Vanguard News Network

New video, Wrath of The Awakened Saxon:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57obZT_JULQ

WN need to read and re-read Michael Hoffman’s book “They Were White and They Were Slaves.” His audio tape on the subject is good too.

But weren’t/aren’t all these white slaves & indentured servants victims of other white people? And the black slaves also victims of “white” people, as far as they see it. Why should anyone, then, give a hoot if always the white folk slave-owing? We don’t come off looking very good, doing this to our own kind.

Now, if all these white slaves & indentured servants were directly owned & mistreated by an obvious minority, then we would have a case to make. Personally, I feel ashamed that white people treated their own kind in this evil way, and so I think we ought to shut up about it until such time as we can prove that minorities were the bad guy.

White people have badly mistreated each other for a long time. I think it’s a problem that needs to be looked at, not ignored or blamed on someone else. Of course, the Groids, Semites, Aboriginals and Orientals have all brutalized their own kind as well, but WE should know better.

I could be wrong, but I would guess that our mistreatment of our own kind really took off as a result of the Capitalist/Industrial Revolution. We no longer live in the pastoral, communal or tribal societies of our ancestors. We are now in an urbanized, cosmopolitan, money-obsessed, cut-throat, Jew-controlled death-race where nothing matters but the Bottom Line. It’s not a natural or normal state of existence. Maybe that’s why there are so many Whites around today who are so f***ed up.

Vaultner, I didn’t know about the enslavement of whites by Muslims until I read the article mentioned at the top, here. Obviously I am talking about mistreatment/slavery of whites by whites.

I am talking about the information posted on davidduke a few months ago, as I recall, a video called They Were White & They were Slaves. Well, British Aristocrats and Vikings in particular don’t look like any folk I would want to be related to. The Vikings, according to Michael Hoffman, who was interviewed on above-mentioned video By Zundel, even sold Scandinavians to Arab slavers.

Hoffman says that indentured servitude did not last for only a few years; that the period of slavery was increased in many cases to a lifetime of drudgery for a white master.

No, we don’t come across too well, if Hoffman’s findings are to be believed. I do know that some Indian tribes kept Negro slaves, and also that free Negroes kept white slaves, but we have some dandy cruelty genes of our own.

Campbell C., the next time you are in a situation where you can observe a non-White male (Jew, Negro, Turk, Arab, Oriental, etc) looking at an attractive White woman, notice the colored boy’s facial expressions when he looks at the White woman. No matter how pleasant, deferential or mild-mannered the boy may have originally seemed, he will suddenly assume the look of a wolf eyeing a lamb.

Non-White males are natural-born sexual predators around White women. It doesn’t matter how well-educated or respectable the colored males are. To them White women are only for raping, enslavement and murder.

Traditionally, American slaveholders preferred to employ men in agricultural labor. This dovetailed perfectly with the needs of West African tribal leaders who sold male captives to the white devils to minimize sexual competition and maintain their female labor forces. African females were not brought to America in numbers anywhere near proportional to that of African males until the mid- to late-1700s. Since the African manimals didn’t awaken one day in the year 1760 and begin gangbanging the relatively few African females available, kidnapped English females brought to America and forced to live and work among them probably brought the continent’s first mulattos into existence.

From the latter half of the 17th century onward, slavery’s demise was on the horizon. Much of this of this was due to the kidnapping, enslavement, and transporting of poor Englishmen to the fringes of the British Empire. Antebellum Homo Monetarists, slavers and slaveholders alike, were perfectly aware of this fact. That is why from 1750 to 1790 the importation of African females rose sharply, resulting in dramatic increases in the American slave population from 1790 to 1860.

Between 1790 and 1860 the Southern slave population exploded. How to account for this explosion when Southern state legislatures began banning the importation of slaves from the 1780s on? To some extent state laws were ignored, which led to the U.S. government banning slave importation in the year 1808. The ban was enforced by heavy patrolling of the African coast. Slavers ignoring state laws do not account for the explosion in the slave population after 1810. The importation of African females in the last decades prior to 1808 and African fecundity is certainly the largest part of the explanation, but there is another.

