22 February, 2008

Dilemma at MSU: What Is/Isn’t “Hate Speech”?

Posted by Socrates in free speech, Jared Taylor, Socrates, universities at 6:12 pm | Permanent Link

What a quandary. Maybe they should read the First Amendment. Jared Taylor is due to speak at MSU on March 19th, 2008:

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 02/20/08 The American Renaissance Conference, Feb. 22-24, 2008 48% similar
  3. 09/08/10 Linder on AmRen 46% similar
  4. 12/25/09 Samuel Jared Taylor – a Despicable Piece of Shit 44% similar
  5. 07/19/08 U.S. Military Court: ‘Racist’ Speech is Protected by First Amendment 38% similar
  6. 08/02/17 Bat Guano and “Hate Speech” 32% similar
  7. 10 Responses to “Dilemma at MSU: What Is/Isn’t “Hate Speech”?”

    1. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      “The original origin of “Hate Speech” was first defined under the Old Soviet Union, under Stalin. It was a “Hate Crime” to openly identify the Bolshevik Revolution as being Jewish. I find that ironic.”

      Posted by Sick of the Marxists at 6:14 PM on February 22

      This was just posted on AMREN. I wonder why they let it through.

    2. Socrates Says:

      shabbos: I wonder if this was the law that he referred to?:
      http://wsi.matriots.com/anti-pogrom-law.html

    3. sgruber Says:

      Does Taylor not realize jews are the White race’s worst enemy?

      What’s is Amren’s theory – the jew will save us from the nigger? Breathtaking.

      The time has come to get rid of the jews.

    4. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      Jew Watch – Jewish Occupied Governments – USSR – Jews and Communism
      Kaganovich, the most powerful Jew in the Soviet Union, supervised the …. to push for laws against what they call “hate speech” — which means any speech …
      http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html – 126k –

      LAZAR KAGANOVICH

    5. Arch Stanton Says:

      I think that calling a Nigger a Negro is ok. Or a Spick a Mestizo, a Kike a Jew etc.

    6. Marwinsing Says:

      See? Just what I moaned about half a minute ago over here.

      IDEO-FUCKEE-LOGICAL SUBVERSION!

      “Maybe they should read the First Amendment.”

      Damn-BLOODY-right!

    7. Marwinsing Says:

      Hate speech. Just what the heck is hate speech? At what stage does hate speech become threatening to another? Precisely where is the line drawn? Answer: it cannot be drawn. Hate speech thus becomes yet another jew-construct designed to further oppress those very people who are already the most oppressed — namely you and I — the heterosexual white male. All this racial hate speech is a load of crap because it’s so damn perfectly natural. Real speech are the words that Yankee Jim’s wife rubbed into his face causing him to lose the plot and thus end both their lives. That’s hate speech.

    8. Mike Quigley Says:

      Hate speech is whatever the non-whites want it to be at the moment.For instance if I were to go into any detail regarding the torture chamber for niggers that I fantasize about every day.

    9. Marwinsing Says:

      ….that I fantasize about every day.”

      Then I must be a nuclear bomb. Aaww… come-come guys ‘n gals, adopt-a -jew.

    10. DMS Says:

      What Is/Isn’t “Hate Speech”?

      The definition, I predict, will be kept secret for the sake of “flexibility”.