8 February, 2014

The Jewing of Anthropology

Posted by Socrates in anthropology, archaeology, Claude Levi-Strauss, jewed culture, Jewed science, Nazi era, Nazis, social sciences, Socrates at 4:58 pm | Permanent Link

You know that a scientific field is corrupted when all of the “big” people in it (and in related fields such as Archaeology and Sociology) are Jews, e.g., Franz Boas, Ashley Montagu, Claude Levi-Strauss, Melville Herskovits [1]. The Nazis warned us about “Jewish science.” We should have listened to them.


[1] the father of Sociology is a Jew named Émile Durkheim

  • 8 Responses to “The Jewing of Anthropology”

    1. fd Says:

      Unless I skimmed over the article too fast, I didn’t see racist anthropologist Carleton Stevens Coon mentioned even once. Coon focused on genetic makeup, whereas Boaz insisted that emperical study was all that mattered. The Jews have largely removed Coon from history books.

      Professor Coon dismissed studying aborigines in far away places. He wanted physical anthropologists to focus more on the European continent.

      The Romans named Africa. The ‘out of Africa’ promotion is political. It really doesn’t matter what section of the earth events happened.
      These same anti-White scientists insist that civilization began in the Middle East. There is evidence that civilizations were up and running on the continent of Europe before the origin of civilizations in the Middle east.

    2. Robert Cardillo Says:

      Gentlemen. Is there anything that once a kike gets a hold of he doesnt muck it up.

    3. CW-2 Says:

      All this ‘out of Afreeka’ and ‘mid-east fertile crescent’ stuff is designed to focus attention away from Europe which was the real foundry where humanity was forged on the anvil and hammer blows of a challenging and unforgiving environment.
      Why is big jew stuffing nigs and muds into formerly clean countries like Denmark and Norway? To destroy the very fountain head of our race.
      Carleton Coon’s major work, ‘The Origin of Races’, 1963, still has the force to completely shatter liberal myths, as has Robert Ardrey’s popular level trilogy of human origins.

    4. Tim McGreen Says:

      The latest anthropological theory from the Jewish experts states that Neanderthals and early modern humans were sexually active with each other. Of course the real reason for promoting this theory has nothing to do with any legitimate science. Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons were probably two very genetically different species of human primate, making any kind of breeding between them difficult if not impossible. Besides, I doubt that our Cro-Magnon ancestors would have found Neanderthal women very desirable anyway. But it’s all about sending a Semitically correct message to White goyim that race-mixing with Blacks and other non-Whites is acceptable, since, according to Jewish anthropologists, our cavemen ancestors mated with those outside of their genetic group.

    5. fd Says:

      This is true, Tim McGreen. The Jews are telling us that our Cro-Magnon ancestors were race mixers. The flip side to all this is that Cro-Magnon man exterminated the Neanderthals.

    6. John Q. Republic Says:

      Outstanding posts, gentlemen.

      The bottom line for White people everywhere in the world to understand is; no matter what the issue, when it comes to the jews, NEVER, EVER, EVER listen to them or take their so-called “advice” on ANY subject………most especially any subject having to do with race, gender or sexuality. It’s pure poison.


    7. Antagonistes Says:

      But doesn’t DNA testing show that Europeans have about 4% of Neanderthal DNA?

      Neanderthals were White! They are still around, also–I have seen them.
      The men are smallish (5’6″ or so), big boned, with the brow-ridge and big jaw, and incredibly strong. Their foreheads are low and slope back. The women are big like Germanic women, and some are quite attractive. They are quite intelligent.

      Of course, they are not pure ‘thals, but they have a lot of ‘thal characteristics.

      The skeleton pictured is a Neanderthal skeleton, is it not? I would guess female, even though the pubic girdle from the side is not quite tilted forward enough.

      But yes, that one Jewish anthropologist (can’t think of his name right now) recently got caught in his lies about skull capacity.

      As Limbo says, THE LEFT LIES, PERIOD.

    8. CW-2 Says:

      Ant, you are correct and your description, excluding the comment on their womenfolk, fits many mid-Easterners, particularly Turks and the non-nerdy variety of kike.