3 May, 2006

Goering’s Letter to Churchill

Posted by alex in Europe, Germany, historical texts, World War II at 6:51 pm | Permanent Link

[Britain’s fear and jealousy of Germany led it to work with the Judeobolsheviks to destroy it, which in turn destroyed the British Empire, and finally Britain herself.

Conservatives acclaim Winnie the man of the milennium, too stupid to see him and his produce for what they are. The same people preaching prudence and moderation celebrate the drunken mass-murderer, showing themselves for what they are, small curs following bigger ones.

Only the jew won World War Two… All children should be taught this ditty. There really isn’t much more needs known.]

Goering’s Last Letter to Churchill

Herr Churchill!

You will now have the satisfaction of outliving me and my comrades in misfortune. I do not hesitate to congratulate you over this personal triumph and the delicacy with which you have brought it about.

You and Great Britain have really had to go to great expense for this success. Were I to consider you simple enough to attribute to it more significance than that of a spectacle which you and your friends owe to the peoples whom you manoeuvred into the war against the Greater German Reich and to your Jewish and Bolshevik confederates, then my declaration to you in the penultimate hour of my life would also, in the eyes of posterity, have been wasted on an unworthy man. My pride as a German and as one of the most responsible German leaders in an historic world struggle does not permit me to waste a single word over the degrading vulgarity of the procedure employed by the victors in so far at least as it applies to my own person. But, as it is the manifest and declared purpose fo this administration of justice to cast the German people themselves into the abysmal depths of being outlawed and, by the removal of the responsible men of the National-Socialist State, to rob them once and for all of all possibilities of future defence, I have, under the judgment which you and your allies have determined in advance, to add a few remarks on the historic subject. I direct these remarks to you because although one of those who knew most about the true background of this war and the possibilities of avoiding it or of ending it in such a stage as would still be tolerable for the future of Europe, nevertheless you refused to your own Tribunal your evidence and your oath. I shall, therefore, not fail to call you in a good time before the Tribunal of History and I direct my declaration to you because I knew that this Tribunal will, in due course, name you as the man who, with ambition, intelligence and energy cast down the European nations under the wheels of foreign powers.

Before History I establish you as the man who, indeed, had the capacity to cause the downfall of Adolf Hitler and his political work, but who nevertheless will not be successful in place of th efallen man in again raising the protecting shield against the Asiatic invasion of Europe. Your ambition it was to maintain your position over Germany by means of Versailles, your fate it will be that you succeeded in this. You personify the hardened obstinacy of your old Master-people but you personify also the obstinacy of their old age, directed against the last great attempts of the revived Germanic Power to decide the fate of Europe in the steppes of Asia and to safeguard it for the future. Long after my responsibility will have found its objective judge in the further development of events, you will have to assume responsibility for the fact that the late bloody war was not the last one which had to be fought out for the vital interests of the Continent on her own territory. You will have to answer for the fact that the bloodbath of yesterday will be followed by a still greater one and that Europe will have to make its stand for life or death not at the Volga but at the Pyrenees. It is my warm wish that you will at least live to see the day on which the world, and especially the Western nations, will have to learn by bitter experience that it was you and your friend Roosevelt who, for the sake of a cheap triumph over National-Socialist Germany, sold their future to Bolshevism. This day will come more quickly than you like and, in spite of your advanced age, you will thus probably still be active enough to see it dawn blood-red over the British islands also. I am convinced that it will bring you all those terrible surprises which, this time, through the fortune of war or because of the German Command’s abhorrence of a complete degeneration of the struggle between our kindred peoples, you have escaped. My knowledge of the nature and extent of the new weapons and projects which, largely due to your military aid, have fallen as booty to the Red Army, empowers me to make this prophecy.

You will, as is your custom, no doubt waste no time in writing good memoirs and you will write them all the better because now none can hinder you in reporting or concealing just what you wish. Nevertheless, you will be powerless against those corrections which the development of events, precipitated by you, will unflinchingly undertake. It will then be your affair to give the peoples the answer to the questions which you have not given to your sham Tribunal and which you have refused to give, not so much to us who wish to have to thank your fairness for nothing, but to historical truth.

You think that you have arranged things cleverly by throwing this historical truth on the dissecting table for the legal sophistries of a handful of ambitious juridical subordinates, and allowing it to be turned into a dialectal treatise of paragraph-quibbling, although you as a Briton and a statesman know all too well that, by such means, the vital problems of the peoples could not in the past be solved or judged, and that they will not be so solved in the future. I have a too-well-founded opinion of your strength and of the cunning of your intelligence for me to think you capable of believing the vulgar catchwords with which you sustain the war against us and seek to glorify your victory over us in a circus-like spectacle. As one of the highest military, political and economic leaders of the Greater German Reich I herewith declare once more, with all emphasis, that this war was unavoidable only because the policy of Great Britain under your personal influence and that of your adherents was stubbornly directed in all spheres to blocking the way to the vital interests and the natural development of the German people, and that you, filled with senile ambition to maintain the British hegemony, preferred the second world war to an undertsanding — sincerely and again and again striven and hoped for on our side — on a basis tolerable for the two most prominent nations of Europe and paying regard to their natural functions and interests. I declare here once more most emphatically that the sole guilt of the German people for the world war, forced on by you, is that it sought finally to make an end of the eternal distress which you ingeniously maintained and cunningly stirred up. It would be carrying coals to Newcastle were I to speak my mind to you about the causes, necessities and motives which, in the course of the war, led to the political and military difficulties which your legal zealots, so certain of their aim, have managed to draw upon so one-sidedly at the cost of the National-Socialist Government of the German people.

The devastated area of European civilization and its historical treasures now lying in ruins still bear witness today in the first place of the desperate bitterness with which a great and proud people yesterday fought with incomparable self-sacrifice for its very existence.

Tomorrow, however, they will bear witness of the unscrupulousness with which alone the superior numbers led on to the field by you could bring about the subjection and deprivation of the rights of this People.

But the day after tomorrow the ruins will bear witness of that betrayal which has surrendered Europe to Red Asia.

The Germany whicih you have beaten will, through its very collapse, revenge itself on you. For neither have you carried out a better policy than we have, nor have you given evidence of greater efficiency and bravery. You have to thank for your victory, not better qualities or an imaginary superiority of your own strength and skill, but, solely and after six years, the preponderance of your coalition. Do not take it for that which you allege it to be. You and your country will soon harvest the fruits of your political skill. What you, an experienced cynic, would not admit as valid in our case (namely: that our struggle in the East was the highest defense action not only for Germany but also at the same time for Europe and is the actual justification for all acts and measures of the German ocnduct of the war which you, from your side, so plainly and ocncisely condemn in detail) your present-day ally and friend Stalin will soon prove to you and to the British Empire. You will then experience what it measn to fight against this opponent and you will learn that you necessity also knows no law, and that you cannot oppose him successfully either with lawyers’  treatises or with the weight of Great Britain and its European dwarfs.

You have advanced the assertion for the German people that for you it was principally a question of the restoration of its democratic form of life. You have, however, not uttered a single word that you are concerned for the restoration of reasonable conditions of life, of which it has now been deprived for a quarter of a century.

Your name stands beneath all the principal documents of this era of British lack of understanding and jealousy of Germany.

