30 September, 2009

The New Extremists

Posted by Socrates in jewed culture, Socrates, William Pierce at 9:34 pm | Permanent Link

by Dr. William Pierce.

“I’ve been thinking more about the things we discussed last week. I tried to tie several very important threads together, each of which could have used much more discussion than we devoted to all of them together. I’m afraid I didn’t do a thorough enough job. In future broadcasts we’ll discuss each of these extremely urgent subjects repeatedly. I want to begin today’s broadcast, however, with a brief recap of what we talked about last week.

I pointed out that there is a major, long-term, concerted effort by the Jewish entertainment media and the Jewish fashion industry to sexualize our children prematurely, to cause little White girls 10 or 11 or 12 years old to behave sexually like 20-year-olds. I used as examples six-year-old JonBenet Ramsey, murdered by an unknown person more than five years ago, and 13-year-old Christina Long, murdered last month by an illegal alien from Brazil. Both of these little girls were dressing and behaving like women much older than they.”

[Article].


  • 7 Responses to “The New Extremists”

    1. CW-2 Says:

      Another great article by the good doctor. While shopping in these multiculti Malls, mums and dads need to ask themselves, just who is behind these repulsive ‘Bratz’ dolls. Little girls used to like attractive dolls, as a projection of how they wished to be ‘when they grow up’. Big jew wants our future women to act and eventually think like degenerates.

    2. The Red Skull Says:

      The good doctors common sense and clear thinking shine through again.Pretty soon,unless we “blindly obey” the edicts of ZOG,we will be considered “terrorists” and “extremists”.The War is Coming,there is no doubt.Unfortunately,its the only thing that will remove the strangling hand of Big Jew from the throat of our Nation.Otherwise,we will decline into a South African type of situation,where our people are at the mercy of our enemies,more than they are now.What will it take for White Man to Wake Up?

    3. Adam Says:

      It doesn’t take much control over people to push them in a direction in which they are already headed. So let’s not quibble about relative percentages, and just grant that the Jews have total control in these industries. We won’t even ask Dr. Pierce to prove that there are large numbers of whites who want to buy more wholesome attire for their daughters, or that the Jews have kept others from meeting such a pent-up demand. Let’s just assume it’s true. Still, one must wonder, where are the parents of these children? Why do they allow their young girls to dress like 20-year-old sluts? Why do they permit them to be mentally gang-raped watching the niggers performing with white women on MTV? If we look deeper, we find that there are a couple of other forces at work that Dr. Pierce neglects to mention.

      First and foremost, the much-ballyhooed death of God has also led to a death of morality. All moral codes up to this point in human history have been based on the existence of God or gods, who handed them down to man as edicts to be obeyed without question. As awareness of the fact that there is no God has gradually spread throughout the mass mind of the 20th century, morality has also suffered a proportionate decline. This awareness seems to gain in force with each passing decade. As I have before explained, for the death of God, we can blame science, especially in its concrete manifestation as the global technological system, since in a rational universe fully comprehended by the laws of physics, God is no longer necessary. Unfortunately though, without a God, it becomes impossible to construct a satifactory moral system. Moral relativism then rules the day, and soon the people descend down into pure hedonism. Yet although it has replaced God, a technological system is no substitute for him. The only restraints that the technological system can place on hedonism have to do with purely utilitarian concerns of negative consequences, e.g., “Don’t drink too much, because you might become an alcoholic, and that might cause you to lose your job.” Or, “Don’t let your daughter dress like a slut, because it might lead to her getting a sexually transmitted disease, or becoming pregnant.” So with the death of God, moral absolutes also died. No type of conduct can now be absolutely proscribed.

      Second, and also important, is the fact that little girls have always, since time began, wanted to act like big girls. Pre-teen girls naturally take 20-year-old girls for their role models. If they see a girl like Britney Spears dressing like a slut and cavorting with niggers, then it goes without saying that they will want to emulate her. However, such conduct on the part of our women would not be possible with the “advances” brought to them by the technological system. The widespread availability of scientific methods of birth control, starting in the 1960s, has allowed women the freedom to have sex whenever they want, with whomever they want, without risking being stuck with raising a child from their debauch. Consequently, since the 1960s, with each passing decade, the women have been getting sluttier and sluttier. Quite simply, they are doing so because they can, and for no other reason. They also are more than ever inclined to experiment with miscegenation. And why not? Where there is the chance for what they think is a little fun, and if morality, which once might have held them back, is now as dead as God, why shouldn’t they? Their friends will certainly neither blame them nor shame them. Often, they are even encouraged in these libertine excesses. This is the culture of expressive individualism that has developed in white people, brought about from an odd mix of technological necessity and opportunity, which acts with racially lethal force on the underlying genetic predisposition of whites to individualism. Throw in the wild card of Jewish media control and Jewish racial hostility to whites, and you have a well-nigh perfect picture of our current ongoing racial and cultural disaster.

    4. Adam Says:

      Ooops. Another proofreading error. I should have written:

      However, such conduct on the part of our women would not be possible without the “advances” brought to them by the technological system.

    5. CW-2 Says:

      Adam, your linking of ‘the death of God’ to the technological system is interesting. Alexander Solzhenitsyn was thinking along similar lines when he wrote this 30 years ago.

      “One the way from the Renaissance to our present days we have enriched our experience but we have lost the concept of a Supreme Complete Entity which used to restain our passions and our irresponsibility. Is it true that man is above everything? Is there no superior spirit above him? Is it right that man’s life and society’s activities should be ruled by material expansion above all? Is it permissable to promote such expansion to the detriment of our integral spiritual life?
      If the world has not approached its end, it has reached a major watershed in history, equal in importance to the turn from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance. It will demand from us a spiritual blaze, we shall have to rise to a new height of vision, to a new level of life where our physical nature will not be cursed as in the Middle Ages, but, even more importantly, our spiritual being will not be trampled upon as in the modern era”

      Obviously Solzhenitsyn is writing as a Christian, but his views are not dissimilar to our own if we equate cultural/spiritual wellbeing with racial integrity. He also appears to forecast the present jew system about to hit a brick wall. Perhaps it has already but our time frame is too short.

    6. Adam Says:

      Nice quote from Solzhenitsyn, CW-2! I liked it enough to track down the source, which was a commencement speech he delivered at Harvard in 1978. The text is available here:

      http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/alexandersolzhenitsynharvard.htm

      Of course, as you well note, as a Christian, Solzhenitsyn cannot admit the death of God, at least in the sense I mean it here, and so is forced to leave his audience in ignorance as to the cause of the evils of the “Modern era”, which he reveals to have afflicted both East and West. Absent also is the conception of technological necessity that is essential to an understanding of the current problem; how it arises, and how to solve it. This we can gain from a close reading of Ellul, with whom Solzhenitsyn appears unconversant.

      The first line of your quote occurs several paragraphs before the end, and there should be an ellipsis after it. The last part, beginning with the series of questions, is penultimate, and is followed by the last line of the speech:

      This ascension will be similar to climbing onto the next anthropologic stage. No one on earth has any other way left but — upward.

      Would that it were true! A downward path is all too open to us. Like Dr. Oliver, I think that man’s devolution into an insect form of existence is equally if not more probable. The Jew is currently at the helm of the global technological system, and unless that system is somehow destroyed, eternal slavery may well be the lot of all other races – just as was foretold in the Bible so long ago.

    7. CW-2 Says:

      Adam, thanks for the link to the original transcipt of Solzhenitsyn’s Harvard speech. It seems my booklet version contains some rewording and omissions I wasn’t aware of.