20 March, 2006

We Are All Wearing Red Diapers Now

Posted by alex in jew-led smear campaigns, jewed culture, Jewish Tyranny, language, Max Hadden at 12:38 am | Permanent Link

by Max Hadden

reddiapers.jpg

In 1998 the University of Illinois Press published a book titled Red Diapers: Growing Up in the Communist Left by two Jews named Judy Kaplan and Linn Shapiro. A red diaper baby is the child of parents who were members of the US Communist Party or who were sympathetic to its aims. Communism, as the student of history well knows, is a Jewish ideology. Further, it is the ideology that resulted in more deaths in a shorter time than any other in history. The latter part of the definition of a red diaper baby — “sympathetic to its aims” — is the category most White people in the world, and in fact a huge proportion of non-Whites as well, fit into nicely. Being sympathetic to Jewish aims is often explicit, as in the case of the AIPAC lobbyists currently under indictment, or the kikes in the Office of Special Plans like Wolfowitz who lied us into the war on Iraq. But even more sinister is the implicit undercurrent that we all take for granted. A cursory glance at the history of this country and Europe indicates that we are all wearing red diapers now.

Modern Tyranny

Tyranny is simply keeping any individual or group from exercising their natural rights, or if you prefer God-given rights as human beings. The most basic of these is the freedom of opinion. Of course an expression of one’s opinion can be either oral (freedom of speech) or written (freedom of the press). The Russian and other people under the Jewish Communist yoke had no freedom of opinion. They could agree with Party opinion or they could suffer the consequences for disagreeing. Consequences could be either physical or economical (which eventually becomes physical as well). People who have lived in a Communist country said that there were not armed guards at every corner waiting to enforce the Jewish mandates of the Party because they weren’t necessary. If someone spoke out against the Party, it might take a week or two for the news to get back to Party headquarters, but the end result would be punishment meted out in the form of a decrease in food rations, downgraded living quarters, a lower paying “job”, or even imprisonment or death. So naturally the majority of folks were frightened to speak out.

innocentatdachau.jpg

Many people think the tyranny imposed by the kike Commies is over, but can we think of some examples from American life today? How about a gentleman named Michael Regan? New York assistant district attorney Michael Regan lost his job after he attended the most recent AmRen (American Renaissance) conference. Isn’t this the same thing the Jews did in Russia? Firing him indicates that the government of New York has a State policy — a Party line — that members of government must not cross. Another obvious Red Party demarcation line is the persecution of historical revisionists like David Irving and Ernst Zundel. The Party line is that you must believe in the so-called “Holocaust”… or else. The proper term should be LOLocaust as anyone who does even the briefest investigation will laugh out loud at the absurd claims of the lying Jew “survivors”. How many Americans know that the witnesses at the so-called “trials” held after the Second World War were paid professionals? Most don’t. (Read Innocent at Dachau by Joseph Halow to learn more)

As an aside about Jared Taylor and his approach at both AmRen and the “New Century Foundation”, it is simply Jew appeasement and in the long run is doomed to failure. He appears to be avoiding the subject of Jews because he doesn’t want to be labeled as “anti-Semitic”. To be labeled “anti-Semitic” is of course the primary indication, a red flag (haha), that you do not follow the Party line. What Taylor doesn’t seem to realize is that if you make any pro-White or “racist” statements at all no matter how mild, you are called a “Nazi”. And as such, you are de jure an “anti-Semite” (actually anti-Jew). One swears in a court of law to tell the truth, the WHOLE truth, and nothing but the truth. The word “whole” should be capitalized, underlined, bolded, or otherwise emphasized. All issues must be presented in their entirety — which generally means not taken out of context — in order to be considered TRUE. If you leave out big parts of it on purpose, you’re being consciously deceptive: in other words, lying. To believe you can be pro-White while not being anti-Jewish is wishful thinking and foolhardiness. Name the Jew or to hell with you.

