23 May, 2014

Arthur Schopenhauer, Re: Women

Posted by Socrates in philosophy, Schopenhauer, Socrates, White philosophy, White thought, women, women and 'equality' at 1:42 pm | Permanent Link

[…]

“The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflexion (sic) but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning: hence their instinctive subtlety and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defence, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning. Dissimulation is thus inborn in her and consequently to be found in the stupid woman almost as often as in the clever one.”

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 12/31/16 Arthur Schopenhauer on Women 73% similar
  3. 08/20/10 White Nationalist Philosophy Re: Women 42% similar
  4. 07/06/12 Women, Men, What’s the Diff? 33% similar
  5. 11/18/19 Women in the Workplace: Big Fun for Everyone! 31% similar
  6. 01/24/08 Arthur Jones: Candidate for Congress, Third Congressional District of Illinois 25% similar
  7. 9 Responses to “Arthur Schopenhauer, Re: Women”

    1. Topkea Says:

      Smart cunts lie. Dumb cunts lie. Big discovery. But lies are like poison. They are insidious and kill slowly. Educating women was a mistake. When Der Tag comes, they will only learn two things: domestic tasks and pleasuring men. Nothing else, because they don’t need to do anything else.

      They can lie and gossip all they like between each other, but we should reintroduce the scold’s bridle. Uppity women will get smacked down on the first offence, gagged on the second, and really taken to town with canes and bike chains on third.

      Soon enough there will be no uppity women. I don’t, and never have, advocated brutality. But women are like children. Sometimes you need the cold, hard terror of savage, unrelenting physical punishment to keep them in line. You may never have to inflict it, but they should always speak and act as if you had the power and authority to discipline them most severely.

    2. CW-2 Says:

      Why was Schopenhauer getting so agitated by the fact that women often tell fibs? Couldn’t he deal with it? It has been my experience that women will tell lies to men who are gullible and who wish to believe the deceptions of women they are infatuated by.
      A healthy man isn’t too worried by feminine fibs and learns to either ignore them or look beyond them to read a hidden truth.

    3. Tim McGreen Says:

      I think Schopenhauer had a lot of trouble connecting with women. He was very awkward around them and did not take rejection very well at all. But his protege Nietzsche loved women, despite a few of his aphorisms to the contrary.

      Men and women both lie a lot, but I think men do it a lot more, usually in an attempt to assert superiority over other males or to get a chick in the sack. Women are much better at being moody and manipulative. They know where each and every one of our weak spots are located, and how to exploit those weak spots to their advantage.

    4. Topkea Says:

      Confirmed – McGreen is a woman. There is no other way to explain her crypto-feminism.

    5. Stronza Says:

      Since every man needs many women, there could be nothing more just than that he should be free, indeed obliged, to support many women.

      Not very smart at all. Everywhere that you have polygamy, you also end up with a whole bunch of men with no woman at all, not even one. Because men need women, men without a woman get crazy and into all kinds of trouble. Maybe the Christian tradition of One Man + One Woman = overall Harmony in Society made sense after all. The Alphas get their high-test women; the betas get their lower class gals. Worked good for a long time.

      In China, they may not have polygamy, but they came along with the goofy idea of aborting female fetuses because parents want sons. You have to have a screw loose to think that practice could ever be successful in establishing harmony. Yet we are told that Asians have a higher IQ than us. LOL

    6. CW-2 Says:

      Chinese aren’t so stupid and they are good students of history. Their long term aim is probably the formation of an army of sex-starved fanatics similar to that employed so successfully by the Ottoman Turks.

    7. Luke Says:

      I’ve often observed throughout my life that women seem to always be much better ‘actresses’ than most of the White male actors who are in the entertainment business. Especially at the beginning of their movie or TV careers, when they are still wet behind the ears and still learning and honing their acting skills.

      The White guys seem to have to work harder at appearing ‘normal’ when they are reading their lines, and most of the most successful White male actors have been ‘action hero’ or ‘Western cowboy/gunslinger’ characters who really do not have a lot of dialog in their movies and are just letting their physical actions on the screen define their character. John Wayne, Steve McQueen, Clint Eastwood, Burt Reynolds, Kevin Costner, Mel Gibson, etc.

      White females, on the other hand, take to acting as fast as baby ducks take to water. They seem to have a natural instinct for parroting phony lines that are artificial and which are not part of the real world, but instead part of the fantasy world that the jews of Hollywood create in order to brainwash the masses.

      I think Schopenhauer was on to something very, very important in his analysis of female behavior. This ‘something’ is very important for White men, and especially younger, more gullible and naive White men – to fully understand.

      The White chick dictionary does not have words like ‘loyalty’, ‘honor’, ‘integrity’ or a sense of ‘justice’ or ‘fair play’. Men, including myself, make the grave mistake of going to great lengths and making countless personal sacrifices in order to please women – only to be shocked to discover later that none of those sacrifices or efforts made even a tiny impression on the female mind, and they very seldom result in any increase in the degree of loyalty or gratitude that the female will feel towards you. Guys, on the other hand – most, anyway, once someone does them a favor and a good deed, they’ll never forget it and will almost always be eager to repay the favor later on.

      It reminds me of the old Eddie Murphy comedy routine, where he was talking about seeing Johnny Carson’s face on the front of a National Enquirer right after one of Carson’s wives decided to divorce him and she was demanding massive amounts of his money in the settlement. The picture of Carson must have been one where he was looking dumbfounded and bewildered, the way a guy gets when he feels a big unwelcome and painful shaft sliding up his ass and Murphy’s tag line, which was supposed to be the headline for the article was “What Have You Done for me…..Lately?”

      The implication was, no matter what Johnny had done for his ‘wife’ during the course of the marriage, no matter how many cars or jewels or fancy exotic vacations he had taken her on – none of that mattered. All she was concerned about now, was what he was going to be ordered by some divorce court to do ‘for her now’.

      Hence, in most instances, agreeing to do favors for White females is almost always a one-way street and any guy who thinks he can ingratiate himself to a female that he’s made sacrifices for is usually a guy who will be in for a very big disappointment.

    8. Tim McGreen Says:

      I didn’t feel sorry for Johnny Carson, because of the shabby way he treated his first wife. She stuck by him when he was a struggling nobody in Nebraska. But once he got rich and famous he dumped her for a newer, sleeker model, only to be taken to the cleaners by the new wife’s Jew divorce lawyer. And then he finds two more bleached-blonde gold-diggers who take him to the cleaners again! Oh well, just another Hollywood love-story.

      Oh, Topkea, I almost forgot….fuck you, buddy!

    9. Stronza Says:

      Now there’s the somewhat famous Broderick case, where the wife, after bearing four living children (a fifth died) and putting her husband through both medical and law school, was seriously f*cked over by him. He took a young girlfriend etc. etc. while still married to Betty. So Betty shot the two of them. They made a tv movie about this, which I saw when I still watched television. Betty was sentenced to 32 years in prison.

      I thought that the movie made Betty look bad, did not take her side at all – probably because she wasn’t a career woman but gladly became a “stay at home” wife & mother after setting her husband up in life. Wimminz aren’t supposed to want to do these things and Hollywood will let us know.

      Messages: #1. Don’t treat your wife like a g.d. slave. #2: In spite of temptation, keep it in your pants, boys, until you can rid yourself of the unsuitable wife in a more dignified manner.

      Johnny Carson was a fool who got what he deserved.