Vanguard News Network

Excuse me while I throw up: The new NA will be the old NA, complete with espionage and informants More of the same. No novelty. Non-stop boring essays. No disrespect to Pierce–just those living in the past.

I want night riders, not candle light writers who stay close to the fireplace where it’s all warm and cozy.

Education and information must be an ongoing part of our program, but in Europe “propaganda of the deed” needs to be urgently considered.

“ZOG (or JOG) never sleeps nor do bona fide “hate groups” like those treacherous Jewish supremacist devils at the ADL and SPLC”
–Will Williams really likes cozying up to the SPLC by granting interviews. Visit the SPLC website to read his latest and second interview. Exhibits very poor judgment.
I believe the NA is infiltrated already.

torrence Says: Will Williams really likes cozying up to the SPLC by granting interviews. Visit the SPLC website to read his latest and second interview.

Hmm, I was not aware of that. Well, it’s not something that I would do, but, in Williams’ defense, Dr. Pierce gave an interview to the TV show “60 Minutes.” Granted, it isn’t the same thing.

I don’t think this “new” National Alliance is going to go anywhere, although it’s good to see more and more pro-White activity both online and in the “real” world.

Will Williams Says: What has VNN done for me lately?

Because I’m a big fan of Dr. Pierce and the old NA, I’ll put a permanent link to the NA in the “Links” section on the main page, at top right.

fd: Williams explained his reason for giving an interview to the SPLC. That’s good enough for most people. Give him a chance first. If he doesn’t prove to be a good leader, THEN criticize him.

http://WWW.NARRG.COM
Read All About it – How the National Alliance will yet be regained!

I just read a few of the comments at narrg.com and my guess would be that the “new” NA is going to quickly disintegrate as a result of endless arguing, infighting, recriminations, lawsuits, counter-lawsuits, sabotage, etc. Good riddance.

Quit it. I’ve never seen so much negativity. Will Williams has been chairman of the National Alliance for how long? A month? And already you’re carving the NA’s tombstone and digging the grave. Come on, be reasonable.

God willing, Mr. Williams will be giving the NA a good kick in the arse to the organisation that it desperately needs. Bollocks to Herr Gleibe and that slag stripper wife of his.

I’ll give it my best, Robert. Thanks.

I have no lawsuits going currently, McGreen. Settled with Tubbington before taking on the Alliance Chairmanship. Those NARRG losers are trying to drag me into their lawsuit against Erich Gliebe, but aren’t having much luck, despite Jim Ring’s blustery bravado about “fighting on tho final victory.”

Little Napoleon won’t like that I put this up, but since he insists on fighting with me this is what he’ll will get for his trouble: https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t443513-68/#post12581185

I inherited a fat file on Jim Ring that I’ll leak out like that a little at the time.

WLP licensed the TD to Lyle Stuart too and we know that aint what his mamma named him.

For years people asked Will Williams to take up this role. Now Erich burys the hatchet, passes control willingly, and the kids stomp their feet and whine. Let’s see who is a real cadre and who is just a litigant.

Gossip, Gossip, Gossip. All this conversation about the NA is immature and effeminate.

Dear Abby, the NA needs you and a team of psychiatrists from Vienna.

One last thought. The whole NARRG gang is exhibiting a phenomenon called MISSION CREEP. An outfit gets together to accomplish an ad hoc task. Organization marshals resources and a money flow is established. Suddenly, and sometimes with unexpected ease, the GOAL IS ACCOMPLISHED. Normally the ad hoc committee would disband… except… that would staunch the money flow…. ergo, the mission is CHANGED so that the money flow can be continued. The new goal is fobbed off as the old goal, and the old goal is forgotten that is has already been achieved, and the gang keep shambling along as a solution in need of a problem.