AmRen folks like to believe that our problems are inherently due to faults within our own White race. But the real situation is that White people haven’t dealt with the problems caused by Jews. If there were no Jews living among us, there would be no non-White problems. End of story. The fact is that Jews are responsible for multiculturalism, immigration, the present day Marxist philosophy Party line and a whole host of other things that are destroying the White race. They have made our cradles empty through concerted effort. Their desires are enforced by our governments, whether in New York or in Austria, just as realistically as if we were Soviet satellite nations: punishment in the form of economic loss or imprisonment. When you cross the Party line, or as in Michael Regan’s case expose yourself to opinions that differ from it, such as the fact that the races are not equal, then you suffer the consequences. If the people who fired Regan would unzip their pants, they would discover red diapers. The kikes pinned them on when they were children. And it’s time to grow up.

“Tyranny” and Other Terms of Confusion

A common problem we have is the adoption of Jewish definitions and word associations. One big mistake some make is to associate a “dictatorship” with a tyranny. Wrong. Like Mel Gibson’s character said in “The Patriot”, an elected legislature can trample a man’s rights just as easily as a king can. Further, the history of the Aryan race rules out the idea that a dictatorship such as an aristocracy is somehow tyrannical by its very nature. Most of the kings, emperors, princes, queens, caesars, tsars and what have you in our people’s history have not been tyrannical at all and had parliament like organizations to help them. A few exceptions, which are even questionable in the sense of telling the WHOLE truth — such as Nero — are often trotted out as examples as to why we should oppose a dictatorship. But this is like saying since we discovered a counterfeit one dollar bill in our wallet then all one dollar bills must be counterfeit. That’s obviously ludicrous. As Thomas Jefferson said, you’re living under a tyranny when the people are afraid of their own government. The Germans under Hitler were not afraid. People under Jewish Communism were. In America today, most of us should be afraid, but we’re not.

Another word is “fascism”. Fascism by itself is present in all societies to one degree or another. The word tyranny has long been associated with “fascism”. Not understanding what words mean in the proper context of a nation-state of people is where we continue to make the wrong conclusions. You can’t solve a problem unless you can correctly diagnose the cause. Just discussing the symptoms of a problem (e.g. black crime rates, the war on terror) does not address the underlying cause (Jews). Fascism is the accusation made when laws are rigidly enforced. Whether or not the laws are just for the citizens — as they were in National Socialist Germany — is never addressed. Any law can thus be considered “fascist” when it goes against what some individual or group wants. The legal binding known as the “institution of marriage” is fascist according to gays. Today any sort of rules at all, whether imposed by school teachers or parents, is associated with fascism, and considered tyrannical. The kikes make jokes about it with their “soup Nazi” on Seinfeld. Ignorant pro-American patriots like Paul Craig Roberts call Homeland Security the new Gestapo. This is utter nonsense and simply sows confusion among desperate answer seekers.

The Jews have recently used the neologism of “Islamo-fascism” to stir up the Christian West to hate Arabs, Muslims in particular. The Muslims are guilty by word association because we all know that Islamo-fascism means a tyrannical Islamic regime is headed our way. I am not defending Islamic fanaticism which fundamentally believes that all States should become Islamic theocracies. I’m saying that Jews and their puppets in the mass media use the word “fascism” because of the connection to Hitler they know the majority will make: Islam=fascist=Mussolini=Hitler=evil=bad=must be destroyed=war on terror=war on Iran=right thing to do. The fact is that the only form of government that does not contain fascism is actually no form of government at all: anarchy. ALL other forms have rules. And enforcing the rules is by definition fascist. It also tends to be naturally patriarchal in form. Men, or fathers, enforce discipline. Counter this observation to the constant anti-patriarchal ranting of the kike-led feminists, faggots who think femininity is a divine aspiration and Jewish mass media portrayal of White males as stupid or bad or both. It’s confusing.