Your name will also stand beneath the result: that this era of the liquidation of Germany from history challenges the existence of Europe.

My faith in the vital strength of my people is unshakable. This People will be strong and will live longer than you. But it pains me that it is handed over to you without means of defending itself and that it now also is one of those unhappy victims who, thanks to your success, now face not an age of prosperous work for the accomplishment of those common tasks set by good sense for the peoples of the West, but the greatest common catastrophe of their common history. I spare myself the dispute over excesses with which, rightly or wrongly, you reproach us and which corresponds neither to my points of view nor to that of the German people, and also over those excesses which have been committed on your side and on that of your allies against millions of Germans. For I know that under cover of this pretext, you have made the whole German people the object of collective excesses of an extent never previously found in the whole of world history, and that also without this pretext you would not have acted differently in your treatment of Germany because, since 1914, you have steadfastly and stubbornly envisaged and striven for no other goal than the destruction of the German Reich. This, your historic object in view, denies to you your claim to the office of judge over the avoidable and unavoidable consequences which your cold-blooded and steady pursuit of your aims provoked, or which were welcome to you as subsequent evidence for the justification of your endeavor. I regret today, as mine and the National-Socialist Government’s gravest mistake, solely the fateful error to which I and our policy succumbed in our judgment of your power of discernment as a statesman. I regret that I attributed to you the discernment of the world political necessity of a satisfied and prosperous Germany for the existence of the British Empire also. I regret that our strength and our means were not sufficient to wring from you, even in the very last minute, the better knowledge that the liquidation of Germany will be the beginning of the liquidation of the British world-power. We took our places and acted each according to his law. I according to the new law, for which this Europe is already too old; you according to the old law, for which this Europe is no longer important enough to the world.

I shall manage to go my way to the end in the sure consciousness that as German National-Socialist I was, in spite of everything, also a better European than you. I leave the verdict over this calmly to posterity, where in accordance with my sincere wish you may belong and live as long as possible. Perhaps Fate will then offer you a chance which you have offered me: of leaving behind in the ruin a Verity.

HERMANN G&#246RING

[Appeared in The American Mercury, Fall 1977]


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 09/27/13 Historian Says: Hitler Wanted Peace, Offered a Detailed, Written Peace Offer, Sent Hess to Deliver It, But Churchill Rejected It 37% similar
  3. 03/15/07 MAYNARD: Response to Letter to Germany 37% similar
  4. 01/22/15 Winston Churchill: a Traitor and a Scoundrel 31% similar
  5. 11/05/07 Letter from CMM 30% similar
  6. 01/28/16 Jews: Never to Blame. Whites: Always to Blame 28% similar
  7. 43 Responses to “Goering’s Letter to Churchill”

    1. Carpenter Says:

      Powerful words. Some of the points Goering is making here:

      –Germany had been deprived reasonable living conditions for a quarter century

      –The British Empire forced Germany into war, by using its alliances to close all doors to negotiations and to put pressure on Germany

      –Germany’s war effort was legitimate because of its struggle against the Asiatic menace, a battle that had to be won in order to protect Europe, something Churchill blindly denied

      –The British Empire won the war only because of the superior numbers of its coalition, not because of any superior skill or genius

      –Churchill and his government destroyed Europe by refusing to negotiate a peace, which the Germans sincerely wished for

      –The British Empire itself would be destroyed by the Red Asiatic threat (the Soviet Union)

      –Europe would have to fight an even bloodier war than WW II to protect itself from Asia and Bolshevism, and its future fate would be decided not by the Volga but by the Pyrennees

      Goering’s vision of a Soviet invasion of Europe almost came true in the early 1980s when Western Europe was nearly defenseless and the USSR, with many times more tanks, could have walked straight through it at will.

      I guess not even Goering could foresee the way Europe would be conquered once the USSR had failed; who could possibly imagine that Western governments would open their own borders to foreign peoples without a fight? You could go back a hundred years and tell people this, and noone would believe you.

    2. Socrates Says:

      How sad that England – once the most powerful White country on earth – played a key role in bringing the Jews to international power via WWII.

      [But note, as I have said before, that it was British leaders who did that, not rank-and-file British citizens. As someone who is of British ethnic stock, I feel the need to mention that. :-) ]

    3. Harry Tuttle Says:

      Britain is done. It’s just another third world hellhole. Posthumous revenge of the Nazis. If Hitler had won, who thinks Britain would now be fading into a bongo party backwater?

    4. WhiteFight Says:

      It seems the lesson here is don’t play nice with jews and the jealous race-traitor white nations they own. It’s a real shame what happened to Germany. I think Germany was the crown jewel of Europe and can be evidenced to this day by the remnants of it’s culture which somewhat still exists in the more rural areas of Germany. I was in Germany recently and places like Munich and Berlin are cesspools of semitic filth (both arab and jewish). These semetic beasts control much of the heart of these once great cities through underground networks of sex-clubs, hostels and many other trades which give them much leverage over the civilian population. I traveled throughout Europe (Hungary,Poland,Denmark,Sweden) and found the rural Germans to be the most cultured and descent people of all Europe. I think they truly were the best Europe had to offer and had to be utterly crushed so as not to make the rest of Europe look bad. Just my opinion/experience…

    5. Sulla Says:

      Folks, don’t get all lost in dispair. It ain’t over until the fat lady sings…. and it sure as fuck ain’t over YET! Those who achieve victory are those who face insurrmountable odds, obstacles and challenges yet, somehow, prevail. That is the story of our race. Think Alexander, Napoleon and Caesar. My namesake crossed the Rubicon (as did Caesar years later) killed all his enemies by proscribing them and basically ruled Rome as a dictator. Yet, everyone, including his generals said it can’t be done, but he did it by having the good sense to ignore their nervous nellyism.

      I believe great changes are coming and I for one have no problems WHATSOEVER in utilizing Machiavellian/Sun Tzu techniques and mindset to achieve what needs to be done. I’ll leave the negative assholes to piss & moan forevermore.

    6. diabloblanco Says:

      It is sobering and ironic to realize not that Herr Goering’s prophetic words were accurate, but that the real truth was much, much worse. No doubt he and even Mr Churchill would have been shocked to find that Britian’s destiny was not the comparitively mercyful fate of Red tyranny, which after all at some point would have been torn asunder and thrown off, following which Englishmen would have again been free and proud, and English roses would again have bloomed, but the unimaginably even more gruseome fate of Black and Brown tyranny, from which there can be no recovery, and which if not thwarted, leads only to eternal death
      This grim winter will never be followed by any spring, and yet worse again is the sure and certain knowledge that the very means which the Creator intended to give eternal life from, the very wombs, were used by forces so foul, so corrupt, so vile, that hell itself turns in horror from them, as a means of extinction
      And yet, even at this hour, for those of us who fear not death, there is another way. THe way of total Aryan unity, of total war, of total death in need be on an individual level, so that our souls and the blood of our race may enjoy the honor of eternal life!

