor supporters of "fringe" political groups anyway, so it is not advisable to use your own car for anything dodgy. It may be spotted by the video cameras that infest our inner cities and especially on petrol station forecourts.

Some combinations of car and occupant(s) are much more likely to get stopped than others - here,in no particular order, are some that are favourites for attracting the attention of the police - 'Boy Racer' vehicles,older 'working class' vehicles,works vans out after dark,cars with more than 2 occupants out after dark,anything that a 'gyppo' might drive ie Transit type van\tipper.At the time of writing ( Dec 2000 ) vehicles to specially avoid using wherever possible are the Vauxhall Cavalier\Astra and the Ford Sierra,Fiesta,Escort and Orion all of which carry maximum risk of a stop-check.

The police have access to the DVLA computer simply by calling their control room and can find out the current keeper of the vehicle,most of the other logbook details and whether or not it is taxed.In addition vehicles may be 'flagged' on the computer as being 'suspicious' or subject to investigation.For every car that is actually stopped many radio checks will have been made on other cars but not acted upon.Driving a 'dodgy' motor is becoming an increasingly riskier business and is to be avoided wherever possible.

Arson and Fire Traces
It's a fact that fire does not destroy evidence and the Fire Investigation Unit who turn up if a fire looks suspicious possess a large degree of skill in being able to determine the flashpoint of the fire and what caused it. They can also tell if the fire was started with petrol, paraffin or whatever.
Chemicals used to start a fire will almost certainly end up on the clothes of the person(s) who started it. Particles of soot will also lodge in the clothing and hair. Many arsonists have been caught because they wanted to come back and watch the fire.

Ballistic and Firearm Traces
In Britain, which has such a small number of private firearms, the forensic investigation of ballistics is considered of paramount importance. For this reason, extreme care must be taken when getting involved with them.

Firstly the potential of the bullet. If it is recovered in good condition, then it will reveal the calibre of the weapon, the type and often the manufacturer. A bullet will remain in good condition if it enters flesh or any other soft material. If it hits thick metal or concrete, etc. it will be disfigured but will retain many of its identifying characteristics. Certain types of bullet are designed to fragment on contact. These are bullets such as Dum Dum, Mercury Tip, Hollow Point or Explosive. Whilst this makes the forensic investigator's job harder, it doesn't stop it. No matter what type of bullet has been used, it's always safer to assume that it has left enough characteristic marks to make it identifiable. As we all know from watching police shows on the ZOG box, the barrel of a gun imparts unique markings to the surface of the bullet, which can be matched to specimens when viewed through a stereo microscope. What we perhaps don't all know is that the shell casing or cartridge also carries unique markings, from the impact of the bolt and ejection mechanisms. All automatic guns eject their cartridges but a cage or trap fitted around the eject port enables these to be caught. Every police force worldwide keeps a pictorial file of all bullets and weapons used previously (and most countries cooperate with each other) and should you be caught with a weapon of dubious ancestry, you could find yourself having a lot to explaining to do.
When a gun is fired, particles of gas and powder will DEFINITELY lodge themselves in any exposed skin or clothing. These particles can be found by a forensic examiner by the taking of ether swabs. In the USA an aerosol has been developed that can be sprayed on the hands and will show up as a coloured dye immediately should it come into contact with these particles. It is used to eliminate suspects after (say) an assassination attempt has been made. Use gloves!
Once a gun has been used it is courting disaster to keep it. It should be cleaned, dismantled and distributed into a deep lake, not forgetting that fingerprints can be preserved under water, especially if covered with a layer of gun oil.
In conclusion, firearms are an area in which forensics are advanced and extensive, thus giving the police the edge. Definitely not an area to get involved in unless you know what you are doing.

Voice Identification
It is possible from a tape recording of a voice to compare it with another voice and decide whether they are one and the same. This is because each person's voice is a combination of frequencies which can be analysed using a sound spectrograph. This is most likely to be called into use for anonymous phone calls, and to this end it should be asumed that all telephones are not secure. Most newspapers have facilities for immediately recording calls and all emergency services calls are automatically taped. Changing your voice, dialect or pitch won't make a hell of a difference to your "voice print". Speaking through a handkerchief has absolutely no effect! If you do have to use your voice on the phone, try everything from pinching your nose, stuffing your mouth with tissues and speaking with a Pakistani accent. Perhaps the best way to phone in a message is to edit on tape together the words of TV personalities, in the same way as ransom notes are made from cut up newspapers. Just imagine: "This is Trevor McDonald claiming responsibility on behalf of C18...."

