8 March, 2013
On Monday They’re Equal, On Tuesday They’re Not
Posted by Socrates in "sex equality", Cultural Marxism, dispossession & destruction, egalitarianism, equality, federal laws, federal power, Socrates, War On White Males, women, women and 'equality' at 1:12 pm | 
Permanent Link
If women are “equal” to men, why do they need special laws to protect them?
Also, what prevents the Violence Against Women Act from being used selectively and/or wrongly? This is just another weapon in the war on White men.
8 March, 2013 at 2:25 pm
By the 1980s, the Jews had successfully conned White women into believing they were a minority too. That they should get in line with the Mexicans, Negroes, Jews, etc. So all the unhealthy White girls gleefully signed on to the the militant assault against White men.
With a surge of barren hags who avoided reproduction and breast feeding came a surge of breast cancer. The doctors who had the courage to point that out were silenced.
8 March, 2013 at 3:37 pm
“This victory shows that when the American people make their voices heard, Washington listens,” Obama said.
MY voice was not heard, you god damn foreign-born communist faggot.
8 March, 2013 at 5:50 pm
All right, this is what I’m talking about. But whenever I offer solutions to the Movement as to how to deal with women, I get crypto-feminists on this site telling me I’m being “disrespectful”. I’ll say it again then: IF WOMEN AREN’T PREGNANT AND/OR PLEASURING YOU WHITE MAN, YOU’RE DOING IT WRONG.
Women exist to have more White children and to pleasure White men. Nothing else. Get it, NOTHING. No reading, no writing, no “votes”, no “rights”, no “marital rape”, NOTHING.
Women are incubators for White children and sheaths for White cocks. Are we clear? This is the way it was when we were greatest and this is the way it needs to be again. Only this time, we know what the consequences are once we give an inch…
If you can’t stomach this, leave the fucking Movement now.
8 March, 2013 at 8:38 pm
“Women exist to have more White children and to pleasure White men. Nothing else. Get it, NOTHING. No reading, no writing, no “votes”, no “rights”, no “marital rape”, NOTHING.”
—Mike Farrell
“Women are incubators for White children and sheaths for White cocks. Are we clear? This is the way it was when we were greatest and this is the way it needs to be again……”
—Robert Redford
9 March, 2013 at 6:15 am
Hold on a minute! Our people were great and unbeatable when there was genuine affection and mutual respect between White women and men.
A White women will proudly bear her man’s White children only when she knows she is cherished and respected.
9 March, 2013 at 6:54 am
@CW-2 – “cherished” and “respected” with reference to women sounds like an invention of Cosmo magazine, circa 1950s. Yet another example of feminist language entering common usage, like “date rape” and “marital rape” and “womynz”.
9 March, 2013 at 8:39 am
Topeka: “@CW-2 – “cherished” and “respected” with reference to women sounds like an invention of Cosmo magazine, circa 1950s.”
Correction to the quote above: It should read “circa 1990s.” White women of the 1950s had a surplus of White babies. They hadn’t been taught to hate their own kind.
If White women want to be cherished and respected, they must earn it. Date rape is nothingmore than sex gone bad, so the sickly girl seeks revenge.
9 March, 2013 at 3:26 pm
Can women be protected from their own stupidity and naivete? http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/turkish_bath_voom_AO6xaUk9Im5NNUn1jQvbaJ?utm_campaign=OutbrainA&utm_source=OutbrainArticlepages&obref=obinsource
9 March, 2013 at 4:03 pm
@Virgil some searching questions:
1) Why was this woman allowed to travel without her husband’s permission?
2) Why was she allowed access to social media?
3) Why do White nations give women passports (passports are the first step to disgusting sex tourism with muds)?
4) Why was she even allowed out of the house with two young children to take care of?
Once, we knew how to deal with women like her: nothing that a swagger stick, rope and lye couldn’t fix. Now, feminists (and those crypto-feminists here on VNN), this is what happens. Happy now?
9 March, 2013 at 5:02 pm
The woman in the article doesn’t appear ‘White’ and was probably a Turk just like her sleazy ‘paramour’. Typical mud behavior, nothing to get worked up about.
9 March, 2013 at 5:45 pm
Well said, CW-2. Jew York Shitty, even the formerly White borough of Satan Island, is almost 100% Mud by now. That woman was not White, nor did she engage in White behavior. Maybe that lowlife she was balling in the toilet was her pimp. Who cares, good riddance.
I say old chap, have you got any more tabloid trash stories you’d care to regale us with?
9 March, 2013 at 9:42 pm
The Violence against women act is useless; the kafkaesque polity is simply implementing another layer of micro-management and control on the citizenry. The swiftest means by which a real and genuine lessening of violence against women could be achieved are the following: full second amendment rights including carry and concealed anywhere in any state, the sealing of the borders and the expulsion off all illegals for starters followed by the mass deportation of all the non-whites, including all jews and muslims, the hunting down and liquidation of all non-white criminal gangs! The full implementation of such salutary policies would most likely first necessitate the removal of our traditional enemies from the levers of power. I mean shutting down the Fed, GoldmanSachs, Wall Street, Hollywood, etc. It could be done in a matter of hours once the levers firmly in the hands of heroic souls! Then, and only then, would there be a bona fide reduction in violence against women!
