26 October, 2009

Jerry Abbott, Re: Obama

Posted by Socrates in black behavior, black icons, black leaders, black pols, Jerry Abbott, Obama, Socrates at 10:56 am | Permanent Link

Abbott comments: [Here].


  • Similar posts:

    1. 12/02/10 Jerry Abbott on the AJC 222% similar
    2. 05/20/09 Jerry Abbott, Re: Marxism 177% similar
    3. 07/31/09 Where Jews are Strong, Others Lose Freedom 171% similar
    4. 10/09/08 Where Jews are Strong, Others Lose Freedom 169% similar
    5. 01/30/10 Is There Any Point in Trying to Help Haiti? 164% similar
    6. 52 Responses to “Jerry Abbott, Re: Obama”

      1. Tim McGreen Says:

        King Barry Obongo is just a carefully researched and marketed media creation. He is as hollow as a chocolate easter bunny.

      2. Adam Says:

        We are supposed to take solace from the fact that he lost the majority of the white vote, 55% to 45%. Yet it’s a measure of how far gone the country is that 45% of whites actually had enough confidence in this illegal alien nigger bullshit artist that they gave him the power of life and death over themselves, their husbands and wives, mothers and fathers, and their children.

        It’s entirely possible that Bush will prove to have been the last white male US President.

      3. Howdy Doody Says:

        It’s entirely possible that Bush will prove to have been the last white male US President.

        IMO TPTB that put twig in office knew he exactly what was/is and planned this out.

        The minute friends ask me who was going to win I told them and they refused to believe it.

        Palin was the icing on the cake, then I knew it was a done deal.

        They are showing US their teeth, and calling US hateful etc.

      4. Howdy Doody Says:

        It’s entirely possible that Bush will prove to have been the last white male US President.
        Un Quote

        IMO TPTB that put twig in office knew exactly what he was/is, and planned this out.

        The minute friends ask me in the summer of 2008 who was going to win I told them and they refused to believe it.

        Palin was the icing on the cake, then I knew it was a done deal.

        They are now showing US all their teeth, and calling US hateful etc.

      5. Tim McGreen Says:

        I’ll bet the majority of White people who voted for Barry Obongo are the same people who would never trust a Black surgeon to operate on them or to fly a plane they were riding in. Yet it’s OK with them to have a Black as their President.

        As crazy as they usually are, at least the Mohammedans in the Middle East had enough sense to realize that Obongo is a fake phony fraud who would just continue the policy of serving Big Jew. That’s more than most White people realized.

      6. Blackshirt Says:

        Most of the problem are the millions of White people in this country who still play by the system’s rules. What I specifically mean by this is that the millions I mentioned above feel it is their patriotic and moral duty to vote. They still haven’t figured out that both parties and candidates are are an elaborate show put on to fool them into thinking they (the masses) actually have the power to pick who rules them.

        Now, when ruminating about why 45% of the White vote went to Obama, does it cross your minds that most of the White vote in question was a vote AGAINST more Republican incompetence and military adventurism on behalf of Israel, rather than a stamp of approval for Obama? Let’s not forget how we got to this place. You could not have had the Obamanation of the current crop of Washington criminals without the stage being set by the former crop of Christard, Zionist, Conservative scumbags who got us into two unnecessary wars in the Middle East as well as giving free reign to the predatory Capitalism that ruined our economy. Yes, Obama is a dirty mulatto closet Social Marxist, but let’s not forget the asshole, rich, White fucks who ran the show for the Jews eight years before.

      7. Blackshirt Says:

        Howdy Doody Says:

        “It’s entirely possible that Bush will prove to have been the last white male US President.”

        The only thing White about Bush was his skin. His heart and mind were completely Jewish, and so it is with most Christard Conservative Americans who love the children of Zion and wish for the return of Jewsus. These wretched White Christards are far worse than any Jew. A Jew can’t help what he is, but a White person with “Jew think” is a vile creature indeed.

        Tom Metzger correctly points out that the enemy isn’t an individual Jew, but the cancer of Jew think. Anyone can catch the cancer of Jew think, it doesn’t matter how Aryan your genes are, if you THINK like a Jew you are a Jew!

        On a side note, Ivanka Trump, the beautiful daughter of Donald Trump and a woman blessed with perfect Aryan features just married a Yid and converted to their religion… think she has Jew think?