Most slave owners were small and desirous of ‘upward mobility.’ Then as now, the motivations of Homo Monetarus and his sycophantic henchmen of the middle-class are work aversion, money acquisition, improved social status, and maximum political power. There were few, if any, legal consequences for impregnating White ‘servant’ or mulatto slave girls, who for sexual reasons alone were highly valued over African women. These strongly suggest that the motivation behind the various “one drop rules” of the latter 18th and early 19th centuries had less to do with the preservation of racial homogeneity than with the sustainment and expansion of the slave base.

Look, today, to antebellum Homo Monetarus’ modern descendants in government, business, and academia. The reward for verbalizing racial “masochism,” crapping on the White underclass, and especially hard on “white trash racists” is 5600 sq. ft. of living space and a swimming pool up in the hills. Ironically, many of his stoutest sycophants are probably the descendants of White slaves: Jed, Granny, Jethro, and Ellie Mae with haircuts, a bath, 2500 sq. ft. of living space, and a Jacuzzi. White Homo Monetarus and his “me-tooing” middle-class henchmen aren’t masochists. They’ve happily dumped on the White underclass from the beginning. The White underclass has never been the intended beneficiary of positive blow black from the power structure – not in slave times, not during Jim Crow, and not now.

Re minimizing of class distinctions by WNs, mentioned by Blightbling.

Indeed. Here & there in prowhite literature I see reference made to some sort of ‘superior values’ that ‘our’ white aristocrats purportedly adhered to in the past. Elitism is actually good & all that, esp. good for us peons. Can anybody here tell me just what those values are, because it seems they are never precisely spelled out.

For my part, I despise the ultrarich, the white rich in particular, with their fucking 35,000 sq. ft. houses and their platoons, regiments maybe, of helpers & servants whose duty it is to make sure that their masters & mistresses look & feel good 24/7. Does anyone here really think that it would be good to have them on our side, because I sure don’t.

Stronza, super-rich Whites are only interested in their money and in preserving their life of privilege. They don’t give two sh*ts about their fellow White man who’s struggling to make ends meet and could really use a break in life. Unfortunately, most of the Founding Fathers were also in this category of super-rich elitists. The Constitution was written by them basically to “legitimize” their control over America. Most of the super-rich Whites don’t even care if their beautiful, well-bred daughters marry a Jew, as long as he comes from a “good” family. But those same people would be furious if their daughters were to marry a decent, working-class White guy………That’s how depraved those pig-rich White people really are.

Class warfare? Damn straight!

For my part, I despise the ultrarich, the white rich in particular, …. Does anyone here really think that it would be good to have them on our side, because I sure don’t?
— Stronza

To answer your question, I really couldn’t say, since I don’t know anybody like that. But surely their money (and clout) would be a great asset…. very helpful in any case.

Oh, and let me add too that many of them have that prosperity precisely because they are intimately intertwined with The System . They are part of it, they have supported it, and they are the direct beneficiaries of it.

I doubt that someone like that would see anything wrong with The System as it is — since it has treated them so very well.

I remember when Mrs. Rockefeller’s fur coat wat snatched off her back on the street, some years ago, by a feral girl pack from Harlem. And little John Kennedy’s bike was taken from him by some black kids in Central Park. And Sen. Schumer’s grandmother was mugged by the usual culprits, causing him to express great outrage that such things can happen. I greeted these news items with pleasure. We need to have MANY more incidents like this before we start to see some changes. Attacks on less “important” people will continue to draw no attention whatsoever.

As an epithet, white trash, or the more extended poor white trash first came into common use in the 1830’s.

Yes, “white trash” or “poor white trash” is an anti-white racial slur that specifically refers to a person’s socioeconomic class (NOT their behavior) as I tried to point out to that pedantic prick Swineo Americanus.

The fact that “white trash” is jewry’s #1 favorite slur should be enough of a reason to banish it from our vocabulary.

But I guess that’s expecting too much from a jewntile bastard.