16 January, 2015

Affirmative Action: a Sick Joke Since 1964

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", Affirmative Action, Affirmative Action vs. merit, Celler, Celler Rights Laws, Civil Rights Act of 1964, jewed Congress, jewed culture, jewed law, private property, republic vs. democracy, republican government, Socrates, War On White Males, War On White People at 3:52 pm | Permanent Link

Hiring standards in government workplaces have been significantly lowered during the past 50 years. Why? Affirmative Action. Any outfit that employs more than 15 people must hire via Affirmative Action. They must hire “X” number of Blacks, Mexicans, women, etc. [1]. Isn’t it comforting to know that, when you are aided by a government worker, he may be totally incompetent? (Such incompetence might be found in health-care workers, e.g., in places such as Veteran’s Administration hospitals).


[1] Affirmative Action came from Title VII of Jewish congressman Emanuel Celler’s Civil Rights Act of 1964. That law stole the freedoms of White Americans to hire and fire whomever they wished on their private property. With that law, America ceased being a White republic

  1. Similar posts:

  2. 11/11/13 New York: Affirmative Action Funny Business 100% similar
  3. 11/10/08 Nebraska Voters Ban Affirmative Action 100% similar
  4. 09/06/16 Affirmative Action Tales, Episode 1 100% similar
  5. 10/02/10 Arizona Prop. 107 Would Ban Affirmative Action 100% similar
  6. 07/05/18 Affirmative Action Policies Under Attack by Donald Trump 100% similar
  7. 6 Responses to “Affirmative Action: a Sick Joke Since 1964”

    1. CW-2 Says:

      In France affirmative action has taken on an entirely new and greater dimension, officially it is called Les Grand Replacement. The corrupt elite now don’t even bother to hide their intentions.
      It is exactly as Dr Pierce described in his broadcast on the NWO.

    2. Tim McGreen Says:

      Despite outrageous stories like these Affirmative Action has chiefly benefited college educated White women and Jewesses, not exactly what you’d call “disadvantaged” groups.

      But all public employee unions should be abolished, as should America’s prison-industrial complex.

    3. fd Says:

      Speaking of prisons, Texas was transformed into a prison state beginning in the 1980s. Brand-new prisons were built all over the state for the purpose of transferring northern prisoners to Texas. Why not load New England up with brick and mortar prisons?

      Here’s the scary part: Most prison management is contracted out to private companies. Contracts signed with the respective state requires a minimum population of about 80%. If the prison population falls below its minimum, the state has to pay the difference in penalty. The system puts pressure on the state to convict as many criminals as possible to meet the requirements of the contract.

    4. Mary O Says:

      Who is “disadvantaged” in our society?

      White women are like Cinderella.

      White women are told to “establish themselves” before they have their first child. In our weak and unstable economy, being established financially takes about 10 years after college. And then they are expected to also be married to a suitable father, or at least in a long-term relationship with a man who takes parenthood seriously. All this added burden puts White women at risk of never having any children.

      Nonwhite women are allowed to have children any time, usually unmarried, and special free daycare centers are set up to keep them in high school or college.

      Nonwhite women get special low mini-rents, thanks to Section 8. Plus free healthcare, free college for themselves or their children, free groceries, and Affirmative Action.

      To achieve comparable value, White women must work long hours in highly competitive fields, and pray they never get laid off.

      By the way, all lay-offs are Whites first.

      White women are perhaps too cooperative. Nonwhite women in any office naturally gang up into mini-unions, and automatically take a confrontational approach with management. If they don’t get what they demand, they will threaten to just not show up, even if the employer would end up in desperate straits. White women typically will struggle to “muddle through” on their own, no matter what, seeking to please their employer, and expecting loyalty in return; nonwhites do the opposite.

      Who gets better results?

    5. Howdy Doody Says:

      Mary O.

      The Messytizzo women can live in the most rural places in the regime get WIX, college credits bogus, used for grant money, free cell phones, free net, free health care, NKVD protection against any one daring to say a word these baby White hating creatures in the grocery stores pregnant with three children or four in tow, with other breeders, laughing and starring at any one who looks at their invasion.

      This is by desigen from the cultural attack on US in the 60”s with the Vietnam war as a cover to stop any resistance and that is what it was too.

      Open borders, and inciting evil, and violence with drugs and excessive booze we all got jooed, as every family was affected

      A people with out any historical knowledge out side of media.

      Right Wing, Left wing you name our people don’t read, and don’t care.

      I have talked to about 30 retired men from the navy not ONE has ever read Lt. Commander Ennis’s book THE USS LIBERTY 1977. or looked at http://www.ussliberty.org

    6. Big Man Says:

      “They must hire “X” number of Blacks, Mexicans, women, etc.”

      What’s your problem with women, and why do you think they are so dumb?

      “Affirmative Action came from Title VII of Jewish congressman Emanuel Celler’s Civil Rights Act of 1964.”

      It is totally corrupt that the same “man” wrote the 1965 Immigration Reform Act just one year later.

      Was there a schedule for this? Like they said “And 6 years later we [The Supreme Court] will make pornography legal and abortion “safe” (sane) the same year.

      They made Abortion and porngraphy legal the same year (1972)