    7. jimbo Says:

      NO GO! areas for whites in major UK cities; a dis-armed population @ the mercy of thugs, psychopaths and non-white ‘hoons’;the wealth and blood of Britain once again being WASTED in yet ANOTHER war for the GODDAMN FILTHY JEWS(Iraq!);a basically worthless economy;millions of white people either @ or below the poverty level or living on the streets while gazillions of QUIDs in ‘foreign aid’ is used to expand the populations of worthless MUD PEOPLE so even more can invade the white home-lands; the ‘silent genocide’ of the white race(abortion, contraception, homosexuality) being promoted by ZOG schmuels along with feminism and multi-culturalism to the extent that most white British children hardly even know they’re British let alone WHITE!; millions of CCTV cameras monitoring the comings-and-goings of WHITE British subjects 24hrs a day while IGNORING the rampaging gangs of MUDS terrorising the white population;crazy ZOG ‘anti-terrorism laws’ cancelling the liberties and freedoms that Britons had viewed as their birth-rights and had fought long and bloody wars and revolutions to uphold

      ain’t a ‘Hitler-free’ Britain GRAND?!

    8. George Crane Says:

      The best Brits will survive even this, and we are with them.

      Never again (Whites killing Whites), at the puppet-strings of Ewige Jude! [see the classic film]

      ‘Eighth Air Force’ [bombing Aryans and their children in WWII] my ass! What a shame on the White suckers who fell for it!

      Only the Jews won WWII!

      GEORGE CRANE (and you can QUOTE me)

    9. Olde Dutch Says:

      Sour grapes from the fatboy…

    10. GB Says:

      This letter must have been written shortly before his suicide. Does anyone know the date it was written?

    11. Celtic Warrior Says:

      Goering pretty well sums up the whole situation we are now facing.
      So what are we going to do about it? Pass resolutions, vote for ‘conservative’ candidates, moan to our friend over a beer? None of these will bring us victory. Instead let us take to heart George Lincoln Rockwell’s command….”White man, stand up and fight”.

    12. Thrasymachus Says:

      There can be no more excuse for White nations to go to war with each other in this age of White racial atrophy. Our only chance for survival requires that all Europeans be on the same team and have the same basic goal – survival. We simply cannot afford to repeat the mistakes of WWI and WWII. When the whole of Europe is secure, then the individual European nations will also be secure and will be able to preserve their cultures, languages, and genetic heritages.

      NEVER AGAIN should take on a new and wholesome meaning — no more fratricidal war!

    13. James Morden Says:

      A powerful testament. If anything a little too generous to Churchill who said he feared that eventually history would condemn him and who knew exactly what the consequences of his actions would be. Part of his price was to make sure his own ‘orrible offspring were well catered for after him.

      No one better personifies Britain’s decline.

    14. NSN Says:

      Isn’t the quote “I think we slaughtered the wrong pig” attributed to Churchill? The “iron curtain” quote certainly is. Yes, the man was a fool and hopelessly out of his depth with it all. Roosevelt was certainly no friend of the British Empire, let alone Stalin.

    15. sambodelicious Says:

      Goebbels used the term “Iron Curtain” to refer to the soon-to-be Eastern Bloc several years before Churchill.

      http://www.fpp.co.uk/Letters/Churchill/Kurtz180602.html

    16. George Crane Says:

      Even General Patton — certainly one of the most dedicated soldiers to ever live — is quoted as saying “We fought the wrong enemy.”

      In the few months, after the war, in which he lived and was still in Germany. I believe he “saw the light” at the end (too late).

      The older movie “Last Days of Patton” is mostly factually accurate, and an excellent dramatization, while it … uh humm …. conveniently leaves out EVERYTHING that General Patton said and wrote about Jews in those months between VE-Day and his death that December, 1945.

      General Patton (finally) noticed what Jews were doing in Europe, how they behaved, and specifically took affront at the ‘Semitic revenge’ character of the Nuremburg trials.

    17. Friedrich Braun Says:

      “Isn’t the quote “I think we slaughtered the wrong pigâ€? attributed to Churchill?”

      No, this is false. David Irving — now rotting away in an Austrian jail for unwisely showing skepticism of the holocau$t story in a speech he made in ’89, i.e. at a time when Austria didn’t even have the anti-holocau$t denial act under which he was convicted…how do you like the “free” and “democratic” Europe? ENJOY! — has persuasively showed that that statement attributed to the vain mass-murdering drunk Churchill is an urban legend. He never said it.

    18. H,Schneider Says:

      Bush could not write a letter nearly as well and expressive even if he is totally sober.

    19. George Crane Says:

      Churchill will be forever besmirched (and indicted) by his own words, his own admissions, and his own writings.

      Perhaps even he realized that, before he died.

      In his own written record of WWII, he admits he KNEW the true story of the KATYN MASSACRE, yet not only did nothing about it, but continued to associate and promote, “buddy-buddy” as Americans say, with his buddy Stalin and the perpetrators!

      Shame on you, Winston. Shame is the word. Real racial loyalty, love of Aryan families, and courage is the exception, exemplified by the FIRST FUEHRER (who was NOT off drinking champagne in a villa in Cairo while decent White men were dying)!

      I have confidence our people will never allow a ‘Winston’ again. He was a classic jew-stooge anomaly, to his family line’s utter shame and eternal condemnation. What White man, who is a man, would put his own family line in that despicable position in White history?!

    20. Lutjens Says:

      General Patton’s warning… there probably wasn’t a finer soldier on either side.

      http://www.natall.com/national-vanguard/assorted/patton.html

    21. JP Says:

      GB – I recall reading that, indeed, it was written shortly before his suicide, and was in fact found with his corpse.
      I think most of you guys are being highly unrealistic here. At the time, the Germans were the aggresors, England drew a line that said this far and no further, Hitler crossed it, and honor required war.
      No nation can crawl that far out on a limb and crawl back down without a fight to the death.
      Recall, also that historically England always made blocs against the strongest European power – Hence they have warred with Spain, France and Germany, in turn.
      Its mmighty easy to look back now and say aw jeez, look how things are now … They should have done this, they should not have done that … None of that matters.
      World leaders in such times of crisis do not operate with the benifit of hindsight.
      Germany appeared to be a mortal threat, the gauntlet was thrown down, and WW 2 resulted.
      How realistic do you think it would have been for any British leaders to have said “Well, we better not fight Germany, because they are white” ?
      They would have been hauled to the Tower, pronto.
      Allowances must be made for historical realities, and not be mixed with contemporary political/immigration/racial issues.
      Whats done is done, and I say ” Lets get on with the business of reclaiming our heritage and birthright”.
      Any middle ground is fast disapppearing, thats easy enough to see.
      Our culture, heritage and homelands across the western world are being raped, trampled upon and spat at by a ravenous horde of implaccable, fast breeding third world creatures, led on, encouraged and indeed, massively aided by treacherous politically correct politicians and media.
      So yes, lets not forget historical perspectives, but lets not get consumed, or waste too much thought process and/or energy on what might have been.
      There is quite enoguh stark relaity starring each and every one of us in the face right here, right now .. Without getting caught up on historical recriminations of men who, by and large, were forced by events to make the decisions that they made.

    22. jimbo Says:

      thus saith ‘JP’…..