Face Identification
We've all seen identikit pictures, and on the whole they just serve to give the roughest idea of someone's face. Obviously, certain things are of more help than others - scars, moles, broken noses, tattoos, etc. The latest development is from Sweden, where a computer takes a basic identikit picture and blurs the edges over, finally producing a computer generated image similar to a photograph. The police also use professional artists to make sketches from a witness's description. It is hard to change the features on your face, but certain things help. Glasses, changes of hairstyle, hair colour, etc. Women can also use a mountain of makeup to heighten cheekbones etc. Men can grow or shave facial hair. A man with a skinhead and a moustache looks radically different from the same man cleanshaven and with long hair.

Responsibility Notes
These are a bit of an ego trip and just give the police more evidence to work on. In fact, it might be the only evidence the police will have, so why give it to them? However. if you do have to send one, there are some things you should be aware of.
Your D.N.A and other details can be taken from the spit used to moisten the stamp and envelope flap. Paper also carries fingerprint traces. When handwriting, use stylised block capitals:-

Only ever write on one sheet of paper at a time, preferably on a flat, hard surface such as glass which will not take the impression of what you are writing. Don't use sheets torn from a notebook as the tear and type of notebook can be matched. Also something innocuous written in the notebook can be already transferred to the sheet you're using, providing more comparisons. Use envelopes and paper from a very commom brand and only write on one sheet at a time. Destroy any remaining sheets or envelopes. Don't keep any stamps from the same block. Don't post anything in your own area. Be aware that minute traces of hair and fibre can be easily trapped in the glue of the letter or stamp, especially if the letter has been in your pocket. This is even more likely if you have been cutting up newspaper words and sticking them down. When doing this, don't keep the glue, the scissors or the paper. Use "Bic" ballpoint pens as these are the most common or use a felt pen, which is also less likely to leave an impression on sheets below.

Typewriter Traces
Every typewriter carries its own unique identifying marks. These come from the keys themselves which show individual peculiarities of wear and style. Then there's the pressure that the keys have made on the paper and the alignment (or lack of it) of the letters. It is also possible to have an idea of the typist from the pressure emphasis of certain letters, e.g. "hunt and peck" versus touch typing. To avoid all this, use a machine with a separate type element such as a daisy wheel. These can be bought from stationery shops for around a tenner and discarded after use. Better paying a tenner than spending ten years in jail. Even better, get one of those small stencils with a full alphabet and numerals (letter size approx 1/2 inch, cost approx o1). Discard after use.
A computer could be better if it's not yours but bear in mind that every item of work done on a computer is saved somewhere in the memory and police forensics will find it so it's best not to use one. Computer printers also have their own unique way of printing. Use block capitals, preferably by using a stencil.

Making Impressions Visible Again
It is sometimes believed that it is possible to remove identifying serial numbers by filing or drilling them off. The numbers stamped on the frames of cars, guns and other metal objects can be made visible again by various forensic procedures. This is because the initial stamping has changed the structure of the metal beneath the surface. The best way to utilise this factor is by filing off the numbers and then banging the hell out of the area with a hammer and cold chisel before re-stamping.
Many items are now marked by the owners with an ultra-violet pen that is invisible to the naked eye. Ultra-violet bulbs can be bought from electrical shops and these will help you read any numbers or marks.

Traces in Printing
When writing "subversive" pamphlets, books, stickers, etc. there are various processes which lend themselves to forensic comparison.Most "typesetting" is done by computers and, as mentioned earlier, each computer printer has its own unique style of printing. The printer may print the letter "S" in a way that may be comparable or the printe may leave tiny, invisible marks that can be identified by matching them to the printed pages. People seem to think that if you clear the hard drive of a computer then it is safe. This is bollocks and you should never really use your own computer for purposes deemed "illegal" by the State, not unless you want to totally destroy your computer afterwards by tearing it apart and taking a sledgehammer to the hard-disk.
Nowadays computers are dropping in price every month. You can probably pick up a decent hard drive from the small-ads of your local paper for about o200 if not less and a printer for an extra o50. These are small and pretty easy to hide in a friend's house (one who's not connected with your group, of course!) while you have a computer at home that you use for legal stuff only. When printing originals, etc. off always wear gloves, etc. as mentioned previously. Use the commonest brands of ink, paper, etc. so as to make comparisons useless. Distribution should be carried out very quickly, preferably with only yourself or the smallest number of people knowing about it as possible. Don't leave any stockpiles in embarrassing places. Remember, the police are trained to look in the places you think they won't and they'll take your house apart brick by brick if they think it will secure a conviction.
To avoid the labour of these above precautions, get comrades abroad to typeset, lay out and print off your literature there if possible. This country's laws are probably about the tightest in the world as far as material that challenges the status quo is concerned but there are countries that have virtually no laws regarding such subjects as race, guns, etc. and which are only a boat ride or short plane flight away. If it's a case of o500 travelling expenses or 5 years in the gulag, which would you prefer?

