8 April, 2014
Equal Pay Baloney, or, More Cultural Marxism
Posted by Socrates in "gender", Cultural Marxism, egalitarianism, equality, equalocracy, jewed culture, Socrates, women, women and 'equality', women in the workforce at 2:27 pm | 
Permanent Link
Women spent years forcing their way into the workplace. Once there, they demanded that the rules be changed to accommodate them, and they’re still making demands. How arrogant is that?
8 April, 2014 at 3:36 pm
If women think they’re equal to men then they are more than welcome to replace that big-ass jug on top of the water cooler by themselves. They can rebuild their own transmissions and resurface sections of the Interstate without any male intervention whatsoever. They are also free to design their own computer hardware and software systems, fly those big commercial jets and design hydroelectric turbines in their spare time. So come on, ladies, let’s go! Are you equal to the task or not?
8 April, 2014 at 3:44 pm
I see plenty of gals driving newer, fancier cars than mine, I see them living in nicer houses with better-paying jobs, so what are they bitching about? Actually, this bullshit about unequal pay is just more Lesbo-Jewess male-bashing. The main reason that the disparity between male and female pay exists is because of the nature of the jobs that men and women do. Sure, girl-dominated jobs like being a teacher or a librarian are important but civil engineering and computer software development, which are done by men, demand more intelligence and education, so naturally they are going to pay more, yes? Yes.
8 April, 2014 at 5:03 pm
Let the EOE females catch a boat to the offshore oilfields that I worked in for 18 years. They can operate the drilling rigs, lay barges, derrick barges, production platforms, boats, etc. On second thought, no thank you. White girls should concentrate on the kind of work that nature calls on them to do.
8 April, 2014 at 5:15 pm
Why can women vote? Why can women speak to men without first being spoken to? Why are women made into clownish generals/admirals? Why is there such a thing as “marital rape”? Why are women encouraged to refuse men sex?
All these questions and many others have one answer, which is the judeo-bolshevik cult of feminism.
After Der Tag, there will be no women’s rights, no affirmative action, no “domestic violence” laws, nothing. Women will return to their rightful role as generators of the next generation of White men. They will not be involved in anything which does not involve pleasuring men and producing and raising children.
THEY HAVE NO OTHER FUCKING FUNCTION.
Once this bullshit X-tard chivalry is beaten out of us, we will realize that there can be no “friendship” or “equality” with women. The different in body and mind is not only great, it is fundamental. Left to her own devices, the Whitest and most Nordic of women will copulate with a Bantu and have its offspring. Always. Only the threat of savage and uncompromising force (remember, women have always feared the physical prowess of men, which is why they are doing their utmost to feminize us) will make her desist. It would take only a few savage beatings (I propose bamboo canes and bike chains) and perhaps a public execution or two of the worst offenders, and these transgressions will be a mere thing of the past.
9 April, 2014 at 4:22 am
And here am I thinking we are trying to persuade our much loved womenfolk to join us WN.
Well, what do women really want? According to Chaucer they want to be the boss. Nature intends women have the deciding voice in womanly concerns such as raising children and the day to day running of the house, but the man, her husband, has the final say in strategic matters pertaining to the world outside the home and particularly in the work place.
9 April, 2014 at 4:53 am
What is usually ignored- you will guess why- how much husbands, partners, lovers etc. pay, donate, present their women to obtain their favors, pleasure,
love. Women take such gifts for granted, it’s never the other way round.
Thus much more than a paltry pay difference is traditionally flowing into the female purse. How does she spend it? To enhance her own appearance- not for him, but for her own vanity. From hairdo fo painted footnails, perfumes, not to forget clothing discarded after a few times of showing them.
Have you ever heard a woman rejecting male contributions to her conceit? Wouldn’t it be natural justice, as result of the equal pay baloney to end the male favoritism of women? After all, we are supposed to be equal, right?
9 April, 2014 at 8:29 am
White women are a natural symbol of beauty. And it is natural that they maintain their beauty. I don’t want sloppy women who care nothing of their appearance. But there is a tipping point: The definition of vanity is worthlessness.
The ancient Celtic tribes were matriarchal. Queen Boudica was a female warrior. Pagan women of Europe carried knives for protection. And they were not concealed.
9 April, 2014 at 1:20 pm
The focus of a woman’s life should be your WHITE COCK. It is the instrument through which new generations of White are born.
If she’s a dyke, a miscegenator, or simply thinks she’s too good to give it up, your WHITE FIST must take over. It doesn’t take much to convince her of the error of her ways.
I don’t buy thus bullshit about chicks going around with knives or warrior women or whatever. Women knew that as long as they took care of WHITE COCK, their men would deploy their WHITE FISTS to protect them.
9 April, 2014 at 1:52 pm
Ancient Aryan women of Europe carried knives strapped to their side. This goes back to at least 5 thousand BCE.
9 April, 2014 at 3:08 pm
Topkea, you’re a class act. Your arguments are always so articulate and persuasive. Cretin.
Our women folk will be just fine, provided we keep them away from Negroes, lesbians and Jewesses.
9 April, 2014 at 4:01 pm
Topeka ‘conversing’ with a feminist:
Topeka. “Lady, if you were my wife I’d put rat poison in your coffee.”
Ms Femperson. “Mr Topeka, if I were married to you I would gladly drink it!”