27 November, 2008

Working from the Soviet Playbook

Posted by Socrates in "sex equality", 'hate' laws, communism, egalitarianism, jewed culture, jewed law, judeo-communism, Marxism, propaganda, Socrates, Soviet propaganda, Soviet Union, Western culture, William Pierce at 11:02 pm | Permanent Link

Westerners who push racial and sexual “equality” are pushing Soviet ideology. Literally.

It wasn’t until the third Soviet Constitution (1936) that the status of citizens was spelled out in detail. Granted, Soviet officials didn’t honor all of the promises made in the Soviet Constitution, e.g., freedom of speech.

Note especially Article 123, which is a hate-crime law.

Newbies, great men like Dr. William Luther Pierce rejected the idea of human equality as being nothing but Marxist propaganda. That is right. Indeed, humans can never be equal.

From the 1936 Soviet Constitution:

“ARTICLE 122. Women in the U.S.S.R. are accorded equal rights with men in all spheres of economic, state, cultural, social and political life. The possibility of exercising these rights is ensured to women by granting them an equal right with men to work, payment for work, rest and leisure, social insurance and education, and by state protection of the interests of mother and child, prematernity and maternity leave with full pay, and the provision of a wide network of maternity homes, nurseries and kindergartens.”

“ARTICLE 123. Equality of rights of citizens of the U.S.S.R., irrespective of their nationality or race, in all spheres of economic, state, cultural, social and political life, is an indefeasible law. Any direct or indirect restriction of the rights of, or, conversely, any establishment of direct or indirect privileges for, citizens on account of their race or nationality, as well as any advocacy of racial or national exclusiveness or hatred and contempt, is punishable by law.”

[Webpage].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 08/03/07 “The EU and the Globalist Alliance” 40% similar
  3. 10/04/15 The USA as Soviet-Like 36% similar
  4. 07/21/14 “Anti-Hate”: Cultural Marxism for the World 36% similar
  5. 08/29/15 America’s Illegal Recognition of the Soviet Union Led to the Destruction of Germany and the Enslavement of Half of Europe Behind the Iron Curtain 36% similar
  6. 04/25/14 Soviet-Style “Easy Divorce”: Killer of White Men 34% similar
  7. 19 Responses to “Working from the Soviet Playbook”

    1. ZipZap McGee Says:

      Oh, ho!! If y’all only knew. The Jews are not only trying to rebuild the USSR that Stalin expelled them from, but they’re also using the CLANDESTINE & SUBVERSIVE “world revolution” playbook to wreck/destabilize our society. Verily, though I’m not one to regularly quote Hitler — in this you CAN virtually scratch any pustule of societal decay and find the Jews. And interesting read, for example is Bella Dodd’s “School of Darkness” where she writes about Judeo-Commies in America trying to introduce “leveling” into our schools — in the 1930’s!

      They have used media and their institution infiltration to create a veritable “Matrix” for us. That is why I never shut up about getting that fucking TV out of your house. I don’t even want to hear that you need the TV “to keep track of what they’re doing”; let me introduce a spoiler: They’re coming to kill you and enslave your children. Anything else you need to know? Get rid of the TV just to set an EXAMPLE for the unawakened, so when they start their TV jabber at work you can belittle them for being “retards who watch TV.” Tell them of the dynamic, fun and useful things you did instead of waiting around to see if Jerry Seinfeld “did it” with Elaine.

    2. Zarathustra Says:

      But what about Jefferson’s phrase in the Constitution, “All Men are Created Equal” (I think Jefferson was paraphrasing Locke)? Equality is a totally impossible and unnatural concept (BTW, since “equal” modifies the verb “created”, shouldn’t it read “All Men are Created Equally”?).

      The Soviet Constitution “promised” a lot of nice things, but none of those promises were ever meant to be kept. Their Constitution was created more for propaganda purposes than for the purpose of law. Ironically (or is it a paradox?), Stalin became de-facto dictator of the USSR at the same time the Soviet Constitution was passed.