9 March, 2013 at 10:31 pm
It’s all about hateful surveillance of the citizenry and military despotism.
It’s time for the pounding hooves of night riders to rob the banks and hang the hardcase collaborators along the way.
9 March, 2013 at 10:52 pm
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/09/us-nyse-disasterplan-idUSBRE9280F020130309
9 March, 2013 at 11:14 pm
A healthy white society has no need for central banks, derivatives, “special financial instruments”,stock markets, futures, bonds,etc. Whatever minimal yet most steeled government we would agree to work with should be forbidden to run a deficit thus eliminating the need to sell bonds. We need strong and healthy white families who work together and help and hire and shelter each other. The family as the original gang; it worked well for the greeks and the romans. We have no need for either communism or judaized capitalism Money is vulgar; we possess the sacred DNA of our race!
9 March, 2013 at 11:29 pm
Healthy white families would have a refined musical culture: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wp4jYnL3wiY
10 March, 2013 at 8:52 am
It’s men who are almost always the victims of violence, not women. Men are exposed to all kinds of dangerous and potentially violent situations that women are not exposed to. But the Social Marxists who promote this shit aren’t interested in facts or logic. It’s all about forcing the goyim to submit to the Jewish yoke.
10 March, 2013 at 9:27 am
The phenomenon that White women have largely turned on White men is contrary to the laws of nature (unnatural enemies). Deluded White women will pay a heavy price for their abnormal behavior. They are setting themselves up for savagery and debauchery by the colored hordes they embrace.
10 March, 2013 at 7:46 pm
Her parents should have discouraged her from becoming a cop! http://www.irishnews.com/news/-we-re-heartbroken-say-policewoman-s-family-1230286
10 March, 2013 at 7:58 pm
“Having the girls around helped – if it had just been full of boys, it would have been a lot harder. I did cry, to be honest.” http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/female-army-medics-tears-when-helmand-casualty-died.20431937
11 March, 2013 at 1:35 am
“We are implacably opposed to all forms of discrimination, whether rooted in gender, race, colour, creed, political belief or other grounds.” All those politically correct platitudes will surely come in handy when the muslims take over England and proceed to gang-rape all the members of the royal family before publicly beheading them! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2291245/The-Queen-gay-rights-champion-I-dont-buy-it.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
11 March, 2013 at 5:58 am
Virgil, that is an amazing article. The Queen has really put her foot in the brown and sticky. If she is so opposed to all forms of discrimination, including that based on ‘creed’, why does she enforce the prohibition against Catholics holding the 5 most senior offices of State. The Prime Minister of the Shitty Isles is forbidden by law from being a catholic. He or she can be a joo, boodhist, moodslim, or voodooman.
Britain is a joke, the sooner it implodes the better.
11 March, 2013 at 9:47 am
The Queen has said nothing new.
Iowa’s Republican platform stated in 1866: “The first and highest duty of our free Governemnt is to secure all its citizens, regardless of race, religion, or color, equality before the law, equal protection from it, equal responsibility to it.”
Minnesota Republicans declared that “the measure of a man’s political rights should be neither his religion, his birthplace, his race, his color, nor any merely physical characteristics.”
Northern Republicans passed forceful civil rights acts of 1866, 1870, 1871, 1875.
11 March, 2013 at 2:48 pm
The nightmare of Reconstruction ended in 1877, when Rutherford B. Hayes won the Presidential election. It was a very tight race against Samuel Tilden, and so Hayes asked for Southern support in exchange for getting the Union to end its occupation of Dixie. And so for the next 80 years America was relatively free of any more nigger trouble. Then came the global Jewish victory of 1945.
11 March, 2013 at 4:43 pm
The queen should start caring about her “subjects” instead of protecting her Paki pets! http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/europe/united-kingdom/130311/sex-slavery-teenage-rape-british-girls-raped-britain#ixzz2NG8Z9VNp The Brits should normally be filled with genocidal rage by now!
12 March, 2013 at 10:15 am
Even the hardcase New England professors admit that Southern paramilitary groups defeated Reconstruction. 16 years of war and occupation against the South was largely a flop (1861-1877). The South rolled everything back but the Reconstruction amendments which were emasculated by Jim Crow laws in Southern courtrooms.
Tthe South was unable to defeat the 2d Reconstruction of the 1960s.
14 March, 2013 at 1:26 pm
Tim McGreen Says:
11 March, 2013 at 2:48 pm
The nightmare of Reconstruction ended in 1877, when Rutherford B. Hayes won the Presidential election. It was a very tight race against Samuel Tilden, and so Hayes asked for Southern support in exchange for getting the Union to end its occupation of Dixie. And so for the next 80 years America was relatively free of any more nigger trouble. Then came the global Jewish victory of 1945.
Excellent post ! Allot of thumbs up.
17 March, 2013 at 12:12 am
“If a woman knows that she can be impulsive, a bitch, a slut, or get knocked up by any man, yet still receive free food, shelter, and a mobile phone from the government, what incentive is there for her to settle with a good man and keep him happy?” http://www.rooshv.com/social-welfare-creates-a-society-of-sluts?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
17 March, 2013 at 2:10 pm
“It was her first trip abroad, an adventure undertaken in part to further her burgeoning passion for photography.” http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/18/nyregion/turkish-man-held-in-death-of-sarai-sierra-from-si.html?_r=0