[color="Red"]ZOG&#8217]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Retired Maj. Gen. Kathryn Frost dies

By SUZANNE GAMBOA, [color="Red"](what the fuck kind of name is that?)
Associated Press Writer
Fri Aug 18, 7:23 PM ET

WASHINGTON - Retired Maj. Gen. Kathryn George Frost, [color="Red"](note the masculine middle name, no it’s not her last name otherwise it would be hyphenated) who was the highest ranking woman in the Army when she retired last year after a 31-year career, died Friday of breast cancer. She was 57. [color="Red"](Most military men qualified to become generals, do so at around age 57 and yet this one retires at 57. O.K. I’m sorry that she had tit-cancer, but I’d bet she got the cancer from all of those abortions and birth control pill side-effects that are just now afflicting so many baby-boomer women. Therefore, I’m not going to carry-on like the wailing jew about this woman, who stole a man’s position in the army.)

Frost, wife of former Rep. Martin Frost (news, bio, voting record), D-Texas, had been battling cancer for four years. [color="Red"](married to a politco pig - strike two)

"Kathy was a woman of incredible strength," the former congressman said in a statement. "I will miss her deeply. [color="Red"](incredible strength!?! - how much could she bench? Note the jew’s continued masculinization of this women, even after she’s dead)

Frost was commander of the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, or AAFES, which operates the commissaries and post and base exchanges on military installations nationally and overseas, including Afghanistan and Iraq. [color="Red"](Two countries where America is having it’s ass kicked)

"She was well-known for her work to champion personnel policies, education and leadership innovations for the U.S. Army," said Army spokesman Paul Boyce. "She will certainly be missed by those who worked with her and those who benefited from her expertise and vision." [color="Red"](So what did she do? Oh yeah, that’s right - she shuffled some papers around for the jew)

Before becoming AAFES commander, Frost served four years as the Army adjutant general and commander of the eastern sector of the Military Entrance Processing Command. [color="Red"](The jew groomed this one. Just how many men’s jobs did she steal in her jew-manufactured career?)

She worked in Berlin on the staff of then Gen. Colin Powell when he was chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. She also worked as a White House social aide during the administrations of President Reagan and the first President Bush. [color="Red"](Yep! There’s the old jew for you! First they put the blond with the nigger, that was a just a jew test to see how far they could compromise her. And then sticking her with Twiddle Dee and Twiddle Dumb was just more resume’ filler.)

Her husband was a 26-year congressman who lost his 2004 re-election bid after Texas' congressional districts were redrawn. The Frosts were married in August 1998 in the U.S. Capitol. [color="Red"](Too bad! The jew re-drew the line because they wanted a nigger congressmen in that district and her husband took it up the ass. Cry me a river.)

They moved from Dallas to Washington last year to be near Walter Reed Army Medical Center, where Kathryn was undergoing treatment. Earlier this year, the couple bought her childhood home in Latta, S.C. [color="Red"](Free medical - that damn VA hospital will kill you every time)

Frost graduated from University of South Carolina in 1970 and earned a master's degree in counseling at Wayne University while on active duty with the Army. [color="Red"](I hope that I don’t have to say anything about this, for everyone to see the fraud that we’re talking about here.)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060818/ap_on_go_ot/obit_frost

She commanded AAFES and MEPS? Whoop de fuckin doo! No serious male officer wanted those positions; in fact if they were given those posts they would have been considered a reject. Surely though, this broad did not deserve to be promoted to General and there is no way a "General" should be running a department store or the induction center. What a joke!

The Pentagon is a whore-house .Detached from reality. Another reason the the Pentagon was chosen in the Zog's false flag 911.

The Pentagon is a whore-house .Detached from reality. Another reason the the Pentagon was chosen in the Zog's false flag 911.

Was it as riddled with asbestos as Silverstein's place over on the Lower East Side? Come to think of it, I do believe I remember the Pentagon undergoing very pricey asbestos removal. Something that would have cost ol' Silverstein much too pretty a penny at the towers.

Better just to blow them up. Wait, we'll stage a terrorist attack and blame....uh....Osama Bin Hidin! The richest skinny ass mean lookin' Muslim of them all! And, we'll insure the towers for 3.5 billion x 2 against "terrorist attacks". Your a genius Larry!

