7 December, 2013

Race Card Project at the University of Oregon

Posted by Socrates in anti-racism movement, anti-White themes, college, egalitarianism, race, Race Denial, race-baiting, racism accusations, Socrates, universities at 3:12 pm | Permanent Link

How confusing: if race doesn’t exist, or doesn’t matter, then why bother to do this?


  • 5 Responses to “Race Card Project at the University of Oregon”

    1. Tim McGreen Says:

      What’s this? A straight, middle-aged White man? And he’s not apologizing for anything? Where’s his wise-cracking Black co-worker or his super-smart Oriental neighbor? Where’s his insulting wife and his ungrateful kids? This is unheard of!

      Nice touch how he mentioned one of the reporters from NPR…National Pinko Radio Radio. Those liberals are more obsessed with race than Dr. Goebbels, but not from a positive, pro-White perspective, of course.

      After his speech concluded, I noticed another YouTube offering on the screen called “Fab Five: The Texas Cheerleader Scandal”. I think I’ll check that one out.

    2. Howdy Doody Says:

      http://www.peakprosperity.com/blog/83626/there-too-little-gold-west

      Hear his words starting at the 56 minute mark.

    3. Howdy Doody Says:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff9WJR367FU

      Pardon me, the link above is the wrong one.

    4. Howdy Doody Says:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzHD-snpHNc

      It has been stated many times, by many people we are not going to get out this mess by voting, sadly

      Here is some who ran for office explains.

      Examine the 1995 CA. Proposition 187 which received 59.8 of the vote at the time.

    5. Howdy Doody Says:

      Quote:
      The Kansas Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday in the appeals of two brothers who were sentenced to death for the murder of four people in Wichita in December 2000.

      According to a news release from the Office of Judicial Administration, the court is scheduled to hear the appeal of Reginald Dexter Carr Jr. at 9 a.m. and Jonathan Carr at 1:30 p.m.

      The Carr brothers were convicted on charges from a Wichita crime spree in December 2000 that left five (WHITE) people dead and one survivor severely wounded.

      Both brothers were charged with multiple felonies stemming from the events of Dec. 14 and 15, 2000. They were found guilty of entering a Wichita home armed with guns; forcing the two men and three women in the home to engage in sex acts with each other and with the perpetrators; taking them to ATMs to withdraw cash; then taking them to a soccer field where they shot them, execution style. The surviving woman ran through the snow for a mile, naked, seeking help. She testified at the brothers’ trial in 2002.

      Reginald and Jonathan Carr also were found guilty of felony murder for shooting and killing one woman on Dec. 11, 2000. Reginald Carr also was convicted of kidnapping, robbery and battery for forcing one man to withdraw cash from ATMs on Dec. 7, 2000.

      According to the Kansas Supreme Court docket, for the Dec. 14 and 15 slayings, Reginald Carr was convicted of four counts of capital murder, one count of attempted first-degree murder, five counts of aggravated kidnapping, multiple counts of aggravated robbery, one count of aggravated burglary, 13 counts of rape, three counts of aggravated criminal sodomy, seven counts of attempted rape, one count of burglary, one count of theft, one count of cruelty to animals and three counts of unlawful possession of a firearm.

      Jonathan Carr, in the crimes committed on Dec. 14 and 15, was convicted of four counts of capital murder, one count of attempted first-degree murder, five counts of aggravated kidnapping, multiple counts of aggravated robbery, one count of aggravated burglary, 13 counts of rape, three counts of aggravated criminal sodomy, seven counts of attempted rape, one count of burglary, one count of theft and one count of cruelty to animals.

      The brothers are challenging their convictions and death sentences because the trial court denied motions to change venues and motions to sever the cases from each other so the brothers could be tried separately. Their court docket also questions the validity of the trial court’s instructions to the jury during the guilt and penalty phases of trial and the constitutionality of the Kansas death penalty act.

      The Kansas Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court have both upheld the constitutionality of the state’s death penalty law. No defendant has been executed in Kansas since it reinstated the death penalty in 1994.

      The last executions in Kansas were in 1965. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the death penalty nationwide in 1972, but allowed executions to resume in 1976.