    3. Socrates Says:

      Zarathustra Says: “But what about Jefferson’s phrase in the Constitution, “All Men are Created Equal” (I think Jefferson was paraphrasing Locke)? Equality is a totally impossible and unnatural concept (BTW, since “equal” modifies the verb “created”, shouldn’t it read “All Men are Created Equally”?).”

      So what about Jefferson? He was referring to White men only.

      The Soviet Constitution wasn’t all propaganda. For example, women gained a lot of “equality.”

      You seem to have a soft spot for communism, a Jewish ideology that doesn’t even work. Why is that?

    4. Zarathustra Says:

      Because in “communist” societies there were no black ghettos, mestizo street gangs or uninsured people who were turned away from emergency rooms. I’m not saying we should live under a system like Bulgaria or North Korea, mind you. But East Germany and Tito’s Yugosalvia enjoyed high standards of living under their old Socialist systems. And they were almost totally WHITE (yes, there were a few Cuban, North Vietnamese and Ethiopian engineering and medical students in Karl Marx Stadt University and Lenin University).There are also more than a few White Russians or Great Russians today who pine for the glory days of the USSR.

      I do not want to white wash or romanticize anything, I just think we, as sentient, racially concious Whites, should think carefully about whom we go after and what battles we will fight.

    5. gw Says:

      “But what about Jefferson’s phrase in the Constitution, “All Men are Created Equal” ?”

      It depends what you consider to be “Men” (as he used the word). A Negro, back then, was rated as 3/5 of a man. And they were widely considered to be a different species altogether, close but not fully human.

      The word “Men”, obviously, did not apply to Negroes. Even free Negroes did not get the vote. This was an unabashedly white country, and intended to be so. Nobody denied it. Nobody was afraid of being called “racist” or anti-Such and such. They ALL were!

      As far as “Equal” goes, that term is so egregiously misinterpreted today! That little phrase has caused so much trouble. If only he could have known. It means only being equal LEGALLY, equal before the law — not meaning biologically equal as human beings. It meant one law for all, as opposed to Europe where there were separate laws (and penalties) for the nobility and others for the commoners. Nobles were tried only by their peers, and accodring to their own standards. Also there was a separate legal system for the clergy; they were under church law, and also tried only by their peers (who were notoriously lenient).

      And it meant that all “Men” started out in the same manner at birth, all in the same condition – naked, helpless, and screaming – without wealth, education, or social status. But after birth, all that changes very quickly.

      “(BTW, since “equal” modifies the verb “created”, shouldn’t it read “All Men are Created Equally”?). “

      No, because it is not an adverb (in this construction). It doesn’t modify the verb. It really means, “All men are created [to be] equal”, or in an equal condition. It’s like saying, “All men are created wise and strong” – not created wisely and strongly (which would be something else). It refers not to the act of creation, but to the condition of being.

    6. gw Says:

      “But what about Jefferson’s phrase in the Constitution, “All Men are Created Equal” ?”

      It depends what you consider to be “Men” (as he used the word). A Negro, back then, was rated as 3/5 of a man. And they were widely considered to be a different species altogether, close but not fully human.

      The word “Men”, obviously, did not apply to Negroes. Even free Negroes did not get the vote. This was an unabashedly white country, and intended to be so. Nobody denied it. Nobody was afraid of being called a “racist” or an anti-Something. They ALL were!

      As far as “Equal” goes, that term is so egregiously misinterpreted today! That little phrase has caused so much trouble. If only he could have known. It means only being equal LEGALLY, equal before the law — not meaning biologically equal as human beings. It meant one law for all, as opposed to Europe where there were separate laws (and penalties) for the nobility and others for the commoners. Nobles were tried only by their peers, and accodring to their own standards. Also there was a separate legal system for the clergy; they were under church law, and also tried only by their peers (who were notoriously lenient).

      And it meant that all “Men” started out in the same manner at birth, all in the same condition – naked, helpless, and screaming – without wealth, education, or social status. But after birth, all that changes very quickly.

