23 August, 2015

They Still Don’t Know the History of the 14th Amendment

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, Socrates at 1:04 pm | Permanent Link

Or, maybe they do know the history of it, but won’t say so due to the fact that all civil-rights laws are based on the 14th Amendment [1]. Anyway, this article is just a bunch of empty words, since the 14th Amendment wasn’t properly ratified by Congress. Only 21 states ratified it; that wasn’t enough to make it an amendment. In other words, all of the civil-rights laws (and related court rulings) are null and void.

[Article].
.

[1] I’m sure that no modern journalist or writer wants to state publicly that America’s civil-rights laws don’t legally exist


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 06/26/15 Big Fag Wins a Major Victory as Supreme Court Rules Queer Marriage is a Constitutional Right 75% similar
  3. 10/01/16 Snivel Rights: Fake Rights Since 1964 68% similar
  4. 05/12/07 Pushing Equality Again 66% similar
  5. 07/27/07 Walker to be Sentenced for “Civil Rights” Violation 64% similar
  6. 07/31/11 Jews: Always Dealing From The Bottom Of The Deck 57% similar
  7. 4 Responses to “They Still Don’t Know the History of the 14th Amendment”

    1. Howdy Doody Says:

      Back in 2000 my traitorous marxist rep from foggy bottom told that the 14th was perfectly legal and any opposition to it was right wing nutty bs, he and his aide were smug about telling me this.

      Paul Craig Roberts wrote an article about Bloomrosen I think was the name, but he as a LBJ fifth column anti White operater who IMPOSED on his own with out authority or any legal standing whats so ever several anti White pro nigger hiring laws by bureaucratic pencil pushing completely !

      Nixon’s team came in and was concluded that all this rules were imposed ILLEGALLY ! The filthy coward and traitors in Foggy Bottom told Nixon and his legal people yeah you can rescind these bogus enacted law’s but the NIGGERS and LEFTIST will Riot’s the beginning of the end of NIXON and any chance of the rule of law that day.

      http://www.watergate.com

      Nixon had over 540,000 White men in LBJ/Eugene Rostow’s war on US going on, and so let this crime go and Blumroosen or Bloomrosen was never prosecuted for his illegal tactics and the media was 1000% against Nixon and his people, they had the Fat K man embedded with Nixon, and so he had traitors and scum from day one like John Dean from day one.

      The media in unison drove Nixon mad at that time, it was get NIXON around the clock. This was his reward for giving them everything including the kitchen sink in 1973 and more. Plus the fifth columnist got US 300,000 slopes and Hmong bastard criminals to deal with back in 1974 and 75. 3/4’s are on aid and the rest likely work for the regime phucking over YTs at every chance they get.

    2. Howdy Doody Says:

      Abolishing America (contd.): Do Whites Have Rights?
      Paul Craig Roberts August 6, 2002, 9:00 am

      Does anyone remember what the civil rights movement
      was about?

      Not today. Four decades later, it is “controversial”
      if not “racist” to recall that the civil rights movement
      was about equal opportunity.

      People were to be hired on the basis of merit and
      ability alone–“the best person for the job”. No other
      factor was to play a role.

      The ink was hardly dry on the 1964 Civil Rights Act
      before an EEOC bureaucrat,

      Alfred W. Blumrosen,
      illegally and unconstitutionally

      subverted the statutory purpose of the law. Judicial
      complicity and congressional distraction enabled
      Blumrosen to redefine discrimination from a purposeful
      action against an individual to the absence of
      proportional representation regardless of discriminatory
      intent.

      Thus did Blumrosen originate the system of race and
      gender privileges known as quotas that are thoroughly

      institutionalized throughout the government,

      private industry, and

      universities.

      Racial quotas are so firmly entrenched that quotas
      prevail even in states where federal district courts
      have ruled against them and referendums have made them
      illegal.