      8. Blackshirt Says:

        As an addendum to the above post, I will point out that Bill Clinton was often cited as “America’s first black president” because he loved him ‘sum negroes. I think ol’ Bill had a touch of “Nigger think”. LOL

      9. Adam Says:

        Blackshirt Says:

        Now, when ruminating about why 45% of the White vote went to Obama, does it cross your minds that most of the White vote in question was a vote AGAINST more Republican incompetence and military adventurism on behalf of Israel, rather than a stamp of approval for Obama?

        I wish it were the case that large numbers of whites understood that the wars are not “wars for oil”, but they don’t. That meme has really caught on, in spite of its obvious falsity. The percentage that blame Israel and Jews for our problems is tiny.

        Although I’m sure more than a few voted against McLoser, or expressed their racial self hatred of the irredeemably white Sarah Palin, by cynically casting their votes for the nigger, that’s still not very encouraging. Anybody who hasn’t figured out the game is rigged, or that a nigger would be any kind of improvement over anything, can’t be too bright.

        I can’t prove it, but my suspicion is that most of the whites who voted for the Kenyan imposter did so because they loved him, and for the euphoric feeling of moral superiority they got from it. They were so proud that they were not “racists”, whom they have been trained to think of as a lower order of humanity. They wanted to do something — anything! — to prove to everyone once and for all they were hep, intelligent, and cool enough to help elect America’s first nigger President. What a bunch of fucken idiots.

        http://camelsnose.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/palin-c-nt1.jpg
        http://images.chron.com/blogs/txpotomac/Obama%20fans%20WI.jpg

      10. Tim McGreen Says:

        Could it be that a lot of Whites voted for Obongo just for the sheer novelty of having a colored President?
        ……………………………………………………………………………

        { Blackshirt Says:

        27 October, 2009 at 2:06 am

        As an addendum to the above post, I will point out that Bill Clinton was often cited as “America’s first black president” because he loved him ’sum negroes. I think ol’ Bill had a touch of “Nigger think”. LOL}

        Slick Willie has more than just a touch of Nigger Think. He’s probably an octoroon. His daughter certainly displays some mildly Negroid characteristics.

      11. Doug Says:

        Tim, I doubt Bill Clinton has any nigger genes in him. Chelsea got her looks from her mom, and if you’ve seen that photo of Hillary’s (jewish looking?) parents, it’s clear where those looks came from. Hillary’s father has the same look as Chuck Schumer. Here: http://www.fiveanddime.net/hillary-clinton-for-president-in-2008/hillarys-family.jpg

      12. Ein Says:

        “It’s entirely possible that Bush will prove to have been the last white male US President.”

        And he was responsible for what came after.

      13. Ein Says:

        Yes, I saw that news item about Miss Trump converting to Judaism. So now the Trump money will go into the tribe. They manage to get it one, way o another. I thought I had read that The Donald was not especially fond of Jews. I wonder what he thinks about this?

        As for Chelsea, I don’t know which parent it comes from (probably the Arkansas side) but I’ve ALWAYS thought there was something a bit negroid there. Now that she’s “all growed up”, she’s got her hair de-kinked and maybe some discrete surgery, so it’s not so obvious anymore. BTW, isn’t she scheduled to marry some Jew too? I think I read that somewhere.

        And that photo! Oh, definitely. But was that Hillary’s step-father? I seem to recall, when she was campaigning for the Jewish vote, that the news was opportunely slipped out that her step-father or grandfather was Jewish.

      14. Joe McGee Says:

        Always great to hear Jerry’s take on the state of affairs, and, as usual, he is dead on the mark. Great article Jerry and thanks to Socrates for posting it.

      15. Justin Huber Says:

        I always like Blackshirt’s posts. I was also disturbed to see Trump’s very Aryan looking daughter marrying a kike. I say “Aryan looking” because I don’t know everything about her background, although she appears to be one of us. I wasn’t aware that she also converted to Judaism. Barf! Of course, her old man behaves like a Jew so I’m not surprised that she married a Yid.

      16. Justin Huber Says:

        Oops. By “old man”, I mean her father-The Donald.

