11 April, 2015

About the U.S. “Civil War”

Posted by Socrates in "Civil War", America, history, History for newbies, Jewish banking, Jewish warmongering, Lincoln, Socrates, war, war as a racket at 3:42 pm | Permanent Link

Did you know that Jews funded both sides of the “Civil War”? [1]. This ensured that, regardless of who won the war, Jews would win.

[Article].

[1] e.g., the Jewish bankers August Belmont & Co., Speyer & Co., J. & W. Seligman, and Erlanger Co.


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 02/17/09 Historians Rate Lincoln, FDR as Best Presidents 85% similar
  3. 05/17/18 History: The Spanish Civil War of the 1930s: Just Like Today, The Usual Masters of Propaganda Were at Work 56% similar
  4. 02/16/08 “War is a Racket” 53% similar
  5. 11/21/14 Ferguson, Black Violence and the Civil-Rights Movement 51% similar
  6. 08/02/07 “No Money in Peace” 50% similar
  7. 20 Responses to “About the U.S. “Civil War””

    1. fd Says:

      After the disaster at First Manassas (Bull Run), the Federals knew it would be a long war and went straight to Wall Street to finance the invasion. At first the Jew bankers said no. To get the money required a lot of friendly conversation and politics. If the Southern Confederacy was financed on any level, I don’t know how it was managed owing to the fact all its seaports were blocked from the world.

    2. CW-2 Says:

      That is a remarkably clear and understandable article. It is amazing how history books, even those for university readership, continue to deliberately cloud and confuse the real politics behind the war between the States.
      Over 700,000 American White men killed to facilitate Northern industrial expansion. Millions more killed in WWjew to facilitate the destruction of Europe. We should always ask, ‘cui bono’.

    3. Mary O Says:

      Seems like the author is ascribing all pre-war Southern economic productivity to the use of slaves.

      Many White farmers worked the farms themselves.

      What percentage of that agricultural export was due to White small farmers and small independent White businesses?

      The author may be trying to make it sound as though all Americans were guilty of profiting from slave labor, and thereby reinforce the White guilt & White privilege etc.

      Generally speaking, large entities are not economically productive: the government, the military, large corporations, unions, collectivized or corporate farms.

      In contrast, smaller enterprises are more flexible, and allow people to compete with each other, thereby motivating them to work hard. Competition drives productivity, since people enjoy the sense that they can actually control or influence their own financial rewards.

      Note that in our now-dead economy, the government has destroyed most small business or small farm opportunities for Whites. The price of groceries is going sky-high, and empty storefronts are everywhere, in small towns and even Midtown Manhattan. Competition has been squashed by the drive for a false equality in every office and workplace.

      Of course, the large cotton plantations did get the cotton out of the ground, but were they actually in any sense efficient?

      Has anyone ever proven that slavery was actually profitable?

      “Slavery is a very profitable business, and we in the North intend to share in those profits. That is one of the main purposes of the Morrill Tariff, which has just more than doubled the average tariff rate. Since you, the South, export at least three-fourths of all your agricultural products and rely so heavily on foreign trade, we in the North cannot – and will not – tolerate the free-trade policies that you have written into your Confederate Constitution …”

    4. Howdy Doody Says:

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you mad. There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception….
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xp5dOibh8GA

      Unquote

      We did have second Civil war with LBJ in 1964 reconstruction two, only much crueler and many more White’s maimed, rapped, robbed and murdered along with a ref hot war with which was planned to drown out any critics on the nightly news with the war coverage instead, race the most important issue of Nation, but was sniffled. LIFE magazine, TV and movies spread the brain rinsing that niggers were just like US, so our children had and especially little White girls would have to sit next Congoid black bastards having Puberty by 10 years old.

      JFK words in the speech have been spun for people who can think, and those that can hear his word exactly and clearly are told by joo/regime media oh you conspiracy nutz etc..

      The book “The Eleventh Hour” by Lewis W. Walt, 1979 USMC 1936-1979 has only ONE review at Amazon, one, just one, and by memory it read if still up there that the book is a dated cold war book, but worth a read etc.

      NO.

      Read it your self, if you are a TV head moron asleep yeah you will have no idea what it is.

      Eugen Rostow SOB of NYC did the Forward, likely got him to soften any tallk about how we got so phucked up with military actions AGAINST OUR OWN interest.

    5. Howdy Doody Says:

      Mary excellent points.

      Though I think he wrote that way just to pierce the brain rinsed about the civil war history like WW 1 99% of White men don’t know any facts as to the reasons, why’s, how, and what a tragic genocidal crime the CW and WW 1 were leading US to our mess now.

    6. Mary O Says:

      The problem with the wars is that our foreign policy has essentially been sold to Israeli and Jewish interests.

      We have Soros-Kagan-Nuland starting a WW3 against Russia in Ukraine, and also Caucasus region; while
      Isis, sponsored by Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Israel, runs amok throughout the Mideast, taking spoiled young immigrants, with their jeans, hip-hop and lack of identity, and selling them on the idea that random violence is a religion.

      To get elected at the national level, politicians need tons of money. The easiest way to get that money is to take it from Israel and Jewish political interests. Both major parties do the same thing. The Demos have Soros, the GOP has the Koch brothers and Adelson.

    7. Howdy Doody Says:

      Mary O, yes of course you exactly correct, but with the treason incompetence and treason of Wilson, and the skillful liar high treason criminal F.D.R. we would not be dealing with the kikes in this dire situation for our race which is IMO the jooo’s final go for broke to have White’s wiped out in this century.

      Even if they had to wipe out most of their own to do it in a bio, or nuke criminal war.

