2 June, 2009

White-Baby-Killer Assassinated, Jews and Leftists Mourn

Posted by Socrates in abortion movement, jewed culture, jewed politics at 2:24 am | Permanent Link

It’s funny how every time an abortionist is murdered, there’s never any mention of the hundreds or thousands of White babies he killed. But whatever. Brainwashed White women will continue to go to the special “clinics” to get unwanted “blobs” removed from their wombs, lest the blobs interfere with their “careers”:

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 06/24/19 White Philosophy for Newbies: Today’s White-Hating Leftists are All Psychological Jews 29% similar
  3. 05/15/07 Bush, His Jewish Friend and Democracy 25% similar
  4. 04/09/11 Abortion: an Anti-White Obsession for Jews, Liberals 25% similar
  5. 04/25/14 Soviet-Style “Easy Divorce”: Killer of White Men 25% similar
  6. 08/09/10 How the Jews are Exterminating the White Race 24% similar
  7. 35 Responses to “White-Baby-Killer Assassinated, Jews and Leftists Mourn”

    1. Heather Blue Says:

      Dr. Tiller aborted more babies than the number of men killed in the Vietnam conflict.

      55-thousand men died in Vietnam. Tiller murdered 60,000 babies. How nice that the SOB’s career is over.

    2. Andea Dworkin Says:

      Why don’t pro-lifers care about real human beings instead of fetuses?

      Why do these same people fight for un-born blobs, yet never say a peep about real life, living people being sent off to die in needless Jew wars?

    3. Tina Carter Says:

      @Andea

      They do, but you have to be a Yahweh’s pets. In any event it doesn’t change anything. he was a symptom, not the disease.

    4. Andrea Dworkin Says:

      Drive to the poor section of where you live. Tell me many of these kids shouldn’t have been aborted… They are doomed to miserable lives, with inadequate love, care or a chance in today’s world. The white race will only prosper if quality(of life and upbringing) rather than quantity wins out.

      If these fetuses are aborted, maybe their souls will be born to responsible parents later on in the future, rather than sluts too careless or foolish to practice birth control.

      How relevant an issue is this to most people anyway? Are there that many sluts out there? Are there that many people who can’t instill morals and responsibility in their daughters?

      This issue just makes Christians waste their time on a bunch of nothing instead of seeing the greater Jewish threat. One tree instead of a Jew forest of crimes.

    5. Blackshirt Says:

      I don’t have any mercy for doctors who abort White babies, but I have no problem with abortion for non-whites. This is the main problem I have with pro-life Christians, including the ones in the “movement”- most of them are completely against abortion and make no distinction about the race of the fetus.

      I advocate free and convenient abortions for all non-whites.

    6. Donald E. Pauly Says:

      Heather Blue needs to take some arithmetic remedial. With a 20 year career and 200 work days per year, that is 15 abortions per day. Not bad, two every hour.

      The good doctor should get some credit for aborting pregnant Negresses and Jewish Princesses.

    7. Blackshirt Says:

      I forgot to mention in my previous post that there are some cases where aborting a White child would be acceptable in my book- incest, rape, danger to the mother’s life, or if the child would be born with physical/mental deformities or retardation.

    8. mattio Says:

      How can a white guy perform abortions? I thought only khazar shitscum could bring themselves to kill unborn babies.

      And how can a church allow a babykiller into their congregation?What kind of bullshit is that? That’s dumber than going to church in the first place.

    9. Tom McReen Says:

      Most abortionists are jews and jew feminists were at the forefront of pushing abortion and campaigning for ‘late-term’ abortion.

      It’s more helpful to new lurkers to highlight the usual cause of the problem than be distracted by pointless Chritian-bashing.

    10. Parsifal Says:

      Andrea, you are spot on. Those Christian Right to Lifers don’t give a damn for the baby once it’s born, only when it’s a microscopic blob inside the womb. They also got all bent out of shape over Terry Schiavo, the brain-dead vegetable hooked up to a life-support machine a few years ago. Of course, they didn’t have to pay the bills to keep that artichoke alive. You either have to be an embryo in a petri dish or a mindless stalk of celery to get the attention of those stupid Christian Right to Life idiots.

    11. wild-bill Says:

      Comparing aborted babies to men killed in wars is a bogus liberal argument since it ignores the fact that babies have control over what happens to them whereas men can refuse to join armies, evade the draft, or get conscientious objector status.

    12. wild-bill Says:

      Typo. Should be that babies have NO control over what happens to them.

    13. Tom McReen Says:

      From Jew Watch:

      -Gloria Steinem (1934- ); founder, Ms. Magazine.

