25 October, 2008

Pedophilia: Thriving in Judaism’s Right Wing

Posted by Socrates in jewish criminality, judaism, Socrates, Talmud, Ted Pike at 10:25 pm | Permanent Link

by Rev. Ted Pike.

“A recurrent theme of Judaism’s highest authority, the Babylonian Talmud, is the right of Jewish men to have sex with 3-year-old girls. My article “Pedophilia: The Talmud’s Dirty Secret” (See, Pedophilia: The Talmud’s Dirty Secret, 10/11/06) documents this with copies of passages from the Talmud which endorse such perversion.”

“Jewish apologists reject this accusation. They say the Talmud’s approval of child sex is ritualistic and “spiritual” in its connotation. Others say that whatever Talmudic rabbis may have sanctioned 1800 years ago is not practiced today.”

The rest is [Here].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 09/21/16 Justice vs. Power 30% similar
  3. 06/10/15 Montana’s Unconstitutional Hate-Speech Law 28% similar
  4. 12/25/10 Argentina: Life in Prison for Right-Wing Leader 25% similar
  5. 07/13/11 The Corrupters 23% similar
  6. 10/06/14 Coming Soon: the Newest “Civil Right”: Pedophilia, or, Still More Championing of “The Other” 23% similar
  7. 16 Responses to “Pedophilia: Thriving in Judaism’s Right Wing”

    1. exalted grand-master oberführer double diamond jim! Says:

      Jewish apologists reject this accusation. They say the Talmud’s approval of child sex is ritualistic and “spiritual” in its connotation. Others say that whatever Talmudic rabbis may have sanctioned 1800 years ago is not practiced today

      clearly proving once again! that ‘The Talmud’ cannot be used as an effective weapon against the yoos except in a vague, limited sense; the yoos will simply say, as above, that it has been “mis-translated” &/or “mis-interpreted”!

      much more effective are “The Protocols” & the yooish origin of the hideous evils of: communism, plutocratic capitalism, WWI & WWII, feminism, abortion, birth control, pornography, homo-sexuality, gun control, multi-culturalism, the Federal Reserve, free-masonry, vaccinations, the vile “counter-cultural revolutions” of the 1960s & the 1970s, the HollowHoax & the New World Order….

      all carefully documented by the likes of Kevin MacDonald & David Duke & easily accesible & under-standable by any-one of average intelligence!

    2. Howdy Doody Says:

      exalted grand-master oberführer double diamond jim! Says:

      25 October, 2008 at 11:37 pm

      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

      Exactly

    3. Zarathusta Says:

      I believe incest/inbreeding is fairly common among “orthodox” Jews. That’s why they give birth to so many retards.

    4. Celtic Warrior Says:

      I don’t see how jews can possibly wriggle out from accusation of encouraging such a vile thing as child molestation, there is nothing ‘spiritual’ or metaphorical about it.

      Incidentally, JC knew what jews were up to. In a passage of the New Testament he condemns those who ‘corrupt’ children as deserving a millstone tied to their necks and cast into the sea. Very strong words.

      Can a vnner provide the exact reference in the NT for this ??

    5. daveUK Says:

      “Can a vnner provide the exact reference in the NT for this ??”

      Luke 17:2 It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea than for him to cause one of these little ones to sin.

      Mark 9:24 If anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a large millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea.

    6. Zarathustra Says:

      What about all the little ones who don’t believe? Is it okay to abuse them? And the child does not sin, it’s the one who harms him that’s sinned. These passages should have read thus: “If anyone causes harm to these or any other little ones, it would be better for him……..” That would make Hay-soos look like he’s defending all children everywhere, not just the ones who believe in him.

      Give me $1000 and I’ll write you a Bible that KICKS ASS.

    7. gw Says:

      Jim says: “clearly proving –once again! – that ‘The Talmud’ cannot be used as an effective weapon against the yoos except in a vague, limited sense; the yoos will simply say, as above, that it has been “mis-translated” &/or “mis-interpreted”!

      Sounds just the same as their sister people’s holy book, the Koran. Mohammed learned from them well. Everything can be explained this way or interpreted that way or translated some other way. Or it depends on the circumstances, or the context, or the historical period. And as a last resort, it can’t be translated precisely but ONLY understood in the original tongue. (Which only they understand.) Pinning down these shifty Semitic religions is like nailing down a blob of Jello. Not worth the trouble even to try.

    8. Tina Carter Says:

      Pedophilia is pillar of Judaism. How is a child circumcised?

      Mohel (penis cliper) remove that skin, and suck the wound of a penis — I kind you not!

      It’s right there in the bible!

      Shabbath 19:2
      They may perform on the Sabbath all things that are needful for circumcision: excision, tearing, sucking [the wound], and putting thereon a bandage and cumin. If this had not been pounded up on the eve of the Sabbath a man may chew it with his teeth and then apply it.

      See yourself.
      http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/br-smc/index.html

    9. Zarathustra Says:

      Well said, gw…..Very well said.

    10. gw Says:

      Thank you T. Carter. That link is amazing — and exactly as you quoted:

      “The method to be adopted is laid down thus: ‘One excises the foreskin….Thereafter, one sucks the membrane until the blood is extracted … so that no danger [to the infant] may ensue; and any circumciser who does not carry out the sucking procedure is to be removed [from his office].’ . . . The operation itself, then, consists of three distinct acts: the excision of the prepuce; the laceration of the mucous membrane covering the glans; and the sucking of the blood ….” Immanuel Jakobovits. Jewish Medical Ethics: A Comparative and Historical Study of the Jewish Religious Attitude to Medicine and Its Practice. New York

      “The baby cried, blood flowed onto his penis — as the rabbi had predicted … The rabbi then bent over the baby and sucked the wound. I know this sounds awful, but it is part of the Jewish tradition. It’s supposed to help the healing.”
      Jack Shamash. “My Son on the Cutting Edge.” Independent (London),
      (December 17, 1998):

      Help the healing?!!! Give us a break! Anybody in the modern world knows that the human mouth is teeming with bacteria. That’s why a human bite is so serious.

    11. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      Literal cocksuckers.

    12. Arminius Says:

      That’s not all. The blood from the baby’s penis is then collected in a vessel, mixed with some wine and all witnesses at the ritual have to take a nip from it.
      Bon appetite!

    13. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      Striking how jews don’t care about pain they inflict on others, including their own offspring.

      Didn’t the master Freud say something about childhood trauma leading to adult pathology? The whole primal therapy of jew Arthur Janov was about repairing such trauma.

      Perhaps the penis torture is designed to stop normal, healthy development- perhaps jews actually despise mental health.

    14. Celtic Warrior Says:

      I read somewhere that male members of the Brit royal family are circumcised by a Mohel. If it’s true, then the conclusion is obvious.

    15. gw Says:

      Pictures that I’ve seen of Prince Albert (Queen Victoria’s husband), supposedly a German, looked suspiciously more Semitic than German.

      And that’s when Disraeli took over too. And the Rothschilds as well, I believe.

    16. Zarathustra Says:

      Albert looked pretty German to me. Of course, only idealized paintings of him exist, no photographs. But I noticed the Jews weren’t interested in getting rid of any British monarchs after Charles I. By the same token, they couldn’t wait to overthrow all the Bourbons, Hohenzollerns, Hapsburgs and Romanovs. Why is that?