Vanguard News Network

Read this article the other day on the IHR site. I found it to be somewhat discouraging. What like to know what others who frequent this site think.

Buy your self a plane ticket do some research your self, and go visit Ernst Zundel then post your own findings, so till then happy trails.

It is depressing. Even though scholars of the holocaust like hildeburg and pressac continue to downwardly estimate the number of jews gassed and continue to refute the most dastardly holocaust atrocities “lampshades of skin”, “soap made out of jewish fat” etc, the common folk continue to believe and continue to be taught the same old lies.

‘6 million jews is an undebatable figure.’
‘there is no doubt there were gassings.’
‘the evidence is unequivocal.’

Meanwhile holocaust scholars, not even holocaust revisionists, holocaust SCHOLARS like pressac admit straight out “there is no direct evidence of gassings.” There are only “criminal traces” which if looked at seriously turn out to be completely harmless innocuous nonsense.

I think if the public knew what holocaust scholars were saying, they would immediately find out how little is actually known or proven about the holocaust, and how completely the holocaust is based on hearsay. Then it’s just a hop skip and a jump to learn what the holocaust revisionists were saying, who are the only honest scholars of the holocaust.

But let’s face it, the public will never hear anything but ‘6 million jews were gassed and turned into soap’ so long as jews control the media. Jewish control of the media has to end before the holocaust can ever be studied. A simple dig at all the camp sites overseen by the UN or some trusted worldwide commission could reveal the truth about the ‘death camps’. It is undebatable that with modern technology we could find the mass graves–if they exist–even if the bodies are gone due to the disturbance in the soil layers and less packed dirt. Then publish the results to the whole world when we find out the lack of mass graves and lo, there goes the holocaust. Why is nothing this simple ever attempted? How can so many books and movies come out about the holocaust, so many museums be founded documenting the holocaust, and we have never once simply dug up the soil of the camps in search of the mass graves holding these supposed 6 million jews?

In any event, the declining sales in holocaust revisionism means the effort has failed. People will go on believing the 6 million jews figure until the end of time, or until after the world has already overthrown its jewish overlords and the information is just a historic curiosity. We’ll have to convince whites of jewish evil some other way. There’s certainly plenty of ways, their evil is like an infinite well combined with a giant octopus with tentacles in everything.

Diamed, you bring up another good point. For supposedly being the most heinous genocide of all time, there isn’t much that is “proven” or “known” about the Holocaust. The Revisionists were really the only people to study the Holocaust scientifically. I think most people would be shocked to know that there really isn’t much hard evidence to support many Holocaust claims.

http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?topic=5264

I don’t trust anybody who says that it’s not important to expose the Hollow Hoax.

It’s odd that new, improved survivors always come out from hiding just when kikerael is about to attack its neighbors. 6 million with Tay-Sachs as it were.

Weber’s letter to the Register-Guard, Oct 19, 2007

David Luebke’s unfriendly piece about me, “Frank debate or complicity with racism?” (guest viewpoint, Oct 17) is mostly silly “let us suppose” innuendo, but contains almost nothing of substance.
The one specific claim he makes about me is untrue. Contrary to what Luebke asserts, I DO NOT “DENY THE HOLOCAUST.” No reasonable or informed person disputes the catastrophe endured by Europe’s Jews during World War II.

Although I am a court-recognized expert on Germany’s wartime Jewish policy and the Holocaust issue, the subject of my talk at the Pacifica Forum meeting on Nov. 2 is the Israel lobby. What I write or say about that or any issue deserves to be accepted or rejected on its own merits, not on the basis of irrelevant comparisons with imaginary persons who deny the horrors of slavery.

That photo of him looks very jewish. Note the hooked nose, ears set back, forhead etc. The IHR under his “Leadership” is a do nothing organization. They now (Weber) just rehashes other people’s news stories. But maybe thats the plan??

In other words, it can and should mean something more to be White. Yes, that is a double standard; gladly.

I’ve got no proof, but I remember reading some shit from maybe the AFP/Collins Piper group that said Weber was a zog agent sent in to destroy revisionism.

In the heart of the British Midlands lies the ancient estate of Coombe Abbey, a gracious old medieval building steeped in Anglo-Saxon history with stories of monks, knights, Henry VIII and whatever else Ye Olde British one could conjure up. A mate and I checked the place out a few weeks back. Fascinating. Except for one “out of place” observation. Floating around, nearby the tourist kiosk were damn Holocaust leaflets! What poor taste and how annoying. Henry VIII, I don’t think, would have approved.

Mark Weber is definitely a fake. This guy is the head of something called the “Institute for Historical Review”, yet he COMPLETELY ignores a very recent and one of the most important historical events of the past 100 years which screams out for revisionism(the 9/11 attacks)?

Give me a break.