      -Bella Abzug (1920-1998); Civil rights and labor attorney elected to
      Congress (House of Rep.) from New York City; served 1971-1977.

      -Betty Friedan (1921- ); feminist leader and author of the book “The
      Feminine Mystique” (1963).

      -Shulamith Firestone (1945- ); Canadian feminist. Wrote “The
      Dialectic of Sex” (1970).

      -Andrea Dworkin (1946- ); radical; apparent lesbian. Author of the
      book “Intercourse” (1987).

      -Susan Brownmiller (1935- ); U.S. feminist. Wrote the book “Against
      Our Will” (1975).

      -Susan Faludi (1959- ); author of the book “Backlash” (1992).

      -Naomi Wolf (1962- ); advisor to Al Gore in the 2000 U.S.
      presidential election.

      -Emma Goldman (1869-1940); early U.S. feminist.

      -Ernestine Rose (1810-1892); b. in Poland; early feminist.

      -Phyllis Chesler (1941- ); U.S. feminist; author of the book “Woman’s
      Inhumanity to Woman” (2002).

      -Judy Chicago (Cohen) (1939- ); U.S. feminist. Author of the
      book “The Dinner Party” (1996).

      -Robin Morgan (1941- ); U.S. feminist. Former editor-in-chief, Ms.
      magazine.

      -Letty Cottin Pogrebin (1939- ); U.S. feminist; co-founded Ms.
      magazine.

      -Gerda Lerner (1920- ); b. in Austria.

      -Annie Nathan Meyer (1867-1951); U.S. feminist.

      -Maud Nathan (1862-1946); sister of Annie Nathan Meyer; U.S. feminist.

      -Geri Palast (1950- ); chair, Committee on Women in the Global
      Economy; U.S. feminist.

      -Rose Schneiderman (1882-1972); b. in Poland.

      -Anita Pollitzer (1894-1975); U.S. feminist; pal of artist Georgia
      O’Keeffe.

      -Gene Boyer (no birthyear available); a founder of N.O.W.; president
      of Jewish Feminists; U.S. feminist.

      -Lucy Komisar (1942- ); author of the book “The New Feminism” (1971);
      U.S. feminist.

      -Karen Nussbaum (1950- ); (apparently Jewish); leader of 9to5-
      National Association of Working Women.

      -Eleanor Flexner (1908-1995); (apparently Jewish–relative is a
      Zionist); U.S. feminist.

      -Riane Eisler (1931- ); b. Vienna; author/feminist; (apparently a
      Jewish-fled Nazi). Author of the book “The Chalice and the Blade”
      (1987).

    14. Mike Jahn Says:

      Someone tell this McReen guy that I am not Parsifal, Parsifal is some Wagner word of which I’m not even a fan. I also never use the term “Mestizo”.

      Give it a rest McReen and stop being so paranoid.

    15. Cowboy Zeke Says:

      The problem I have is that the dumbass doesn’t have the sense to steal a license plate or at the very least remove his license plate. Needless that he should be caught for such a stupid mistake. I respect the man, he had the strength of his convictions.

    16. brutus Says:

      Quote from Andrea Dworkin

      “Drive to the poor section of where you live. Tell me many of these kids shouldn’t have been aborted… They are doomed to miserable lives, with inadequate love, care or a chance in today’s world.”

      No healthy White child should ever be aborted. Abortion is not a solution for disadvantaged Whites. There are other more acceptable solutions.

      Now if you opined that it’s perferable to kill jews instead of killing White babies, some might be more inclined to agree with that opinion.

      .

    17. 2050 Says:

      Andea Dworkin Says:
      2 June, 2009 at 11:08 am

      Why don’t pro-lifers care about real human beings instead of fetuses?

      They do. They care about kids and to know this you’d have to hang out in some church till you saw all the programs for kids they come up with (these truly help a lot of white families, esp those who homeschool) to keep kids wanting to go to church. And many provide a lot of free food to people.

      Of course at the local food bank type church here the mexicans get in line and take most of the freebies these days.

      And then there’s the sending money and relief to help Guatamalen etc, kids who the commercial says would otherwise die at the 30,000 a day?? or whatever, stay alive and healthy so that they cam move to El Norte someday.
      —————

      Good list of jew feminists TM. Jews dominate the abortion industry and the ‘pro-choice’ movement and the pro pro-choice media which gives them their publicity whether in news or movies.

      Without jews starting and pushing it, there would be no abortion industry for Christians to be against.