Why was the Pentagon hit? Why not Norfolk naval shipyard? It would have cripple zog military adventure in the Middle East. You can be damn sure if the terrorist attempted top skrike Norfolk military depot, the fighter jet would have intercepted in no time.
My theory on why the Pentagon was hit was to get the top brass tink- tank military echelon on board to fight the phony war on terror.(as bush said, either you are with us or with the terrorist) this was an assurance act of deceit. A coup de'ta within the system of patriotic americans.

Fast forward 5 years. The Pentagon is full of dual citizen and lackeys personal.

Even the much vaunted US hardware and weapons platforms have become obsolete. The F-15, our frontline fighter, is tired and has been eclipsed by even the Russian's SU-27 with its vectored thrust can outfly the F15, F16 or F14. The Russians have also surpassed the US in ICBM technology with the R-36M-2 rocket and the Topol cruise missle.

The F-15, our frontline fighter, is tired and has been eclipsed by even the Russian's SU-27 with its vectored thrust can outfly the F15, F16 or F14.

Speaking of that:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1994695142386399860
This Russian jet can do some amazing stunts, but I don't think it's actually a SU-27. Maybe it's a newer model.

Edit: I think it is an SU-27M

Even the much vaunted US hardware and weapons platforms have become obsolete. The F-15, our frontline fighter, is tired and has been eclipsed by even the Russian's SU-27 with its vectored thrust can outfly the F15, F16 or F14. The Russians have also surpassed the US in ICBM technology with the R-36M-2 rocket and the Topol cruise missle.

Perhaps, but nothing the ruskies or anyone else has can match this bad boy.

F-22A Raptor Advanced Tactical Fighter Aircraft US Air Force , USA

The F-22A Raptor advanced tactical fighter entered service with the US Air Force in December 2005. The USAF requirement is for a fighter to replace the F-15, with emphasis on agility, stealth and range.

F-22A DEVELOPMENT

By 1990 Lockheed Martin, teamed with Boeing and General Dynamics, had built and flown the demonstration prototype aircraft, designated YF-22. The first F-22 fighter aircraft was unveiled in April 1997 and was given the name Raptor.
"The F-22A can 'supercruise', flying at over Mach 1.5 without afterburner."

In September 2002, the USAF decided to redesignate the aircraft F/A-22 to reflect its multi-mission capability in ground attack as well as air-to-air roles. The aircraft's designation was changed again to F-22A when it achieved Initial Operating Capability (IOC) in December 2005.

The decision to proceed to Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP) was authorised in August 2001 and Lockheed Martin delivered 49 aircraft under LRIP contracts. Initial operational test and evaluation began in April 2004 and was successfully completed in February 2005. The F-22 entered full-rate production in April 2005.

The USAF has a total requirement of 381 aircraft but funding may not be made available for more than 180. Over 50 aircraft have been delivered. The first operational wing of F-22A Raptors is based at Langley AFB in Virginia.

During flight tests, the F-22A has demonstrated the ability to 'supercruise', flying at sustained speeds of over Mach 1.5 without the use of afterburner.

Lockheed Martin has put forward proposals for a fighter-bomber version of the F-22, the FB-22, which will have larger delta wings, longer range and the ability to carry an external weapons payload of 4,500kg and total weapons payload of 15,000kg.
DESIGN

The F-22 construction is 39% titanium, 24% composite, 16% aluminium and 1% thermoplastic by weight. Titanium is used for its high strength-to-weight ratio in critical stress areas, including some of the bulkheads, and also for its heat-resistant qualities in the hot sections of the aircraft. Carbon fibre composites have been used for the fuselage frame, the doors, intermediate spars on the wings, and for the honeycomb sandwich construction skin panels.
COCKPIT
"Lockheed Martin has proposed for a fighter-bomber version of the F-22, the FB-22."

The cockpit is fitted with Hands-On Throttle And Stick Control (HOTAS). The cockpit has six color liquid crystal displays. The Kaiser Electronics Projection Primary Multifunction Display provides a plan view of the air and ground tactical situation including threat identity, threat priority and tracking information.

