28 January, 2010

The Jewing of Language, Part II

Posted by Socrates in homosexual themes, homosexuals, jewed culture, jewed language, jewish authors, propaganda, Socrates at 5:31 pm | Permanent Link

Here’s a good example: the word “gay” as a euphemism for “homosexual”:

[Article].

More about “Miss Furr and Miss Skeene” and “gay”: [Here].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 07/29/13 Even the Pope Thinks Queers Are Equal 100% similar
  3. 06/19/18 Britain: Royal Fag Weddings These Days 77% similar
  4. 06/26/18 “The White Racial Movement and Gays” 44% similar
  5. 08/19/09 The Culture of Deceit, Part II 42% similar
  6. 04/12/08 Deconstructionism: the Jewing of Language 42% similar
  7. 20 Responses to “The Jewing of Language, Part II”

    1. Nordlander Says:

      So it was Jew Gertrude Stein who invented the propaganda word “gay”. No surprise there.

      From the second link:

      “Miss Furr and Miss Skeene”–referring to Ethel Mars and Maud Squire, respectively–was written between 1909 and 1911, but wasn’t published until 1922 in Geography and Plays. The piece reached the general public as a reprint in the July 1923 issue of Vanity Fair, where it was subtitled “Ladies who were gay together and how one left the other behind.” It was also reprinted in Carl Van Vechten’s Selected Writings of Gertrude Stein (1946). In a work of relatively few words, Stein managed to use the words “gay” and “gayer,” along with (to a lesser extent) “cultivated” and “cultivating,” in almost every sentence.

      And the media Jews pick it up and use it over and over until the goyim start parroting it like mindless lemmings.

    2. Nordlander Says:

      A related jewing of debate is the meme that homosexuals are “denied the right to marry.” Sounds like a right everyone should have, right? If you give it to normals, you can’t take it away from the abnormals, right? But in fact, it hasn’t been taken away from them. Homosexuals – unfortunately – have the same rights as everyone else. They are allowed to marry, just like the normals. They are just not allowed to marry someone of the same sex, and the same rule applies to the normals. But this is something the media will never mention.

    3. lawrence dennis Says:

      A kike is a kike is a kike.

    4. virgil Says:

      they also stole the rainbow and the colour purple. the arrogance of organized faggotry is unacceptable. smash fagism!

    5. Tim McGreen Says:

      I have been giving liberals too much credit lately…Actually, they’re kind of stupid and lazy, even more so, sometimes, than right-wingers. Does the average politically-correct Leftie even know why the word “gay” is used to refer to a homo? Probably not, because liberals don’t like thinking very much. They prefer using cliches and hackneyed phrases, like “turning back the clock”, “same sex marriage”, “global warming”, “a woman’s right to choose” and so on. Liberals are more uptight than Kahnservatives are when it comes to freedom of speech or expression. All those “progressives” are actually advocates for Orwellian Thought Control.

    6. Tim McGreen Says:

      And the Libs are more obsessed with the issue of Race than any Nazi or Klansman ever was. Yet the Libs keep whining that we need a “color blind” society. What a bunch of whiny, immature assholes.

    7. Kuda Bux Says:

      A nose is a nose is a nose.

    8. Doug Says:

      Jews/liberals claim that race doesn’t matter, that we’re equal… so W=B=J=L. Then why do they care if we choose W every time? They’re equal! Why do they care about groups, when in their other argument they claim we’re identical? That’s one paradox to use against them.

    9. tbow002 Says:

      Jews/Liberals claim to be all for diversity, yet their agenda is actually the opposite and will destroy all diversity by mixing everyone together.

    10. Tim McGreen Says:

      Liberals do not want any diversity, just blind obedience and submission to their authority.

    11. Henry Says:

      “their agenda is actually the opposite [of diversity] and will destroy all diversity by mixing everyone together.”

      Right. If given their way, they will establish uniform mud-ism, everywhere. It will mean the extinction of all differences.
      All the while, babbling about “diversity”, of course. They’re total hypocrites.

      I mean their Jewish leaders are hypocrites, that is. The obdeient, cud-chewing herd of followers just haven’t taken the trouble to think their ideology all the way through to the end result. Universal mudism!

    12. Fred Says:

      This is the same as the use of the term ghetto to refer to a slum. The word “ghetto” means where the jews live just as parish means where the catholics live. So when someone recounts the horrors of living in the Krakow ghetto the average person gets a mental image of modern american slums, and everyone knows neighborhoods don’t deteriorate on their own they literally have help through neglect and indifference.

      Here in Detroit in passing conversation when someone refers to the “ghetto” I always say “Ghetto?? There are no jews living there that is a slum”.

    13. Igor Alexander Says:

      Hey, my post made it on the frontpage!

    14. Igor Alexander Says:

      “A related jewing of debate is the meme that homosexuals are ‘denied the right to marry.’ Sounds like a right everyone should have, right?”

