Vanguard News Network

I treat all news items reported by Jewish controlled Main Stream Media (MSM) as simply arbitrary statements. They could be true or they could be false. Only independent research and assessment can verify these reports. That’s the problem with Jews — if it is in their interest to tell the truth — they tell the truth, and if it’s in their interest to lie — they lie! Once people catch onto this and understand their nature, then our upside-down world of insanity will begin to make sense.

In continental (?) Europe, the media are far from pro-Israel. They take the side of Palestinians or Lebanese, as a rule, that is, Arabs. Israelis complained about it, and called it anti-Semitism in Europe, especially Belgium, “the Beast is back”, etc.
The media criticise Israel, but they wouldn’t criticise a Jew living in Europe (= parasite), at least they wouldn’t talk about his “Jewishness”, and they hush Brown (=parasites) crime. They ignore the dangers of immigration, every day they campaign for endless waves of “regularisation” of “undocumented” “persons” (“workers” would be a lie, “parasites” would hurt too much), smile at “multiculturalism”, etc.
I think that it’s only in the UK (?) and USA that the media are so Zionist.
Yet, white genocide is happening in every white country. There aren’t more proud white men in Europe than in the USA.
Is the way the news from Palestine are given the most important issue for you? Do you cry for Arabs, really?
I mean, in Europe, you WILL read editorials questioning Israel’s ruthless policy, but that changes nothing to the way vital racial questions are dealt with. Europe is full of Arabs the way America is full of Mexs. Sometimes, you get the feeling the media are cavorting for them.

Is there any doubt that jews would have sold Saddam the nukes and then made money having him arrested. Somehow a certain case in the 40s has altered jew trickery on how to sell enemies the bomb secrets.
Just be glad the jew Rosenbergs were caught arrested tried and executed for selling nukes to their jew Soviets who in turn passed it on to China N Korea and Cuba back in the late 40s.Top: Jewish Criminals & Spies: Julius and Ethel Rosenberg Anti-American Jewish-Zionist-Soviet Spies. Had the Rosenbergs lived in todays 100% jew owned big media this would have gone unreported and never would they have been jailed much less executed.
Thank you Joe McCarthy. BTW why hasnt GW Bush and his neocon jews attacked Castro who was in power twice as long as Saddam and who was twicew as ruthless and killed twice as many people? Guess Castro didnt have a bomb to go 10,000 miles to hit jewland did he?
The Rosenberg?s were with out a doubt one of the single biggest example of America?s resolve to show the world it did not take the Communist challenge lightly. Communist threat to America was very real to the government, law enforcement and the public. American leadership had made the country?s position on Communism very clear in the years following World War Two. America considered Communism as a direct threat to her way of life. America considered the disclosure of her atomic secrets a very serious threat to her safety and democracy.

At the end of 1945 the United States of America was standing tall over the rubble of World War Two along with the rest of the free world. The threat to world peace had been defeated and all was well with the world. The United States had stepped forward as the world?s shining example of democracy and protector of global freedoms. With power of the atom safely under control of this self appointed protector the world, the free world every where seem like a safer place. But this sense of security was shaken in 1949 with the Soviets successful detonation of an atomic bomb. The United States trepidation would was heighten with the Communist take over in China in the same year. The rapid expansion of communism alone was a threat to world peace as far America was concerned, but a communist threat with nuclear capabilities was unthinkable.

How could the Soviet Union have mastered this technological feat so quickly? It had taken The United States of America two billion dollars and over four years to master this enormous feat. The Soviet Union by general scientific consensus was at the very least five to seven years behind the free world effort of the United States in the area of atomic weapons. Now only six years after the end of World War Two the United States was again locked in a fight for democracy this time against a foe with nuclear capabilities. America prepared its self for the worse, but how had this threat had gathered so quickly? American scientist swore that the Soviets could not have developed a nuclear capability this soon without outside help. The source of the Soviets help was at first unclear. The help that the Soviets supposedly received appeared to have come in the forms of Julius & Ethel Rosenberg and David & Ruth Greenglass.