      “(BTW, since “equal” modifies the verb “created”, shouldn’t it read “All Men are Created Equally”?). “

      No, because it is not an adverb (in this construction). It doesn’t modify the verb. Good question, though. It really means, “All men are created [to be] equal”, or in an equal condition. It’s like saying, “All men are created wise and strong” – not created wisely and strongly (which would mean something else). It refers not to the act of creation, but to the condition of being.

    7. Zarathustra Says:

      But do we really have equality before the Law here in the USA? The rich have access to bail money and a top-flight legal defense. The poor get public defenders (who are overworked and underpaid) and rot behind bars until their court date, which is often months away. For example, if Martha Stewart was poor and/or unknown, she would have been sent to a Federal Prison for 20 years for lying to Federal investigators about her complicity in that insider stock trading scandal.

      Jefferson had a first-class intellect, but he and the other Founding Fathers were not racially concious enough. They had more allegiance to their Class than their Race.

    8. Socrates Says:

      Zarathustra:

      People can’t get turned away from emergency rooms in the U.S. It’s against the law.

      Your other points are noted, however, keep in mind who was against Hitler’s Germany (i.e., communist countries). Let us not romanticize Marxists. Let us see them as they are/were.

    9. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      2. The East German Puzzle

      “Before the Second World War the East German economy had the signs of a blossoming landscape. At that time per capita national income amounted to 103 per cent of West Germany, compared to a mere 31 per cent in 1991. In the industrial sector labour productivity dropped from 91 per cent of the West German level in 1936 to merely 31 per cent in 1991. East Germany is a case of an economy that was relatively wealthy, but lost out in relatively short time.”

      http://www.ith.or.at/ith_e/kuczynski_prize_lectures_2007_e.htm

    10. Marwinsing Says:

      Well said ZipZap – kill your TV, toss it – pawn it to the enemy.

    11. Mark Says:

      “Any direct or indirect restriction of the rights of, or, conversely, any establishment of direct or indirect privileges for, citizens on account of their race or nationality, as well as any advocacy of racial or national exclusiveness or hatred and contempt, is punishable by law.”

      So we have it even worse, they didn’t allow privileges, we have institutionalized privileges for non-whites, women and Jews.

    12. Zarathustra Says:

      Shabbos, the German Democratic Republic (DDR) was not founded until late 1949, so what’s all this stuff about East Germany’s economy in 1936? Maybe you meant to say 1956?

      Yes, Socrates, the example of emergency room care was not the best I could think of on short notice, but my point was that these “bad guy” commie states had universal health and dental care, whereas we have tens of millions with no health insurance of any kind. And many of the uninsured are White.

      Cuba sends doctors and engineers to impoverished countries around the world; the USA sends mercinaries, stealth bombers and occupation troops. I know you are not defending the present System we are saddled with, but was there nothing that the Marxist states did that we could learn from or benefit from?

    13. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      “People with toothache are resorting to pulling their own teeth because they cannot find a NHS dentist, a study out today says.”

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1566241/Sufferers-pull-out-teeth-due-to-lack-of-dentists.html

      “The statistics of the industrial census of 1936 that I studied in Berlin-Lichterfelde are very extensive: distinguishing 300 industries and most provinces and Länder. After processing all the hand-written tables for the provinces and Länder, and adding up East and West, the census of 1936 provides a very good estimate of the two German economies before they were separated.” (from the link)

    14. Cpt. Candor Says:

      Zarathustra’s correct. The late Robert Frenz of FAEM encouraged his readers to “plough on the left side of the field as well as the right,” although I like Alex’s statement that “we are neither left NOR right” better, seeing as the whole left/right conflict currently serves as a major ZOG tool to keep the Masses of Asses blind and obedient.

      Indeed, “Communism” seems a MUCH better field in which to plant the seeds of Ethno-Nationalism than even the de-jewed variety of Capitalist “Democracy.” I’ve found the recent history of Viet Nam to be particularly instructive concerning this.

