12 October, 2012

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide if Racism Against Whites is Still Okay at Universities

Posted by Socrates in Affirmative Action, Affirmative Action vs. merit, Celler, Celler Rights Laws, jewed Congress, jewed culture, jewed law, Socrates, Supreme Court at 11:10 pm | Permanent Link

Nearly 50 years after Affirmative Action (it should be called Talmudic Action) was created, the high court will consider whether racism in college admissions is constitutional [1].


[1] the law which created Affirmative Action (the Civil Rights Act of 1964) came from a Jew, New York congressman Emanuel Celler

  1. Similar posts:

  2. 04/22/14 U.S. Supreme Court Ruling: a Win, But… 94% similar
  3. 02/22/12 Federal Race Mandates About to Hit a Roadblock? 92% similar
  4. 10/02/10 Arizona Prop. 107 Would Ban Affirmative Action 90% similar
  5. 11/10/08 Nebraska Voters Ban Affirmative Action 79% similar
  6. 06/15/20 Big Fag/Big Tranny Win Big in a U.S. Supreme Court Ruling That Was Based on Cultural Marxism 78% similar
  7. 6 Responses to “U.S. Supreme Court to Decide if Racism Against Whites is Still Okay at Universities”

    1. Arminius Says:

      Can anybody right in his mind expect the Jew-infested Supreme Court, or any court for that matter, to decide in favor of the white race?
      When will these litigants take a lesson from their enemy?

    2. Luke Says:

      I am quite often amazed by the fact that so many in the pro-White community still seem to be unable to comprehend the real agenda that was behind this ‘affirmative action’ legislation.

      It was cleverly cloaked and packaged, Madison-Avenue style, and sold to the stupid and embarrassingly naive White majority as a measure to help compensate blacks who’s ancestors had been slaves. It was an enemy stroke of diabolical genius in a tactical sense, because the enemy (jews) correctly understood that one of the most deadly weaknesses of the White race is their self-destructive and deeply engrained sense of ‘fair play’ and their innate desire to try to see the others point of view.

      Affirmative action, as it was originally sold – was never intended to be permanent. It was supposed to be a temporary boost up the ladder, and it was intended to be given to blacks who’s ancestors had been slaves.

      Today, as it was intended, affirmative action now is applied automatically to every non-white piece of third world human scum who steps foot inside America and the fact that none of these turds were ever the slaves of our white ancestors seems to no longer matter in the eligibility equation.

      What the real agenda was then, and which is painfully clear to see today – is that affirmative action was a Cultural Marxist tool that was designed to help them disenfranchise the White male from as many areas of influence, power, prestige, employment and general society as possible. This disenfranchisement was a critical component in the Cultural Marxist’s prime objective – which was to destroy White Western Civilization. Since White men were correctly viewed as the architects of Western Civilization – they had to be removed and deprived of their ability to hold power and exert influence over the Western world.

      This is what has been going on, friends. Affirmative Action is now, and has been from the beginning, a jewish weapon of waging war against White men. It gives these evil jews a government sanctioned, legal weapon that they can use to deliberately and maliciously discriminate against White men – and it is past time for our people to wrap their naive and gullible brains around this fact of life.

    3. Tim McGreen Says:

      To think that the Amerikwan system of Justice is so goofed up that the monstrous policy of “Affirmative Action” will either continue or end because of a decision made by one senile old faggot on the supreme court? ?? I ask you, is it any wonder the Chinks and Arabs are laughing at us?

    4. fd Says:

      White learning institutions are used as weapons against White people.

      Mongoloids and Negroids must have visual instruction. They cannot start from scratch. They can drive a cadillac or big rig, but they can’t build one. Copycats is what they are.

    5. archer Says:

      I’m not the brightest “goy” by any stretch, but I remember thinking what a crock of shit AA is. While I’m at it I’ll include “free trade” to bring the disadvantaged up to our standard of living, how about “raced based admissions”, probably one of the more dangerous scams shoved down our throats. The list could go on and on.

    6. Sgt. Skull Says:

      Can you imagine the nationwide furor if a nigger girl who met entrance requirements to a major university was denied admission? There would be riots and flash mob attacks against innocent whites and the assistant head nigger in charge at “Justice” would launch a federal investigation. And head nigger Obongo would prattle about how a sweet young black girl that could have been his daughter was discriminated against. And the moronic white soccer moms and kwans would have teared up and cooed with delight.

      Not sure if the court verdict is in yet, but I would expect one of the so called high court conservatards to become a turn coat and vote like a left wing anti-white bigot and against this courageous white girl (and all white people) in the usual 5-4 decision that somehow always goes against whites 99.9% of the time.