      At the time, the Germans were the aggresors, England drew a line that said this far and no further, Hitler crossed it, and honor required war

      ho hum! more brain-washed nonsense from ‘the Discovery channel’…..sorry to burst yr delusions there, boyo, but the AlLies were the aggressors…..’the big two’ declared war on Germany not vice versa…..oh….BTW…..ever heard of the brutal massacre of thousands of ethnic Germans in Poland courtesy of the kike media there? (the
      REAL reason Hitler invaded)…..thought NOT!……

      No nation can crawl that far out on a limb and crawl back down without a fight to the death.
      Recall, also that historically England always made blocs against the strongest European power – Hence they have warred with Spain, France and Germany, in turn

      courtesy of….GUESS WHO?…..the Brits were, unfortunately and despite short periods of white greatness, pretty much totally under the thumb of the yoos since the shabbos goy Cromwell re-admitted them @ the end of the seventeenth century(many speculate that, despite the edict of King Edward Longshanks, they were never really ‘turfed’ @ all…..having originally entered in 1066 courtesy of William the Bastard…whose ‘conquest’ was characterised by the familiar kike hall-marks of rapine, brigandage, looting and mass murder inflicted on a totally innocent civilian populace!….but: be that as it may!)
      Many Europeans were aware of the viral nature of the yoos and, hence, had them quarantined in ghettos(a rather too over-generous application of ‘xian’ principles when other remedies would have been more appropriate….but: let a virus roam free and, sooner or later, it will GOBBLE UP YR ASS!)….hence: the Brits ‘warring’ with them

      Its mmighty easy to look back now and say aw jeez, look how things are now … They should have done this, they should not have done that … None of that matters.
      World leaders in such times of crisis do not operate with the benifit of hindsight.
      Germany appeared to be a mortal threat, the gauntlet was thrown down, and WW 2 resulted

      HORSESHIT! Germany was NEVER a threat to the Brits and the powers-that-were KNEW IT!….there’s no ‘appeared’ abt it!

      How realistic do you think it would have been for any British leaders to have said “Well, we better not fight Germany, because they are white� ?
      They would have been hauled to the Tower, pronto

      EXACTLY! which proves, quid pro quo, that the REAL RULERS were NOT WHITE but……you guessed it!
      ‘jd-xianity’ & ‘Talmudism’…not a HELL of a lot of difference…..as Hitler him-self said: “democracy and bolshevism are THE BASTARD OFF-SPRING OF xianity”

      Allowances must be made for historical realities, and not be mixed with contemporary political/immigration/racial issues.
      Whats done is done, and I say � Lets get on with the business of reclaiming our heritage and birthright�

      yet more HORSESHIT!…….hv u a franchise or sumthin’?
      it is PRECISELY BECAUSE OF THESE ‘historical realities’ that the Brits NOW HAVE the problems they do…..and the White Race cannot move forward until the past is ‘set straight’ & that means a ‘rehabilitation’ of Hitler & the Nazis and a recompense for the hideous wrongs done to Germany….OTW: we suffer under the Talmudic ‘logic’: “oh….you can’t be a white nationalist because the Germans were ‘white nationalists’ and they started WWII and killed six million yoos!”
      …..those who control the past, control the future………..

      Our culture, heritage and homelands across the western world are being raped, trampled upon and spat at by a ravenous horde of implaccable, fast breeding third world creatures, led on, encouraged and indeed, massively aided by treacherous politically correct politicians and media

      welcome to the Jew World Order…..the destruction of Western culture would have occurred DECADES AGO if it wasn’t for the 50+ yrs of VALUABLE TIME purchased for the White Race by the GREATEST WHITE MAN WHO EVER LIVED!

      So yes, lets not forget historical perspectives, but lets not get consumed, or waste too much thought process and/or energy on what might have been

      tell it to the yoos….hardly a day passes that whites are not reminded ad infinitum ad nauseum of those ‘wicked Nazis’…..when the yoos stop, WE’LL STOP!

      There is quite enoguh stark relaity starring each and every one of us in the face right here, right now .. Without getting caught up on historical recriminations of men who, by and large, were forced by events to make the decisions that they made.

      sorry…they were FORCED BY THE KIKES to make those decisions not ‘by events’……..when you start looking at reality from the only perspective THAT MAKES SENSE(viz: race) then U might, just might, start to MAKE SENSE yr-self!

    23. Celtic Warrior Says:

      The exchange between JP and jimbo reveals the two aspects of WW11 interpretation, both make valid points, although examination of the historical facts supports the conclusion that Churchill was a race traitor going back to at least 1915.

      More to the point; I’m looking for victory, how the hell are we going to save the Western World and our civilisation in next 20 years?

      Are we, as William Gayley Simpson pessimistically thought, about to go over the Niagra Falls with only the faint hope of survival and difficult rebirth?

    24. Big Bawana Says:

      I am almost finished reading David Irving’s “Churchhill’s War.”

      Indeed, how true, how true are all Mr. Goering’s words.

      I hope that one day our race will accord Winston Churchill the legacy that he so richly deserves: that of fool and villian beyond compare.

    25. jimbo Says:

      ‘Big Bwana’:
      *“I hope that one day our race will accord Winston Churchill the legacy that he so richly deserves: that of fool and villian beyond compare”*

      Churchill seems to have ‘recanted’ to some extent post-WWII.
      Of course, that doesn’t exonerate him from his culpability(especially towards future generations of white children)

      as for ‘fool’……[email protected] least he wasnt’ STOOPID enough to buy into
      the Holohoax. His 5-vlm History of the Second World War contains no such absurdities…..perhaps he had his eye fixed on his future reputation after all.

      more to the point: what can be said of today’s pathetic political specimens who genuflect before this Moloch?…….what, indeed, will posterity say of their pathetic posturings?…….they won’t even warrant a mention…..the trash compactor of history is where THEY truly belong

    26. Jackumup Says:

      A lastGasp of air from a civalized humanBeing. as a catholic I heard a story of a Pope around 1880 who is said to of drop during Mass in what was explained as a trance. It was reported that he heard Jesus talking to the devil.
      Satan stated that the 20th century was his and he would conqeur the world

      Mabey the tale is true.

    27. Zip Says:

      Qoute’ “All Germany wanted in 1939 was the return of the city of Danzig back to the Reich. No more, no less. What a small problem that was, when compared to the problems which confronted Europe in 1945”

      From William Joyce’s last broadcast as ‘Lord Haw Haw’ in April 1945.

      In my own view Churchill was an arrogant murderous war criminal as well as something of a sexual deviate. I sincerely hope he burns in hell for all time.

    28. jimbo Says:

      ‘Jackumpu’ reckons:
      *A lastGasp of air from a civalized humanBeing. as a catholic I heard a story of a Pope around 1880 who is said to of drop during Mass in what was explained as a trance. It was reported that he heard Jesus talking to the devil.
      Satan stated that the 20th century was his and he would conqeur the world*

      certainly the 20th cntry was BAD for the White Race. However: only the yoos seem to have benefitted…….
      “Cui bono?”
      “Jui bono”

      perhaps the yoos ARE the Devil?