      I have always been pro-life. I even stood out there with the protesters a couple times. Careful, some lib may try to throw a cup of piss at you to maybe show you how evil they think you are for trying to make their girlfriend have her baby?

      I agree with blackshirt these days, and now advocate and encourage abortions for non-whites and jews.

    18. Stan Sikorski Says:

      Words are for discussion – Bullets are for change.

      Thousands upon millions banter back and forth the pros and cons of abortion. One man did something about it. That one man has more power in his trigger finger than all the BTUs and carbon dioxide blown around by those “talkers”. And he has changed the landscape for those babykillers for now on.

      I am all for the darkies, slants and yids killing their blobs. But Healthy White women should not do so.

    19. Parsifal Says:

      Brutus is right, no healthy unborn White baby should ever be aborted. There will ALWAYS be someone interested in adopting a White baby. However, all unborn retards and diseased cripples should be aborted at once, unless the parents can PROVE they will support the thing and it will never become a burden to Society.

    20. Adam Says:

      In my view, the white race faces greater problems than just shrill kvetching by a bunch of feminist Jews.

      I offer a simple metaphor for your examination.

      Picture a white man in a room with a gun to his own head, on the verge of suicide, and a Jew constantly urging him fire, offering him all sorts of jewy reasons to do so whenever it looks like his will is starting to flag. In a single image, that’s our situation, the situation of the white race.

      There are three elements here, tangled in a Gordian knot of complexity:

      1. Jews, and their pernicious evolutionary struggle against whites of European descent.
      2. The technological system itself, in this case represented by the gun.
      3. White race’s indifference to the question of whether it lives or dies, represented by the suicidal white man.

      Without the gun – so-called “therapeutic” abortion, and other forms of birth control, which have all worked together more than anything Jews have ever said to promote the equality of the sexes – and without white willingness to use the gun (i.e., the technological system) to destroy itself, all the racial hostility and clever rationalizations offered by the Jew would be for naught. After all, the Jews have hated us for thousands of years, but it is only lately that they have come within sight of attaining their goal of genociding us. What has changed? The answer is: Technology. The technological system, ironically enough developed primarily by white men and for a time useful in subjugating the lesser races, now has matured to a point that it provides the means whereby the white race can efface itself from the planet.

      Most here appear to see the technological system as inherently neutral, but in fact it is not. The proof is that those groups of whites who reject the technological system or are forced to exist largely outside of it for one reason or other – for example the polygamist Mormons or the Amish – aren’t having these problems. Their numbers are increasing. Meanwhile, even in white areas that are relatively free of Jews, such as in Russia or Scandanavia, our populations are in decline.

      For millions of years, woman was bound to man by her dependency, especially in her role as child-bearer. Out of that fact of biology directly stemmed man’s cultural role and status as head of the family, protector and provider. But the development of truly effective scientific forms of birth control have changed all that. She now can be as promiscuous as she likes without risking pregnancy, and in sexual matters this means that she has achieved a powerful form of equality, gifted to her not by Jewish agitation, but by the technological system itself. That such an event, without precedent in the long history of our race, should have profound evolutionary effects is not surprising. The precipitious decline in the status of the white male, the abolition of the family itself as a center of cultural life, and the horrific increase in miscegenation all are consequences of this, though naturally they are unintended ones. Jews, of course, are happy to see these evils being visited upon us and do what they can to make things worse, but these things would exist even without them. White men have been dethroned by their own technology, and the white race itself may soon perish as a result.

    21. CW-2 Says:

      Adam, that is an interesting a fresh view of our situation. I would add that the situation is compounded by White men and women losing respect for themselves and each other. In this the jew media is the major underminer of White self respect and racial pride.

      Also the Amish exist as a focused community based on mutual aid. White people don’t exist in communities any more, we have become atomised individuals with no concrete expression of our collective will. The Amish, and similar communities, are as resistant to outside pressure as is a bar of iron, we unfortunately have all the solidity of a gas.

      We fall back on inappropriate technology because there is no embracing White community to provide guidance and leadership.