Two displays provide communication, navigation, identification and flight information. Three secondary displays show air and ground threats, stores management and air threat information.

A BAE Systems Head Up Display (HUD) shows target status, weapon status, weapon envelopes and shoot cues. A video camera records data on the HUD for post-mission analysis.
WEAPONS

A variant of the M61A2 Vulcan cannon is installed internally above the right air intake. The General Dynamics Linkless Ammunition Handling System holds 480 rounds of 20mm ammunition and feeds the gun at a rate of 100 rounds per second.
"The F-22 has four hardpoints on the wings, each rated to carry 2,270kg."

The F-22 has four hardpoints on the wings, each rated to carry 2,270kg, which can carry AIM-120A AMRAAM or external fuel tanks. The Raptor has three internal weapon bays. The main weapons bay can carry six AMRAAM AIM-120C missiles or two AMRAAM and two 1,000lb GBU-32 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM). The bay is fitted with the EDO Corp. LAU-142/A AVEL AMRAAM Vertical Ejection Launcher which is a pneumatic-ejection system controlled by the stores management system. Raytheon AMRAAM air-to-air missile is an all-weather short to medium range radar-guided fire and forget missile, with a range of 50nm. The side bays can each be loaded with one Lockheed Martin/Raytheon AIM-9M or AIM-9X Sidewinder all-aspect short-range air-to-air missile.

The GPS-guided, Boeing Small Diameter Bomb (SDB) is being integrated on the F/A-22. Up to eight SDBs could be carried.
RADAR

The AN/APG-77 radar has been developed for the F-22 by the Electronic Sensors and Systems Division of Northrop Grumman and Raytheon Electronic Systems. The radar uses an active electronically scanned antenna array of 2,000 transmitter/receive modules, which provides agility, low radar cross-section and wide bandwidth. Deliveries of the AN/APG-77 began in May 2005.
COUNTERMEASURES

The aircraft's electronic warfare system includes a radar warning receiver and a BAE Systems Information & Electronic Warfare Systems (IEWS) (formerly Lockheed Martin Sanders) missile launch detector.
NAVIGATION AND COMMUNICATIONS

The TRW CNI communications, navigation and identification system includes an intra-flight datalink, joint tactical information distribution system (JTIDS) link and an identification friend or foe (IFF) system. Boeing is responsible for mission software and avionics integration. The aircraft has a Northrop Grumman (formerly Litton) LTN-100G laser gyroscope inertial reference, a global positioning system and a microwave landing system.
ENGINE
"The F-22 is powered by two Pratt and Whitney F119-100 engines."

The F-22 is powered by two Pratt and Whitney F119-100 engines. The F119-100 is a low bypass after burning turbofan engine providing 156kN thrust. The F119 is the first fighter aircraft engine equipped with hollow wide chord fan blades which are installed in the first fan stage. Thrust vectoring is controlled by a Hamilton Standard dual redundant full authority digital engine control (FADEC). The FADEC is integrated with the flight control computers in the BAE Systems Flight Controls vehicle management system.

http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/f22/

True, the F22 is awesome, as will be the F35, the problem is the cost. They have had the F22 for around 6 or 7 years but have only deployed a handful. If the Air Force and Navy want to really have air dominance against a first rate power they will have to get these things on the flight line in numbers and replace the old systems. The F22 costs nearly 200 million per plane. The F35 by the time it rolls out will cost 60 million per plane estimated. The F22 was only supposed to cost around 60 million per plane.

http://www.afa.org/magazine/Sept1999/0999f22.asp

True, the F22 is awesome, as will be the F35, the problem is the cost. They have had the F22 for around 6 or 7 years but have only deployed a handful. If the Air Force and Navy want to really have air dominance against a first rate power they will have to get these things on the flight line in numbers and replace the old systems. I am not sure but I think the F22 costs nearly 200 million per plane. The F35 by the time it rolls out will cost even more.

http://www.afa.org/magazine/Sept1999/0999f22.asp

Your article is dated 1999. The F-22 entered full-rate production in April 2005. You're right about the cost, though.

The USAF has a total requirement of 381 aircraft but funding may not be made available for more than 180.

Maybe it's just me but I don't think that Zog military will allow a bunch of cossacks or dinks to gain air superiority over them.