    29. Vadim Says:

      This letter makes it perfectly clear what all the second ww was really about. It outlines the reasoning and goals that Nazi Germany really had in the 2-nd WW.
      As we all so well know,Holocaust of Jews never took place,they were
      never exterminated as a race by Germany. They were put in camps,
      yes,made to work macht frei,yes. Attrocities were commited against them,yes, but those were never detrimental to survival of jews as a race,
      or significant as compared to losses of eastern slavs at the hands of verhmacht. This proves that Germany didn’t target jews as a prime
      enemy. That enemy was always Russian Blood. Communism was
      just an escuse for N.S. to exterminate everyone who had russian blood
      (a few hundred of millions of eastern slavs,that formed 3 people).
      If communism is a problem,remove the communist government,and then
      free all the eastern slavs people and let them be a part of a european family. Communism was jewish,not russian, so once the support of jews was removed,the communism would collapse and be forgotten.
      But we are reading here that eastern slavs are asiatics, never to be related
      to as europeans who gave the world so many classical composers,
      timeless works of art,of architechture, inventions of science,e.t.c.
      Russian blood was not neant to remain in Hitler’s vision of Europe.
      Compare the numbers of civilian losses among eastern slavs in the
      second ww,during the german advance and occupation of soviet
      territories to all others. They by far exceed all the losses of other nations put together.Majority of slave laborers in the Nazi factories and camps were russians,ukrainans,belorussians. In the occupied soviet territories
      starvation,deceise, destruction of infrastructure,scorched earth policies
      in the contryside,death from systematic mass atrocities and murder
      of civilian eastern slavs by verhmacht was astronomical(as well as those hundred of thousands eastern slavs that died in the nazi slave labor).
      Schools were limited to teaching only basics,no higher education was
      to be allowed. Hitler and his leaders were the same kind of people
      that drowned for pleasure the hundreds of thousands of captured russian soldiers in the lake in the 1-st ww(before any comminism happened). German elite viewed russians as asiatics and infiriors during 1-st ww,and that got much more advanced under Hitler. He added the supposed racial infiriority of e.slavs in the mix using his fairy tale fake science.
      Just look who these defenders of Europe allied themselves with?
      They were happily killing american and other whites on battlefields together with true and genuine asiatics,japanese,who were keeping pace with Verhmacht in mass murder, that Japan commited in China,and all other asian lands that they attacked and occupied. Apparently they were more racially acceptable than russian *asiatics* to Ol’ Adolf.
      Germany lost because they came not to liberate russians from jewish tyranny under Stalin(who was mud georgian and enjoyed the power
      to slaughter millions of white people in USSR just to pleasure his hatred
      and envy that every mud has of any white person still alive).
      Muds hate everything about white people,they only want as gone from this Earth. I was true in time of Ghenhgiz-Hun, it’s true today.
      Another argument that often is presented is that extermination was
      not conducted by german occupants in Poland,Czehoslovakia,Yugoslavia,
      and no scorch earth policy and total war was conducted by N.S.Germany there.It’s true that they were considered more desirable racially by N.S. because their lands were colonies of western people in distant past.
      The only real slavs to N.S. were those of russian blood,and it’s only those
      that were targeted for extermination in Hitler’s vision.
      Nazi Germany was defeated not by Churchill,remember,3/4 of german army was sent against Russia,and it was defeated,destroyed,and stoped there. Western Allies were picking the leftovers after it was already
      over for Hitler’s Germany. Hitler lost because he came not to liberate but to exterminate Eastern Slavs.Stoping him was for us,eastern slavs,as life and death. Comminism’s grip was not the reason we had to stop him.
      It was survival. Not of the West,but of those of russian blood.
      It was race war,either us or Hitler,and jews were just an outshoot of N.S.Policy.N.S. done nothing to deal with global jewish power,because than they would attack the heart and center of jewish power,U.S.A.
      U decapitate Greater Zion in U.S.A. and all it’s creations can’t survive
      everywhere else. Look how comminism just dissapeared when
      ZOG of USA decided it was time to cut the wires they pulled in USSR
      and Warsaw Pact. Hitler went after the wrong enemy,and he paid for it.
      Understand, I can justify Hitler’s invasion of USSR if he came to remove commie opressors and make us free,but in truth he killed millions
      of our civilians,robed us,burned and destroyed our economies,education,
      medical services,infrastructure. Hundreds of thousands more died
      in Ghulags to rebuild what he destroyed. Comminism was strong as ever,
      when he was defeated. ZOG is run from the West,not from the East.
      Look how much more the West is corrupted than Eeast today.
      I don’t understand why u people admire this man and his hatchmen.
      White people didn’t have Hitler when they expelled jews from their countries. They defended themselves naturally,by instinct alone.
      U don’t need to worship failed NS idiology to know in your heart
      was is truth. Just look around u at those blacks,mexicans,arabs
      that opress and savage u. They are here bacause white race had a
      chance in 30-s-40-s to to be driven by Germany to full liberation
      by fair expulsion of criminal ZOG power elite,never by atrocities
      or murder of civilans!).
      Instead they let ethnic hatreds and savage racism agains other whites
      to drive them and unity of white race was killed for the future.
      N.S. was a failed ideology,and needs to be shunned and discarded.
      U need only a common sense and compassion to your race to know
      what is wrong and what is right. U don’t need an old failed n.s. mass murderer and his failed henchmen to teach u obvious things about what u are and what u need to do.

    30. jimbo Says:

      re: Vadim

      i’m not going to address everything u’v posted because of the length….just a few points……firstly, as you say, the White Russians were decimated by the JewSSR. However, I dispute the claim that Operation Barbarossa was ‘a war of aggression’. The facts now say that Stalin INTENDED to INVADE Germany. He had a MASSIVE ARMY poised on the Polish frontier ready to do just that….hence: the great n° of Russian troops captured…..an ex-KGB colonel called ‘Suvorov’ wrote a book (‘Icebreaker’) on just this. Also: Heinrich Himmler declared Balts and Ukrainians to be members of the same race as the Germans….so we can probably infer that White Russians would also have been included….no reason why they shouldn’t have been… see: http://white-history.com/hwr64iii.htm
      We also have the case of General Andrei Andreevich Vlassov, a former Soviet Army General, who, with Hitler’s approval, raised an Army of Russian Liberation…as for ‘liberating’ the Russians from judaeo-bolshevism: i maintain that was Hitler’s intent. However, don’t forget that the yooish commisars and the KGB FORCED the Russians to resist the Germans by all sorts of foul methods like holding their families hostage &c and instantly executing any-one who did not participate in their partisan/terrorist out-rages. Also: the JewSSR media was TOTALLY and ABSOLUTELY kike-ised by such scum as Ilya Ehrenberg….so: many Russians were also brain-washed to a greater or lesser extent. Faced with such pressure, there was little that they could do and little that the Germans could do except to respond in kind…and, BTW, the Geneva Convention actually legitimises the execution of ‘partisan’ groups who operate ‘behind enemy lines’ and do not wear military uniforms…..they fall into the same category as SPIES.
      THe point is that, like it or not, Russia was then a hot-bed of judaeo-bolshevism which was the biggest threat that the White Race had faced up until then. In a war situation, and a race-war at that, it is difficult to distinguish friend from foe….the fact remains, however, that the Waffen SS contained numerous recruits from ALL OVER EUROPE….who saw Hitler as the best hope of European civilisation @ that time….as for German soldiers killing ‘white’ Anglo-American forces: those same forces had been TOTALLY BRAIN-WASHED by the GODDAMN KIKE to believe that they were on some sort of ‘crusade of liberation’ when, in fact, all they were doing was driving the nails into their and their race’s own COFFIN….what were the Germans expected to do? The hideous behaviour of these same Anglo-American forces towards German POWs after the un-conditional surrender(along with such atrocities as the TERROR BOMBINGS of Hamburg, Munich, Berlin, Dresden &c….and in conjunction with such documents of genocide as the Morgenthau Plan, for instance) clearly indicate which side could claim the MORAL RIGHT. Don’t believe THE BIG JEW LIE that WII/Europe was ‘a good moral war’ and that ‘Hitler was a monster’. WWII/Europe was a DISASTER for the White Race and probably the MOST IMMORAL WAR IN HISTORY(as writers like F J P Veale have noted) and Hitler virtually SINGLE-HANDEDLY gave the White Race 50odd yrs of breathing space…..only the Jew won World War Two

