16 November, 2008

The Vexing ‘Jewish Question’: A Nineteenth-Century Scholar’s View

Posted by Socrates in 'anti-Semitism', jewed culture, jewed finance, jews, Socrates, vintage jew-crit at 6:59 pm | Permanent Link

by Goldwin Smith: [Here].


  • 11 Responses to “The Vexing ‘Jewish Question’: A Nineteenth-Century Scholar’s View”

    1. Antagonistes Says:
      17 November, 2008 at 9:13 am

      This Jewish tendency to exaggerate (and outright lie) can be seen all through the Bible, and other ancient and modern Jewish writings. This tendency may not be exclusive to the Jews.

      Literal-minded Westerners do not understand this mode of expression, and take it literally.

      “Who is saying this? Why are they saying it? To whom are they saying it? What is the context?”

      These rules of higher, textural criticism serve everyone very well, and only a fool would not apply them, whether it be to the Bible or any document or reporting.

    2. Zarathustra Says:
      17 November, 2008 at 11:02 am

      Centuries pass, empires rise and fall. And yet the Jew remains unchanged. Der Ewinge Jude.

    3. Wolf Says:
      18 November, 2008 at 1:02 am

      “Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of anything that is lent upon usury: unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the Lord thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it” (Deuteronomy 23: 19, 20)

      In other words God says it’s okay to fuck your neighbour provided you’re a kike and he’s not.

    4. Wolf Says:
      18 November, 2008 at 1:15 am

      While googling that last quote in hopes of finding some plausible explanation for what is by most moral standards a damning ethnocentric supremacist notion, I stumbled upon yet more words of wisdom by the big Jew in the sky as recorded in the holy book:

      “No one whose testicles have been crushed or whose penis has been cut off may be admitted into the community of the LORD.”Deuteronomy:23 2

      God hates Unichs. You learn something every day.

    5. Zarathustra Says:
      18 November, 2008 at 4:12 am

      The Mold Testament is thoroughly Jewish with its neurotic, scatological, hate-filled anti-Goy stories and laws. How can any Christian admire it or draw comfort from it?

    6. gw Says:
      18 November, 2008 at 12:16 pm

      Only the brainwashed.

    7. gw Says:
      19 November, 2008 at 12:01 am

      “God hates Unichs. You learn something every day.”

      It wasn’t their fault. Did they have anything to say about it?
      Another example of Jewish justice — blame the victim.

    8. Zarathustra Says:
      19 November, 2008 at 3:13 am

      It must be a Semitic thing to blame the victim instead of the purpetrator. Mohammedans will stone to death the girl who was gang-raped instead of the rapists, because the rape brings “dishonor” to the girl’s family. How can you reason with people like that? No wonder the Jew believes all that Holohoax nonsense. They have a different, mutilated perception of what truth is.

    9. gw Says:
      19 November, 2008 at 7:05 am

      “It must be a Semitic thing to blame the victim instead of the purpetrator. ”

      Now, that is a very interesting connection: punish the “rapee”, not the rapist. It’s all about shame, not culpability.

      We look for who’s culpable. They look for who’s been shamed.
      The person shamed must be further punished to erase the shame.

      Indeed, Semites have a very strong obsession with anything having to do with guilt or shame. (Actual perpetrators are of little concern.) And they are experts at spreading the guilt around — on others.
      [eg. the Holyco$t — yeah, it’s holy (to them) and it’ll cost you.]

    10. Antagonistes Says:
      19 November, 2008 at 11:22 am

      How about this one:

      “When men strive together, one with another, and the wife of the one draweth near for to deliver her husband out of the hand of him that smiteth him, and putteth forth her hand, and taketh him by the secrets, Then thou shalt cut off her hand, thine eye shall not pity her.” (Deuteronomy 25: 11,12)

      I don’t know about you, but if a White man was fighting Abignegro, and was getting the worst of it, I would make his wife a hero if she put forth her hand and wrenched Abignegro’s testicles.

      There was also a true incident when Abignegro tried to rape a White girl. She grabbed his “secrets” and made him crawl in pain down the stairs, out the front door, and there, with both of them naked, and her firmly gripping his bedamned testicles, she waited until the police came.

      What a heroic picture; what a great statue that would make! The ice-cold wrath of the Aryan woman, thrown back at the primitive savage, her mastery over him made manifest by the very act of her wrathful ivory iron grip on the only source of accomplishment his people have ever exhibited! Her face, blazing with the righteous, slow-to-kindle wrath of the disciplined European aristocrat-in-spirit, shows only contempt as she beholds the troglodyte, writhing at her feet, as her unashamed nocturnal nakedness bursts into an ice-blue holy incandescence under the approaching lights of the police cruisers!

      By God, I would have fallen at her feet, as at the feet of Diana herself!

      I wish old what’s his name, the Nazi sculptor, could get ahold of that one!

    11. Zarathustra Says:
      19 November, 2008 at 6:00 pm

      Arno Brecker would have loved to make a sculpture depicting that tableau, I’m sure. I hope it’s a true story. It’s about time White women turned the tables on the mindlessly violent Black predators who stalk them.

      Pizza Man, I’m sure you condone Black-on White crime as “revenge” for the “fact” that we were all slave-owners and stole the Indians’ land and are responsible for global warming, right? I know how you antis “think”. It’s always Whitey’s fault, get Whitey, kill Whitey, make Whitey’s women pay.