vvendetta.jpg And finally, the use of the word “totalitarianism” is also improperly defined and misunderstood for most “writers” in the kosher media today. This is particularly relevant at the moment given a recently released movie called “V for Vendetta” which I’ve been told is about totalitarianism. What totalitarianism is supposed to mean is that the philosophy that a State is guided by should be followed by all of the various facets of the nation to ensure social harmony and little or no conflict. What this means in practice, for example, is that if you teach the fact that the White race is a separate species of human beings in your educational institutions you CAN NOT and SHOULD NOT have an immigration policy that allows non-Whites to invade your land and thereby eventually destroy the White race. The immigration policy of a nation-state must be part of a TOTAL package that looks out for its people just as all other rules in a society should be consistent and in unison. A government plants the seeds of its own ruin for not understanding the total effect of all behaviors in a society. In other words, the big picture, especially the future, of a nation’s people must be considered widely and constantly in order to achieve the maximum benefit for the nation’s people. This type of totalitarianism does not have to be tyrannical. A race’s nature will guide the form it takes.

To end these word games let me say that I disagree with the notion that we should not use the term “racist” just like I disagree with the idea of not using the word “Nazi”. When you start backing away from the term “racist” and opt for “racialist” because of the ways the Jews have redefined it, then the kikes are winning. You’re giving ground to them. They’ve won some turf. Not only that, but you’re adding even more confusion by adding unnecessary ambiguity. When folks call me a racist or ask if I am one, I simply respond that I am a racist and I am a Nazi, and everyone would be one if they really knew what the words meant and not what they’ve been told they mean by a bunch of lying Hebes. The same goes with “revisionism”. Historical revisionists are described by what they do. To revise means to look again and revisionists try to make sure history is as factually accurate and truthful as possible. This process should continue indefinitely whether it concerns setting the facts straight about Nero or the LOLocaust. To run away from the term is to accept Jewish definitions again and I say fuck the Jews. I only care about what the Jews say when they’re telling the truth. And that’s rare.

Useful Idiots and Iran

When a child is raised, especially a White or Aryan child, he reaches a stage where he becomes idealistic. He becomes patriotic and believes that his country is the greatest and her leaders always right. Soviet children who were taught in state government schools to believe in Communism thought it was true until they began questioning what was going on. They noticed the “truth” they’d been told didn’t square with their experiences. It didn’t square with the facts. Communism was supposed to bring an abundance of food yet the stores were practically empty all the time, for example. The few thinkers among the people who understood something was wrong had to develop split personalities — they had to say one thing to their bosses while believing another. Isn’t this the same thing we have going on today? Don’t most people who realize that spics and niggers are not our equals fear to speak out against the Jewish Marxist ideology that claims the opposite? When children are raised with incorrect ideology, the majority of them as adults NEVER get back on the right track again. It’s up to the minority of realists to steer their fellow countrymen and women away from the cliff’s edge.

VNN’s own Glenn Miller was interviewed on a radio show recently and did a terrific job. When the host asked him how he could possibly think the Jews control the mass media and were even controlling his own radio show, Miller responded that the radio show host knew in his heart that he couldn’t speak out and say the races weren’t equal because he would suffer the consequences. Further, the host obviously would never say anything bad about Israel or Jews for fear of the dreaded accusation of “anti-Semitism”. A perfect example of how the Jews have most of our people following the Party line and therefore CONTROL them. Just because we don’t have cards saying that we are Communist Party members doesn’t mean we aren’t practicing Communists, even if unwittingly. As Julius Evola might have said, most of us are ideological mercenaries. Military merceneries get paid for their power. American flag-waving Marxist and Jew-loving yahoos get paid for believing a certain way. When the lemmings believe a certain way they will reap the rewards from the nation courtesy of the Party. To each according to his greed. Eh, comrade?

