14 March, 2009

China Worried About America’s Finances

Posted by Socrates in China, economics, economy, jewish criminality, jewish traitors, Socrates at 5:03 pm | Permanent Link

Funny and sad at the same time. We borrow massive amounts of money from a wealthy (!) communist – ok, semi-communist – country to, among other things, pay for wars that we shouldn’t be fighting in the first place. Trivia: two Jews – Solomon Adler and Harry Dexter White – played important roles in the fall of China into communist hands in 1949. Those two men deliberately sabotaged China’s currency:

[Article].


  • 10 Responses to “China Worried About America’s Finances”

    1. Zarathustra Says:

      I would hardly call Red China’s government “communist”. They have an authoritarian, centralized bureacracy. In a truly communist system, there would be no more government. The proletariat would manage their own affairs and everyone would be responsible for everyone else’s well-being. At least that’s how I think it was supposed to work.

      Also, I would remind VNN’s legions of right-wing Republican “conservatives” that it was Republicans like Richard Nixon and George Bush Sr. who opened up diplomatic and economic ties with Peking, not so-called liberal Democrats. At least there are still a few true liberals who espouse pro-American, pro-working class populism, whereas the right wing has completely sold out to the Internationalist crowd.

    2. old_dutch Says:

      Amen.

    3. old_dutch Says:

      Getting a little more current, rather than beating up on Harry Dexter White. This jewboy Bloom looks like big trouble to me: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1880228,00.html

    4. Zarathustra Says:

      Truman’s Secretary of State, George C. Marshall (of the Marshall Plan fame), was also instrumental in letting the Reds take over mainland China in 1949. We spent 50 years, hundreds of billions of dollars and wasted tens of thousands of American soldiers’ lives trying to fight an enemy that Regime Central had absolutely no intention of defeating.

    5. Andrei's Ghost Says:

      w w w . h a a r e t z . c o m

      Last update – 16:09 3/11/2009
      U.S. official: Obama won’t cut military aid to Israel
      By DPA

      U.S. President Barack Obama will not cut the billions of dollars in military aid promised to Israel, a senior U.S. administration official said Wednesday.

      The $30 billion in aid promised to Israel over the next decade will not be harmed by the world financial crisis, the official told Israel Radio. He spoke on condition of anonymity.

      The Obama Administration however expects the next government of Prime Minister-designate Benjamin Netanyahu to continue peace negotiations with the Palestinians, he said.

      The increased military aid was promised to outgoing prime minister Ehud Olmert by then-under secretary of state for political affairs Nicholas Burns in August 2007.

      Israel Radio also quoted the official as saying that if Hamas joins a Palestinian unity cabinet but does not accept the conditions of the Quartet of Middle East peace sponsors – the U.S., European Union, United Nations and Russia – the Obama Administration would have no dealings with that government.

      The radical Islamist movement ruling Gaza is holding talks in Cairo with the secular Fatah party of moderate President Mahmoud Abbas and other factions on forming a unity government.

      The talks in Cairo are a bid to reconcile between the rivaling factions, which have been locked in a bitter power struggle since Hamas beat Fatah in January 2006 elections and culminated in the Islamist group violently seizing sole control of Gaza in June 2007.

      After the Hamas elections victory, the Quartet said it would boycott Hamas, unless it recognized Israel’s right to exist, endorsed past interim peace deals calling for a two-state solution to the conflict, and renounced violence.

    6. old_dutch Says:

      Marshall, like Patton wasn’t afraid to voice his opinion of jews. Most historical critics of the jews are pragmatic & rational.

    7. Ein Says:

      Zarathustra Says: “I would hardly call Red China’s government “communist”. They have an authoritarian, centralized bureacracy. In a truly communist system, there would be no more government. The proletariat would manage their own affairs and everyone would be responsible for everyone else’s well-being. At least that’s how I think it was supposed to work.”

      That’s my understanding too. Funy, isn’t it, how communism always gets subverted along the way to utopia and becomes a vehicle for a new aristocracy that replaces the old one?

      And usually a much worse one. (Or should I say always?)

      “Also, I would remind VNN’s legions of right-wing Republican “conservatives” that it was Republicans like Richard Nixon and George Bush Sr. who opened up diplomatic and economic ties with Peking…”

      Right again. But don’t forget that super-Zionist, Kissinger, the consummate Court Jew.

    8. mrcrouton Says:

      Even if China was communist, who cares? I’m not Chinese and it shouldn’t be white nations business to give a damned about what form of govenment rules over mongoloids.

      I don’t care if they force abort their babies, or march each other into death camps. it’s their destiny, not ours.

      White nations should just work internally keeping their nations white, and the hell with the negroid and mongoloid nations.

    9. Karen Says:

      Communism is but an idea. It is a tool. It has never been in practice. What you get is State Capitalism run by jews. Some are more equal than others………..

    10. Tom McReen Says:

      “Also, I would remind VNN’s legions of right-wing Republican “conservatives”

      It’s him again.