    31. Celtic Warrior Says:

      This is all very interesting…. but has anybody got any concrete answers as to how we can avert the tidal wave that is about to engulf us?
      The WN historian Michael Hoffman says that we should not look outside of ourselves for solutions but encourage young WN to have as many kids as possible. A 20 year breeding program to start NOW!

    32. jimbo Says:

      ‘Celtic Warrior’ says:
      This is all very interesting…. but has anybody got any concrete answers as to how we can avert the tidal wave that is about to engulf us?
      The WN historian Michael Hoffman says that we should not look outside of ourselves for solutions but encourage young WN to have as many kids as possible. A 20 year breeding program to start NOW!

      I don’t think we’ve got 20 yrs quite frankly. My solution is:
      mass emigration of white people(especially those with young families) to Russia/Belorussia….perhaps even the Ukraine(don’t think the ZOG puppet guv’mint will last long there)…..no good whites having large families if their kids just end up in ‘schmuels’ and turn into more little ZOG-ite ‘patriotards’

    33. Celtic Warrior Says:

      Sure, we have got to bring up our kids in the ways of the truth. As regards emigration to western ‘Russia’, I don’t think the locals would welcome that prospect.
      Defence-in- depth is one option, although are numbers are sadly decreasing we still nominally control some pretty good real estate in the best parts of the world. ZOG is trying to kill us off, but even they can’t be everywhere at once.

    34. Vadim Says:

      First of all,I do think that immigrating from the West to Eastern Slavic nations is a good idea. Best to marry in your nation and bring your wife over,this way you add,not subtract. Unfortunately, many westerners only take females in Russia e.t.c. to their respective multicultural hells to expose their offspring to nigger and mexican husbandry,*no kids ever feminism*,and eternal schmuel programming from the first months of life.

      Regarding WW2. I am familiar with all the arguments about preemptive
      invasion by Hitler and the Erenhburg provocations,mass rapes by
      Red Army,and that Vlassov and some others served occupants e.t.c.
      This subject is not exactly for blogs,so I’l be a bit brief.
      There is no scientifically admissable evidence of the fact that invasion of Germany was imminent in 1945. It’s typically presented by the sort
      of pseudo-researchers that get off on playing Solzhenitzin.
      They hate russian past(and often present too) and blindly glorify those
      that came to destroy it in the ww2.
      Still, I am not opposed to genuine preemptive war(or even an agression)
      if u do it to save a people. Verhmacht murdered anywhere from 5 to 10 million civilians only in Ukraine alone. Apparently they came to liberate us of our lives in the process. Stalin killed millions of ukrainians too,in the 30s.
      Hitler was apparently no better. Ukraine submitted to Germany and welcomed the occupation. Instead the statehood was denied,new anti-comminist government put in camps,and Hitlerian mass murder began through starvation(Stalin style),labor to death,and relentless countryside torching. It matters not what some or the other nazi high brass might have said though I don’t believe that they ever considered slavs equal. Nothing proves that,but much indicates the opposite. Just read the asiatics refferences in the subject of this article.
      Stalin was murdering russians just the same,so to someone like Vlassov going to serve german army was more acceptable than be a cannon fodder
      in a red army. Still,such people were traitors to their own people.
      But I’l give u another example. Ukrainian anti-communists fought the germans. After Nazi racists denied the statehood to Ukraine,attacked democreatically elected germany-friendly government and mass murdered civilians ,it became necessary to resist this occupation.So,the former ukrainian anti-communist government force, UPA fought both commies and germans. People would not support the communist red army much,
      if germans were not treating eastern slavs as sub-humans. It’s naive to attribute a mass resistance of eastern slavs only to commie propaganda.
      Perhaps those verhmacht boys were not so cherubic..?

    35. jimbo Says:

      Vadim says:
      “There is no scientifically admissable evidence of the fact that invasion of Germany was imminent in 1945. It’s typically presented by the sort of pseudo-researchers that get off on playing Solzhenitzin”

      I think you mean 1941 NOT 1945….?……..OTW: i’d say there was not inconsiderable evidence to back up the assertion that Stalin was intending to invade Germany and was thwarted because of the:(i)swift victory of the Wehrmacht in the West/Battle of France[he had obviously anticipated a longer campaign] and (ii)excellent military intelligence of the Third Reich. here’s the link to Suvorov’s book
      the reviewer states: “In spite of rigid Soviet censorship, Suvorov has succeeded in digging up many nuggets of valuable information from publicly available Soviet writings that confirm his central thesis. ‘Icebreaker’ is based on the author’s meticulous scouring of such published sources as memoirs of wartime Soviet military leaders and histories of individual Soviet divisions, corps, armies, fleets and air units” I haven’t read this difficult-to-obtain(wonder why?) book but doubtless he may well have also included stuff from the now publicly-accessible Kremlin archives: just like Irving did with his Goebbles’ Diaries. For me: the biggest strike AGAINST the ‘orthodox’ belief of Hitler’s aggression is the VERY LARGE NUMBER INDEED of Soviet POWs(several million from memory!) captured in the first few days of Operation Barbarossa…..WHY were there so many troops in those border areas? An army poised in ‘attack’ mode is clearly not going to be able to resist an ‘attack’ itself. To resist ‘attack’ you have to be in ‘defence’ mode…..just like the Russians were at The Battle of Kursk….which, of course, they won convincingly.
      I can’t accept this:
      “It matters not what some or the other nazi high brass might have said though I don’t believe that they ever considered slavs equal”
      Of course it matters….Germans were HANGED @ Nuremberg purely and simply on the basis of ‘what they had said’ (Julius Striecher for instance) And Goebbles, for instance, is constantly being cited as ‘brain-washing’ Germans with Nazism. I have read many of his speeches ( HERE ) but, while he does castigate Russians to some extent it surely doesn’t approach any-where near the vituperation he held for the Jews for instance . Also: that may have just been Goebbles: I have read Mein Kampf twice and can recall NO REFERNCE WHATSOEVER to Russians as ‘sub-human’. There CERTAINLY WERE rfrncs to niggas and Jews as ‘sub-human’ but NOT RUSSIANS. And, don’t forget, Mein Kampf is forever cited as THE BIBLE of National Socialism…it’s difficult to see how an ex post facto idea like ‘Russian sub-humanity’ could creep in when it’s not holy writ as it were!
      As for the atrocities allegedly committed against the Ukranians: I find it hard to believe. What are your sources there? We can’t be expected to believe accnts published in the (Je)West by official ZOG court-historians. re: these 5 to 10 million Ukranian civilian fatalities: how many of these can be attributed to ‘mis-fortunes’ of war like aerial bombing, artillery barrages, starvation caused by a war-time situation and/or war-time diseases like typhus…HOW MANY were killed by Soviet military stuff-ups?
      In war, truth is the first casualty.
      What-ever: surely the Russian people would have been INFINITELY BETTER OFF under Hitler than under the Jews?…..don’t forget, the Jews massacred over 30million White Russians. I doubt very much indeed if that was Hitler’s intent.