Part Two:- Who's Watching You ?

Eye Spy
We find video cameras everywhere these days; shopping centres, car parks, banks, football grounds, large houses, hospitals, as "traffic controls", etc. These are all "public" video cameras which do have some use, but we must also regard them as security measures. Mainly, these cameras are there to deter potential "criminals" and instil a healthy sense of paranoia. These cameras are mainly preventative although they are increasingly being used evidentially. For example, a programme about surveillance cameras a while back showed a couple of friends arguing in an empty car park. The argument became a fight and both men received injuries before the police arrived, having been alerted by the staff in the CCTV control room. Both men were then arrested for affray and even though they said in court that it was a small argument that had now been sorted, both were convicted and jailed.

Camera surveillance is now part of everyday life and because of their numbers we often simply fail to notice cameras. They are used and monitored by two separate groups. Firstly, the police and State security agencies and secondly, by the propertied classes who are unhappy with the level of security offered by the police. Video cameras can be disabled in any number of ways. Spray paint on the lenses, stickers, glass etching fluid, a lump hammer, airguns with steel pellets, etc. Big Brother is watching you, but you can do a lot to damage his eyesight.

Video And The Police
These days the police are attaching a great deal of importance to videos and have special video teams who, covertly and openly, monitor demos, pickets, riots, gigs, etc. in order to provide concrete evidence of crimes being committed and to be able to identify individuals and the groups they are associated with. You can no longer go to a demo or even a covert B&H gig really without a high chance of being recorded. Thsi is done to identify regulars and "ringleaders". This information is shared by police forces woldwide. At certain events it is common for the police to pose as news teams and "interview" those taking part. In our case though, the surveillance is more likely to be covert with the police using long-range cameras or cameras concealed in a parked van or building opposite.

Video And The Private Sector
Because of the appallingly low clear-up rate that the police have for crimes against property, rich people and companies are increasingly resorting to private security firms. This applies particularly to companies that suffer from expensive vandalism, e.g. banks, vivisection labs, animal exporters and your local red bookshop.

To deal with this surveillance the most important thing is to be unrecognisable. For the most part this means keeping masks and balaclavas handy but not in situations where this may look too suspicious, such as a march or daylight activity. (For us, as White Nationalists, there is always the Public Order Act which bans "political uniforms" and the wearing of clothing that covers the face will not be tolerated by the police, although watching news footage of events organised by reds, etc. this rule doesn't seem to be univerally applied). Hats, caps and glasses can be worn though, but try to avoid wearing conspicuous clothing as this will make you stick out.
It is possible to burn the cone of video cameras by simply pointing the flash gun of a camera directly into the lens and giving them a burst, thus making them unusable. The best place to try this is at demos with the cameras of the cops and the TV crews (for all practical purposes, the two are indistinguishable). The same thing can be tried on private security cameras, really just for the harassment value, but this will not always work as they often have anti-glare coating on their lenses or are keyed for night-time use, and in both cases will not register high levels of light. Many security cameras will work perfectly at night, either with the aid of floodlighting or with infra-red. You can be seen in pitch darkness.

Police Helicopters And Their Video Capacity

Police helicopters carry radio receiving and transmission capabilities on microwave frequencies, video surveillance equipment, night searchlights, loud hailers and on-board computer terminals. Most police helicopters now also carry heat-seeking image intensifiers that can detect body heat even when hidden. This can be used to detect fugitives in areas of low population.
The helicopter crew will be in constant contact with the ground and their response time is very fast. For example, they can fly across London in just 15 minutes. The pilots are police officers. The video camera is mounted on the side of the fuselage and can be pointed in any direction and focused to record a face in a crowd. The picture is monitored on board but using microwave transmission it can also be monitored from vans or the command centre at New Scotland Yard. This system is called "Hele-Tele" and in practice it means that an individual in a crowd can be isolated, identified, and police on the ground can be redirected to him by radio, even when he is only visible from the air. At night, the camera is complimented by a powerful directional searchlight, although it can use existing light, or work on infra-red frequencies, but with a distinct loss of quality. This has been used in Ulster for spotting night time movements, especially on the Border. In places where there is a large amount of residual heat, such as built-up areas, image intensifiers lose much of their effectiveness.
The on-board computer is a terminal, which means they have all the information on the PNC to work with. This makes the system autonomous. In practice, they can spot a car from the air, zoom in on its plates, then find out the name and address of the owner/previous owner together with details of any criminal record they may have. In fact all the information available on the PNC.
The heat sensitive equipment carried by police helicopters is delicate and they don't much like rockets and distress flares being fired at them. This is about all that could be used to annoy them, short of building a microwave radio jammer or launching a SAM missile!

