11 May, 2014

Free Speech for White Men? Not in Switzerland

Posted by Socrates in America, free speech, free-speech martyrs, jewed culture, jewed law, Socrates, Switzerland, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline, White ideology, white nationalism, White Nationalists, White philosophy, White thought at 8:21 pm | Permanent Link

In fact, America is the last remaining White country where you can freely criticize Jews and other non-Whites without legal penalty. As Tom Metzger said (paraphrasing), “the West will stand or fall on the fate of America.” The USA really is the last outpost for freedom. This includes speech rights, gun rights, property rights, civic and political rights. How ironic: America is the most Jewed country in the West, yet, it’s still the most free. We’re just lucky, I guess.

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 06/18/18 Bye-Bye, First Amendment (So Long, Free Speech) 55% similar
  3. 01/31/14 Writer: Should Neo-Nazis Have Free Speech? 50% similar
  4. 02/08/17 Where Does Free Speech End and Harmful Speech Begin, or, What Would Our White Founders Think? 50% similar
  5. 10/05/08 On Free Speech 49% similar
  6. 04/16/17 Free Speech and the Tyranny of the Left on Campus 47% similar
  7. 6 Responses to “Free Speech for White Men? Not in Switzerland”

    1. CW-2 Says:

      Philo-semitic censorship is nothing new for Geneva, throughout the 16th century the city was the center of reverence for everything jewish.
      Anyway, jews are a pretty dumb bunch, while their insane desire to throw us all in the slammer will slow down our victory, their actions will make our triumph inevitable.
      It is we who are on the right side of history.

    2. Mark Says:

      Socrates: “In fact, America is the last remaining White country where you can freely criticize Jews and other non-Whites without legal penalty.”

      Are your comments meant to be satire Socrates? Only four articles down you wrote, “Any speech which is not approved by the Jewish media or by the Jewish homosexual lobby is forbidden and is therefore “thought crime.” Is not thought crime a “legal penalty”? What is the difference other than the nomenclature?

      Socrates: “The USA really is the last outpost for freedom.”

      Clippers owner Donald Sterling surely disagrees: Banned for life from any association with the Clippers – a team owned by Sterling; banned for life from attending a Clippers facility; prohibited from participating in any personnel decisions, business or player, involving the Clippers; fined 2.5 million dollars; and forced to sell the Clippers (recommended).

      And I’m only ecstatic knowing that the U.S. represents “the most free” country in an unfree and wholly Judaized landscape. See e.g., http://www.dailystormer.com/college-debate-forums-brought-down-to-primitive-levels-by-blacks/.

      If serious, you penned your latest screed while intoxicated on LSD-laced Kool-Aid.

    3. Tim McGreen Says:

      Compare how easily White Americans were able to speak their minds a few decades back on almost any subject with how nervous and apologetic most White Americans are today to say anything that might be construed as “racist” or “offensive”. We’ve fallen very far, very fast. But we’re still comparatively free when you look at all the Judaic mind-control laws in other White countries.

    4. Socrates Says:

      Mark Says: “Are your comments meant to be satire Socrates?”

      No. A legal penalty is, like, jail or prison.

      —–

    5. Sgt. Skull Says:

      I have a sinking feeling that “hate” speech laws are just around the corner in the kwa. “Hate” will constitute any truth spoken by a white person that the kikocracy doesn’t want revealed or any statements they and their mud soldiers disagree with.

      Of course, these would only be enforced against whites while muds will still have free reign to trash and disrespect whites.

    6. Tim McGreen Says:

      You could be right, Sgt., but first the Social Marxist scum will have to indoctrinate all the kiddies in grade school into accepting any new laws against “hate” (i.e., the truth).