NeoNietzsche
NeoNietzsche
@neonietzsche
Estimable Member
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Topics: 5 / Replies: 234
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

NN, your pal Robertson still didn't seem surprised that they collapsed. Strange. Not at all. If Robertson, here speaking in PR mode, had expresse...

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

Like I said before, the BBC is wrong about the WTC core having been constructed of reinforced concrete. No, your report leads to a misimpression for ...

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

1) First FEMA depiction, still used in the UK: 2) Second FEMA depiction, absent core concrete: 3) Actual structure of the Towers...

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

Nice try NeoNietzsche, but your BBC source is plain wrong, and Your MSNBC quote is used out of context. The BBC source is correct as to the existence ...

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

BBC News | AMERICAS | How the World Trade Center fell http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1540044.stm Thursday, 1...

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

"Yamasaki and engineers John Skilling and Les Robertson worked closely, and the relationship between the towers' design and structure was clear. Face...

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

OK, so you're saying that my friends, who have years of experience in the construction trades and military demolitions, never heard about C4 coated re...

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

Sorry, but I've known these guys for years, they are the real deal, unlike your UFO website experts. Not one of these guys has ever heard of C4 coa...

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

Latin skills do not pertain to demolitions. The fact is that rebar exists in a building for a reason. A few more of the above, JP, and I'll have enou...

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

Before you attack their credentials don't forget that you have not provided any proof of your own. Res ipsa loquitur.

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

I know 2 guys who were EOD specialists in the military. I also know a professional welder with 20 years experience. I'm assured by all three people ...

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

The only way to reconcile this analysis inclusive of the 4 Glaring Inconsistencies is that the thick coatings of the rebar of the cast concrete suppor...

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1154643 The actual slowdown in construction was when it was revealed by the governme...

20 years ago
Reply
RE: BYU physics prof: WTC bombed, not taken down by air

Ok your credibility just took a nose dive. We are supposed to believe that the WTC towers were actually rigged to explode WHEN THEY WERE CONSTRUCTED?...

20 years ago
Page 3 / 16