Ergo, Narrg was organized to unhorse Gliebe. EG unexpectedly retired; but all the attention and whatever the donations, were too much to renounce, so Jim Ring enthralled all his erstwhile comrades into equating WW with EG and continuing the “Struggle” with flourishes of heroism. PS send your donation!!! The fight must go on!!! Etc etc…

Little Napoleon won’t like that I put this up, but since he insists on fighting with me this is what he’ll will get for his trouble: https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t443513-68/#post12581185”

Well, looks like Mr. Williams is heading the interim NA like other losers in the White Nationalist laugh-in.
Isn’t there something better to be done with your time?

Let me get this clear. Just like WWW graciously said when he attended the last hearing– the NARRG has accomplished a good purpose of encouraging EG to step down. And make no mistake, EG has shown good faith by doing so.

“passes control willingly- Do the circumstances allow for such a view?”

YES. NEW CHAIRMAN APPOINTED BY BOARD; OLD CHAIRMAN RESIGNED. OLD CHAIRMAN PUBLICALLY ACKNOWLEDGES NEW CHAIRMAN WHO NOW HAS ASSUMED OPERATIONAL CONTROL.

what about that is so hard to understand? Nothing: except that it means the mission is accomplished. Dissolve the ad hoc committee called NARRG or be guilty of attacking the organization rather than trying to help it.

“Evasion effort” is not a claim to that is triable in a court of law. What the NARRG plaintiffs have is a fraud lawsuit on behalf of an entity which they do not formally control nor belong to nor represent in any sense, against a guy who is unemployed and would not be able to pay even if he won. And if he did pay guess what you fools, the money would properly be going back to the NA and not the NARRG.

Get the parties straight. How much do you pay your lawyer an hour to not have explained this to you?

As for ruining his life, EG lives and can go on with the next phase of his life post the NA whether the NARRG hates him or not.

The NARRG is ignoring the fine example set by Will Williams of burying the hatchet and trying the help the organization back to health instead of further crippling it with pointless intrigue.

Think about this NARRG plaintiffs: by following the known troublemaker Jim Ring, denounced by Jost Turner, which letter WLP kept on file no doubt for the significance of its friendly warning– but by following him, you run the risk of making yourselves look both like troublemakers– and also people who do not understand the legal system. For leadership material in America, like the system or not, you had better be able to use it properly. This is not a proper use of your own resources let alone any kind of way to do anything good for the NA organization which you supposedly wish well.

I saw that Jost Turner letter and it says back in 93 Jost Turner said Jim Ring was a troublemaker. What is he now? A troublemaker with a bigger following than he had in 1993.

But those who continue to follow his poor example will be ruining their own reputations for future interactions with other people in these circles, be assured. There is still time to hop off the Jim Ring bandwagon.

Let’s all hope that out of this fracas comes a new sort of person who can work better in a group, stay more loyal to old comrades, and be more judicious in the use of scanty resources than those who would persist in the folly of maintaining this suit. Who will that be? If you want out, then simply instruct your lawyer that either you will voluntarily dismiss the suit as a group, or, let Jim Ring carry it on his own and you may each individually withdraw. Hey– don’t take my word for it– why not go hire your own lawyer to check it out and see if in fact this interpretation is valid? What’s to lose? Another thousand or another twenty thousand? For the possibility of an uncollectible judgment. Wow. You can thank me later. This is not legal advice, this is just a suggestion made for benefit of the organization. if that’s what it’s all about, isn’t it?

Why is Mr. Smith focusing on Jim Ring, you ask. Because he’s the NARRG ringleader. I’d bet you $100 that there is not going to be a trial, Mr. torrence, except that with your being anonymous to me I’d likely not collect when I win the bet. I don’t make a practice of betting with anonymous people or on things that I haven’t carefully calculated the odds of winning.

You, Ring, Mrs. Papadopoulos and the others should start your own organization. I’m RESTORING and I’m REFORMING the National Alliance now and my governance is none of your goddamned business. I’ve inherited an active membership in good standing that I’m responsible to and you NARRGs are not part of it.