Whenever I’ve attended lectures and book signings by prominent people opposed to the war on Iraq I’ve always run into Communists. One of these events last year was a tour by the outspoken British Member of Parliament George Galloway. Galloway spoke eloquently about how the war against Iraq was an injustice and how Palestinians and Arabs in general were long suffering due to European and American policies in that region. But he then went on to complain that the Bush administration was racist and fascist and was engaging in some sort of imperialist capitalism. And the Communist rabble in the crowd cheered him on while I just shook my head. These Communist fools don’t even understand that if Bush really invaded Iraq for oil, as Galloway proclaimed, its behavior could be appropriately called State Capitalism which everyone — whose head hasn’t been pumped with bullshit — should realize is Communism. And if Bush is a racist, and therefore a Nazi and fascist, can these morons please explain why every single so-called neo-Nazi group in America was AGAINST the Iraq invasion? Of course they can’t because their ideology — just like anything else concocted by Jews — is based on lies, misinterpretations, misunderstandings and plain old fashioned ignorance.

I’ve mentioned several examples of our complicity to the Jewish Party line — you can’t be a pro-White, you must believe in the Holocaust, you can’t admonish Israeli behavior — yet a more dire aspect of the Chosen’s destructiveness looms ever closer on the horizon: the coming war against Iran. Recall that I said in a past article (“Planet of the Kikes”) that the Jews produce books not because they are supernaturally prophetic, but because they are guide books on how things need to be steered. As I mentioned, the kike Nostradamus said the way to get the war against Persia (Iran) going was to attack Rome. This fans the flames of the last great war: Islam versus Christianity. Rome seemed a strange place for an attack when I first wrote that piece, but I’ve recently realized that at the time Nostradamus wrote his verses there was no Vatican City State. The Holy See existed, but the Vatican wasn’t officially separated until 1929. I wouldn’t be at all surprised, given that most of the Christian world is of the Catholic persuasion thanks to its schools and missionaries, that the “Pearl Harbor” event that will infuriate Whites and even many non-Whites so much that they’ll want to destroy Iran is an attack in Rome that Nostradamus alluded to — centered at the Vatican. It’s the greatest and possibly only geographic location symbolizing Christianity. Perfect for a badly needed Mossad “false flag” operation.

Conclusion

As all addicts learn, the first step in recovery is recognizing that you have a problem. In the case of White people in America, in Europe and nearly everywhere else, we have a BIG problem: Jews. Just like the proverbial frog in the water that’s been heated up gradually, the masses of people don’t even realize that they’re in hot water. They don’t recognize that Jewish Soviet style policy and ideology have been and continue to be put into practice. If someone gets up and says, “Let’s kill ourselves! Let’s commit suicide!”, everyone would say they’re crazy, but when they say instead, “Let’s do this! This is good! This is fair! We must be humane! Let the Mexicans in! Let your daughter date Africans! Give homosexuals a fair shake! Promote poor, oppressed gays on television! Put women in charge! Terrorists are haters! Terrorists are evil! Bomb Iraq!” it all sounds good, but it’s really the thing as “Let’s commit suicide using indirect methods!” So the Jews change the verbiage to something more palatable and acceptable while slowly and surely drawing their plans against us (to borrow from H. G. Wells).

Why should we listen to Jews? Why should we give a shit about what they think or say? In fact, why should any of you reading this believe me for that matter? My answer to that is simple: don’t. Believe what you want to believe as long as “Nazis” like myself get a proper hearing and get to express our opinions. We’re not afraid of criticism or even being proved wrong for that matter. You can make up your own minds about what rings true or not. Some people say that “promoting hate” against the Jews is irresponsible because it makes a real Holocaust possible. That sentiment reminds me of a line in the movie remake “John Carpenter’s The Thing”. Question: What if we’re wrong about the Jews? Answer: Why then we’re wrong. And by that I mean who cares if we’re wrong even after we’ve thrown the kikes out of our country and hanged or shot the most treasonous ones, it was still right to take our country back. Shouldn’t we be allowed to have our own country run by our own people? Of course we should. One of the first steps in doing that is recognizing the Jewish ideologies that are killing us, and then removing our red diapers. And these diapers need changing, bad.