Your article is dated 1999. The F-22 entered full-rate production in April 2005. You're right about the cost, though.

Maybe it's just me but I don't think that Zog military will allow a bunch of cossacks or dinks to gain air superiority over them.

I just found a more recent article that has costs at 360 million per plane. Plus it will cost billions to train all new maintenance crews to keep them aloft. There is something to be said for the Cossack strategy of keeping things simple, durable, cheap and mass producing them. On paper the new Panzer tanks should have crushed the T-34's at Kursk. However, they had severe reliability problems and were outnumbered by the dependable T-34's.

I was watching a lecture at the Reserve Officers Association in San Antonio on CSPAN early this morning, and the speaker was talking about this very issue. He said he opposed the F22, not because he hates the Air Force or because the F22 isn't a stellar performer, but because we can't make enough of them. His main worry was that we'd get into a fight with China, and rapidly lose too many of our air forces to maintain the fight for very long, considering the huge cost and time it takes to build our newest generation of frontline fighters.

The same lecturer also lamented that the Navy will need "more hulls," which I feel to be an accurate assessment if we're to control China and the oil rich middle east at the same time. The problem is that we let the military waste away under Klinton, and now El Presidente Boosh just wants to make his big business partners some money, which means we're pissing our land forces away in Iraq, not properly running the peace there (saw another lecture on this at National Defense University on CSPAN a few days ago).

Hell, even the Russians are having this problem. They've made breakthrough after breakthrough in the tank world, but can't afford to implement them. Same with their fighter force.

But back to the topic at hand, yes, ZOG's army is in terrible shape. That's why I recently made the decision NOT to enter it. The entire military is rapidly filling up with every non-White piece of trash imagineable. Many of them don't really give two shits about America, and are only there for the paycheck. This is eerily similar to the Roman army around the time of their decline, where they relied on mercenaries and foreign troops.

Our heavy armored force has fallen into decline, with no new tanks coming online recently, while we continue to lose them in Iraq. Further, we've fallen behind the technology curve in this area. While our potential enemies would still have a hard time dealing with our vast fleet of M1A1's, we simply have failed to capitalize on new developments and have only around 500 of the newer M1A2's in service. Luckily for us, most analysts think that a major power war would be mostly at sea and in the air.

There is something to be said for the Cossack strategy of keeping things simple, durable, cheap and mass producing them. On paper the new Panzer tanks should have crushed the T-34's at Kursk. However, they had severe reliability problems and were outnumbered by the dependable T-34's.

The Russians, like the jappos, are good at copying things. The T-34 had an American designed suspension system. It's engine was a copy of a 500 horsepower German BMW diesel motor. They were able to mass produce them because eastern Soviet factorys were out of range of German bombers. A luxury The Heer didn't have as they were being hammered day and night by allied planes.

Interesting how this topic changed.

But here's my take on how wars are won in the 21st century.

A: You MUST have air superiority (Learned by the Nazis)
B: A fast moving infantry (i.e. Blitzkreg)
C: No media coverage (war is ugly, and sometimes the truth is disheartening to the public)
D: Complete domination by the victors over the loosers
E: And this is the most important, it's a numbers game and war is a game of attritian, i.e. 100 planes and 5 pilots, 5 planes and 100 pilots doesn't work.

I just hope that the shit doesn't hit the fan, and in November we can vote out some of these horrible politicians, but then again the grass isn't always greener on the other side. Who knows, I surely don't....

For the record, the F-35, called the Lightning II, is an international effort. The US, UK, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, Australia, Norway, Denmark, Canada, Singapore and Israel are all contributing "partners" in this venture, although the US is the largest contributor by far.

While the F-22 is an awesome aircraft, it is also very expensive. the F-35 has the same technology as the F-22, but at a 'fraction' of the cost. But: do we want a fighter that shares technology with at least 10 other nations? Technically we would be sharing two fighters, since the F-22 has the same systems as the F-35.

Perhaps the topic has not changed. ZOG knows its meal ticket is in bad shape, so it offers an international fighter project as a cheaper alternative while at the same time another step to making international government possible has been achieved.

Maybe I am just paranoid. Our government would not dare sell us out like that, would they?