10 February, 2013
Police Chiefs vs. County Sheriffs: Who’s More “Soviet”?
Posted by Socrates in cops, police, sheriffs, Socrates, white nationalism, White Nationalists at 4:32 pm | 
Permanent Link
It seems that there is a difference between the two, thankfully. But nonetheless, how many sheriffs would actually defend White Nationalists? (Very few).
11 February, 2013 at 8:18 pm
This is a new angle on law enforcement that I have not previously considered. I have heard about sheriffs who will not enforce Barry Obongo’s gun-grabbing agenda. Nor will they put up with any wetbacks or dope dealers lurking around their jurisdiction. The word sheriff comes from the old English “shire”, or county, and “reeve”, the county law officer. Shire-Reeve. Sheriff.
By contrast police chiefs are always spouting the Jewish Party line about guns, gays and greasers. I guess that’s because they’re always thinking about the next stage of their political career, to become mayor or governor. With the possible exception of former NYC police commissioner Teddy Roosevelt not one of those police chiefs has a kilogram of guts or decency. Arrogant swine, they’ll be dealt with soon enough.
11 February, 2013 at 8:32 pm
In a somewhat related story I find myself supporting the colored ex-LAPD cop Christopher Dorner. He has the pigs going crazy trying to find him. This cat is some kind of Black Rambo who should not have been screwed with. Too bad there aren’t any White Rambo types who are willing to rise up and fight back against the System like Dorner is.
11 February, 2013 at 11:52 pm
The sheriff of Jackson county, Texas has stated that he will not enforce any new gun laws. The county sheriffs in rural counties will be most effective in federal resistance. Why? Because they are surrounded by the folk.
Posse Comitatus — power of the county
12 February, 2013 at 12:35 am
As the article stated, police chiefs, especially in major urban areas, are vetted for their political views before they are appointed, so they almost always will be anti-gun and nigger & wetback coddling while at the same time showing indifference or outright hostility to traditional whites and their interests. Of course, many urban whites are self hating creeps anyway who will support any top cop or politician who hates them.
And how many swashbuckling, tough talking sheriffs will defend white nationalists? Well, I’d be surprised if I’m able to count them on one hand. After all, any racially conscious white person is a knotsy, hatemonger and likely auntie-semitic and should be expelled from polite society.
12 February, 2013 at 2:52 pm
Sgt. Skull Says:
12 February, 2013 at 12:35 am
As the article stated, police chiefs, especially in major urban areas, are vetted for their political views before they are appointed, so they almost always will be anti-gun and nigger & wetback coddling while at the same time showing indifference or outright hostility to traditional whites and their interests. Of course, many urban whites are self hating creeps anyway who will support any top cop or politician who hates them.
And how many swashbuckling, tough talking sheriffs will defend white nationalists? Well, I’d be surprised if I’m able to count them on one hand. After all, any racially conscious white person is a knotsy, hatemonger and likely auntie-semitic and should be expelled from polite society.
Exactly !
14 February, 2013 at 6:39 am
A sheriff’s office could be operated on a dime if needed be; all volunteers composed of well-armed honest citizens of the county. A private home could serve as an office. The generic Kwa cop is dependent on a paycheck. When things reach a critical point, their very police stations will be burned to the ground as the nonwhites massively chimp-out. Their situation is hopeless! Only county sheriffs in rural areas, backed by the locals, will be able to maintain law and order. Posses could be formed composed of countless deputy sheriffs allied with the local militia. After a week, all the invaders would be in Mexico or decorating lampposts!