24 July, 2014

Homosexual Marriage: Forget the Reproduction Issue. It Endangers Children

Posted by Socrates in "gay marriage", adoption, Big Fag, homosexual themes, homosexuals, queers, Socrates, Western decline at 2:08 pm | Permanent Link

Queers commit roughly 1/3 (i.e., 33%) of all male-on-male child molestation. This is grossly disproportionate: normal proportion would be 1% to 3% [1]. Also, queers are more likely to use drugs and have mental health issues. So, why would anyone want queers to “marry” and adopt kids?


[1] queers are about 3% of the U.S. population. Of course, this includes lesbians, too

  • 10 Responses to “Homosexual Marriage: Forget the Reproduction Issue. It Endangers Children”

    1. Stronza Says:

      “Queers commit roughly 1/3 (i.e., 33%) of all male-on-male child molestation.”

      So if not queers who is committing the other 2/3 of male-on-male-child molestations?

    2. Tim McGreen Says:

      The “reproduction” argument in favor of banning phony homosexual “marriages” is kind of weak. A better argument, but one that would be hard to prove in a court of law, would be to say that by broadening the definition of marriage to include homosexuals it cheapens the value of marriage altogether, discouraging straight couples from bothering to get hitched. Another argument might be that neither Federal judges nor elected politicians have the authority to change the traditional definition of what marriage is.

      But most judges, like most other “respectable” authority figures, are friggin’ whack-jobs who tend to abuse their power and authority.

    3. Tim McGreen Says:

      “But judges and politicians,……” is what I meant to write.

    4. Mary O Says:

      Homosexuals don’t actually want marriage and children. They feel intense anxiety over their behavior, and they are desperately trying to assuage that anxiety with symbols of social approval.

      What they don’t realize of course is that nothing could possibly cure them of their anxiety and guilt; not even the Pope canonizing every homosexual in the world a living saint. No matter what society grants them, they will always demand more.

    5. Socrates Says:

      Stronza: I don’t know.

    6. Sean Gruber Says:

      It should be illegal for two male queers to “adopt” a young boy. You can guess what they want him for.

    7. Joey Says:

      Stronza’s question is the only legitimate point of view in this whole segment. I think the answer is obvious.

    8. Tim McGreen Says:

      Yet another coal-burner who needs to eliminated from the gene pool.


    9. Tim McGreen Says:

      A homosexual couple raising children is acceptable only in the most fucked-up, affluent and ultra-liberal communities, like the Upper East Side of Manhattan or The Castro in San Francisco. But in REAL America, where 99.93% of us live, a child with two dykes or two fudge-packers for “parents” would probably be bullied and shunned by his peers. Sure, there are no doubt some households where Mom will let Sally, her “friend from work”, move in to the house and sleep in the guest room down the hall from the kids, because Mom is separated from Dad and is secretly a lesbian. She may even ask the kids to call her “Aunt Sally”. But a situation like that is kind of rare. At least I hope it is.

    10. DrBilbo Says:

      No, Queers commit 100% of male-on-male child molestation. This is simple logic. If you are male and like sex with another male. regardless of age, you are queer (or at least, bisexual). Get it? Whoever came up with this statistic must be using a definition of “queer” that is “a man who has publicly admitted he is gay” or something. This is political correctness in action.