Vanguard News Network

He he he.

But it’s the middle part of the bell curve (i.e. the working class) that sets the long term agenda for the rest of the group.

Without the average 100 IQ the White race has, which creates a realitivly stable and creative society, the high IQ achievers are left high and dry.

There are high IQ blacks, but because the MAJORITY of blacks are low IQ and predisposed to violent behaviour those high IQ blacks can never realize their potential.

Unless they have access to White society that is.

But, granting them that, ultimately destroys White society.

I’m not sure what to make of what New America has told us so far. It’s seems he endorses some version of Harold Covington’s PNW migration, and building a “new Christian man” – but not via a mass movement. How he proposes to bring these things about is a mystery, at least to me. Also, I wonder if he really believes (and wants everyone else to believe) in this type of Christianity, or whether he regards Christianity as merely a technique for manipulating large groups of people. The latter it has done very well for generations. But not everyone has the knack for believing in Jeboo, or accepting that people can rise from the dead.

In any case, although there is a superficial similarity in our terminology, New America means something very different than I do when he refers to “the System”. And the project of reforming human nature is an old one, tried initially by the Nazis, and then by the Soviets, and now – and this is what New America perceives as a “war” – by the technological system as it has been refined, jewed, and distilled in America and Europe. Maybe it will help to review these efforts:

New Aryan Man — Aryan man believed in loyalty, honor, objective reality, and eugenics. He believed in race struggle as the determining factor of human history, and he believed in the superior intelligence and strength of Aryan man vis à vis the other races. The New Aryan Man was to be a product of selective breeding. While believing the same things as Aryan Man, New Aryan Man would be even more intelligent, more honorable, and more willing to sacrifice himself for the good of race and nation than the Aryan man of Germany in the 1930’s. The project of producing the New Aryan Man was, then, in essence, the task of re-setting the norm for German citizenry, improving it both physically and mentally. Physical and mental infirmities were also to be eradicated through eugenic measures. New Aryan Man was to be strongly racist, sexist, atheist, and nationalist.

New Soviet Man — New Soviet Man believed in the primacy of Marxism-Leninism, and class struggle, as opposed to race struggle. He disbelieved in genetics, eugenics, the existence of such a thing as “human nature”, objective reality, and race, believing these ideas merely to be outmoded and oppressive constructs of the ruling class. He was to work tirelessly with selfless dedication for the triumph of the proletarian over the bourgeois and capitalist. New Soviet Man was to be strongly anti-racist, anti-sexist, atheist, and international communist.

New American Man — “New American Man” is somewhat of an oxymoron, in that he believes in the absolute equality of the races and the sexes. He is, therefore, not so much the New American Man as the New American Person. Nor is this the only contradiction contained within the New American Person. For example, it neither believes nor disbelieves in objective reality. It is capable of changing its opinion on this question immediately, even within the same thought, as when touting the advantages of racial mixing as conducive to “hybrid vigor”, while at the same time insisting that race does not objectively exist. Hypocritically, New American Person believes that all cultures are of equal worth, but only so long as their foundational principles do not conflict with western principles of freedom, equality, and democracy. New American Person considers itself the only true expression of the American idea, yet is a globalist who believes nationalism is outmoded (except in the case of Israel), is sexually neither strongly male nor strongly female, and is aggressively anti-racist. Very protective of Jews, while claiming to be impartial, New American Person is 100% certain both that the Holocaust happened and that that fact must never questioned or investigated. Not so much atheist as uninterested in, or even suspicious of, traditional notions of God, New American Person nevertheless holds these secular beliefs with a fervor best characterized as religious. Scientific investigation of their accuracy is discouraged, and always penalized by social and even criminal sanctions. In this, they resemble strongly tenets of religious faith.

In a sense, New American Person represents an advance over its two predecessors, New Soviet Man and New Aryan Man. The architects of New American Person appear to have realized that those previous New Men were vulnerable because they had principles, however misguided, and in the end, for various reasons, failed when they were unable to live up to those principles. The improved New American Person lacks this vulnerability because it has no real principles, and ultimately worships only the power granted to it by its technology. Its motto: “If it works, it’s good.” Its values of freedom, equality, and democracy, therefore, are less principles than its mythic aspirations, evolved as a technique for producing maximum social harmony. Attempts to define them show that they are little more than catchphrases, gutted-out words which can be twisted and reshaped to mean virtually anything, as the situation dictates. Consequently, in the name of freedom and equality, whole libraries full of lawbooks regulating every detail of behavior are tolerated. New American Person is also quite prepared, with a vast array of sophisticated technological weaponry, to impose its version of democracy on all the peoples of the world (at least the ones incapable of effectively fighting back), killing every man, woman, and child of them, if necessary, until they agree to accept it.