      The 1964 Civil Rights Act has been illegally enforced
      for 37 years. The result is a massive system of race and
      gender discrimination against white males in order to
      achieve proportional representation of racial minorities
      and women.

      Now comes an astonishing report from the U.S. Office
      of Personnel Management: “Annual Report to Congress,
      Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program, Fiscal
      Year 2000,” released in April 2002.
      [You can read it

      on Adversity.net, an
      anti-preference

      organization that fights for victims of reverse
      discrimination, with analysis and comment. The original
      government version may be found

      here.]

      This report to Congress makes brutally clear that
      despite the “equal opportunity” name of the program,
      the purpose of the federal program is to make certain
      there is no equal opportunity for whites in federal
      employment.

      The report uses tables and bar charts to make
      unmistakably clear that federal discrimination against
      whites goes far beyond merely achieving proportional
      representation for blacks. In all 22 independent
      federal agencies and in 16 of 17 federal executive
      departments, blacks are massively overrepresented.

      In the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (sic)
      blacks comprise 46.4 percent of the employees. The
      “affirmative action” or racial quota target for
      proportional representation (percent in Relevant
      Civilian Labor Force) for the EEOC is 6.4 percent black
      employees.

      Blacks are thus overrepresented in EEOC employment
      by 625 percent!

      And the EEOC is the federal agency that is supposed
      to enforce equal employment opportunity.

      Blacks are overrepresented in the National Science
      Foundation by 504.7 %; in the Pension Benefit Guaranty
      Corp. by 538.7 %; in the Securities and Exchange
      Commission by 452.1%; in the Smithsonian Institution by
      452.1%, in the Federal Communications Commission by
      370.1%; in the Social Security Administration by 263.5%;
      in the Commodity Futures Trading Commission by 375%; in
      the Office of Personnel Management by 286.7%; and so on.

      In cabinet departments, blacks are overrepresented
      in Department of Education employment by 464.7%; in
      Department of Labor by 254%; in HUD by 383%; in Treasury
      by 176%; in Department of Justice by 106%; in Department
      of State by 165%; and so on.

      The push is now on in the federal government to
      achieve comparable overrepresentation for Hispanics and
      females.

      If these two “minorities” achieve similar
      overrepresentation, there will be no room for white
      males in the federal government.

      Did you know that the federal government pays its
      managers “superbonuses”
      for hiring, training, and promoting nonwhites? According
      to a

      lawsuit filed against the Secretary of Energy by DOE
      employees, a DOE boss, Anibal Taboas, staffed the
      Argonne National Laboratory with minorities, while
      reassigning white males to dead end jobs where they
      could be terminated under reduction in force polices.

      For this achievement, the lawsuit says Mr. Taboas
      received thousands of dollars in bonuses.

      Note that no one in the government intervenes in
      behalf of white males who suffer discrimination, not

      President Bush, no

      congressional committee chairman, certainly not the
      Justice Department or the EEOC.

      Today in the United States white people have no
      political representation. Whites have to struggle in the
      courts against government opposition to claim any
      resemblance to equal rights.

      Explicit government policies have made whites second
      class citizens. Whites are a dispossessed majority in
      their own country.

      Why did the white majority allow themselves to be
      stripped of the equal protection clause of the
      Constitution? Why do whites remain loyal to the
      political parties that took away their rights?

      What is the future for whites in a political system
      where

      both political parties

      pander to third world immigrants and support racial
      privileges for minorities? Having lost

      equal protection of law, what will whites lose next?

      COPYRIGHT CREATORS
      SYNDICATE, INC.

    3. Howdy Doody Says:

      http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/15/us…on-figure.html

      Patrick Chavis, 50, Affirmative Action Figure

      By DOUGLAS MARTIN

    4. fd Says:

      The lawless 14th amendment is a Black Republican Reconstruction amendment. An enormous Federal power grab. Before the war, everybody was a citizen of their state.

      Every Southern state except Tennessee voted against the 14th amendment. The furious black republican party pushed it through illegally. Common citizenship is the law of the land.