    36. George Crane Says:

      We Whites — the descendants of the Alamo martyrs — are NOT going to give up North America without a conflagration the likes of which no (temporary) Western ‘government’ has ever seen!

      The Jews now have their own racial homeland in Israel, and should go to it. The niggers have Africa, where they rightfully belong by God’s own will, Nature, and should remove to it as quickly as they can transport themselves. The Mexicans will be leaving soon for southerly lattitudes, whence they came and where they belong, one way or another.

      We Whites will have our territory, too!

      88!

      GEORGE CRANE
      the year 2006

    37. jimbo Says:

      ‘George Crane’ says:
      “We Whites — the descendants of the Alamo martyrs — are NOT going to give up North America without a conflagration the likes of which no (temporary) Western ‘government’ has ever seen”

      the sooner the better. the longer we wait, the harder it will become. the time to act is NOW before the ZOGs pull another 9/11 con job and bring on the JewWorldOrder with attendant gulags in tow!

      “The Jews now have their own racial homeland in Israel, and should go to it”

      don’t count it…..yr not gunna get rid of them that easily….the lion’s share live else-where and, unless they’re subject to some pretty heavy-duty ‘persuasion’, they ain’t gunna budge!
      “When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded Gentile. They have not the slightest intention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine so as to live in it. What they really are aiming at is to establish a central organisation for their international swindling and cheating. As a sovereign State, this cannot be controlled by any of the other States. Therefore, it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who have been found out and at the same time a high-school for the training of other swindlers”

    38. jimbo Says:

      (Mein Kampf; James Murphy translation; Vlm I chptr xi ‘Race and People’)

    39. Celtic Warrior Says:

      Re George Crane,
      I hope I’m still breathing when the fighting starts. Don’t just look to the Alamo for for heroic inspiration, there have been lots of valiant WN down the ages.
      Jean de Valette, commander of the knights during the siege of Malta in 1565, when he saw that the Turks had made a hole in the walls shouted, “I am 70 years old, I have no wish to die in my bed” and launched himself into the fray. That is the sort of combative spirit we so urgently need.
      White men stand up and fight!

    40. Vadim Says:

      Still,regardless of the opinion that USSR was about to attack Germany(I wonder why..to help out Britain that was also so anti-communist?),but it was not USSR who attacked and envaded first,anyway.
      I ‘ve spoken myself to a former KGB officer at that time,who informed
      me that Red Army was in no condition to take on german army in 1941,
      because it severely lacked commanders(Stalin killed a lot of officers),
      many soldiers had no weapons,poor equipment and armaments,lack of military radio comminicators,poor supply lines.
      So,if they did envade Germany,they would be decimated by Verhmacht.
      Remember,finish army was no match for german one and they annihilated
      Stalin’s much bigger forces.
      Still, I am talking about what happened during invasion,not during
      the first attack on june 22,41. Atrocity rate,casualties,and overall
      collapse was much higher in Eastern Slav lands than it was everywhere else where german army was an occupant. Prefferencial treatment does come to mind.
      Suvorov is a Solzhenitsin wanna be, he is making things up to enforce his points. This is rather typical approach for decident writers from Russia.
      They have no way to get facts,so they invent them. First of all,
      no russian state archive would let these documents about invasion plans be open or viewed,ever. And they likely never were. If this was undeed
      open,it would surely become something more tangible than just
      empty refferences and tales about reading some x-files,and this
      sort of sensation has come out in russian press and materials too,
      but they never had a shred of real proof. Russia is not an open society,
      u know this, ‘they keep the secrets of their plans for Germany(if such were) meticoulosly. Their whole doctrine depends on this. Jews would
      eat them for breakfast if they leaked something like this. It’s top secret,
      for sure…Suvorov wouldn’t be caught dead around it in Russia,especially
      being a dissident with a big chip on his shoulder against the regime.
      Troops were captured not only near the border,but all the way through
      the advance,which was very swift.Russians were eager to surrender cause
      it was their chance to excape Stalin”s hell. But u will notice that such numbers never surrendered again. Some millions of inmates died in
      german camps,so it dawned on many that Hitler was as bad as Stalin.
      Both my grandfathers fought the germans,one was in regular army
      (I never met him,he was heavily wounded and died 10 years after the war)
      and the other fought as partisan in Serbia. His tales told me a lot about
      what germans were like. It was not untypical for germans to
      burn villages and execute civilians, even in Serbia where atrocities were very much lower than in Ukraine. He told me that every partisan germans caught was tortured in perverse ways. He though germans were demons from hell,cause he couldn’t imagine people doing this to people.
      His comrads were found mutilated beyound recognition,with burnt nails,
      burnt genitals,cut out organs,eyes,nails put into the body.
      Verhmacht seemed fanatical,sure of their racial superiority,so atrocities
      were easy to do for them.
      Don’t expect to find everything in MK,it was not written in a time when
      russian strategy was developed. Hitler was not a prophet,he wrote
      then about things that were important to him then.
      When Russia was invaded,and when Ukraine was,and Belarus,
      then commanders were given their orders to lead a total war,
      no mercy. Numbers can be lower or bigger,I didn’t count the bodies,
      I don’t know, but compared to jewish holocaust what does it achive
      to overhype goy ukrainian losses? German leaders were punished for
      what they did to jews,everything else was just incidental.
      Ukraine wouldn’t be better off under Hitler,not unless it’s better off dead.
      Starvation was apparently deliberate under occupation,cause it wasn’t caused in other occupied territories on such a scale. No ukrainian
      would be alive after 10 years under germans for sure. Hitler wanted
      to populate Ukraine with germans,that’s why he denied us the statehood,
      Ukraine was not allowed to be a nation,only a land to be repopulated
      and with using natives as mostly uneducated primitive slave workers.
      So that’s why they closed universities.