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 06/04/12 “We Are All Greek Jews” When White People Think Racially 33% similar
  3. 06/24/19 White Philosophy for Newbies: Today’s White-Hating Leftists are All Psychological Jews 25% similar
  4. 02/07/10 Australia: More Info About the Red Octopus Jewctopus 25% similar
  5. 04/30/19 Okay, Now, Let’s All Speak Negro Slang 22% similar
  6. 08/10/12 Thanks to Central Bank Money-Voodoo, We Are Spending Our Country to Ruin 20% similar
  7. 10 Responses to “We Are All Wearing Red Diapers Now”

    1. Carl Loerbs Says:

      An interesting sidelight to this post is that the Jewish commentator Michael Savage coined and uses the term “red diaper doper baby”.

      I would suggest that Max Hadden write more often as his time permits. This has got to be one of the most coherent, scholarly, and civil discussions on naming the Jew I have seen. This is an example of the use of intellect to illuminate rather than to obfuscate.

      I agree with his attitude towards the use of the word racist. The SPLC recognizes no distinction between the Constitution Party and AR on one end, and VNN and NSM on the other end. All are considered equally racist and are equally condemned by Morris Dees. Racism, in its purest form, in simply race-consciousness or awareness. Its use determines its value. We have allowed to Jews to define racism long enough.

      However, I would also like to address Max Hadden’s willingness to accept the designation “Nazi”. The term “Nazi” is actually a Jewish-inspired derogatory diminutive of the term “National Socialist”. The intent of the National Socialists in Germany was strictly honorable; they picked a nation up off the deck by the scruff of its neck, planted it solidly on its feet, and shoved it back amongst the front ranks of nations. The sparkling eyes and rapt countenances displayed by Germans at the various mass rallies conducted by the National Socialists were not and cannot be faked. Perhaps it might be appropriate to de-toxify and de-Judaize the word “Nazi”, but we’ve allowed the Jews to define and dictate our standards and values long enough. But in any event, it’s a peripheral issue and in no way detracts from the overall value of Max Hadden’s presentation.

    2. apollonian Says:

      Good to see Max Hadden again. We need to de-Judaize like the kikes imagine they can “de-nazify.” Death to Judaism. Apollonian

    3. alex Says:

      It’s a very good article, and I particularly like the focus on the fact that we already live in a tyranny. The average American fears the government, and that is precisely what tyranny means.

      Our government has rightly been called ‘ZOG’ for Zionist Occupational Government. The jews attempt to strip us, the sons of the founders, of our words and our weapons, by doing in the the First and Second Amendments. They murder our communities by destroying our civil rights, doing away with the free association that is Constitutionally guaranteed, and once allowed us to protect ourselves. In Israel these same hypocritical jews walk around with full machine guns. They live behind walls separating themselves from people they hate, and they pass laws preventing anyone without jewish blood from becoming a citizen.

      ONE STANDARD FOR JEWS, ANOTHER STANDARD FOR EVERYBODY ELSE.

      The jews have set the stage for a revolution, and with the Internet giving us access to history, we see that this time, when we get on top of the jews, we eradicate them and the problems they cause for once and for all.

      DEATH TO THE JEWS.

    4. alex Says:

      Jews launched America on a $1 trillion folly in Iraq, all to make world more comfortable for sick, vicious Israel.

      No special money came forward from the Jewish community, the richest in America.

      No special forces came forward to volunteer to prosecute a cause benefiting only the jews and actually damaging the host.

      We don’t need jews, fellow White man. The jews need us – as tax slaves and cannon fodder.

    5. James Hawthorne Says:

      Another great article by Hadden, my favourite VNN National Socialist writer. Itz all true, the Goy dance to the Jew-tune in whatever way they want. The lemming has no clue how he is being played by these monsters, and played he is. While he has his head in the sand, the Jew lauds it over him like the parasite he is.

      Every part of our society is ‘Jewized’ as the article states, at the moment the dullard lemmings dance the kikeadance in ever swirling circles. We are without doubt in the Jewish matrix…. I dare you White man, your choice, the red pill or the green pill ?