The Rosenberg?s, these Americans, the same ones who had been involved with America?s nuclear war effort during World War Two appeared to have shared information about America?s atomic secrets with the Soviets.

In 1950?s two American?s were charged, tried, convicted of spying for the Soviet Union and were finally executed for violation of the Espionage Act of 1917 These two people were Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, but did the Rosenberg?s really commit the espionage they were accused of? And what would be their motive for committing this crime? Closer examination of the information seems to produce some doubt as to the guilt of both of the Rosenberg’s and the decision to charge them the crime of espionage. Why were these two people the only ones ever prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and subsequently executed for disclosure of atomic secrets? If you look at the case from a distance the Rosenberg’s died due to a chain of circumstances that seems ridiculous now but in 1950s was the right and proper thing to due. The actions taken against the Rosenberg?s appears to follow the hard line attitude against Communism stressed by the Eisenhower and former Truman administrations.

The impact of Senator Joseph Mc McCarthy and his hunt for Communist with his Red Scare tactics can not be discounted and did nothing to aid the Rosenberg?s cause. This public anti-communist bias created a serious challenge for their defense lawyer. This was a major indicator of the general climate that the general population was exposed to. This strong anti communist attitude was in the newspapers radio and the minds of the public and must be considered a factor in the trial.

The Rosenberg?s and the surrounding events of their accused espionage betrayal of atomic weapons secrets has long been the subject of controversy depending upon your point of view. Were the Rosenberg?s chosen to be made an example of to show the extent of Americas resolve in the fighting communism?

The Rosenberg?s are an enigma within America. Both Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were beneficiaries of the American dream. The Rosenberg?s owned a business, had a nice home and two lovely children. So why would these two people obvious benefactors of this life style try to undermine and destroy this dream by committing espionage for the Communist. To help the Communist did not appear to make any sense to Americans. The Communist were diametrically opposed to this lifestyle and committed to changing it by what ever means necessary.

The Espionage Act of 1917 was the statue the Rosenberg?s was charged under. The Espionage Act of 1917 was originally written to aid in the prosecution of foreign agents that disseminated information to a foreign power against the United States during World War One, this act carried the death penalty in the time of war. This 1917 statue became a convenient law with which to prosecute the threat to the American Dream that the Rosenberg?s presented. There was an attempt to charge the Rosen bergs under the Atomic Energy Act of 1946. This action was struck down by the Supreme Court as a violation of and de facto prosecution the actual details of the trial will be covered under the trials section of the web site.

The Rosenberg?s became targets of America?s hunt for Communist when Karl Fuchs was arrested in England for espionage. Under interrogation Karl Fuchs gave up the name of David Gold who revealed David Greenglass as a co conspirator. David Greenglass in turn gave up Julius and Ethel Rosenberg as part of a plead bargain to keep his wife from being charged as a courier for the spy ring that the Rosenberg?s were a part of.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was under great pressure to charge some one with this crime of the century. Rather than settle for the small fish the FBI felt that if they put enough pressure on Julius they would be able to ensnare the whole spy ring. The FBI really wanted a confession from Julius Rosenberg to this crime of espionage. Julius Rosenberg was not cooperative with the FBI?s efforts. To try and put leverage on Julius the FBI decided to charge Ethel Rosenberg. There was very little hard core evidence to charge Ethel with as seen from the FBI surveillance transcripts. Transcripts were made available under the Freedom of Information Act. It was hoped that Julius Rosenberg would roll over on the spy ring to save his wife, additionally the FBI felt that could bargain with Ethel Rosenberg to put pressure on her husband to reveal the information that the FBI wanted, but this was an unsuccessful strategy.

Court transcripts from the prosecutor and defense show the strategy that each of the lawyer used to for his respective position. As expected the prosecution followed the hard line of the FBI and the Administration. The defense tried to prove that the Rosenberg had nothing to do with the compromise of information. Unfortunately for the Rosenberg’s their defense lawyer made a critical mistake when dealing with the lens drawing made by David Greenglass in court. He had the drawing classified status made a point of court record thus increasing the value of the document for the prosecutor, rather than treat the information as common knowledge which would have helped the Rosenberg case.