      17. Ein Says:

        And I always like Justin’s posts! They are too rare. As for the Trumps, some time ago I saw some dark grumbling about them on the Judicial site, where the truth is generally the reverse of whatever they say. So that rumor has proven worthless. The clincher is when the article stated that she “converted” to Judiasm. So she was one of ours after all.

        But not now. Sad.

        I believe I’ve read that the Trumps are of Dutch descent. I can’t guarantee that.

      18. Blackshirt Says:

        Tim said:

        “I’ll bet the majority of White people who voted for Barry Obongo are the same people who would never trust a Black surgeon to operate on them or to fly a plane they were riding in. Yet it’s OK with them to have a Black as their President.”

        You are probably right on that. I’d also like to add that the fact that Obama is half-White also worked in his favor. It is interesting to me that Obama is referred to and considered by most to be a “black” man, when in reality he is a mongrel. Not saying that that is any better than your run of the mill bluelip, but on the average Joe and Jill sixpack find mulattoes more acceptable in the workplace, politics, etc. than a Wesley Snipes, coal-black, congoid. I suspect that Obama wouldn’t have gotten the level of support he did from the VOTING White public if he looked more like the dried prune of a father of his.

      19. Blackshirt Says:

        Thanks, Justin for what you said about my posts. I agree with Ein that your posts are too rare… you should come out and play some more! Of course McWeenie will accuse you of being a “sock puppet” if you agree with me or Tim, but don’t let that stop you.

        Now about Trump, I don’t know much about his family, although I know Ivanka’s mom is Ivana, and she was originally from Czechslovakia. I think she is still quite beautiful even though she is older. Contrary to what the Nordicists say there is great racial stock in Eastern Europe and I personally think Slavic women are the most beautiful in the world. Spend some time in Eastern Europe and you’ll see what I’m talking about. But back to Trump’s daughter- I think she got her looks from her mother.

      20. Donald E. Pauly Says:

        VNN readers have rushed to judgement about Sambo. I voted for him because he will collapse the U.S. Government and initiate a civil war quicker than would have Juan McCain. It also served to show Juan what I think of him.

        I believe in Terrible Tommies famous Five Words:

        “Worse is better for now.”

        Sambo is the only politician whom I have voted for who has delivered in spades. (No pun intendended)

      21. Adam Says:

        Blackshirt Says:

        Tom Metzger correctly points out that the enemy isn’t an individual Jew, but the cancer of Jew think. Anyone can catch the cancer of Jew think, it doesn’t matter how Aryan your genes are, if you THINK like a Jew you are a Jew!

        Metzger doesn’t have a grasp of biology. It would make as much sense, and as little, to say that thinking like a nigger makes you a nigger, or that thinking like a Jap makes you a Jap. Whatever truth there is in statements like these is strictly metaphorical.

        Race is a biological concept that applies to the real world, and we ignore it or try to dispense with it at our peril. Remember, it’s ANTI-racists who think that race is only a social construct.

      22. Tom McReen Says:

        “You could not have had the Obamanation of the current crop of Washington criminals without the stage being set by the former crop of Christard, Zionist, Conservative scumbags who got us into two unnecessary wars in the Middle East”

        Jewish zionist neo-con scumbags.

        “as well as giving free reign to the predatory Capitalism that ruined our economy.”

        Capitalism? And it’s predatory jews.

        “but let’s not forget the asshole, rich, White fucks who ran the show for the Jews eight years before.”

        How could we with you here to remind us constantly, comrade?

      23. Blackshirt Says:

        McReen, why does it bother you so much that I point out the traitors amongst our own people? Why do you get your panties in a bind whenever I mention the evils of Capitalism? Are you trying to tell me the engines of Capitalist markets around the world are solely run by Jews? Why do you try to deflect attention from the White people who COLLABORATE with the Jews within the whole ZOG system?

        Why McReen? Why can’t you answer me instead of dissecting what I say and trying to find fault with it (95% of your posts are attacks on me and what I say)? I suspect that you and/or your group of trolls have a vested interest in keeping White racists from focusing attention on those who collaborate. I also think your mission is to keep everyone in the racial struggle from adopting newer and productive tactics. That is why you are so vehemently opposed to any change in the ruinous tactics of the past 60+ years.

        You know McReen, you never answered my question about Jewsus. How can you worship a Jew and a Jewish god and claim to hate Jews? It’s so hypocritical. And then you come on here and try to insinuate that I’m a Marxist, Jew, Satanist, etc. when you bow your knees to a JEW!