    6. Irmin Says:

      Max Hadden wrote:

      ***
      I disagree with the notion that we should not use the term “racist” just like I disagree with the idea of not using the word “Nazi”. When you start backing away from the term “racist” and opt for “racialist” because of the ways the Jews have redefined it, then the kikes are winning.
      ***

      The preceding is factually inaccurate. Jews did not redefine the term “racism”; they invented it. It’s their word, not ours.

      “Homophobia” offers a recent parallel, recent enough that everyone can see how a label, when aggressively promoted, can be used to redefine normality as sickness.

      Perhaps it’s too late now to back away from the terms they devised, long ago, to demonize our old racial consciousness. I don’t think it is too late, though opinions on the matter differ. But whatever our position on the value of these labels “racism” and “racist,” we shouldn’t get their history wrong. “Racist” was not originally our name, and no one sneakily redefined it. “Racist” and “racism” were pejoratives devised and propagated by left-wing Jews in order to delegitimize us. They’re pejoratives now and they have always been pejoratives.

      If your enemy calls you Jim and your real name is Tom, there may be no harm in granting him a small victory and answering to Jim. If, on the other hand, your enemy calls you a hate-filled lunatic, you’d be wise to reject his label.

      The history of “racist” and “racism” is closer to the second scenario than the first.

      –Irmin

    7. James Hawthorne Says:

      The jew Magnus Hirschfeld wrote his book Racism (actually Aracism in German) to refute the tenements of National Socialism. He did this because the nazis were so blatantly anti-homosexual and anti-Jewish and closed down his “Institute of Sexual Science” in Berlin. He correctly identified the race basis of National Socialism and to him the two were one in the same. Racism equals National Socialism. Hirschfeld being a Jew and probably gay felt up close and personal (he fled to France) the effects of racism. To him it meant persecution and oppression, but to the nazis it meant protecting and preserving their own race from kikes! So Hirschfeld accurately described National Socialism as a race-based ideology, or racism, then immediately tried to redefine it as meaning unjustified abuse.

      You’ve got to either use racism or some sort of words like specism and specist to understand a fundament of National Socialism which is race. It’s either that or Galtonism or Darwinism (both who were not jews).

      Hadden is correct in that Jews, especially from the Frankfurt School, have since redefined the racism of the National Socialists even worse than Hirschfeld to mean not only persecution of non-whites but world domination! Ask anyone in America today and they will say that “nazis” or “racists” want to kill all non-whites, take over the world, bring back slavery, and abuse non-whites for fun. Which is a fucking jewish lie and perversion of what true National Socialists believe.

    8. apollonian Says:

      Christianity Needs Reason To Battle Heresy Of “Non-Racism”
      (Apollonian, 21 Mar 06)

      It’s actually quite simple, comrade Irmin: non-racism is absurd and un-natural, LITERALLY A HERESY (and/or corollary), aside fm being actually inhuman and suicidal. But we all achieve the ideal (in truth and objective reality) throughout our lives, I guess. As artists we merely need be HONEST to start with, and if then we’re only logical, we’ll surely overcome our Judeo-“Sadducean” enemy. (Ck essays of Apollonian on NewNation.org, under “commentary.”)

      Conspiracy, though determined is yet cyclic, and we merely need play the cyclic phase of history more accurately than our oppressor. See Oswald Spengler’s “Decline of the West.” Reduction to absurd comes for the parasite at that point when the host becomes exhausted, expiring upon poor hubristic parasite, now so victorious.

      Hence u see Judeo-“Sadducean” conspiracy is self-defeating and the topmost Jews (and “Sadducean” suckalongs-accomplices) must decoy the goyim remaining by a strategic sacrifice–and sellout–of their own Jews, these Jews of the lower, “working-class,” order.

      I notice lately the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR–see JBS.org) has been sponsoring “criticism” of Bush II. For if Bush has to “take a fall,” he will to serve his CFR masters, the “Sadducean” mastermind-counterparts to original New Testament (NT) version, who lead the “Judeo-Christians” (JCs) led by such as Falwell, Robertson, Limbaugh, O’Reilly, et al.

