16 May, 2008

Homosexual Marriage is a “Civil Right” in CA

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", Big Fag, homosexual themes, Socrates at 12:02 am | Permanent Link

Civil rights” are phony and Jewish, but nonetheless they caused – or helped cause – the un-banning of queer marriage in California:


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 10/09/14 Queer Marriage: It Won’t Be Long Before It’s “Legitimate” in Every State 72% similar
  3. 04/29/15 U.S. Supreme Court Set to Rule on Homosexual Marriage in June 62% similar
  4. 05/14/14 Out-of-Control ‘Fag Marriage Steamroller’ is Crushing Every State in Its Path Like a Giant Lavender Rolling Pin 55% similar
  5. 05/07/07 Shaun Walker and “Civil Rights” Laws 55% similar
  6. 06/27/15 Fallout From Supreme Court Ruling on Queer Marriage + Diseases 54% similar
  7. 16 Responses to “Homosexual Marriage is a “Civil Right” in CA”

    1. Mike Quigley Says:

      This is one more contribution toward the genocide of our race.

    2. Mark Says:

      “”The California Supreme Court’s example is often emulated and it often is sort of a groundbreaker,” said David Cruz, a law professor at the University of Southern California and an expert in constitutional law.

      “In the 20th century California was the first state to strike down laws against inter-racial marriage. They did that 19 years before the US Supreme Court got around to it.””

      Any surprise here?

      I’m against homosexuality, however I see heterosexual interracialism as more of a threat. Allowing interracial marriage is much more destructive than some dykes getting matching pant suits.

    3. sgruber Says:

      When a jew speaks, flip his words to the opposite of what he says. Then you will have the truth.

      “Civil rights” = “Savage wrongs”

      “Free trade” = “Controlled market”

      “Tolerance” = “intolerance”


      Try it sometime. You will feel the eerie sensation of living in the world of the movie “They Live”: the sunglasses will be firmly on – and the blinders off.

    4. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      Very important article on VDARE re decline of LRC site:

      (From rockwell to crockwell)

      ‘Anthony Gregory complained on Lewrockwell.com that “decrying real racial oppression, especially in the form of imperialism, is sometimes considered ‘PC’” but that in reality Wright was a victim of conservative political correctness that refused to acknowledge “[t]he Founding Fathers were hypocrites. The US was the aggressor in the Mexican War. The European colonists were horrible to the Indians. Slavery was a great evil. Japanese Internment was a great evil…The criminal justice system is systematically unfair and oppressive.” ‘

      Whereas Rothbard once said that the litmus test

      “which can set up a clear dividing line between genuine conservatives and neoconservatives, and between paleolibertarians and what we can now call “left-libertarians”… is where one stands on “Doctor” King”,


    5. Hans Schneider Says:

      All we can hope for is , that nature with its tremendous capacity for coming up with the right solution, i.e. a a stronger more vicious and faster acting virus than regular aids

    6. Voir Dire Says:

      I’m sure few of you missed this from the home page of the jewish-owned yahoo and its’ endless devotion to the utter banality of all things meaningless and to keeping idiotic Americans distracted…It’s little “see the crowd go wild” caption is easier to stomach than watching Ellen’s all-white, female lunatics give her a standing ovation following her announcement she’s getting married.


      A sane female

    7. lawrence dennis Says:

      The way the judenpress covered this debacle of a court ruling tells you that the “victory” came long before judges sat down to decide. Jew journalists and jew lawyers long ago decided to destroy all that is good and holy in this world, and courts just now are getting around to ratifying the final act of degenerate destruction.

    8. sgruber Says:

      Most of these judges decided which side they were on at age 12, or even earlier. Expressing it requires the fullness of time merely.

      The time has come to get rid of the jews.

    9. Mark Richards Says:

      We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
      That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

      When the Legislature refuses to do the people’s business the people have no choice but to resort to the initiative process to secure the government of their choice. But when the Supreme Court overrides the people’s will, what recourse do they then have? According to Thomas Jefferson, it is just cause for Revolution.

      The initiative passed to define marriage as between one man and one woman was overturned by the California Supreme Court. The Court invoked patriotism and liberty, fairness and justice, as ordained by the Constitution. The venerable Constitution had laid down the rules for our nation, and not even the will of the people could overrule its instruction. The hands of the Court were tied, and the Constitution must prevail.