The trial Judge, Judge Kaufman for the Rosenberg?s trial and sentencing had a very hard line view on the espionage and his decision for a harsh sentence for both of the Rosenberg’s as shown by an excerpt from his sentencing statement. ?The competitive edge held by the United States in super weapons has put a premium on the service of home grown variety that places allegiance to a foreign power before loyalty to the United States. The punishment to be meted out in the case must therefore serve the maximum interest for the preservation of our society against these traitors in our midst? I consider your crime worse than murder ?I believe your conduct in putting the into the hands of the Russians the A Bomb years before our best scientist predicted Russia would perfect the bomb has already caused , in my opinion, the Communist aggression in Korea.? Judge Kaufman’s Sentencing Statement. When the Department of Justice was asked for sentencing recommendations the FBI said that the death penalty was recommended for Julius and a thirty year sentence was recommended for Ethel. This recommendation was pasted on to Judge Kaufman and ignored. FBI Agent Interview Unfortunately, the Supreme Court was unable to help the Rosenberg’s for after initially granting a stay of execution this decision was reversed by the High Court .

The feelings of the Eisenhower administration did not vary from the guilty consensuses shown by the court. Twice President Eisenhower refused to grant executive clemency for the Rosenberg’s. The Intelligence Community had decrypted Soviet diplomatic communiqué³ during this time frame, known internally as the Venona files. The Venona files were only made available to certain people within the Truman and Eisenhower administrations. The Venona Files allowed the Administration to have inside information as to the Soviets recruitment of agents and possible involvement of the Rosenberg’s. This information was not made available to prosecute the Rosenberg’s because the Intelligence Community did not want to compromise this unique source of intelligence for America. So the Venona files remained a secret classified Top Secret. The Venona file had little or no impact upon the trial at the time. The use of this information could have cleared Ethel Rosenberg especially since the government really only wanted to use her as a lever against her husband. From the initial examination of the decrypted files it would appear at first glance that Julius Rosenberg would not have fared as well as his wife. In 1995 a portion but not all of the Venona file have been declassified In these files the Soviet complement an agent named ?Antenna? and later known as ?Liberal? and complemented him for his recruitment efforts. It is believed that ?Antenna? was Julius Rosenberg therefore he would not have been exonerated by the release of this information. The Rosenberg children also known as the Meeropols have this same information available to them and the have an entirely different take of the information in the Venona. The children still maintain the innocence of their parents to this day.

Since the Venona files have only been partially released it makes the claims by both the government and the Meeropols hard to separate at this time. America was not to let a threat to the country?s safety and well being go unchallenged. The trail of the Rosenberg’s was the result. In later years newer evidence has been made available. An interview with Feklisov the spy master that was in charge the spy ring that the Julius Rosenberg was suppose to be part of flatly stated that Julius Rosenberg was the only one to participate in the espionage effort in the US. Also there is a book out now were David Greenglass comes out and states that he lied about Ethel to save his wife and family Depending upon who you are talking to the guilt of the Rosenberg’s has been established with out a doubt or only Julius was guilt and Ethel was innocent or another view is that contends that the Rosenberg’s where used as a scapegoat while the guilt went free because of deals that they made with the government. It seem to be the general opinion with in the Law enforcement side of the house that if the Rosenberg’s had cooperated they to would have been spared the death penalty like David Greenglass but they let their principles overcome common sense. The controversy over the Rosenberg continues even today with both sides of the argument still claiming that they are right and the other side is wrong. Recent articles still claim that there respective point of view is correct as shown with Herbert Romerstein article written in 1999 and claim that ?Venona intercepts prove that Rosenberg?s are guilt? but as previously shown in the interview with the spy handler Feklisov Ethel Rosenberg was never used in the spying operation. The Michael Meeropol statement issued 22 March 1999 just prior to the public release of the Venona Intercepts tells the other side of the story. Michael Meeropol still contends that his parents were innocence, and were used to make a point by the US government.