      Hence in accord w. NT conspiracy theory-analytic-template we work assiduously upon the elder and JC component, these the dupes who give legitimacy to such as Bush II, frontman and enforcer. And we have the great and classic historical example of saint and Roman emperor Constantine the Great.

      NT then speaks the people’s language, a rhetoric and art we must absolutely master, reading history accurately and preaching it all to the people, so willing and eager to hear, no matter how cynical u may yet have to be sometimes–which Linder/VNN is too much. For merely being cynical is not great feat.

      We patriots must be INFORMATIVE and most encouraging to our fellow humans, Christians though they may be. It is folly and self-defeating for patriots to reject Christian aesthetic, philosophy (actually quite simple), and objectivity–to be rationalistically observed strictly fm the literature, quite good enough. NT then provides a language and mentality by which to approach our great patriot’s task.

      CONCLUSION: Thus is art properly understood, as Christianity is aesthetic parallel and consistent w. ideal of OBJECTIVITY–this in pointed antithesis to Judaic TALMUD featuring subjectivity, foundation for fraud culture, “Mammon.” Thus the art is so much a mentality among so many of the people; it demands proper appreciation as veritable weapon if only used, treated, and respected properly. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

    9. James Hawthorne Says:

      The Germans invented the abbreviation “nazi” themselves. It was used in publications for expediency. “Nazi Sozi” was the entire abbreviation. They used many. Goebbels even joked about it referring to “Nazis” in a speech once. It’s like saying “Commie”. It really should have no negative baggage with it. It’s just an abbreviation.

    10. Mister Snipe Says:

      AMREN posting 3/21/2006:

      I hope on their death beds they look back with regret on their work and say, “I blew my one God-given life on THAT?!�

      Posted by Civilized Neighbor at 9:41 PM on March 20

      “Now comes Harvard educated Noel Ignatiev, an academic at Harvard’s W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African-American Research. Dr. Ignatiev is the founder of a journal, Race Traitor, which has as its motto, “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.�

      The journal’s purpose is “to abolish the white race.�

      At the least, Dr. Ignatiev intends cultural and psychological genocide for whites. It is unclear whether physical extermination is part of the program. A statement by the editors on the web site says that the new abolitionists

      “do not limit themselves to socially acceptable means of protest, but reject in advance no means of attaining their goal.�

      Dr. Ignatiev does not believe his agenda is controversial. He writes:

      “The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.� Thus does he put whites on notice. If they oppose their abolition, they are “white supremacists.�

      According to Dr. Ignatiev,

      “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.�

      “Make no mistake about it,� he says,

      “we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed—not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.�

      What “social construct� will be left? A black one? An Hispanic one? Muslim? Asian? What about Jewish?

      The Washington Times reports that Dr. Ignatiev is himself Jewish. If Jewish intellectuals and Israeli political leaders can be believed, Jews have a cultural and racial consciousness. Israel is the Jewish homeland, and Israelis seem determined to keep it that way. Can anyone imagine a gentile at an Israeli university founding a magazine devoted to abolishing the Jewish race?

      Yet, Dr. Ignatiev believes that it is self-evident that whites in their homelands should be abolished.

      Where did he get this view? His only education was at Harvard where he received two graduate degrees.

      Is Harvard embarrassed? No. Dr. Ignatiev [[email protected]] is showcased in the current issue of Harvard Magazine. Getting rid of whiteness is not controversial at Harvard, because it is the business of American universities.â€?

      This is from a Paul Craig Roberts article on VDare about Noel Ignatiev the supposed inventor of Whiteness Studies. Roberts and other critics of Whiteness Studies seem unsure of whether Ignatiev is calling for the literal destruction of the white race. But he has been quoted as saying that he is indeed calling for the literal destruction of the white race. People who support this usually couch their genocidal intent in postmodern psycho-babble like that in the above statements. I think whites should find the spread of Whiteness Studies throughout our universities both alarming and enlightening.

      Posted by John S. at 9:49 PM on March 20