“New Soviet Man — New Soviet Man believed in the primacy of Marxism-Leninism, and class struggle, as opposed to race struggle. He disbelieved in genetics, eugenics, the existence of such a thing as “human nature”, objective reality, and race, believing these ideas merely to be outmoded and oppressive constructs of the ruling class. He was to work tirelessly with selfless dedication for the triumph of the proletarian over the bourgeois and capitalist. New Soviet Man was to be strongly anti-racist, anti-sexist, atheist, and international communist. ”

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

The Communists saw everything in terms of class and economics, something which, truth be told, does have more than a little validity. A bunch of gun-wielding niggers trying to jack your SUV at a stoplight is one thing. But when all the wealth and power in our society is getting concentrated into fewer and fewer hands, while your standard of living is dropping like a stone and you’re getting deeper into debt, then the issues of class struggle and wealth distribution become very real indeed.

And it’s not all the Jews’ fault. Hardly! The people mainly responsible for oppressing and exploiting us are wealthy, powerful, fellow Whites….The White executives who ship your job off to India, or who make obscene profits while raising the costs of health care and gasoline. The White contractor and manufacturer, who only hire underpaid illegal beaners to build those McMansions and yachts. The White Federal judge, who sentences some poor dumb White kid to thirty years in prison for spraypainting a swastika on a synagogue door, or stabbing some nigger in a fight. The rich Whites who move to a certain area for its view of the ocean or the mountains and then force the poorer Whites off their property. The White politicians who vote for Hate Crime laws or vote to borrow a few trillion more from the Red Chinese. The White CEOs who lay off 10,000 of their White employees while getting multimillion dollar bonuses and pay raises for themselves.

I hear that the richest 3% in this country own about 75% of the wealth. Do you think they obtained all that wealth fairly? Do you think they will be happy with “only” 75%?

You’re goddamn right I beleive in class warfare!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

in reply to Parsifal:

you wrote:

And it’s not all the Jews’ fault. Hardly! The people mainly responsible for oppressing and exploiting us are wealthy, powerful, fellow Whites….The White executives who ship your job off to India, or who make obscene profits while raising the costs of health care and gasoline. The White contractor and manufacturer, who only hire underpaid illegal beaners to build those McMansions and yachts. The White Federal judge, who sentences some poor dumb White kid to thirty years in prison for spraypainting a swastika on a synagogue door, or stabbing some nigger in a fight. The rich Whites who move to a certain area for its view of the ocean or the mountains and then force the poorer Whites off their property. The White politicians who vote for Hate Crime laws or vote to borrow a few trillion more from the Red Chinese. The White CEOs who lay off 10,000 of their White employees while getting multimillion dollar bonuses and pay raises for themselves.

I hear that the richest 3% in this country own about 75% of the wealth. Do you think they obtained all that wealth fairly? Do you think they will be happy with “only” 75%?

You’re goddamn right I beleive in class warfare!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

in reply:

Your most telling point was made at the beginning of your post, when you said:

And it’s not all the Jews’ fault. Hardly! The people mainly responsible for oppressing and exploiting us are wealthy, powerful, fellow Whites….

All true, but my focus would be on the larger issues implicit in David Lane’s commentary on what he would do.

Let me tie it in with the greatest Insight Metzger ever had, when he noted:

“Who do I blame for all of these things happening to us? I blame us, because we let it happen to us.”

Covington said it best:

It makes no sense to try to do what we want to do WITHIN The System, because The System designed to stop what we are trying to do.”

WE were groomed to be tools of the System, at all points possible, by an educational system that is actually, first and foremost, an indoctrination system.

All too many of us – say, 90% – never outgrew this enforced state of Childhood, with its attendant state of Learned Helplessness.

Lane saw that we would have to develop the skills needed slowly, and steadily, always working to the fulfillment of a Greater Purpose – a Homeland for our Race, in the fulfillment of a Racial Destiny that will have our Posterity walk Among The Stars.

