25 October, 2007

A Nigerian Agrees with Dr. James Watson

Posted by Socrates in egalitarianism, political correctness, racial science, racism accusations, Socrates at 6:15 pm | Permanent Link

(By the way: Watson, who had previously been suspended from a New York laboratory pending a review of his comments about race, has resigned from that lab) [1]:


[1] about Watson resigning: [Here]

  1. Similar posts:

  2. 10/19/07 More About Watson 83% similar
  3. 10/18/07 Watson, Again 58% similar
  4. 04/14/11 Greece: Always-Tolerant “Antis” Try To Attack DNA Pioneer Watson 45% similar
  5. 10/24/07 Reed, re: Dr. James Watson 39% similar
  6. 10/26/07 “James Watson’s Ordeal” 29% similar
  7. 9 Responses to “A Nigerian Agrees with Dr. James Watson”

    1. radical white boy Says:

      the watsons seem to be a brilliant clan…..the watsons and mcclintocks designed and built the submarine HUNLY in new orleans for the confederate cause during the civil war….scientist barbara mcclintock was the forerunner of unraveling DNA ….some of their kin find niggers disgusting !!!!!!!!!!!!

    2. lawrence dennis Says:

      Even “smart” niggers know that their race is intellectually stunted. That’s why they let Jews create and manage the “snivel rights” movement. Here I quote in full the entry for “Talented Tenth” on wikipedia (as of Oct. 25, 2007):

      The Talented Tenth was written by W. E. B. Du Bois in September 1903. Published as the second chapter of The Negro Problem, a collection of articles by African Americans (New York: James Pott and Company, 1903).

      The Talented Tenth was a term coined by W.E.B Du Bois during the Harlem Renaissance to describe the phenomena that was one in ten black people becoming effluential in the world (such as continuing their education, writing books, or becoming directly involved in social change).

      The Talented Tenth is also the name for a student organization founded on the campus of Sam Houston State University in Huntsville, TX in 2000. Their website is http://www.shsu.edu/~org_tt , or you can search Wikipedia for The Talented Tenth Inc.

      from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talented_Tenth

      Yep, 1 in 10 negroes become “effluential,” all right.

    3. sgruber Says:

      Larry, hilarious about “effluent.” Effluent = “sewage that has been treated in a septic tank or sewage treatment plant.”

    4. Mark Says:

      The Nigerian disagrees with Watson on a fundamental point tho. Watson, being a geneticist, knows that the African problem is a much lower distribution of genes that increase intelligence. The Nigerian still believes that God has bestowed Africans with the same amount of intelligence, but for some reason Africans just refuse to use it. Unfortunately it’s a permanent disability from one generation to the next. The best thing blacks could do is start practicing eugenics and at least select for the best among them. Unfortunately blacks tend to have a very tribal mindset and embrace the lowest of their kind to spite the white man. Celebrating the Jena Six is a recent example. I see blacks only becoming better if other races intervene and sterilize their inferior masses.

    5. Arminius Says:

      The arguments above, undisputable they may be, seem for me beside the point.
      The Black developed in its African environment to near perfection. He did not require clothing or brain power, for nature provided him with all necessities, intelligence was there only a hindrance. Physical agility (running especially) and strength mattered. Diseases and natural catastrophes didn’t matter, for nature selected the black female 25% more fertile than a white woman and made the black male sexually more aggressive. It could thus quickly replace any population losses.
      The population stabilized naturally over ten thousands of years, because the struggle for survival, as for example the Ice Age imposed on white man was completely different for the Black of Africa.–

      The trouble started when the negro was imported (by WHITE and oriental traders) to America and, recently, to Europe. He doesn’t fit into a world (and culture, of course) quite alien to his genes, and this confuses him. Unable to compete with the whites, but expected to do so, manipulated by jewish exploiters and stringpullers, his response is hatred, inferiority, abuse, aggression and eventual racial war.
      Who can honestly blame him? The Black is a victim of the system, too.
      Realizing this, I feel how immense the task is to clean up the racial (political, economic etc.) mess we are in.

    6. r Says:

      Where are the propagandists who think only Jews were responsible for the slave trade? Come on now, I know you’re out there.

    7. sgruber Says:

      I guess in r’s opinion, Frank Weltner is a liar (“propagandist”). Or I guess everyone on VNN is?

    8. FeralWhiteMale Says:

      Arminius wrote: “The Black is a victim of the system, too.”

      Yeah, right, Blacks are “victims”… just like rattlesnakes.

      r wrote: “Where are the propagandists who think only Jews were responsible for the slave trade?”

      ROTFL. All races had slaves, but Jews, were when statistically normalized for their percentage of the population, bear the most responsibility for bringing Africans to the Western hemisphere (e.g. Jews were twice as likely to own slaves in the colonies than Whites). I’m thinking “r” = retard.


    9. ein Says:

      Jews…bear the most responsibility for bringing Africans to the Western hemisphere (e.g. Jews were twice as likely to own slaves in the colonies than Whites).

      Not only the Western Hemisphere. It was nothing new. They were well experienced.

      Jewish traders, always the enterprising middle men, followed the Roman armies into the Rhineland two thousand years ago. Their principal items of commerce, which they shipped south: hair (blond), amber, and slaves. Not necessarily in that order. One can assume that in Britain, Gaul, etc. it was the same paterm. Those Angle children for sale in the slave market of Rome, whom the Pope mistook for angels, probably arrived in the caravan of a Jew.

      In the Middle Ages, they similarly monopolized the trade back and forth across the Mediterranean when Christians and Moslems were generally at war. Being middlemen, they could sell Christian slaves (i.e.Europeans) to Moslems (i.e. Africans) and African slaves to Europeans. A Christian could not sell or buy a Christian, and a Moslem could not sell or buy a Moslem. But Jews could do both. Around the Black Sea too, the enterprising Khazar middlemen did a huge business selling Slavs to the Turks and Persians. “The harvest of the steppes” it was called. As I understand, this was one of the reasons the Khazars chose to convert to Judaism: so they could function as independent middlemen between Christians and Moslems.

      Similarly with the production of eunuchs. Because of some religious proscription in Islam, a Moslem could not create a eunuch but could own one. Europeans had no demand for eunuchs, having no harems to guard. But Moslems did. Jews were happy to oblige.