    22. Adam Says:

      To think of the technological system as itself being a problem is difficult and counter-intuitive, since it is contrary to our usual way of regarding it. From long habit we constantly think of it as neutral, when it actually isn’t. The illusion is fostered because we can imagine that mass media technology could be used to promote white unity, in the same way that it actually is being used to promote white disunity and genocide at the hands of the Jew; or to recur to my metaphor above, because the gun could be used to kill the Jew, instead of the white man using it to kill himself. Such statements, however, come laden with a lot of assumptions regarding free will; assumptions that may well be mistaken. Could this nation of sheep-like whites that we have become ever turn against the Jew? Or could it, of its own volition, abandon the technological system? For my part, I doubt it. Whites act as they currently act for a multiplicity of reasons, and the current situation is a result of many long causal chains of events intertwined with fiendish complexity, many of them serendipitous and with unforeseen and probably unforeseeable side effects. What would the world be like if television had never been invented, for example? To allow what is undoubtedly the greatest invention in the history of propaganda to fall into the hands of a hostile, alien minority was a big mistake for the white race, and perhaps a fatal one. Yet we can imagaine that maybe some other group of whites differently constituted – a society of Hitlers, or of Heydrichs – would find it easy to throw off the technological yoke, or to break the spell of the Jewish hypnotist. Perhaps they would have both the insight and the will. Maybe so. But the sad fact is we aren’t dealing with such supermen. We are dealing with ordinary, atomized, deracinated whites, most of whom have only average intelligence and will. Whites as they are, with all their weaknesses, those are the people we are trying to save, not a race of supermen. Like it or not, they’re all we’ve got to work with.

      All that we can know for sure is what the evidence shows: Those who reject the technological system or those who are for some reason expelled from it or who exist outside of it, are thriving. Those who don’t, are withering. Thus, the solution seems clear: If you want to save the white race, destroy the technological system.

    23. Tom McReen Says:

      “In my view, the white race faces greater problems than just shrill kvetching by a bunch of feminist Jews”

      It’s absolutely a part of the problem. Giving women the vote, women in the workplace, equal rights, affirmative action, judges awarding females sole custody of children and much more.

      Nobody said it was the only problem but it can’t be discounted as mere ‘kvetching’.

    24. Tom McReen Says:

      “Thus, the solution seems clear: If you want to save the white race, destroy the technological system.”

      Removing the jews would be a far more obvious solution and more productive for us than ‘destroying the technological system’.

      “We are dealing with ordinary, atomized, deracinated whites, most of whom have only average intelligence and will. Whites as they are, with all their weaknesses, those are the people we are trying to save, not a race of supermen. Like it or not, they’re all we’ve got to work with.”

      A good point so it wouldn’t be more productive working with them rather than theorising about ‘technological systems’?

    25. Adam Says:

      Removing the jews would be a far more obvious solution and more productive for us than ‘destroying the technological system’.

      How do you propose to do that? If you aren’t going to answer any of the other questions I asked, or respond to any of the arguments put forward, at least tell us this much.

      A good point so it wouldn’t be more productive working with them rather than theorising about ‘technological systems’?

      Would it? What makes you think so? Can you point to any recent success?

    26. shabbos s shabazz Says:

      “. . .greatest invention in the history of propaganda. . .”

      Religion?

      The Fed was established long before TV.

      jews have been expelled from around 100 areas. How did they manage to take over without technology?

    27. CW-2 Says:

      A very interesting perspective has been opened up, but it is a bit like a receding horizon, we are still no closer to a solution even though our insight has been deepened.

      Is the answer a return to the land and self-reliance? That is what the Amish started over 200 years ago.

    28. Tom McReen Says:

      “How do you propose to do that?”

      It is the main reason we are all here. Why act like I have proposed something odd?

      “If you aren’t going to answer any of the other questions I asked, or respond to any of the arguments put forward, at least tell us this much.”

      Why do I have to respond to everything you said? Why do you answer questions with questions? Why are you avoiding the jewish point?

      No technological systems, just right doesn’t have the same zing. We are all very aware of how the mass media is used against us. How do you suppose we replace it if we don’t remove the jew?

    29. Adam Says:

      shabbos s shabazz Says:

      “. . .greatest invention in the history of propaganda. . .”

      Religion?

      The Fed was established long before TV.

      jews have been expelled from around 100 areas. How did they manage to take over without technology?

      I am using the word “technology” in the sense that Jacques Ellul used it in his book The Technological Society. By “the technological system” I mean the entire assemblage of means whereby humans, via applied technique, obtain what they want from the world. This isn’t limited to mere machinery, although that is its most obvious manifestation. It also includes any kind of social technique, economic technique (such as the Fed), agricultural technique, technique of government, etc. The range and scope of techniques covers almost every aspect of human existence. There are even techniques of mastication. Not all techniques are equally important, of course.

      It seems to me that what power the Jews have over us comes from the fact that they have, to a large degree, taken control of the technological system, ensconced as they are in key positions in the vital areas of mass media, academia, finance, and government. Their power has grown pari passu with the growth of the technological system. If that system is destroyed, so is their power. Without that system, they once again shrink back to a tiny, powerless minority.