      24. Tim McGreen Says:

        How can any racially concious White person possibly defend Capitalism???? It’s a Jewish swindle, a Jewish con-game. Look at the financial mess the world is in right now. It’s strictly the result of unregulated, unbridled Capitalism. Then look at those responsible for it. They have names like Reuben, Sommers, Greenspan, Paulson and Geithner. Our White ancestors did NOT live in Capitalist societies, they lived in communal and agrarian ones. Capitalism is the Jewish dictatorship of money. We live at the mercy of Wall Street and the Fed.

        Any White person who thinks our salvation lies in the US Constitution, the Bible and Capitalism is no friend of the White Struggle. He is the enemy and his online name is Tom McReen.

      25. Blackshirt Says:

        One clarification here, when I say I hate “Capitalism”, I don’t mean I’m against Free Enterprise. Those are two different things.

        In response to Adam, I would also like to clarify that I agree with what you said in regards to the biological nature of Race. Of course I believe in the biological nature of Race or I would not be on this website and profess to believe in the best interests of the White Race. The point I was trying to make with my post, and the point that I believe Metzger was trying to make is that just because you have a certain genetic profile, you are not destined for anything. I believe in the overall racial superiority of the White, European race, but I can’t deny that there are groups of defective Whites who probably should never have been born. This is just plain reality and anyone who says someone is destined for superiority just by the nature of being born with European features is not accepting the reality of the existence of defectives in our population. I personally think when I see a beautiful White woman with a nigger that she is mentally defective and therefore her genes are not valuable. I don’t care how Aryan she looks, there is something defective in her brain and there is a chance that any children she were to have with a White man in the future would possess her defects. In my opinion you cannot create a racial society without Eugenics.

        Adam, the point I am making is that there is a defective streak that runs through the White populations of the world, and this defective streak exists in a segment of our people because we have abandoned Eugenics. Now, you mention “social constructs”. Well, the social environment does affect our people to an extent, especially with Whites who possess the defective streak. It is my view that these Whites don’t possess valuable genetic heritage because of their defects. So getting back to the point of the post you responded to, if a White person has “Jew think” they might as well not be White at all. I am not one of these people who think all White people are valuable, although this view seems to exist in the more conservative realm. When I see a wigger, I don’t see someone with a valuable genetic heritage to pass on. True, if that person would have children and those children were brought up in a White environment they MAY seem to be healthy mentally and physically, but I personally think the defect still exists somewhere in their DNA. The reason I feel this way is the result of my personal experience. I have known White people who grew up with non-racially aware families and surrounded by non-whites who became dedicated White racists, while others who grew up in similar situations became wiggers. How can you explain this sort of outcome? I explain it by attributing the healthy White racial instincts to something innate within a person’s mind and DNA that led them down the path to racial awareness.

        With all of that said, I don’t have all the answers, and I don’t even think the world’s scientists can truly answer or predict how much our DNA or racial heritage plays a part in what we become as adults. All I can do is draw conclusions from personal experience and from what is happening in the world around me. I hope I have explained myself, Adam. It’s the old nature vs. nurture argument. I think it is a great mistake that some White racists make when they ascribe everything to nature and not to take stock in how nurturing can bring out the defects in some of our gene pool.

      26. Adam Says:

        …if a White person has “Jew think” they might as well not be White at all.

        Certainly. But they are still not Jews. Similarly, a nigger can’t become white merely by thinking white thoughts, whatever that might mean. Race is a biological distinction residing in objective reality, independent of thinking or feeling.

        It’s the old nature vs. nurture argument. I think it is a great mistake that some White racists make when they ascribe everything to nature and not to take stock in how nurturing can bring out the defects in some of our gene pool.

        Nature sets an upper bound on what we can become, and nuture determines how far we realize those potentialities. For example, like a kernel of a “superior” strain of corn germinated and then kept in total darkness could never fulfill its full potential, someone who had the genetic potential to be a great genius, if raised in a very poor environment, might never fulfill that promise. But is that failure to achieve full potential a “defect” in such a person’s DNA, remediable through eugenics? I don’t know that I would rush to such a conclusion.