I suspect Lane realized the greatest strength of the Jews is a single-minded focus on Racial Duty – a thousand years ago, a rag merchant who made a penny profit at the end of the day was happy as a matter of two principles.

The first principle, the Lesser Principle, was his ability to skillfully manipulate the Outsiders – the Other RACES – into supporting him at their expense.

The second principle, the Greater Principle, is this:

That penny, INVESTED over a thousand years in developing the Race, helped lay the temporal foundations for the Race of Israel conquering all other races.

The Jews had a a Plan, with One Commandment, and One Goal, towards which even the smallest of actions could be placed in the service of.

We don’t – and, the System is designed to stop THAT happening at any price.

Every time we see ourselves as victims, and helpless victims, at that, we define ourselves down to the level where the Destroyer rejoices; beaten and demoralized, we are strongly encouraged to remain Eternal Children – Puer Aeternae, Peter Pans playing at the work of Adults – always at the mercy of the kindness of strangers who see us as we see sheep, grazing animals that naturally look Down, and NEVER look up.

THAT is what we must fight, within Ourselves, where he SO have the Power to Choose.

I see Covington’s Northwest Republic as the best designed Bridge to get us from where we are, so that, one day, our Posterity will walk Among The Stars.

THAT is the outcome of a thousand small choices we make daily, and THOSE choices are where our Power – our ability to be effective – resides.

We simply need to be united in the overarching Goal, and all else will fall into place, solely as the result of OUR disciplined labors.

Thus, we will turn the Jews from Attacking Demons, into Servant Angels, because we will learn FROM them, how they control us, and the Institutions that are so much a part of our lives.

Note this, as well:

The ONE thing all of our Racial Enemies have worked diligent to destroy is the foundation of our Warrior Caste.

What would you do about THAT, personally?

How would you do that?

More to follow.

Parsifal Says:

The Communists saw everything in terms of class and economics, something which, truth be told, does have more than a little validity.

Reducing everything to economics and class warfare based on economics falsifies reality. It’s a very jewy way of seeing things, and although it can have its uses, I think its a bad idea to accept this frame of reference generally. After all, there are lots of important human motivations that have nothing to do with the economics, which on the individual scale can only mean the profit motive. Do you have children? If so, what would you sell them for? What about personal honor or integrity? Can you put a price on it? Loyalty? How much is it worth? In short, if you agree that such things as kinship, loyalty, and honor are for sale, you tacitly denigrate yourself and play into the hands of the Jew. Seeing things in this way makes it impossible to justify the existence of other cultural systems in which money is not the highest value, because you have agreed in advance that such systems don’t exist.

However, because modern technological civilization is global in scope, and as a practical matter if not by definition is multi-racial and multi-cultural, money is the only common unit of exchange, and as a consequence that sort of thinking is encouraged. The relationships between nations begin with the economic. This places it at odds with other cultural systems, such as the one that was attempted by the Nazis, or the one that is being attempted by Islamists, or the one proposed above by New America.

Historically, the sequence is usually as follows:

First, an economic relationship is established between two nations/races. Examples: the slave trade, where the nigger became a commodity, a farm animal; or the Jew, who proved useful to the old white elites in Europe as a tax collector and a slave trader.

Next, someone notices that economic relations will be enhanced if certain political rights and responsiblities are granted to the parties. A political relationship between the two nations/races becomes established. Examples: slavery being an inefficient system, the negro is freed and given right to vote; colonies of a sovereign nation accepting the protection of a patron state in return for allowing their economic resources to be exploited, such as happened in Europe’s relation to the New World, Africa, Asia, etc.

Next, as economic and political relationships become elaborated, the two nations/races start to become socially amalgamated. Social amalgamation is dictated by internal logic of the development of the technological system. It helps things function more smoothly if the component human parts become more like one another, since technical systems require uniform input and output. Examples: the contamination of white culture by negro anti-culture – as in jazz and rock music, sports, films, etc.; the entire civil rights movement; desegregation.

The final phase is genetic amalgamation of the two nations/races. Pre-existing human races, created by natural selection, are destroyed. The technological system has no use for those racial distinctions, any more than it has a use for the outmoded values of kinship, loyalty, or honor. They are relics of a previous natural system which has now been superseded. The technological system is all-devouring, and can allow nothing to stand outside itself, just as the technological state can allow no authority higher than itself. Thus we see that the root of what New America perceives as a “war” declared by the system against the white race, and against white values is, as a practical matter, the necessary result of the growth of the technological system.

