23 October, 2015

Whites Under Siege in South Africa

Posted by Socrates in anti-White terrorism, anti-White themes, communism, communism-as-Jewish, jewed culture, jewed politics, Jewish behavior versus White behavior, Slovo, Socrates, South Africa, War On White People at 12:13 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: the communist Jew, Joe Slovo [who looks White] gives the communist salute)

Why are Whites under attack in South Africa? Because Jews gave Blacks political power. In fact, one Jew, Slovo (above) was the key man in the 1993 “deal” between White leaders and Black leaders to give political power to Blacks. See Joe Slovo/interim constitution plans.

[Webpage].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 04/15/17 South Africa: Whites Could Be Facing Trouble 100% similar
  3. 04/28/08 Health Care in South Africa 87% similar
  4. 12/01/13 The Jewing of South Africa 77% similar
  5. 01/29/15 Whites Are Being Genocided in South Africa 77% similar
  6. 10/29/07 South Africa: “Unemployed Were Better Off Under Apartheid” 76% similar
  7. 5 Responses to “Whites Under Siege in South Africa”

    1. CW-2 Says:

      White people aren’t under siege only in South Africa, we are under siege everywhere, now in our homelands. We are taxed, browbeaten, and physically abused to promote the monstrosity of ‘brown man’.
      Whiteman, stand up and fight!

    2. fd Says:

      Whites in South Africa literally voted to hand over their government to Negroes. I believe the mass voting took place in 1993.

    3. Joe Says:

      Who’s the black with the bulging eyes in the far-right of the picture? I didn’t know frogs and apes could mate.

    4. CW-2 Says:

      it is impossible for communism to exist unless supported by the Whiteman’s technology and infrastructure, even Mao discovered that truth when the so-called ‘great leap forward’ failed abysmally.

    5. Mary O Says:

      Photos showed a young man with his face bleeding driving a white car, and later demonstrators jumping on top of the overturned car. Does anyone know if the young man escaped?

      Also, none of the demonstrators were carrying books. Were they “students”?