Those Alliance members who are currently on our rolls but are six months or more behind in their pledges, after one warning from me to catch up, will be culled if they do not make an effort to become current, just like was our policy when Dr. Pierce was Chairman. I will not carry deadwood as was my predecessor’s practice and I will not tolerate willful troublemakers. http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1472&start=40

Torrance, maybe Mr Ring is a fine chap. Indeed I do not know him. I am just taking stock of what the NARRG has written on its own website, and making reasonable inferences. Has not Mr Ring stepped forward in your group to sharpen the rhetorical tone against Will Williams? Maybe I misread all the NARRG stuff. Perhaps I misunderstand. Perhaps he is confused. Perhaps he thinks pursuing EG to the Nth degree will accomplish something useful. Perhaps he thinks getting a judgment against EG will have some hard-to-fathom effect on the NA which is not a party to the suit. Perhaps he sees farther and deeper than us all. Perhaps he is just a lean and hungry man like yon Cassius. I don’t know. Tell us, who leads the show there? Perhaps that information could help dissipate this quarrel. Are all plaintiffs there in favor of a scorched earth, bitter end come what may fight, even if it leads off in the wrong direction? Indeed we do want to know: who are the leaders?

I seriously believe the NARRG plaintiffs are most likely a majority of well meaning people who have not quite assimilated the unexpected change in leadership and the positive development that it signifies. Perhaps, then, let people of true leadership and quality show their flexibility in adjusting to a changed situation now. White leaders have to be light on their feet and adjust to facts that change– not get tunnel vision, mission creep, and keep pursuing the mileposts that are already in the rear view mirror! Let’s take stock of the situation now as it is not as it was.

A gracious tone Will uses. We have all seen on the internet that he has other tones to use that are scathing. He is not biting now at the NARRGs though some of them have bitten at him. Some. We know not all. I believe his tone exemplifies positive leadership and what’s to be expected from someone who steps forward. Well done!

Who viewing this drama over the past decade could have foreseen that EG would bury the hatchet and pass reins on to a former comrade who had sharp words for him, for years? And this caused me to pause and reconsider: what faults that we saw in EG’s performance in the past, were actually attributable to people around him, who either did not do their jobs, or deliberately sabotaged the situation? Perhaps now it is too complicated to sort out– but you can be sure a lawsuit isn’t going to sort that out, where people are busy assigning blame. Why not turn to eyes to mutual goals that lie ahead? It’s not like the real goals we might all share may easily be obtained. Let’s not kid ourselves: there is hardly a more difficult operating environment than this. And the old activists know this.

In the end, we need to keep in focus who “The Enemy” really is. It’s not other white people of good will, who wish the upward climb of our kind. White people need to overcome “personalities” and aim for the cause.

Might I suggest, if you don’t like what the next fellow is doing, then just go do your own thing better. Don’t be like HAC who has spent decades dragging everyone down with slanders, everyone from Metzger to Pierce to Duke. Let’s not squabble over the tiny memberships: let’s grow the whole pie. Let’s bring in new blood, and develop new resources, not fight over the old.

We know who the bad guys are. Lessons having been learned, difficulties having been diminished, the focus needs to be turned downrange and not sideways, folks.

Speaking of the New National Alliance Website: http://natall.com/about/what-we-believe/

If there are any former Alliance members reading this who are interested in being part of Alliance-rebuilding do so soon. Gliebe is gone. I need you back. Of course new applicants who weren’t around when our Alliance was in its hey day are welcome to apply as well. We need our youth. I’ll be assigning special low membership numbers to the first 100 signups in 2015, with the lowest going to those who make higher pledges or pay ahead at least six months. It doesn’t cost us anything to do that, and if we succeed the Alliance members with these low numbers on their Membership cards will have bragging rights with their grandchildren.

It’s time!

The first National Alliance BULLETIN under my Chairmanship will be mailed out before the end of this month, so get on our list if you want to be a participant and get the inside scoop on Alliance-building. For those who don’t want to be Members for one reason or another, you can become a financial Supporter and receive out internal BULLETIN, too. Members and Supporters also receive issues of National Vanguard magazine as they are published, along with other perks.

Will W Williams – Chairman