If the white race is to be preserved, at least in anything like its current form, then it follows that the technological sytem must be either permanently crippled or destroyed.

You misquoted Parsifal, who did not reduce “everything to economics and class warfare…”

And, anyone who doubts economics and class warfare do not provide a significant part of a useful analytical framework for human behavior need only visit any area where manufacturing has gone away, forever.

As I said, “It’s a very jewy way of seeing things, and although it can have its uses, I think its a bad idea to accept this frame of reference generally.”

Imagine if we could create a White State where the (minimal) central government operates and makes all decisions based on One Question – “Is it good for the Race?”

This works extraordinarily well for the Jews, and should work even better, for us.

You haven’t understood the argument.

To the technological system, the question is not (and can’t be) “Is it good for the race?”, since as I said, race had developed under the system of natural selection, and is at best a nuisance from the perspective of the technological system. Such a system requires a uniform product as input in order to provide a uniform output. Hence, the current project of producing the tan everyman, the “New American Person”. He is a product of “technological selection”, a process whereby man is re-engineered to be better adapted to technological society. He represents the end phase of the elaboration of the technological system.

With respect to Israel, I will only point out that in my opinion, its long-term survival prospects seem poor. It’s an economically and politically dependant state, so weak that it cannot survive without outside aid. Its eventual political and social integration with the rest of Palestine seems to me to be inevitable. The Jews themselves, on the other hand, haven’t really required Israel, and still don’t require its continued existence, although of course it is very convenient for them to have such a state to serve them as an international crime headquarters. They have managed to persist in diaspora for thousands of years not because of Israel, but only because they are a unique people with a racial religion. With little or no concept of truth, honor, or loyalty beyond “what’s good for Jews?”, and what is probably a genetically-based obsession with money and the power it can buy, they are peculiarly well adapted to survival in the milieu of technological society. Whites have no such advantage, unfortunately.

Excellent nutrition and a clean, healthy daily life is a good place to start developing a healthy tribe.

You can’t “start” a tribe in 2009. You can see to your own health & hygiene.

Civilization – which only one Race, the White Race, can Create and develop,

Except cities, civitates, existed when the Aryans were rustling each others’ cattle and eating dingo out on the steppe. Swoosh! Down comes the self-important house of cards.

Civilization is overrated; it’s what afflicts us, not an object of worship. White nationalists are very confused — on one hand they yearn for archaic simplicity (talk of “tribe”, “babies”, “collapse”) and on the other speak in awe of this “Civilization” they want to “preserve”. Which is it, tribus or urbs? But therein lay the dilemma: the urbs has no place for them, yet there is no primitive, unsupervised ager for a new fundatio trib?s

New America Says:

My criticism of those who would do away with Civilization is the same as my criticism of those who would do away with Christianity – “What would you replace it with?”

What do you replace cancer with?

You are unconquerable in your ignorance, like most of Jeboo’s halfwit children.

By the way, Captain America, you have misquoted observer. (I mention this only because I know how it upsets you.) He said that there is no ager (Latin for “field”) in which to found a tribe, not “anger”. Are your superhuman powers of discernment failing you? Do you need new reading glasses? LOL.

in reply to Parsifal:

you wrote:

I’ve been around the block a few times and not once has Christianity ever helped me or my family. NOT ONCE. Only a sense of Racial and Family kinsmanship can save us, concepts that are in open conflict with the anti-Family, anti-Nature and anti-Race teachings of Christianity.

in reply:
Your criticism is of what Christianity has become, at the Institutional level – JUDEO-Christianity, which, literally, can not be.

The parasite has remade the host in its own image, and now, the host is dying; the “Mainstream” congregations are well on their way to the dustbin of history, and good damn riddance.

You might want to look at the christianseparatist dot org website for some ideas on what Christianity was MEANT to be – Patriarchal, Positive, and Family sure looks synonymous with the word “RACE.”

Note, by the way, how many churches in Europe are being turned into mosques; or, to put it a bit more bluntly, how many old, decrepit women are being pushed aside by young, vigorous men.

And why aren’t the Men of Europe defending the churches?

Simple.

The churches didn’t want them, so they decided to return the favor.

There’s a useful example in that, for us.