        Another problem with eugenics from the white racist point of view is that it destroys what it claims it wants to conserve. For instance, how far could the white genome be modified until the resulting product didn’t merit inclusion in the white race? Using genetic engineering technologies, it will shortly — certainly within 50 years, and probably much less — be possible to change such things as skin color, texture of hair, eye color, and body structure, along with modifying IQ and personality characteristics. In such an environment, the usual markers of race will become unreliable; human races will for all intents and purposes cease to exist.

      27. Justin Huber Says:

        Here’s another nature vs. nurture anomaly. I live in a small town in Michigan that is probably 98% white. Why is it when I go to the bar on Saturday night I see a large number of wiggers? In addition to this, why is the DJ playing black rap music half of the time? Very discouraging if one thinks about it. I’m not even going to mention how the white women react to the rap music.

      28. Z.O.G. Says:

        Small towns in America are always like that.

      29. Donald E. Pauly Says:

        Blackshirt hit the nail on the head:

        “I personally think when I see a beautiful White woman with a nigger that she is mentally defective and therefore her genes are not valuable. I don’t care how Aryan she looks, there is something defective in her brain and there is a chance that any children she were to have with a White man in the future would possess her defects. In my opinion you cannot create a racial society without Eugenics. ”

        Negroes and Negresses do the White race a great favor by searching out the mud sharks. We Rastafarians will send them back to Africa with the Negroes that they love.

      30. Tim McGreen Says:

        Generally speaking, the only racially conscious White people are to be found in racially mixed areas, like towns next to military bases or the older suburbs of major cities. You’ll see and hear lots of racially-based hostility in places like those! But in all-White communities, the residents have the luxury of being liberal and “tolerant”, since there aren’t any coloreds around to put their “enlightened” beliefs to the test. The people in those all-White towns may love their Black and Brown brothers, but they make damn sure that no “low income housing “or “affordable housing” is ever built anywhere near them.

      31. Ein Says:

        How very true! Yes, the most “tolerant” people are invariably those who have the luxury of not having anyone around to tolerate!

        Strangely, the clear irony of this never seems to strike them.

      32. Donald E. Pauly Says:

        Ein has been nominated for the new Birdman Memorial Quote of the Day for the above, see http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=102852

      33. Ein Says:

        Thank you! I’m highly flattered. But the real credit belongs to Tim, who inspired my comment. He said:

        “in all-White communities, the residents have the luxury of being liberal and “tolerant”, since there aren’t any coloreds around …
        The people in those all-White towns may love their Black and Brown brothers, but they make damn sure that no “low income housing “or “affordable housing” is ever built anywhere near them.”

        I don’t think he could have said it more perfectly. Yes, tolerance is truly a “luxury” — one that is reserved exclusively for the rich. When will people see that? If you’re less than very rich, you can’t afford to be tolerant. You can’t afford to be tolerant any more than you can afford to buy a yacht. It’s beyond your means.

      34. Ein Says:

        Tolerance is simply a way of showing off. It’s — in a sense — a form of conspicuous consumption. That is, it’s a way of flaunting your wealth and status to others and showing that you can afford it.

        And it’s a form of social one-upmanship. It’s a way of saying that… “I’m more compassionate than thou” — as long as it doesn’t cost you anything. Heaven forbid if you had to give up something in the process. (But it’s alright if others do.)

      35. The Red Skull Says:

        The Definition of a Liberal=Someone who expects others to live by AND pay for the Liberals ideals,without having to live up to or pay for their ideals themselves.

      36. Tim McGreen Says:

        Herr Ein, apparently it’s my lot in life never to get ANY credit for ANYTHING I write, but I am glad you were gracious enough to give me credit for the quote you made that Herr Pauly and Linder have rightly praised you for. I guess I’m just one of those prophets without any honor in his own country, eh?

      37. Ein Says:

        Fear not, Tim. True quality does not go unnoticed. You’re more appreciated than you realize, even when no further comments are made.

        That word, “luxury” is what intrigued me. It is precisely the right term. It’s the key to unlocking the puzzle, the key understanding the “rich liberal” mentality. Years ago, when studying economics, I read Thorstein Veblen’s works exploring the concept of “conspicuous consumption” (I believe he invented the term). These were written a century ago, at the height of the Golden Era of the very rich — the “Gilded Age”. His insights (which apparently never occurred to anyone before) were brilliant — very ordinary things we take for granted and no one ever thought about.

