11 October, 2009

The Jewish Bomb

Posted by Socrates in Jewed science, Jewish Tyranny, Manhattan Project, nukes, Roosevelt, Socrates at 11:49 pm | Permanent Link

nuclear cloud

In an American magazine, there is an article about the U.S. nuclear-bomb project of the 1940s [1]. It mentions the fact that Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard initiated the bomb by sending a letter to president F.D. Roosevelt in 1939. Of interest to our readers is the fact that nearly every key person involved with the creation of the first nuclear bomb was a Jew [2]. It was, it can be said, a “Jewish bomb.”

[1] article “Manhattan Project,” Invention and Technology, Fall 2009

[2] the Jews – besides Einstein and Szilard – included J. Robert Oppenheimer, David Bohm, Rudolf Peierls, Felix Bloch, Eugene Wigner, Niels Bohr, James Chadwick, James Franck, Otto Frisch and Edward Teller. Enrico Fermi was married to a Jew

  • 55 Responses to “The Jewish Bomb”

    1. Ein Says:

      It seems that everywhere you look, there’s a Jew involved in whatever’s going on. Checking into Mulberry Harbours, I find that this operation was under Rear Admiral Edward Ellsberg. He had apparently been in the scrap metal business, formerly, and became Principal Salvage Officer of the US Navy. Yes, he was a Jew.

      From Massawa, Ellsberg went to North Africa to become Principal Salvage Officer in that theater. He worked under Admiral Andrew Cunningham, the British officer commanding naval forces in the area.

      Ellsberg was sent to England in time for the Normandy Invasion, where he was instrumental in preparing 89 damaged or superannuated ships for scuttling to make artificial harbors.

      Large floating breakwaters fabricated in steel were anchored outside the main breakwaters that consisted of “Gooseberries” (block ships) and “Phoenix” (concrete caissons). During bad storms at the end of June 1944 these broke loose, and possibly caused more damage to the harbours than the storm itself.

      The engineers were unable to refloat these and US Navy Captain (later Rear Admiral) Edward Ellsberg, already well-known for quickly refloating scuttled ships at Massawa and Oran, was brought in to accomplish the task, though not without obtaining Churchill’s intervention in taking the task away from the Royal Engineers and giving it to the Royal Navy. The Phoenixes, once refloated, were towed across the channel to form the “Mulberry” harbour breakwaters together with the “Gooseberry” block ships. Ellsberg rode one of the concrete caissons to Normandy.

      This operation gained him great admiration in Britain, where he was appointed an Officer of the Order of the British Empire (O.B.E.).

      For his efforts he was promoted to the rank of Commander by Act of Congress and given the Distinguished Service Medal by the Navy Department, since which time he has popularly been known as “Commander Ellsberg”

    2. Adam Says:

      Ein Says:

      “a rival school of thought proposed by Duke University professor David Goldstein says that the early Jewish traders who founded the Ashkenazi took local, European women as wives. If so, such an early infusion of Aryan DNA might help explain the measurably higher IQ of Ashkenazi vs. Sephardi Jews.”

      I can believe that explanation much more easily than the other one. It seems only logical that early Jewish merchants following the trade routes would not have brought their wives along with them. So they settled down and took what they could find from among the local populace.

      Yep, makes sense. That’s apparently what they did in Ethiopia too.


      Hence, the result is that while many Jews do still retain a Semitic look, a great many also do not. And some look just as Aryan as anyone possible could. You would never believe that some of them are Jews. And also, since that very early intermarrying, there have doubtless been many, many other intermarriages since, down over the centuries. That covers a LOT of generations! Human nature being what it is, despite all the prohibitions against intermarriage (just as in India) it still happened. And it’s still happening now.

      Ein and anyone else interested in Jewish genetics should check out the discussion of an importantrecent scientific paper by Goldstein et al. of this topic on the Gene Expression blog.

      From: http://scienceblogs.com/gnxp/2009/01/how_ashkenazi_jewish_are_you.php

      As the authors note, the Ashkenazi are almost certainly a compound population. There are full-Jews who “look gentile” and full-Jews who could pass easily in the Middle East as a native. Most Ashkenazi Jews exhibit a mix of features. The genetic likelihood that the Ashkenazi have varied origins should no surprise. The paper notes that Askhenazi heterozygosity is actually somewhat greater than American whites, implying that the source of their distinctiveness has to do with genetic origin, not genetic history (i.e., population bottlenecks). Another population which I suspect resembles the population history of the Ashkenazi are Uyghurs, who fall between Europeans and Han Chinese in their ancestry. But the hybridization even occurred in the past, so the Uyghurs today can be thought of as a separate population with its own suite of genetic combinations, as opposed to a hybrid of two “pure” groups. Similarly, Ashkenazi Jews no doubt emerged from hybridization evens between Middle Eastern and European females, but over the generations they have been relatively endogamous (most gene flow has been out of the community into gentile Europeans through conversion) and so are a genetically coherent population in their own right.

      The last sentence is relevant to your point about intermarriage, Ein. Owing to the fact that Judaism is a racial religion thousands of years old, unique in the world in that regard, over the centuries gene flow has been overwhelmingly outward from Jews to their host populations. They “infect” other races with their genetics via conversions and defections from their group, but they preserve their own racial purity as a result of their religio-cultural practices. The loci of these infections then act as points of subversion – “whites” who, by reason of their genetics, understandably may have great sympathy for the Jews and Jewish causes. I am sure we all have known whites like that.

    3. Tim McGreen Says:

      I’d just like to point out that the Judaism practiced today is different from the Judaism practiced two thousand years ago, which in turn was different from the Judaism practiced a thousand years before that. There seems to be a widely-held misconception that Judaism is the world’s oldest religion and has remained unchanged for thousands of years. Not so.

    4. Adam Says:

      Tim McGreen Says:

      I’d just like to point out that the Judaism practiced today is different from the Judaism practiced two thousand years ago, which in turn was different from the Judaism practiced a thousand years before that. There seems to be a widely-held misconception that Judaism is the world’s oldest religion and has remained unchanged for thousands of years. Not so.

      Not sure what you are alluding to here, but the only thing relevant to this discussion is their religion-based endogamy and “ethnocentrism” (i.e., the polite word for racism). That hasn’t changed one bit.

    5. Hoff Says:

      Did you know the jews in Moscow had the A-bomb in 1942? Not a working one but all the parts. All stolen from America during Lend-Lease.

      Major Jordan’s diary. 3 post from top of page.


      Goldmann later recounted a humorous episode from that period of intense informal negotiations (1945).

      ‘The car stopped in front of the porch and at the sight of us, Roosevelt said: “Just look, Sam Rosenman, Rabbi Stephen Wise, and Goldmann are having a discussion. Go ahead, Sam will tell me what I have to do on Monday”.

      His car started and Roosevelt had it stop again to say: “Could you imagine what Goebbels would give to have a picture of this scene. “The President of the United States is getting advice about how to behave from the Three Wise Men of Zion”.’ [24]