Demos, Pickets, Riots, Etc.
Since the 1997 Public Order Act came into effect, and even more so with the Criminal Justice Act, all public demonstrations, etc. have come under much stricter control. As far as we are concerned, marches and public meetings are a thing of the past in inner city areas. They'll be able to find some law to stop us even selling perfectly legal literature publicly, as they've done at Brick Lane since 1993. At every meeting that's advertised to paid-up members of a "respectable" Nationalist group, there's a SB officer or his CID equivalent taking notes and making a report, picking out "ringleaders", etc. Information gathering is all-important. Photographers and video crews will be outside to take pictures of everyone attending, in the hope of convicting or identifying them later.
After a riot, there will be all the usual shower of "community leaders" and "community policemen" sifting through all the
available phtograph and film footage. TV companies and papers willingly supply all their photos and footage to the police. On the rare occasions when they are unwilling to do this the courts will force them to hand the footage over to the police. Although cameras are useful, from our point of view, for recording arrests, they can also help to convict. There is no reason at all for anyone to go to a gig or meeting with a camera. Where does Gable get his photos of all our gigs from? In a riot situation, people seem to think that carrying a camera makes them a non-combatant. Perhaps everyone could leave their cameras at home...at least then we'd know who were the cops.

'Local Intelligence'
On a neighbourhood level, information is gathered in many ways. Some of these are seemingly quite innocent, but it is intelligence gathering nevertheless. It is obtained by police on patrol, by undercover squads operating in secret, by talking to shopkeepers and garage proprietors, from the public via neighbourhood watch schemes and by formal meetings with other officials who possess information. Much police intelligence can be gathered from the police's own records, and even factual criminal records can be turned to intelligence purposes. This is even more the case in crime reports which contain many details of persons who became involved, either as witnesses or victims in the criminal process.
The neighbourhood community copper does most of the "spade work", gathering gossip and slander, and making prejudicial judgements of their own. All local information is relayed back to the station where it is processed. Most forces now have their own computer, independent of the PNC, where all local intelligence is stored. However, the local system and the PNC "talk" to each other and exchange information.
We should also be aware of the type of people who are likely to provide intelligence to the State at a local level. No matter what the organisation (local police/CID/SB/MI5), information is gathered by bribery, intimidation, the "recruitment" of civilians as spies/neighbours, the local grocer, the milkman, postman, local clergy, access to local government files, social welfare, vehicle licensing, local housing department files, observations by electricity and gas meter readers, etc. In short, the recruitment of everyone and anyone who is willing to assist the secret police. School teachers are a particularly attractive proposition in this respect. The types of homework essays set for kids can be particularly revealing; "A Day in the Life of my Family", "My Family's Best Friends", "My Family's Likes and Dislikes". Essays on these subjects can all be quite entertaining, or not quite so, depending on your perspective, motives and objectives. Is this an exaggeration? Think about it...would you trust your ex-Headmaster? Also, remarks your kids make in class, especially on the subject of race, etc. will be noted and the police will have access to all files at the school. Why do people grass each other up you may wonder? Usually out of "public spiritedness", or just because they're impressed by a badge.

Special Branch
Special Branch is the executive wing of MI5, or if you prefer, Britain's secret police. All references to Special Branch also apply to the recently formed Racial and Violent Crimes Taskforce which was set up following the MacPherson report and the London nail-bombings. This latter body is the most overtly political police body in existence. They even employ Gable as a "special adviser" so you can see where they're coming from. Normally they are accountable to the CID, but operationally SB report to MI5 and the Home Office. Their headquarters are at New Scotland Yard. Almost every police force has SB officers attached to it. Their main job is gathering intelligence for MI5, that is things that concern "internal security". They have total access to information gathered locally by the police and any that they concentrate on themselves. They use the PNC to a far greater degree than the police.
Special Branch have various methods of collecting information and various sources. Surprisingly perhaps, 75% of information is given away free. Here are a few examples:

1) All the names and addresses of political activists who appear in the press, national and local, are noted and indexed. Extra prints of demos, etc. can be acquired from the papers for background research and journalists will be asked to supply additional information such as the names and addresses of people who write letters about such forbidden subjects as race, etc. to the paper.
2) All those signing petitions to Parliament, even in the most innocuous cases.
3) Letters coming to the Branch from members of the public, giving details about their neighbours or pictures of political activities naming someone they know.
4) The papers, magazines, pamphlets, etc. of political groups. Where possible they subscribe via a box number. Newspapers from Nationalist groups containing pictures of activists selling papers, etc. are a big favourite.
5) During raids by both the Branch and the police, the contents of address books, letters, photo albums, cheque stubs, etc. are all noted down and cross-indexed to determine "friendship networks".
6) Telephone tapping and mail surveillance. All mail can be read without you noticing it's been tampered with.
7) Trials of members of political groups are watched for those who attend and help the defence. Branch officers are at all entrances to the court and photos are taken covertly, either from a van or window opposite the court.
8) Approaches for information are made to employers and State officials of all types, like DSS personnel, doctors, teachers, postmen, etc.
9) A report on every meeting and demo of any Nationalist group is prepared by the Branch or the CID/police in attendance. The contents of speeches are noted, "ringleaders" are identified and photos and video footage are taken.
10) Grasses, touts and informants. There are five main kinds:

i) The "innocent" informer who tells a Branch officer what he considers to be common knowledge about colleagues in the movement, etc. Also in this category are the reactionaries who grass up those they consider to be a threat to society, or when they might profit by the downfall of the victim. Both these types are unpaid and act out of a sense of "public spiritedness", or because they've been watching too much of The Bill on the ZOG Box.
ii) The "innocent" revolutionary who also tells "what everyone knows". Branch officers are usually ill-informed and giving them any information at all is stupid.
iii) Paid informers. Comparatively rare, but someone sympathetic to the Branch or just mercenary and who is paid in cash for information.
iv) "Paid in kind" informers. More common, these are people over whom the Branch has some sort of hold (threat of prosecution, embarrassing information, etc.) and who are forced to give out details.
v) Undercover Branch officers. There are not many of these and they tend to infiltrate organisations and campaigns which are new or loosely bound and in which the participants are less likely to know one another.

Special Branch keep a close eye on the "right wing" in Britain but their job is not made easy by the abundance of factions and splinter groups. More and more members of these groups, pissed off at their lack of progress, are ignoring the "democratic road to Nationalism" and advocating direct action (how shocking!). The disadvantage that this poses for the Branch is that whilst openly legal, democratic groups are easy to watch and categorise, groups without leaders and no central command structure or organisation are much harder to keep track of. Openly legal, democratic groups offer the Branch all the information they could wish for on a plate. These groups hold lists of all their members with full details of names, addresses, telephone numbers, etc. Such lists are guaranteed to fall into the laps of the Branch on a regular basis. Not content with that, these groups then helpfully organise regular ZOG photo shoots (sorry, marches and demonstrations) so that the Branch can also put faces to the names they already have. It's not surprising that groups such as these will never be banned, despite the State's opposition to their beliefs. They are just too useful a tool to lose.

MI5
MI5 is the domestic intelligence service, responsible for intelligence, counter-espionage and security within the UK. It's main task is the monitoring of subversive groups and individuals who might pose a threat to national security. It also monitors the activities of foreign nationals/agents and of diplomatic staff in Britain. In practice, any group whether open or covert, must of necessity come into contact with MI5.
MI5 is officially known as the Security Service and has 9 branches; Counter-Espionage, Protective Security, Counter-Sabotage, Counter-Subversion, Intelligence and Operations, Scientific and Support Services, Computer Division, Training and Registry, Administration and Finance. All these branches are divided into sub-sections, all of which have a specific job to do: i.e. F Branch deals with groups as diverse as C18, the BNP, NF, red groups, anarchists, etc; A Branch deals with criminals such as large-scale thieves, etc; K Branch studies foreign powers.

Telephones
Telephones are poison. From the very outset, it is wisest to assume that everything said on a telephone is totally public and that everything can be heard. Britain has one of the most advanced telephone systems in the world. Every call is recorded; date, time, duration, recipient, town, country, cost, etc. They send you an itemised bill - the police can easily get a list of people who ring you. Telephone systems can be made to automatically monitor conversations and begin recording should key words enter the conversation. This has been used for quite a while now in Ulster.
It is already possible to tap any phone in Britain from one command centre. If your phone is tapped, it is unlikely that you will notice anything out of the ordinary, although it has been known for people to pick up the receiver and hear their previous conversation being played back to them! It's more likely you'll have a clearer line than usual, as this is in the bugger's interest. Telephones are tapped at the exchange or from a command centre, so you are highly unlikely to find a little transmitter in the set itself. If this happens, it's more likely that you are a victim of industrial espionage.
One of the ways to check if you are being bugged is to arrange a fake action over the phone and see how many coppers turn up! Another way to have fun is to ring up a friend and at a prearranged signal you both reduce your voices to a whisper. If a bugger is listening in, they'll hopefully turn up their headphones to hear better. Your friend gets off the line and you blow a referee's whistle as hard as you can down the phone. This should shatter the bastard's eardrums although it might not make you too popular! Unfortunately, this little joke will not usually work as most calls are recorded automatically. Still, it's worth it for the nuisance value.
The circuit of your phone can also be left open, and while it will still work properly, the mouthpiece turns into a microphone and can be used to record anything that is said in the room. For this reason it's best to keep your phone in a drawer or next to a playing radio.
Once again, telephones can never be secure. If at all possible, stay away from them but if you have to use them, take care.