    8. Howdy Doody Says:

      joo’s backing of the South, and Benjamin Judah serving as secretary of state for CSA, may have been a move by joos on both sides to see that the South was crushed totally no matter how many deaths would occur, because of these reasons.

      Reason being that the plantation’s profit margin was not even enuff to pay the new doubled tariff what so ever, and still be able to run that operation. I say the joo’s slave bankers in R.I. and Boston were quite aware of new farm implement inventions coming by VA. companies like McCormick that moved to Minn. at the on set of the coming C.W.

      So the joo’s feared masses of slaves being worthless the prices of slaves were going to plummet.

      No one talks about about farm equipment improvements. I am going to guess the poverty and brutal reconstruction in the South also lead to keeping more blacks and Whites having to do minimal labors due to the fact their was no money to buy the farming equipment. Who knows how the money lenders after the work dealt with implement companies who need more investment to expand.

      No matter with out the war between the states, I tell you the South would have just because of competition of the market place have modernized MUCH earlier no later than 1870 with that criminal Lincoln rail road/bankers pushed war.

      Tax the South harshly not the RR’s or bankers.

      By the way the tariff of was twice as much going North by RR’s with goods as the North going South till WW 2 started, yes.

    9. Mary O Says:

      Middle-class America today is also being crushed with taxes; the useless wars and immigration can be considered as a type of tax.

    10. fd Says:

      Historians and the Federal government lie about death rolls in the 4 years war. The standard was always 200 thousand in the South; 300 thousand in the North. But now it’s 250 thousand and 350 thousand respectively. The Confederate death rolls show 133 thousand. Add another 60 thousand for error and it’s under 200 thousand. The Black republicans starting with the generals lied to the Northern people about fatalities in the field, something that was not possible in the South. I’m sticking with 200 thousand and 300 thousand

    11. fd Says:

      The death toll of citizens of the South are not included in the Confederate dead.

    12. Tim McGreen Says:

      fd, seeing as how the Rebel seaports were under Union blockade starting in 1862 is it possible that the Confederacy was getting its funding from across the Rio Grande via Mexico?

    13. fd Says:

      This is true, Tim McGreen. The Rio Grande crossing was certainly a possibility. The blockade runners also brought resources to Southern ports.

      “In 1879, it was believed that the Union had spent $6.1 billion on the war – and that was real money back then.” http://www.antiwar.com/orig/powell.php?articleid=13035

    14. Non Ame Says:

      Ironic how today the South is a bastion of conservatarded Republicuntism. I doubt you’ll find more rabid patriotards ready to do the bidding of ZOG in its proxy wars for Israel than in the South.

    15. Rigor Mortis Says:

      The South lost its war for emancipation from the Yankee yoke, because it was too nice, to gentlemanly, it never got beyound the tactical phase. The first battles they lost should have taught them, that the monster they were fighting against had no intentions of relinquishing the invasion, and then the laughable belief that the Northern democrats would defeat Lincoln at the polls. Its almost as laughable as believing Rand Paul and libertards will rescue us.

    16. fd Says:

      I will not argue with your words, Non Ame. Johnson and Kennedy destroyed the solid South. But it took 2 centuries and billions of dollars and occupation to compromise the Southern country. There is one formidable asset of Dixieland: It has the ability lash out with extreme racism at any given time, whereas the North continues to be a parade of strangers incapable of acting in concert. All is not lost. The North has friends in the South and the South has friends in the North. That is all that is required to defeat the enemy.

    17. fd Says:

      The South lost the war because it was fighting an international army with an unlimited supply of blood and war appliances. Virtually every Confederate general stated in their battle report: overwhelming numbers and resources, vastly superior numbers, immensely superior numbers, greatly superior numbers, formidable numbers. There is one thing certain sure—the hateful city on the Potomac got a severe lesson in martial skill.

    18. Tim McGreen Says:

      And yet the British were up in Canada and the French were down in Mexico, both rooting for the Confederacy to win. The Rebels also had a lot of allies in New York City, of all places.

      I don’t want to come across as some A-hole armchair general but maybe the South should have fought a guerrilla-style war against the Northern invaders, instead of the more or less conventional war that their military leaders were trained to fight at West Point.

      April 14, 1865…150 years ago today Abbie Lincoln got his comeuppance while watching some second-rate play with his half-mad wife. Maybe if he was with his troops in the field, visiting the sick, the wounded and the displaced or lending a helping hand to those who were hurt the most by HIS war instead of trying to enjoy himself at the theater that evening he would have lived a good deal longer.

      The biggest downside to Lincoln’s assassination is that it turned him into a martyr and national “hero”. The same thing happened a century later with the assassinations of JFK, RFK and MLK. All four of those characters were anything but martyrs or national heroes.

    19. fd Says:

      After Mr. Lincoln was killed, Mary Todd spent time in an asylum. The couple in the balcony were married at a later date. He murdered her and ended up in an asylum for the rest of his life. The event at Ford’s theatre was symbolic of the war—A train-wreck.

      The end of the war wasn’t climactic. The conclusion was flat. Different portions of the Southern Confederacy surrendered according to circumstances in their area. Incorrigible southern fighters were still in the field after Lincoln was gone which explains why Reconstruction was defeated.

    20. Rigor Mortis Says:

      The South wasn’t bellicose enough, it had taken alot of shit from DC, and the jew carpetbaggers before it called it quits in 1861, but than it was to late. The North had all the railroads, harbors , naval vessels, commercial fleets, probably 6X the White population, and the promise of more cannon fodder from Germany and Ireland. You just can’t win a major conflict in the modern era without those resources. If the conflict had been more contained like the Revolutionary war, the South might have faired better, the South was to vast a territory for the resources and manpower of the South.