26 May, 2009
They Insult Our Intelligence
Posted by Socrates in BNP, Britain, elections, England, race, racism accusations, Socrates, white nationalism, White Nationalists at 1:55 am | 
Permanent Link
by Alex Kurtagic.
“One would think that an award-winning journalist writing for a national ‘quality’ newspaper and with access to some of the most eminent personages of the age would be capable of penning an intelligent article about an unconventional politician, providing novel insights and depth of analysis where his lesser peers would have been content with a facile regurgitation of clichés. Unfortunately, we live in an age when, not originality of approach or sophistication of insight, but blind subjection to Freudo-Marxist dogma and crass fealty to the state-sponsored party line are the key to achieving recognition in a journalistic career.”
26 May, 2009 at 3:05 am
The BNP should take that picture of the happy White family and put it inside of a red circle with a diagonal red line across it as an illustration of what the Jews, lefties and globalists want to do to the indigenous people of Great Britain (ie, the White people of Great Britain).
26 May, 2009 at 4:59 am
A good article and an accurate assessment of the situation in Britain. The fact that Farndale’s piece was published in the Daily Telegraph, whose readers would expect to have some sympathy for the BNP, clearly demonstrates just how worried the race traitors are.
The BNP is a fairly moderate party and Nick Griffin, although his instincts are sound, is walking a tightrope. There is a persistent rumour within British WN circles that Griffin made a tacit deal with the zionists, namely he would take a pro-Israel stance and weed-out anti-semites from the party. In return their media would cut him some slack. I have no way of knowing if this is true, but it appears the ‘Daily Torygraph’ hasn’t heard about the ‘deal’.
26 May, 2009 at 8:00 am
Good observations, gentlemen. Since most of the mainstream media is in enemy hands, Ferndale’s hatchet job is a prima facie example of how the ideological Jewish ethnic war is being waged against the white race. The effects of this drumbeat of incessant defamation of any semblance of white nationalist opposition, is now being tested in the local British elections. Do the seminal British Anglos have enough grit and moxie to break free of the mind altering parasites? It would be nice to see something positive from Britain for a change.
26 May, 2009 at 2:15 pm
Although it would probably cause a lot of grief in the short term, any “nationalist” party in the future has to identify the Jewish race as our number one enemy. We can’t make anymore concessions to these people. It’s amazing how half of the worldwide Jewish population expects us to kowtow to Israel yet refuses to live there themselves. Furthermore, even if they were to all emigrate there tomorrow, they would still face a demographic crisis in the region that they might not overcome. Before we pat ourselves on the back, whites need to give some serious thought to our own demographic problems, which we brought upon ourselves with a fair amount of help from the Jews.
26 May, 2009 at 3:17 pm
Justin says” “any “nationalist” party in the future has to identify the Jewish race as our number one enemy. We can’t make any more concessions to these people.”
You’re right. But to begin with, it will be necessary first to identify the Jews as a racial group. That alone is a massive problem. Many people just don’t get the concept. They can’t imagine what you’re talking about. You’re talking race/tribe/ethnicity, while they’re thinking religion. It just doesn’t fit into their mental framework. They think the Jews are just a quirky variety of Protestants who go to church on Saturday instead of Sunday, that’s all.
I was having a conversation last week with a very nice, very intelligent young man who insisted that there is no way of identifying a Jew as such, since they’re “nothing more than a religion.” (I don’t know how the subject came up.) I maintained that some Jews ARE visually identifiable while many others are not. He was adamant, insisting that you can’t tell a person’s “religion” by their looks! That’s ridiculous, he said.
Then I asked how how it it that most Jews (that I have known, at least) are non-religious? He just looked at me blankly. That stumped him. Non-religious Jews? He didn’t comprehend how such a thing could be possible. I could have gone on to ask him how there are a number of Jew-specific diseases which are genetic. Are there hereditary Presbyterian diseases too? But that was unnecessary as he was so frightened of the whole discussion that he had to change the subject. This was at his place of business, and he works for a Jew. (What else?) Incidentally, I think that’s the only Jew he knows, so he has very limited experience with the topic. But maybe I got him to thinking a tiny bit.
So how can there be such a thing as a non-religious religion? Because it is NOT a religion!
26 May, 2009 at 4:58 pm
Good post Ein. I can remember when I myself didn’t think of the Jews as a racial group. To my untrained eye, they looked white. Jews are quite clever in making people over here believe they are a religious group rather than an ethnic group. Unfortunately, many white “conservatives” play into the Jews hands by talking about Judeo-Christian values (barf!). This brings me to my next point. I also believe that religion can really play NO part in any successful nationalist movement. A lot of people will probably not like that, but it’s what I believe. I also hold some views of Christianity that might not be popular as well.
26 May, 2009 at 5:50 pm
“Unfortunately, many white “conservatives” play into the Jews hands by talking about Judeo-Christian values (barf!). This brings me to my next point. I also believe that religion can really play NO part in any successful nationalist movement.”
Another agent of division? Jahn again? Always blabbing about Conservatives and Christians but never about communism or the new left. There are a number of these posting on VNN now, many of them from one source.
We already know the ‘judeo-Christian values’ shills are zionists.
26 May, 2009 at 8:12 pm
When posting the link on GoVNN, please remove the “#” and everything to the right of it in the url. That way the page will open at the top.
I realize that is not how it appears when you log on to the front page of the occidental observer.
27 May, 2009 at 9:52 pm
Tom,
I don’t think Justin was trying to sow discord with his comment about Christianity. Maybe it is counterproductive in a tactical sense, to bring this up but the Christian pastors and ministers and priests have had a very harmful effect in many white countries like So. Africa where they convinced whites to vote themselves out of power and now they are being killed and raped at rates which will see no whites in a decade or so.
