18 October, 2007
Watson, Again
Posted by Socrates in egalitarianism, England, political correctness, Socrates at 12:22 pm | 
Permanent Link
Dr. Watson’s speech has been canceled, due to his comments about race/intelligence (see the post “Scientist’s Comments on Race/Intelligence Criticized,” Oct. 17):
18 October, 2007 at 1:38 pm
>But the museum has cancelled the event, saying his views went “beyond the point of acceptable debate”.
Skills Minister David Lammy said Dr Watson’s views “were deeply offensive”.
He added: “They will succeed only in providing oxygen for the BNP.
“It is a shame that a man with a record of scientific distinction should see his work overshadowed by his own irrational prejudices.”
18 October, 2007 at 1:41 pm
(Reposting this because the first time it didn’t post the full text for some reason.)
“But the museum has cancelled the event, saying his views went “beyond the point of acceptable debate”.
Skills Minister David Lammy said Dr Watson’s views “were deeply offensive”.
He added: “They will succeed only in providing oxygen for the BNP.
“It is a shame that a man with a record of scientific distinction should see his work overshadowed by his own irrational prejudices.””
They supposedly believe in free speech, well unless it’s “unacceptable offensive free speech.” What utter nonsense.
David Lammy is a black politician, who has no right to judge a scientific pioneer such as Dr James Watson . Lammy’s job is to be a liar and a con artist. He’s not an intellectual nor a scientist, and does not value objective truth. Only what is personally and socially acceptable and useful to him. Lammy and the rest of the politically correct mob are the ones with irrational prejudices. For they have already decided what is “policy” regardless of the truth.
18 October, 2007 at 1:55 pm
Unfuckingbelievable. I hope intelligent scientific-minded people see the absurdity of treating such an integral person in our knowledge of DNA as if he were an idiot. Superior willpower ALWAYS wins, and if insanity has a stronger will, it defeats logic. That’s the lesson here.
18 October, 2007 at 2:06 pm
Watson’s view merely represents white logic. Each class has different logic- this is polylogism. Read about it here:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=polylogism&btnG=Google+Search
18 October, 2007 at 5:24 pm
They can’t even let the man speak. That’s outrageous.
18 October, 2007 at 5:27 pm
nobody objects ,if one says that blacks can run faster due to having a different metabolism. Conversly there must also be differences in the mental arena. Any school teacher, that ever had blacks to teach ,will attest to the fact that on average they are not as intelligent than whites. The Brits are hypocrates by making a fuss about this.
18 October, 2007 at 6:27 pm
I dont find it unbelievable at all, I find it quite typical. even the part where they say they do believe in free speach just so long as no one says anything they dont like, in so many words. If they had to debate this publicly they would be proven wrong, so all they can do is continue lying and not let anyone point out the obvious, and if they speak up anyway throw them in jail for ethnic intimidation or some bs.
18 October, 2007 at 11:49 pm
Mark says: “They supposedly believe in free speech; well, unless it’s “unacceptable, offensive free speech.”
In other words, they belive in [so-called] “free speech” so long as you agree with them. BUT THAT’S NOT FREE SPEECH!
One would have thought that in the Western World these issues were settled, at last, long ago. Obviously not. Are we heading for a new Dark Age?
19 October, 2007 at 5:34 am
Liberals don’t like to be confused with the truth.
19 October, 2007 at 8:32 am
Since racial facts are racist, then racial facts must be censored, so commands the ZOGs and kikenmedia.
19 October, 2007 at 9:51 am
Watson has been fired.
Note the last two paragraphs of the story. Those statements are absolutely false, and a large number of scientists know it. (Those statements are the PC dogma clamped down when the whole subject of genetic differences comes up.) But the newspaper reports ’em as fact. This does nothing but intimidate scientists – a chilling effect. It may get colder. Possibly Watson will be jailed, like David Irving; we’ll see.
In the meantime, who will stand for free thought and science? If they “make an example” of Watson, then why can’t we make an example of them? We’re not children, and they are not our parents. Some of them will have to eat lead before they grasp that.
20 October, 2007 at 3:40 pm
Apparently he’s back in the USA by now, just ahead of getting arrested by the thought police of the Equality Commission.
Now it seems he’s done a slick double take, and (à la Clinton) is no longer apologizing for the statement itself but only for “any offense it may have caused”
So does he now stand by his statement or doesn’t he?
Interesting to see too that the publicity-grabbing Mayor Lebenstein of London has intruded himself into the act. – On the side of Diversity, needless to say.
“In an article for The Independent yesterday, Dr Watson apologised for any offence he may have caused. He also said at the Royal Society that he was “bewildered” by the quotes attributed to him and that he had “no memory” of ever having made them – although he did not deny that he could have said them.
Ken Livingstone, the Mayor of London, attacked Dr Watson, saying that the comments were racist propaganda masquerading as scientific fact….”Such views are not welcome in a city like London, a diverse city whose very success demonstrates the racist and nonsensical nature of Dr Watson’s comments,” he said. ”
21 October, 2007 at 11:13 pm
Right, niggers made London successful. I believe that. Sure.
Livingstone is licking Jewish bum: he was the guy who recently got in trouble with The Chosen Race for comparing a jew reporter to a concentration camp guard. Among other frictions with kikes. The kikes don’t like him and have it out for him. So…spit on Dr. Watson, the co-discoverer of DNA. THAT’S the ticket, Ken!
There is a solution to the jewish problem.
21 October, 2007 at 11:23 pm
Sorry, forgot to include a link about “Red Ken” (an anti from way back, but not liked by kikes…probably “hideously white” in their beady eyes). HERE.