Z.O.G.:

Please, avoid calling people “fakes” unless you can prove it. Weber is a long-time revisionist.

He may indeed be a Judas Goat, as Carto and Piper have surmised. His agenda is puzzling, to say the least.

Willis Carto and Michael Piper accuse everyone of being either a “Zionist agent” or being part of some kind of “Conspiracy”. I think it would be best to avoid all of them, Weber, Carto, Piper, Jared Taylor, David Duke, Don Black, et al. They all seem to be more interested in fooling around than they are in fighting for the White Race. None of them will ever admit to being pro-White racists or revolutionaries, that’s for sure…………………………

Michael Collins Piper talked about Weber just recently. Apparently he’s the guy who filed a fraudulent affidavit that was used to unlawfully raid Willis Carto’s residence. You cab hear the archive of Piper’s show here

MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 2009
MP3 Files: Hour 1
Playlist Files: PLS M3U

Robert Vaughn; Israel and Gaza;
Mark Weber & Institue for Historical Review;
Pro-Zionist Policies in Germany

The fact that holocaust revisionism has been embraced by a head of state, President Ahmadinejad of Iran, whom you can watch on You Tube rationally defend it with an outraged Mike Wallace on “60 Minutes,” is very significant. Mark Weber, who heads the premiere historical revisionist organization in America, chose NOT to attend the 2006 holocaust conference in Tehran hosted by President Ahmadinejad. This, was very significant, too, because it indicated then that Weber’s commitment to the research that the name of his organization represents wasn’t genuine. When pressed for comments about the Tehran Conference by the media his statements were equivocal and counterproductive. It’s time for Weber to step aside and let someone else run the IHR, or change its name to reflect the purely anti-Zionist direction he’s announced that he wants to take it in. It’s not honest to continue to use the names of jailed revisionists to solicit funds for an organization that no longer promotes what these men believe in. Weber is a pamphleteer who has been living for too long now off of the hard work of real authors who have sacrificed everything, including their liberty, in the search for truth.

I agree with Socrates in that I don’t believe that Weber is a “fake”. He has been a revisionist for a long time and I’ve enjoyed several of his articles. What is puzzling to me, is that all of a sudden he seems to be pulling back, possibly recanting. If that’s the case I think he should come out and say it.

Just because someone is an “historical revisonist” doesn’t neccesarily mean he is pro-White or anti-Jew.

Well, well, well, Zara Boy, looks like I dun stepped on some corns.
So you’re “a racially conscious individual,” eh? You do mean a
racially conscious Jew, don’t you? Afterall, you adopt the
modus operandi of a typical Jew troll, shooting off your mouth
about irrelevant matters, then denigrating those individuals
who truly are trying to make a difference for the White cause,
no matter if we are in total agreement with them or not. By the
way, Jew Troll, how much money have you been contributing to the movement, including this website? Yeah, we know…not so much as a nickel. So pack ‘er on up, Boy, and take your trolling operation elsewhere…you’ve done been outed, dickhead. PS, learn to spell “conscious.”

Zarathustra,

“Curt-ass”? Oh, my goodness, bitch boy, the last time I heard
that slur was — when? — grade school? You’re so amusing,
so witty, bitch boy! I have the courage to write under my own
name, not under a pussynom as you do, Zarathustra, you little,
semen-sucking Semite, you! You call me a stupid moron, yet
you can’t even spell “conscious.” I thought you kikenspiels
were supposed to have a better grasp of the English language
than that.

You complain about being called a Jew troll in the past. Did
you ever think that if you didn’t think and write like a Jew troll
people wouldn’t be accusing you of same? And you completely
dodged my question concerning donating to White-cause organizations. That simply begs the question: Do you, kike boy?

Tell us, little, bitch boy, if you’re not a kosher kocksucker, why it
is that you’re attacking nationalists online who are doing their
very best to make a difference; i.e., Duke, Piper, Black, et cetera. Tough question, ain’t it, kikenspiel? That’s my beef with you, bitch boy.

“Of course, I was under the impression that Alex Linder was not going to tolerate this kind of invective among those who post here.”

It goes on all the time. (Sad to say.)

It’s one thing to disagree, respectfully, but we must learn to be more civil with each other. This disgusting sort of schoolyard spat only drives reasonable people away — which may be the purpose of some others all along.

“.…more coming soon.”

Let’s hope not! We’ve already seen enough.

Incidentally, I also did not care for his disparaging comment about Duke and certain others, but this is no way to address it.

(And what would you know about his hooked nose?)

Some paranoid posters imagine there’s a Jew lurking under every bed, but I am not one of them. We do, however, have a surfeit of quarrelsome and abusive gentiles. If only they could channel their anger productively, instead of at each other!

Let’s get back to the topic. Let’s see …. what was it anyway???