    15. Zoroaster Says:

      You seem to have a soft spot for communism, a Jewish ideology that doesn’t even work. Why is that?

      Anyone else hear the threatening tone of the Kommissar in this setup?

    16. Socrates Says:

      Cpt. Candor Says: “Indeed, “Communism” seems a MUCH better field in which to plant the seeds of Ethno-Nationalism than even the de-jewed variety of Capitalist “Democracy.” I’ve found the recent history of Viet Nam to be particularly instructive concerning this.”

      People who are attracted to communism are different than people who are attracted to nationalism. The former are emotional. The latter are logical. Granted, people who live in, say, Cuba, have no choice but to embrace communism – either that, or they go to jail.

    17. Cpt. Candor Says:

      Socrates said:
      “People who are attracted to communism are different than people who are attracted to nationalism. The former are emotional. The latter are logical. Granted, people who live in, say, Cuba, have no choice but to embrace communism – either that, or they go to jail.”

      Both logical and emotional types can be found in nearly all political camps, and the actual pracitce of “Communism” varies to a considerable degree, depending on who’s running the show and where. Again, with Viet Nam we were told that we were protecting a country from a bunch of evil, brainwashed scum who had mass-murder on the mind. Well wadda’ ya’ know, turns out we were actually setting half the country on fire while attempting to suppress something that could be considered a Nationalist Rebellion (some deluded vets I’ve talked to lament that the “Commies” were cruel to the various ethnic minorities, including the jew-like “Hoa” community of Chinese in Viet Nam) that got funding and questionable economic ideas from the Soviet Union.

      Hell, even as bad as North Korea supposedly is, it still remains one of the most ethnically and linguistically homogeneous countries in the world. As with Zara’s comments about former East Germany, Communism may not have been ideal, but when compared with the Runaway Capitalist “Democracy” that has largely replaced it, it may constitute a stepping-stone in the right direction.

    18. jim donaldson Says:

      I don’t careabout “communism” per se, the goal is homogeneous white states in NA, Europe, Russia, ANZ, etc, upholding white values like self-reliance, science, reason. I’ve no problem providing “free” health care–to other whites–so long as they pay for it through WORK later.

    19. gw Says:

      “Jefferson had a first-class intellect, but he and the other Founding Fathers were not racially concious enough. “

      They didn’t HAVE to be! It just wasn’t an issue back then. So very much was taken for granted. Too much. But blacks at that time had no place in American society except as property.

      As for Jefferson’s wording of the Declaration, he phrased it in flowery poetic terminology (which I think, seen in hindsight, is regrettable), rather than as a careful, precisely worded legal document. It has caused a lot of trouble and confusion in the world ever since — trouble that he surely never intended. He was quite clear about his racial views.

      “People can’t get turned away from emergency rooms in the U.S. It’s against the law.”
      Perhaps that’s now the case. It wasn’t always. I once stepped on an old plank in a vacant lot and a rusty spike went right through my foot. I went to the ER, and the first thing they wanted was to know how i was going to pay. That came before any treatment. It was pay or die! I had no job then and no money, and told them so. I was refused treatment and I left. Thank goodness, nothing came of it. I was just lucky.

      Even now, I have a medical plan for which I pay plenty, but there is no dental or eye care included. I don’t know of any plan which does offer those. When it comes to those, you’re on your own. The Jewish dentist up the street wanted to do a whole job on my mouth for $18,000. Finally, he came down to a bargain price of $8,000. which he made it sound like he was doing me a favor. I walked out! I had a broken tooth which I finally filed down at home with a shop file. Incidentally, where I live, you can’t find a dentist that isn’t a Jew. I think there is no such thing.

      “Cuba sends doctors and engineers to impoverished countries around the world; the USA sends mercinaries, stealth bombers and occupation troops. “

      They’re very shrewdly winning the propaganda war, while we’re very clumsily losing it.