NB CELL-PHONES - A WARNING!
Almost everyone has a mobile phone these days and they are very useful - BUT NOT ONLY TO YOU! Be aware that the police can find you when your cell-phone is on. Cell-phones always log-on to the nearest transmitter mast and if the police know your phone-number they will have a good idea where you are because the transmitter masts only have a short range and around 90% 0f the area of Western nations is covered by them. If you need to use a mobile phone on an activity, use one that is not registered and unknown to those who don't need to know and keep it turned off unless it is absolutely necessary.

Part Three:- Dealing with Cops and Journalists

Cop Cars And How To Spot Them
Most cop cars have orange stripes around the sides and revolving blue lights on the top, which kind of gives the game away. That is, of course, if you've been for a drink on New Year's Eve and the taxis are charging twice as much so you've taken the car. If you're a known supporter of a revolutionary group, the pig car that's following you is more likely to be a clapped out old wreck that'll make you think your banger is a lot better. You can't really spot them by the appearance of the occupants. Plain clothes police, especially SB, don't have those regulation police haircuts, they just look like any other person in the street. Probably the only way you'll know if you're under surveillance by the police is if you familiarise yourself with these cars. After a while you will begin to "sense" them and spot them a mile off.
The cars come in mainly neutral colours, mainly dull brown, green, etc. More vivid colours do occur but less frequently as these catch people's attention. The real giveaway however is the number plates. A car's registration will tell you where it was registered. The letters that indicate this are the last two of the group of three. London police cars are registered in West Central London and are given the codes UL, UV, UW and UU. So the registrations K378 PUV, L778 RUW and G891 TUU could all be police plates. For other parts of the country, the location codes are given in the back of the AA Members' Handbook, or in the back of the Investigative Reporter's Handbook by Stuart Christie.

How To Spot A Plainclothes Cop
As mentioned previously, the only time we have any real dealings with the cops, they're usually in plainclothes and not all that easy to spot unless they've just kicked your front door in. But it does become easier to recognise them after you've seen a few. Once again, it's worth going down to your local nick and have a look at the way they dress. Even though their hair might not be regulation length and they've not had a shave for a couple of days, they seem to like following fashion and will wear Fred Perry, LaCoste, etc. They wear decent jeans as well and like leather jackets and expensive wristwatches and will wear Nike or Adidas trainers for pursuit.
But then there's Special Branch, the political police. They're usually White, aged in their thirties and are specially trained for infiltrating the fringes of demos. For this purpose they will try to dress in a similar way to the people that they are trying to get in with, maybe just by having a short haircut, docs and jeans and going to a pub when they know there's a gig or meeting on. They may just observe people coming to the activity - how many, what sort of people, any literature going round from groups such as C18. If some people are sitting next to them they might start a conversation, etc. We all know the routine and they are pretty easy to spot, especially if they start buying people drinks. Rule is, don't start talking with anyone you don't really know at activities. We should all know this by now. Just keep your gob shut in the presence of strangers.

Raids
When the police or SB raid, it is very often a "fishing trip". They will painstakingly sift through your letters, address books, mailing lists, phone books, photo albums, etc. and copy and cross reference them. They will try to establish "friendship networks"...who knows who. It's best to keep such material hidden somewhere safe and imaginative. Don't keep things like weapons, false IDs, etc. stashed. Basically, nearly every home in the country has somehting illegal in it, whether it's a nicked library book or a fiddled meter or, in our case, some stickers you've had for years that might just offend the "race laws". It would be sily to get nicked for something this small, as it gives them some leverage against you. If you are raided, try to keep your eyes on the police at all times and thoroughly search everywhere after they've gone, or after you get home if they take you as well, for bugs or drugs that they've planted as an excuse to come back and nick you. Tell any friends who are in your address/phone book in case they get a visit as well. Stay calm and don't let them intimidate you. Tell them they're in the wrong, be up in arms about invasion of privacy...after all, every Englishman's home is his castle!