        “People, rich and poor alike, attempt to impress others and seek to gain advantage through what Veblen coined “conspicuous consumption” and the ability to engage in “conspicuous leisure.” Veblen argued that consumption is used as a way to gain and signal status. Through “conspicuous consumption” came “conspicuous waste” –Wiki

        For example, why was it the fashion [and still is] for the rich to wear all white to outdoor sporting events like polo matches and tennis games, where they were likely to get smeared with grass stains and mud? Answer: Because, in a time before washing machines, electricity, and modern detergent, when laundry was all done laboriously by hand, it required a whole team of laundresses toiling over wash tubs and scrub boards and boiling pots of water to keep those clothes looking fresh and white. Darker clothes would have concealed the grass stains and sweat, and would have seemed more sensible, but that would have been “cheating”! The whole point (of white clothes) would have been missed. On the other hand, crisp white clothes — before “wash and wear” and modern bleach were ever heard of — were a way of proclaiming to all the world that you had a army of servants at your disposal. Without having to say a word, it was a way of showing off. Something like wearing diamonds and furs — before fakes were invented, and few people had them.

        As industrialization and mass production advanced, coupled with electrical appliances, the possession (and thus the conspicuous waste) of mere goods and of human labor became a less flamboyant symbol of status. As the 20th century moved on, something more was needed. Thorsten Veblen died (1929) before that new replacement became apparent. It became clear after WW2.

        Nowadays, clean, bleached white clothes don’t mean very much anymore. Anyone can have them, and you don’t need a team of laundresses and valets keeping your wardrobe ironed, crisp and white. And costume jewelry and excellent fakes became available to everyone, so jewels don’t mean that much anymore either. Anybody can wear them and only an expert would know the difference. In fact (as a reaction to Woolworth’s), jewelry became unfashionable with the very upper class who showed their contempt by wearing minimal ornamentation, while too much jewelry came to be considered low class, vulgar, and trashy. And furs are currently very politically incorrect among the “enlightened”. So the very rich have had to find some other way of flaunting their indifference to the petty problems that bedevil the rest of us ordinary souls. They discovered “civil rights”.

        By backing minority causes and flaunting their conspicuous tolerance (instead of conspicuous consumption), they can appear gracious and benevolent, demonstrate their moral superiority above others, and simultaneously show us that they don’t have to jostle and compete in the workplace or in the line at the checkout counter … the way mere commoners do.

        If they’re in politics or business, they can further profit by winning the burgeoning mass of minority votes and/or fat government contracts. And they’re applauded by the media and all “the people who count” for their benevolence. For them, it’s all a win-win situation. While they reap all the credit for their enlightened social concern, their generosity costs them NOTHING, as they can pass the bill down to the common man and let him pay it. It’s the Ordinary Joe who will, in the long, run have to pay when he’s passed over for a promotion at the plant, in favor of Tyrone, or his son is denied a scholarship in favor of Tyrone’s son. Or, heaven forbid, his daughter is raped or seduced by Tyrone’s son, and she brings home a little picanniny for mommy and daddy to have to raise.

        And Winston Megabucks wonders why Joe is a bigot!

        Just what is wrong with “those people” anyway? Can’t those ignorant rednecks see the benefits of Diversity? The market is up, benefits and bonuses are soaring. When everything is going so beautifully, what is their problem?

        I could have mentioned Winston’s neighbor, Hyman Sapirstein. But unlike Winston, Hyman isn’t puzzled. He doesn’t wonder why. He quietly knows the score.

      38. Howdy Doody Says:

        And Winston Megabucks wonders why Joe is a bigot!

        Just what is wrong with “those people” anyway? Can’t those ignorant rednecks see the benefits of Diversity? The market is up, benefits and bonuses are soaring. When everything is going so beautifully, what is their problem?

        I could have mentioned Winston’s neighbor, Hyman Sapirstein. But unlike Winston, Hyman isn’t puzzled. He doesn’t wonder why. He quietly knows the score.

        Un-Quote, and thank you.

        ==========================================

        When I read the latest NKVD poll reports that only 22% of people know that jooos control media from 50% in 1964 the year one of our top three criminal presidents was elected by that jooish media regime, its hard not to be bewildered.