      My stock response to that assertion is that marriage is a privilege, not a right; a privilege reserved for people who are biologically capable of having children together, i.e., a man and a woman. The primary purpose of marriage, I say, is not to recognize the love between two individuals, but to provide a stable family and homelife for children to be raised in.

      To dispute this seems as futile as disputing 2+2=4, and yet people do dispute it, many of them not even queer. At this point I think the average goy is so out of touch with basic reality that he’s going to have to rest his hand on the hot burner before he acknowledges that there’s a good reason not to do that. That’s how far downhill we’ve come.

    15. Igor Alexander Says:

      Make that “home life”; I guess “homelife” isn’t a word.

    16. Igor Alexander Says:

      “They are just not allowed to marry someone of the same sex, and the same rule applies to the normals. But this is something the media will never mention.”

      Another approach I like to take is to say that I don’t think homosexual marriage is going far enough; if homosexuals are allowed to marry each other, I think we should also allow pedophiles to marry children, animal lovers to marry their pets, and necrophiles to marry corpses. There’s also no reason not to allow polygamy. Hey, as long as it’s consentual and the participants truly love each other, what’s there to object to? Only a bigot would disapprove.

    17. Igor Alexander Says:

      “And the Libs are more obsessed with the issue of Race than any Nazi or Klansman ever was.”

      Funny thing is, white liberals are far more contemptuous towards non-whites, and hence by their own definition, “racist,” than any White Nationalist who simply wants racial seperation and to stop footing the bill for aid to non-white nations that will never give anything but grief in return. The inferiority of non-whites is implicitly assumed by every liberal who supports affirmative action or who says that the key to helping non-whites is to remove them from their native culture. To say that blacks would be less violent if they were removed from black societies and raised by whites is an admission on the speaker’s part that white culture is superior to black culture.

      I can’t for the life of me understand why liberals opposed colonialism, because trying to turn non-whites into white people is exactly what the liberals dream of doing, just as the colonialists tried to do.

    18. Igor Alexander Says:

      “Why do they care about groups, when in their other argument they claim we’re identical? That’s one paradox to use against them.”

      “There is only one race and that’s the human race” and “there is no such thing as race”; yet oddly, there seems to be no ambiguity in defining the races when it comes to fleecing whitey.

    19. Ein Says:

      Fred Says: “This is the same as the use of the term ghetto to refer to a slum. The word “ghetto” means where the jews … So when someone recounts the horrors of living in the Krakow ghetto the average person gets a mental image of modern american slums.”
      ………………………………

      The mis-use of that word is something that really bugs me. It’s no accident. It came into vogue in the radical 60s; and we can easily guess who made it fashionable because blacks themselves wouldn’t know anything about European ghettos, and most whites wouldn’t either, but Jews certainly would. Jews would be keenly aware of the word “ghetto”. So, radical Jews taught the blacks that they were living in horrible, wretched “ghettos”…. which was not the case at all. It’s a self-serving term for the Jews which kills two birds with one stone: it makes the blacks think they’re victims of cruel gentile oppression, and it allows the Jews to whine about how persecuted they were and to elicit sympathy for themselves at the same time. The word portrayed the Jews and the blacks as suffering together, both victims of white gentile oppression.

      But a ghetto is not a slum. It really means nothing of the kind. “Ghetto” was/is originally the name of of an island in Venice which was the district where the Jews settled. As it happens, some Venetian Jews were very rich, and Ghetto was no slum.
      http://www.mytravelitaly.com/veneto/venice/ghetto-jewish-district-in-venice/
      http://venice.jc-r.net/campi/ghetto.htm

      I have seen the ghettos of Prague and Seville, which (I was very interested to note) are considered choice neighborhoods to live in today. Excellent old mansions. Prime real estate. You need money to live there.

      Even the Jewish area of Frankfurt, the West End, was the district of villas and mansions. During WW2 it, alone in the city (which was otherwise leveled), was spared from allied bombardment, and many of those old mansions still stand today, converted to luxury hotels and condos, many still owned by the original families. [Question: Weren’t they all supposed to be dead?]

      Someday (in Brazil or China or somewhere), the Jews will be wailing to their new hosts about the dreadful old days in America when they were presecuted and were forced to live in the wretched ghettos of Beverly Hills and Miami Beach under unspeakable conditions and terrible poverty.

    20. J.E.D. Says:

      I find the word “positivity” very strange.

      jews are nation wreckers

      Destroying languages, music, gender and architecture is only a small part of their work, that’s just what they were created to do, and they express their talents whenever the opportunity arises.

      Go to church, pray, and read the bible, as it will do little good until you know the mystery of life…may these precious words always be on your lips my little children…..”jews are nation wreckers” repeat these words before you retire at the end of every day and repeat them every morning when you rise and you shall be saved.