The Police National Computer
The Police National Computer (PNC) has been operational since 1986. It supplies details of car owners, disqualified drivers, etc. as well as people with criminal records, those due to appear in court and people wanted for questioning. Over one hundred million entries now exist on the PNC.
During a name check, the PNC cross-indexes your name between 8 different indices. Not everyone is listed on the PNC, so if you were stopped and checked in the street for example, then you could get away with a false name and d.o.b. If your name is not listed on the PNC it will come back as "no trace". If the police were being funny however, they could search you and if you did have ID on you with your real name on, they'd probably do you for wasting police time. Always use an uncommon name. If you use a common name for which there are likely to be a lot of entries on the PNC then they'll only start asking more questions.
Britain is the only country in Europe where you don't have to carry an identity card, although it probably won't be long before we do. Giving a false name is not an offence as long as the name you give is "one by which you are not known". This means that it is unusual in practice for anyone to be charged with using an alias.

Are You Being Followed?
When the police follow you on foot, they operate in teams of three or more, all in radio contact and co-ordinated from a station or a car. They can be very hard to spot, because if one of them thinks that you have seen him/her they will drop behind and let another take over. Always when being followed, the way to flush a tail is to do something illogical, such as jump on a bus and then jump off again immediately and see who follows you. Go up an escalator and then come down again. Take a lift up and down. Cross a road twice. Take a route that is more complicated than necessary. There is no reason for anyone else to do any of these things unless they are following you. You could have a friend follow you at a distance over a prearranged route to see if they can see anyone else following. Geddit? To lose a tail, head for very crowded areas such as shopping centres, high streets, department stores, etc. and try and slip in and out of crowds and exits.
In a car the same thing applies. Car tails are often done in a "box", whereby three or four cars will follow ahead, behind and parallel to you. You may not see them but they will always be where you want to go. Going round a roundabout more than once or taking four consecutive left or right turns are classic methods of telling if you are being tailed.
Whether on foot or in a car the ideal situation is to get to somewhere isolated, such as long, empty roads or areas of parkland, so that anyone tailing you will stick out like a sore thumb.

Blend In And Get Away
It's a good idea to listen to police radio transmissions and get used to the way they operate, most importantly how they look for someone and how they phrase descriptions. If you're running away and they're after you, your description will be put over the radio to cars and foot patrols. Firstly, you will be an "IC" number, which denotes your racial category. Then your approximate height, age, colour and clothes will be given, and a description of anything you may be carrying. Obviously, the police are alert to anyone running or appearing in a hurry or nervous. If possible, RELAX and try to make your way towards other people. You're safest in a crowd. Try to appear as if you're going about legitimate business. A suit, tie or smart clothes/haircut, etc. works wonders. After daylight you can pin the collar of a dark suit up around your neck and you will be converted for the night. If anyone comes along, simply let your collar down to reveal a white shirt and tie. It's amazing what a suit will let you get away with. You can carry a briefcase or a clipboard. You have to appear to belong in the area where you are. A skinhead in a business suit in the slums is obviously conspicuous. Working clothes such as a donkey jacket, overalls, etc. give an air of legitimacy. These clothes or overalls can be taken off and discarded to immediately change your appearance. It is important to be able to change your outward look in a short time or to be indistinguishable from people around you. This can be done quite easily; a reversible jacket, a hat pulled out of a pocket, what you've been wearing under your overalls. The intention is to look inconspicuous. Dark trousers or blue jeans are the most common. Wear a dark or neutral top (brown, black, navy, grey). Bright colours make you stand out. A radio description of you will mention these. Try and see what makes people stand out in a crowd and see if you can copy the people who blend in.
When trying to get away from a situation, it is always imperative to know the area beforehand. Where are the nearest shopping centres, places where you can lose yourself in a crowd? Which roads can you go down? Any dead ends? How will you get away? A motorbike can get through traffic like a hot knife through butter. A bicycle can go places that a police car can't and is also very quiet! Pick what is best for the situation.