      39. Tom McReen Says:

        “Any White person who thinks our salvation lies in the US Constitution, the Bible and Capitalism is no friend of the White Struggle. He is the enemy and his online name is Tom McReen.”

        You lie like a jew, marxist troll. Do we have your permission to mention the holohoax yet?

        How many sock puppets now? – ‘They’re at it again, ma!; Old Dutch’s sidekick; LOL, Parrot’ – way to prove you’re serious about being here with your lame parody name.

      40. Tom McReen Says:

        “I guess I’m just one of those prophets without any honor in his own country, eh?”

        (spits over monitor in disbelief at delusions of grandeur)

      41. Tim McGreen Says:

        Tom, I shall not give you permission to discuss the Shoah, as you are incapable of doing so in a mature, responsible manner. You contribute nothing of substance to the discussion, only some poorly expressed broadsides against me. I’m afraid you’ll have to do much better than that if your intention is to leave me nonplussed.
        …………………………………………………………………….

        [(spits over monitor in disbelief at delusions of grandeur)]

        Spits over monitor? In disbelief? What did I just get through telling you about poorly-expressed broadsides?

      42. Z.O.G. Says:

        Get the hell out of here, you old queen hippie burnout.

      43. Tim McGreen Says:

        I wasn’t addressing you, ZOG, you little borderline ‘tard. Go pick the nits out of your hair. Or maybe you can ask Uncle Tom McReen to help you.

      44. Tim McGreen Says:

        ZOG, you name the time and place and I will pound your fucking stupid-looking face into the goddamn pavement. If you don’t name a time and place, then you are just a pussy, which is something I already figured out, anyway.

        C’mon, faggot, I’m waiting.

      45. Z.O.G. Says:

        Uh-oh, now the old queen hippie burnout has suddenly morphed into a Hollywood tough guy.

        Good stuff. :-D

      46. Tim McGreen Says:

        {Z.O.G. Says:

        31 October, 2009 at 5:36 pm

        Uh-oh, now the old queen hippie burnout has suddenly morphed into a Hollywood tough guy.

        Good stuff. :-D}

        I’m really glad you’re so entertained by my words, you creepy little faggot, because I’m fucking serious. Come on out from behind your mother’s skirts so I can beat the shit out of you, you stupid, cowardly shit. Let’s see how entertained you are with a few teeth missing, douchebag.

        :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

      47. Tim McGreen Says:

        I’ll be civil to everyone else here, even McReen, but you are just a fucking waste of space, ZOG. Even your moniker is stupid. I’m no Hollywood tough guy, I’ve just had it with your faggy little snippy remarks. I post on this site to discuss racially-related issues. Apparently, you’re just here to be an obnoxious little asshole. I guess you’ve got a tiny 3″ hard-on for me, so come on out into the open, faggot, and we’ll see who’s the real tough guy.

        I mean it, ZOG. Come on out from behind Mommy’s skirt. She can’t protect your sorry ass forever.

      48. Z.O.G. Says:

        Hey, I thought hippies were supposed to be gentle and friendly? What gives?

        :-)

      49. Christy Says:

        Definition of a Socialist:

        Someone who believes she is entitled to the fruits of another’s labour for sitting on her ass!

      50. Tim McGreen Says:

        Definition of a Capitalist:

        Someone who believes in the Jewish dictatorship of money.

        or

        Someone who thinks the wealthiest 3% of the populatuion is entitled to own 80% of all the wealth.

        or

        Someone who wants to send your job to a slave-labor country like China and leave you with nothing but debt and bankruptcy.

        Get it?

      51. Tom McReen Says:

        Definition of a socialist:

        Someone who believes in jewish dictatorship.

      52. David Baker Says:

        Here’s some Obama jokes.

        Obama was pitching platitudes to a crowd of people on the Whitehouse lawn, when a young boy suddenly proclaimed: “Look momma, the clothes have no Emperor!”

        Obama was fielding inquiries about his birthplace, when a man stepped up to the microphone and addressed the president: “Sir, you are from Kenya, I can tell.” Obama struck a pose of indignance, and asked the gentleman to explain his remarks. “Mr. President, your limousine has remained in stock condition. Any American black would have had that ride ‘Pimped Out’ by now!”

      Leave a Reply

      You may use the following HTML tags in your comments.

      <a abbr acronym b blockquote cite code del em i q strike strong>