      Religion could be considered a technique of crowd management, true. In that way, it is much like television – a kind of cathode ray tube for a people who haven’t yet discovered science. Like television, it’s a way of getting people to think and behave the same, enforcing a conformity of thought and action. I wouldn’t characterize it as an invention, however. Not in the usual sense. I suspect religious sentiments in general to be an outgrowth of our biology. They persisted because they had survival value, probably because it facilitated in getting people to work together in groups, which in evolutionary terms outcompete individuals.

    30. Tom McReen Says:

      “Religion could be considered a technique of crowd management, true. In that way, it is much like television – a kind of cathode ray tube for a people who haven’t yet discovered science.”

      That’s a popular meme with anti-religious types but it’s not wholly accurate.

    31. shabbos s shabazz Says:

      Picture of Amish guy at “drive up” ATM:

      http://idle.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/10/08/1353229

      They accept rides in horseless carriages from “English” friends.

      An amazing number have cell phones. Hypocrites.

    32. Luek Says:

      It is the policy of the IRA to never refer to political assassinations or killings of opponents as such. Rather they are referred to as “sanctioned executions,” never as killings or assassinations.

    33. Adam Says:

      CW-2 Says:

      A very interesting perspective has been opened up, but it is a bit like a receding horizon, we are still no closer to a solution even though our insight has been deepened.

      Is the answer a return to the land and self-reliance? That is what the Amish started over 200 years ago.

      Breaking up into ethnic cells like that may be of value in assuring the survival of some segments of the white race. It certainly seems better than doing nothing. But allowing the technological system to persist runs the risk that it will eventually be used against any such cells, as we saw recently happen to the polygamist Mormons. From the strategic point of view of ensuring white racial survival, it would be better to destroy the technological system than attempt to live with it poised like a sword of Damocles over one’s head.

      It is also important to notice that the technological system has strong anti-racist, egalitarian tendencies built into itself, as the example of feminism shows. It’s hard to see how feminism would have ever taken hold without the development of truly effective scientific means of birth control, which gave women freedom from being controlled by men through enforced pregnancy. In this case, technology made them the sexual equals of men, able to be just as promiscuous.

      Worse, as a rule, new techniques succeed in displacing old ones because they are a better means of attaining a desired objective, meaning that they will ordinarily be welcomed by the people as a great improvement. But the unintended consequences of new techniques aren’t always easy to foresee, and can be impossible to prevent. If it had been generally understood in advance that the invention of truly effective scientific birth control would also result in a vast increase in miscegenation, destruction of the nuclear family, loss of power and status for men, etc., it might not have been received as such a blessing. Similarly with advances in agricultural techniques, which were considered a great boon, but which have, as a side effect, enabled massive population growth among non-whites, contributing in consequence a flood of non-whites into white homelands, thus ensuring white genetic destruction.

      shabbos s shabazz Says:

      Picture of Amish guy at “drive up” ATM:

      http://idle.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/10/08/1353229

      They accept rides in horseless carriages from “English” friends.

      An amazing number have cell phones. Hypocrites.

      The attractions of the technological system are yet another reason why its destruction should be considered by anyone wishing to preserve the white race. Those opponents it doesn’t openly attack and kill it assimilates. One may predict with confidence that once the Amish are drawn far enough into the system, they will abandon their way of life of their own volition.

    34. Truthteller Says:

      White babies are aborted because the white fathers don’t want to take responsibiity for getting their white girlfriends pregnant. When white men stop f*cking white women without marrying them, the problem will stop. Keep your c*ck in your pants until you’re married; and stop acting like white men are begging the women not to go to the abortion clinic.

    35. David Baker Says:

      Abortion is one aspect of human behavior which clearly places us in the cross-hairs of Biblical prophecy. I am not opposed in principle to the practice, as long as the mother understands that she is terminating a human life, and must seriously contemplate the psychological and physical factors related to her decision. What I am adamantly opposed to is both the aura of convenience fostered by the media on this subject, and the fact that people who are religiously, morally or otherwise opposed to abortion are forced by the government to underwrite the procedures, and are restricted from counseling women considering abortion against having one. There is an absolute truth about the liberal agenda: Every liberal program in existence would end tomorrow if liberals were made the primary source of funding for the program. Unfortunately, women are herd animals, and closely adhere to any ‘trendy’ behavior their compatriots proclaim as fashionable, and ‘Liberating’. The world was a much better place before this cadre of Jewish liberals wrested our moral, financial, and traditional values from our grasp.