    41. jimbo Says:

      re: ‘Vadim’
      just a few quick points re: yr comments above and then i’ll hv to drop off this blog befeore it ‘scrolls off’ the VNN hm/pg!
      i can see that yr firmly convinced of ‘the beastliness of the Hun’ as it were so we’ll just hv to ‘agree to dis-agree’:

      Still,regardless of the opinion that USSR was about to attack Germany(I wonder why..to help out Britain that was also so anti-communist?),but it was not USSR who attacked and envaded first,anyway

      Britain and the USSR were controlled by the same crew: the kikes! That’s why! The plan was to keep Hitler occupied in ‘the West’ and then launch an attack from the East. As for Hitler’s ‘pre-emptive strike’, it is legitimate even to-day for a nation to launch a pre-emptive strike if another nation is mobilising large masses of troops on its borders.
      (*NOTE*: from David Irving’s Hitler`s War: ” ‘The Führer is convinced that Moscow and London were in the same line of business long before June’ wrote Goebbles….’Their aim had been identical: the destruction of the Reich.Stalin had been on the brink of attacking Germany. German division commanders found that the enemy had better large-scale maps of Germany, Austria and Silesia than they did them-selves. Air reconnaissance had revealed that Stalin had established a huge complex of arms factories beyond the Urals. The Russians had also built several completely un-publicised high-ways along which they advanced, while the Wehrmacht adhered to the only roads they were aware of. In Red Army barracks, were found dummy German soldiers for target practice that had been manufactured long before June 1941. Most of Hitler`s commanders-including Bock, Kluge, Halder and Richard Ruoff had agreed that he had selected the proper time to strike’ “)
      concurrent with this, the RAAF maintained an un-restricted ‘terror bombing’ campaign against the Third Reich after the Fall of France and despite several desperate peace over-tures from Hitler and Rudolf Hess. These terrorists deliberately bombed hospitals, schools, kindergartens and orphanages Hitler ‘held his water’ for the best part of four months before responding in kind with the London ‘blitz’

      I ‘ve spoken myself to a former KGB officer at that time,who informed me that Red Army was in no condition to take on german army in 1941, because it severely lacked commanders(Stalin killed a lot of officers), many soldiers had no weapons,poor equipment and armaments,lack of military radio comminicators,poor supply lines

      OK: no dispute about the decimation of the officer corps.
      However, here’s what Irving says about the early days of ‘Barbarossa'[he is quoting from the personal diary of Christa Schroeder, one of Hitler’s secretaries]: “Afterward, we go at 1pm to the general situation conference in the map room…..the statistics on enemy aircraft and tanks destroyed are announced-the Russians seem to have enormous numbers, as we have already annihilated over 3500 aircraft and over 1000 tanks including some heavy ones, forty tonners.”
      and: “By June 30, the encirclement of Minsk was completed. Army Group Centre had captured 290000 prisoners, 2500 tanks and 1400 guns” (Hitler`s War; by: David Irving; Focal Point Publications 2002– dwn_ld the ENTIRE BOOK for FREE )
      doesn’t sound like a ‘rag-tag’ army to me!

      So,if they did envade Germany,they would be decimated by Verhmacht. Remember,finish army was no match for german one and they annihilated

      OK: point taken. I’d forgotten about the Finns

      Suvorov is a Solzhenitsin wanna be, he is making things up to enforce his points. This is rather typical approach for decident writers from Russia

      well, of course, i hvn’t actually read Suvorov’s book so i’m @ some-what of a dis-advantage there.
      However, i’d be pretty reluctant to dismiss any-thing that the IHR approves of. Their research,analyses and material is not often noted for being in-accurate or plain wrong. Hence: the amount of aggro’ they cop from the yoos!

      If this was undeed open,it would surely become something more tangible than just empty refferences and tales about reading some x-files

      as above: i hvn’t read the book so i don’t know what sources he was quoting. I can only comment that David Irving got un-fettered access to some pretty sensational material from the archives. I think there was a period there(and do correct me if i’m wrong) of several years in fact about the time of the Yeltsin/Gorbachev conflicts when things in the former USSR were in a state of semi-chaos as it were. This was when Irving acquired his material and may well have been an opportune time for the likes of Suvorov to acquire similar. And, we can’t rule out the corruption of petty bureaucrats can we?
      Even in many Western countries, ‘confidential’ even ‘restricted’ information can be accessed if you ‘know the right people’ and are prepared to ‘grease enough palms’

      Their whole doctrine depends on this. Jews would
      eat them for breakfast if they leaked something like this

      maybe. except that the yoos are no longer calling the shots in that neck of the woods are they? also: stuff can be ‘leaked’ without ending up splashed over the front pgs of the Jew York Times or the Washington Post. Their usual tactics when something un-settling to their raison d’être appears is ‘the silent treatment’ with most pblshrs refusing to touch the offending item with a barge pole and all major organs of literary review like the Times Literary Supplement or the New Yorker Review of Books staying schtum!

      Troops were captured not only near the border,but all the way through the advance,which was very swift. Russians were eager to surrender cause
      it was their chance to excape Stalin’’s hell

      my understanding was that they were captured by the ‘division-load’ that is: 5000+ men @ a time. Whole Corps @ a time! THat doesn’t sound like the Wehrmacht just bagging a long line of ‘stragglers’ does it?….see abv: re: Irving!

      But u will notice that such numbers never surrendered again

      can’t that be attributed to the NKVD cracking down hard? whereas, during Operation Barbarossa, they had obviously been ‘wrong-footed’ Wasn’t the official policy that the ordinary Ivan be infinitely more scared of his unit’s commissar than of the Germans?

      He told me that every partisan germans caught was tortured in perverse ways. He though germans were demons from hell,cause he couldn’t imagine people doing this to people……It was not untypical for germans to burn villages and execute civilians, even in Serbia where atrocities were very much lower than in Ukraine. He told me that every partisan germans caught was tortured in perverse ways. He though germans were demons from hell,cause he couldn’t imagine people doing this to people. His comrads were found mutilated beyound recognition,with burnt nails, burnt genitals,cut out organs,eyes,nails put into the body. Verhmacht seemed fanatical,sure of their racial superiority,so atrocities were easy to do for them

      Look: i’m sorry abt this but all of the above is what is called in a court of common law in my country (Oz) hearsay. What someone allegedly told YOU is, i’m afraid, INADMISSABLE as evidence. No historian worth a cracker would accept that sort of testimony. UNLESS: yr grandparents told YOU, for instance, times, dates, places, the particular units of the Wehrmacht involved, names of NCOs or officers present @ or directing such incidents. And, of course, those particulars would have to MATCH UP with official Wehrmacht records…….’eye-witness testimony’ and ‘hearsay’ un-corroborated by hard, factual information is what constitutes the HollowHoax i’m afraid. It’s what the yoos have been beating the entire White RAce over the head with for the last 50yrs or so. Sorry to have to call yr bluff on this: but: there you are. Even ‘eye-witness’ accounts in major criminal trials can be ‘suss’. There are whole areas of case law just on that one single aspect: identity. Without hard, corroborating evidence of a documentary and/or forensic nature, it’s A VERY SLIPPERY SLOPE INDEED

      German leaders were punished for what they did to jews

      IOW: they were punished for NOTHING because NOTHING was done to jews. @ least, nothing that can be proved to have the slightest substance. Except that they turfed the yoos from their positions of influence in the media, academia and the law and strenuously encouraged them to emigrate. If you wanna call that ‘persecution’ then BE MY GUEST!

    42. elbrus_arya Says:

      In 1944 the british army in harmony with bolsheviks occupied iran just at the time when iran was to organize a Kurdish-Azerbaijani guerilla group to cut-off US aid to soviets via Azerbaijan to Caucasus . I think this was the greatest wwII point of return for humanity which no one speaks out.If this group was organized well the world woulb be in the humanity’s hand.

    43. Giordan Smith Says:

      It’s an impressive letter to be sure – like Goering’s Nuremberg testimony – but can we be sure that it’s authentic? I am a bit bothered by the long gap between its date of writing and publication date.