      But this is the same California Supreme Court that never saw a gun control law it didn’t like, in spite of the Second Amendment. It stood idly by when roadside sobriety checks and asset forfeiture violated the Fourth Amendment’s protection from unreasonable search and seizure. It said nothing when “hate crime” laws violated free speech and equality before the law. It was silent when fines and imprisonment that far exceeded the crime became cruel unusual punishment.

      But when immoral judges with perverse values are thwarted by the people, their reverence for the Constitution suddenly emerges. When they wish to inflict their perversions on us, the Constitution is a club; but when it could be used to derail their agenda it’s a limp dishrag.

      No anarchist or spy ever posed a greater threat to America that these liberal judges. Their obvious contempt for normal people and their dogged determination to force their views down everyone else’s throats is treasonous. We must heed the advice of Thomas Jefferson, and act upon right and our duty. We must throw of such government, and provide new safeguards for our future security.

      We could recall the judges, and we should. But then we should subject them to the historical punishment that traitors have always received. They should be brought before a tribunal of the people, and executed.


      Jewish ADL Welcomes California Supreme Court Decision In Support Of Same-Sex Marriage, as long as the new “couples” are White Gentiles……

    11. hdumpty Says:

      Could anyone give me a link to an authoritative article that discusses the ownership of the “The E.W. Scripps Co.” a.k.a. “Scripps Newspaper Group”? In particular, whether the ownership is jewish.

    12. hdumpty Says:

      P.S. I’m new to this site–is there a particular place to post questions such as my preceding one? Thank you.

    13. hdumpty Says:

      I may have answered my own question about Scripps. The names, bios, of everyone involved (with one exception–a financial officer who has a name that appears Jewish) seem very non-Jewish. The CEO before the company recently split was Ken Lowe, apparently a country boy from North Carolina. The company’s headquarters were in Knoxville, and are now in Cincinnatti. The company apparently own about 25 newspapers, according to Wiki. The founder seems non-Jewish.

      Apologies for the distraction, and the probable misplacement of these posts.

    14. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      Welcome- another escapee from That Other Site.

    15. ein Says:

      “The CEO before the company recently split was Ken Lowe”

      Lowe (loew or löwe) is of German origin, meaning “lion” in German. It is very frequently (if not usually) considered Jewish. With Jews, it (Löw/Lev) is a Germanized variant of Levi, Levine, Levinsky, Levitz, etc., also Loewen (Levine).
      This touches on is a very interesting Jewish peculiarity with names, those names called Kinnui (Kinnuim, pl) and it gets quite complicated.

      The names of Jacob’s twelve sons are often used as Jewish given names. This is the case of Judah (Yehuda), Nephtali, Issachar, and Benjamin. In the Bible (Genesis 49), Judah is compared to a lion. For this reason, the given name Lion [Löwe] is often used as an équivalent of Judah. It is called a kinnui of Judah. In written documents, the same man can sign either Judah or Lion[Loew]. Eventually, these given names became the family surnames LION, or LYON in France,and LOEWE in Germany.

      In the same way, Nephtali was compared to a doe in the Bible. Therefore, we have Cerf in French, Hirsch in German, and Zvi in Hebrew, which are kinnuim of Nephtali; and they later appear as the family names, CERF, HIRSCH, HERSCH, HERSCHEL.

      As Issachar was compared to a donkey (for sexual reasons), one would expect to find Donkey as a kinnui of Issachar. But the donkey, not being well thought of, has been replaced by a bear: So we have Dov in Hebrew, and Bär or Baer in German. The corresponding family names are BAER, BER, BERR, BEHR and BERNHARDT, being further gallicized in France into BERNARD.

      The kinnui of Benjamin is the wolf. In France, the corresponding word, loup, was sometimes modified into Louis, perhaps as a compliment to the kings. Thus, Jewish families bear the last names of LOUIS or LOUY, (or as with the French apostle of decadence, Pierre Louÿs, born in Belgium). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Lou%C3%BFs
      In Germany, the given name Wolf and the surnames of WOLF or WOLFF are very common among Jews.

      These four kinnuim are not the only ones. There are numerous other instances of equivalents between a biblical given name and a secular one, It must be borne in mind that names such as Bernhardt and Wolf are not restricted to Jews alone. Therefore, Löw(e) need not always be Jewish. Nor is its current bearer necessarily Jewish. However, the element of probably always plays a part. And so, combined with the noteworthy coincidence of newspaper ownership, it would seem highly likely that he is either a Jew or at least of Jewish origin.

    16. ein Says:

      PS. I meant to write (above) “the element of probability always plays a part.”
      (SpellCheck often does as much harm as it does good!)