What To Do When Arrested
Everyone has their pet theory about this. Some think it's best to make a fuss and demand your rights, etc. whilst others think you should just keep your mouth shut the whole time. Obviously a lot depends on the coppers and the charge, but on the whole the best thing is to keep as quiet as possible. It's easy to give advice but it can be very frightening in a station, especially if it's your first visit, and everyone reacts differently. If you're middle-class and your dad's a lawyer, then you can kick up as much fuss as you like and the police will treat you differently. They know who to keep on the right side of. This situation will only apply however to the wankers who infest groups like the SWP, etc. and as all our people are working class and conform to most of the police's prejudices the story will be different. You will get short shrift.
Most crimes are solved by "confessions" so the Golden Rule is NEVER MAKE A STATEMENT and especially NEVER SIGN A STATEMENT. Without a signature it can be disputed in court. With a signature you're *ed. If you do sign a statement, remember to sign and number every page and right up to where the writing ends, so that nothing can be added. If more than one of you has been arrested then you will be played off against each other..."Fred's confessed to everything". To avoid this sort of crap, you all have to agree to say absolutely nothing. Cops are experienced interrogators and they can spot inconsistencies and inaccuracies a mile off, so there really is no point in concocting elaborate alibis and excuses as you are bound to slip up, and once they know that you've lied once, they'll never give up.
The best way to behave is to play the role they expect of you. Be slightly in awe of them, willing, polite and slightly stupid. Kicking up a fuss and demanding your rights will only get you in the *. No one likes a smart arse. If you do want to know your rights, contact the N.C.C.L who will provide you with all the information you need. It's useful to know these things.
The best thing is not to say anything at all while in custody, although if you refuse to give your name, address, fingerprints, etc. you could end up being remanded while the police obtain a court order to make you comply. Ask others who have been arrested before and see what worked for them. Chances are they'll all tell you just to keep your mouth and don't make a statement!

And finally a word about Journalists

Journalists often try to give the impression that they are sympathetic to certain causes but never trust a reporter as far as you can throw 'em.

They'd sell their Grandma for a story and are only interested in the "scandal" side of a story. Anything they write will be in line with the editorial policy of the rag they work for. They will lie through their teeth to get you to talk to them. Tell these bastards to * off unless they want their next meal to be their teeth. These people are scum and will distort everything you say and will be only too happy to finger you to Special Branch or the police who regularly drop in at their offices. All that stuff about "protecting their sources" is a load of bollocks. They will usually come up with what the police want to hear; they'd be taken to court if they didn't. These people are lying scum, only interested in how big their pay cheques are going to be at the end of the month and your only contact with them should be between your boot and their teeth.

Dangers of Race-Mixing

The “irrational” animal only joins with members of the same race for procreation. People close to nature like the Germanics, the farmer, who is rooted in the soil and close to the earth, who feels the call of blood and race, acted from the same instinct exactly the same. Only the “overly rational” cultured person believes he can act against nature. That is always to his detriment. If two different races mix, their hereditary traits never merge into a new genetic mass that will be passed on uniformly. We know from the study of hereditary that, aside from the coupling of certain genetic factors, the traits are inherited individually and independent of each other. At the propagation of such bastards these traits rather further separate and divide themselves up in the various descendants.
Every racial-mixing changes the harmonious racial make-up. The farther apart the mixing races stand, the greater will be the disruption which such a bastardization has as a consequence. Furthermore come all the disadvantages in the areas of health and especially psychology which result from race-mixing.
Mix-breeds are physically and psychologically disharmonious.
Race-mixing means a slow decline of the higher race and hence the sure loss of the folkish uniqueness. The consequences of a harmful race-mixing are clearly taught to us by history. From the moment on where folk loses its racial consciousness a moral, intellectual and cultural decline set in. The even today often taken opinion that race-mixing is culturally expansive and even culturally creative is false. Correct, on the other hand, is that contact with foreign folks and races often first triggers in us the correct consciousness of our own essence. This knowledge, however, requires us precisely to a strict separation of everything foreign to our kind in racial regards.

About race-mixing the Fuehrer says:

“Blood-mixing and through it the sinking of the racial level is the sole cause of the dying off of old cultures.”

A series of culture-folks shows the following common line of development, which, however, does not represent a law of life:
After a slow rise up to a certain level there follows a short golden age and then a rapid decline. The decline of strength is almost always introduced in that in place of simplicity, sobriety and health come pleasure-seeking, lack of principles and sickness. Simultaneously bloody wars eradicate the best carriers and lack of children steadily reduce the number of the capable. The death blow, however, is dealt by the mixture with foreign blood. It has the consequence that inner contradictions become ever greater. With such division it is then easy for a vigorous folk to triumph over the sickly one.

The Nordic race is carrier and foundation of German man.

Nature teaches us as the highest law:

The individual is not the purpose, rather the means of life.

The German folk is not the sum of 85 million people, rather a great oneness, a community, in which the Nordic hereditary make-up predominates. This hereditary make-up shows itself not only in physical form of appearance, rather it finds its expression above all in a COMMONLY DIRECTED RACIAL SOUL. Not decisive, even if desirable, are the physically Nordic features of the individual person alone, rather his psychological-character characteristics.
The Nordic race is the race of the German folk, it impresses its stamp on our essence, it determines our thought, action and feeling.

Taken from: SS Race Theory and Mate Selection Guidelines
Booklet SS Race theory is the part of Galuben und Kampfen: Fur die SS-Manner aus den deutschen Volksgruppen des Sudostens

Субјективно Значење Расе

Adolf Hitler - Mein Kampf