28 May, 2009 at 11:56 am
I think Mr. McReen’s comment proves my point about why we should leave religion out of political discussions. The two don’t mix and almost always create a misunderstanding. In the future, and God only knows when it will be, do we wish to create a state based on race or one based on religion? I would opt for a racial state. Besides, whenever I think of “religious” states, I’m reminded of the Middle Ages and much of the Islamic world today. Just a thought. I’m sure people will let me know what they think.
28 May, 2009 at 4:16 pm
“proves my point about why we should leave religion out of political discussions. The two don’t mix and almost always create a misunderstanding. … I’m sure people will let me know what they think.”
Hey, I agree with you and Chubby completely. Absolutely!
I think I have said this myself rather recently. On some things you will never get people to agree. But why should it be necessary? It’a a personal matter. Some things (like religion) should best be left to private choice and kept out of the public arena.
28 May, 2009 at 4:22 pm
Amen to that! Pun intended.
28 May, 2009 at 4:22 pm
“I think Mr. McReen’s comment proves my point about why we should leave religion out of political discussions. The two don’t mix and almost always create a misunderstanding.
It is possible to discuss religion, unfortunately it is a point of discussion for anti trolls to use for dividing White people or anti jew Christian-hating, while pretending to be WN.
“In the future, and God only knows when it will be, do we wish to create a state based on race or one based on religion? I would opt for a racial state.”
I’d support a White racial state.
28 May, 2009 at 4:53 pm
Which should be placed first in one’s life- facts, or religion?
28 May, 2009 at 7:35 pm
Well, that all depends where your values lie.
If you’re a spiritual person, you’ll put religion and faith first.
If you’re a rational person, you’ll put facts and reason first.
Which do you prefer? I know what i do.
28 May, 2009 at 7:36 pm
But, in keeping with my poilicy, I’ll keep it to myself.
29 May, 2009 at 3:32 am
Like Tom McCreen is so fond of saying, religion is the opiate of the masses.
29 May, 2009 at 3:32 am
Like Tom McCreen is so fond of saying, religion is the opiate of the masses.
29 May, 2009 at 9:25 am
“Like Tom McCreen is so fond of saying, religion is the opiate of the masses.”
I never said it once but please do continue showing you are a liar and a marxist.
Actually, don’t bother as you have proven it conclusively already.
31 May, 2009 at 7:02 am
I almost feel bad about defeating your idiotic arguments, Tom. It’s like stepping on an ant over and over again. Where’s the sport in that?
31 May, 2009 at 7:02 am
I almost feel bad about defeating your idiotic arguments, Tom. It’s like stepping on an ant over and over again. Where’s the sport in that?
2 June, 2009 at 4:57 pm
“I almost feel bad about defeating your idiotic arguments, Tom. It’s like stepping on an ant over and over again. Where’s the sport in that?”
I don’t know, tell me when it happens.
I feel that way about all your sock puppets, troll. They are all so similar it’s like you’re exposing yourself on purpose.
31 March, 2010 at 10:20 pm
I realise this is a bit of center .but in regard to the BNP I am reminded of the parriot seen ,from Monty pythons Circus,
Look pet sales man ,you have sold me a dead parriot( MUTI CULTURE BULL SHIT LONDON) ,no it looks fine to me,it looks fine because you have nailed its feet to the perch,( lies of the conser, lib, lab, 5 headed hydra )the bird is no more ,it has gone to meet its maker ,it is no long in organic existance, it has gone to parriot heaven,no muti culture parriot is fine look it moves ,of couse it moves ,because you are shaking the bloody cage,O look polly wonts a craker, thats not its bloody talking thats you ,pretending that its talking, LOOK) I WANT MY MONEY BACK ,errrrrrr———-NO.end of conversation ,walks out of shop,100,000, native whites leave london per year.
31 March, 2010 at 10:43 pm
This is another story I thought up, Their is this 80 foot pile of dog shit on the pavement,( LIBERAL, MUTI, WHAT EVER ISM)it is covered in silver gleaming paper with bows and little bells hanging of it. All the clever people, the media ,the political partys , the interlectals, the smug no alls that live in white suburbs far removed from their own white poor working class ,let alone the blacks, GATED COMMUNITYS, why writing for the washington post, you know the type. and they dance around it singing, kom bar yar, endlessly ,while praiseing each other as to how clever they all are, how this wonder of the new age smells like chocolate, only us smart, clever people ,understand truth of the chocolate, dont you just love muti culture resturants, dosnt it just give you a warm glowing feeling deep down inside, your moral soul, and lo and behold some small child passes ,NICK GRIFFEN, and he says, this smells like dog shite to me .Now the wind comes up ,and it starts to rain ,KAOS, and this 80 f pile of shit lands on ever ones head, THE FUTURE OF USA ,UK,western world
31 March, 2010 at 11:05 pm
Judeo christain civilisation, is an American term it has no truth to us brits, Greek thought is based on MATHS ONLY, christain ideas pertain to the soul of I/ MAN, IT IS WRONG TO ASSUME THAT IS HAS ANY THING TO DO WITH /MEN. the group deals with another group with maths ,number of blacks in USA to be same as whites in southern africa, 4 million in SA , 4 million blacks in america,MINDKIND is the thoughts of the british ,not the shit consept of muti culturism ,equity, 50 50 ism, not equality, belief in the degenerated idea of good intensions, IT LEADS TO hell, JUST LOOK AT YOUR INNER CITYS. this is the reason why i am a bnp member.