9 June, 2009

A Feminist Pioneer’s Rethink

Posted by Socrates in feminism, Feminists, jewed culture, Socrates at 10:29 pm | Permanent Link

Another Jewish scam, feminism has become so much a part of Western society that, at times, you hardly notice it. This feminist, thankfully, has had second thoughts:

[Article].


  • 10 Responses to “A Feminist Pioneer’s Rethink”

    1. Parsifal Says:

      Where is the benefit to dumping your 2 year-old off all day at some germ-infested daycare center staffed by minimum-wage strangers? Yet another poisonous Jewish scheme, namely Feminism, has been exposed as a dangerous and disastarous fraud.

    2. Blackshirt Says:

      I find it interesting that a feminist like the one in the article suddenly has a change of heart about traditional gender roles. I guess the social experiment didn’t go as planned, but the damage is already done.

      Now it seems like both parents HAVE to work to provide, and the option to live on one income is long gone. Perhaps if we could get back to a society where a man could make a decent wage we could return to a man being able to support a family. I doubt we’ll ever see those days again, though.

    3. Shylock Says:

      What happens if the goyim kill a murdering Jew in Israel

    4. NAME THE JEW Says:

      Jews have used the radically leftist White male hating ideology known as ‘feminism’ as yet another strategy to destroy the White family and especially White womanhood, similar to multiracialism/miscegenation, mass-immigration, Judeoplutocratic capitalism & Judeocommunism, mass-media subversion, Jewish undermining and domination of medicine/law/academia, etc.

      Modern ‘feminism’ (better called ‘Judeofeminism’) is thus exposed as a subversive and dangerous Jewish movement merely by noting the huge number of Jewish women who are of course the leading figures of the Judeofeminist movement; see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Jewish_feminists & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_feminism

    5. Tina Carter Says:

      As Dr. William Pierce said; Jews are our misfortune. They can’t be trusted no matter what side they are on.

    6. Parsifal Says:

      True, Miss Tina, Jews always try to control both sides of the issue. On discussion panel-shows, one Jew will take the position of defending Israeli aggression against the Palestinians and the other Jew will criticize Israeli aggression (but not before he states that he is the son of Holocaust Survivors and supports Israel’s “right” to exist). Of course, Palestinians are never invited to participate in such debates or discussions, only Jews. Same with any discussion of attacking Iran or continuing the war in Iraq, or Free Trade, immigration, etc. Only Jews are permitted to give their two cents, since they’re “experts” on everything.

    7. Ein Says:

      On discussion panel-shows, one Jew will take the position of defending Israeli aggression against the Palestinians and the other Jew will criticize Israeli aggression …

      Yes, we see that repeatedly, for anyone who has eyes open enough to notice. (But most of the public don’t.)

      Even in newspaper editorials and magazine columns — in fact, everywhere — you often find you have one Jew arguing with another Jew. Or a whole groups of Jews. But the entire supposedly “impartial” debate is in the hands of Jews arguing with each other.

      Nonetheless, they are all in agreement on key topics such as Israel, integration, immigration, diversity, pluralism, etc. Those really vital topics are placed outside the realm of debate; they’re all agreed upon implicitly. No dissenting view is tolerated. It’s not even considered possible that there could be any other view. It would like arguing over the theory of gravity or whether the world is flat. No sane person would waste his time.

      OF COURSE multiracialism is good! OF COURSE diversity makes us stronger! OF COURSE Israel must be supported! Every sane and decent person agrees on THAT!!!

    8. Igor Alexander Says:

      All women have done the last 50 years is to prove men were right for the last 50 generations.

    9. Igor Alexander Says:

      “A noted contrarian, Pizzey has rarely been predictable in her views on feminism. She has previously suggested that some women were attracted to abusive relationships, drawing harsh criticism from other feminists.”

      Feminist Camille Paglia took flak for saying more-or-less the same thing; that some women stay in abusive relationships because the sex is hot.

    10. Igor Alexander Says:

      “He said: ‘One of the theoretical foundations of this would be that parents or even grandparents have stakes or investments or commitments to children that, literally and figuratively, money can’t buy.'”

      As if it takes a scientist to figure out that kids are better off with a mother at home and not being shoved into daycare when they’re barely out of diapers. Would any of these feminist twats have liked it if their mothers had shoved them into daycare when they were 2 or 3 years old?

      Are we finally starting to realize that society might be better off putting the welfare of children ahead of “women’s rights”? Took long enough.